Bicameralism and the balance of power in EU legislative politics

References

• Bressanelli, E., Koop, C., & Reh, C. (2016). The impact of informalisation: Early agreements and voting cohesion in the European Parliament. European Union Politics, 17(1), 91–113. doi: 10.1177/1465116515608704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, R., & Thomson, R. (2011). The nexus of bicameralism: Rapporteurs’ impact on decision outcomes in the European Union. European Union Politics, 12(3), 337–357. doi: 10.1177/1465116511410087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crum, B. (2005). Tailoring representative democracy to the European Union: Does the European constitution reduce the democratic deficit? European Law Journal, 11(4), 452–467. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2005.00270.x
   Google Scholar
• De Ruiter, R., & Neuhold, C. (2012). Why is fast track the way to go? Justifications for early agreement in the co-decision procedure and their effects. European Law Journal, 18(4), 536–554. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00617.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diermeier, D., & Myerson, R. B. (1999). Bicameralism and its consequences for the internal organization of legislatures. American Economic Review, 89, 1182–1196. doi: 10.1257/aer.89.5.1182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M., Gornitzka, Å., & Trondol, J. (2014). A not so technocratic executive? Everyday interaction between the European Parliament and the Commission. West European Politics, 37(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2013.832952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, H., & Héritier, A. (2004). Interorganizational negotiation and intraorganizational power in shared decision making: Early agreements under codecision and their impact on the European Parliament and Council. Comparative Political Studies, 37(10), 1184–1212. doi: 10.1177/0010414004269833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, G. (1995). From the Luxembourg compromise to codecision: Decision making in the European Union. Electoral Studies, 14(3), 289–308. doi: 10.1016/0261-3794(95)00017-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, G., & Tsebelis, G. (1996). An institutional critique of intergovernmentalism. International Organization, 50(02), 269–299. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300028563
   Google Scholar
• Häge, F. M. (2007). The division of labour in legislative decision-making of the Council of the European Union. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 13(4), 497–516. doi: 10.1080/13572330701663595
   Google Scholar
• Häge, F. M., & Naurin, D. (2013). The effect of codecision on Council decision-making: Informalization, politicization and power. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(7), 953–971. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2013.795372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, W. B. (2007). Divided politics: Bicameralism, parties, and policy in democratic legislatures. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 245–269. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.071105.112758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héritier, A., Reh, C. (2012). Codecision and its discontents: Intra-organisational politics and institutional reform in the European Parliament. West European Politics, 35(5), 1134–1157. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2012.706414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, S. (2002). Constitutional agenda-setting through discretion in rule interpretation: Why the European Parliament won at Amsterdam. British Journal of Political Science, 32(02), 259–280. doi: 10.1017/S0007123402000108
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R. (2001). Models of democracy: Elite attitudes and the democratic deficit in the European Union. European Union Politics, 2(1), 53–79. doi: 10.1177/1465116501002001003
   Google Scholar
• König, T., Lindberg, B., Lechner, S., & Pohlmeier, W. (2007). Bicameral conflict resolution in the European Union: An empirical analysis of conciliation committee bargains. British Journal of Political Science, 37(02), 281–312. doi: 10.1017/S0007123407000142
   Google Scholar
• Kreppel, A. (2000). Rules, ideology and coalition formation in the European Parliament past, present and future. European Union Politics, 1(3), 340–362. doi: 10.1177/1465116500001003004
   Google Scholar
• Kreppel, A. (2001). The European Parliament and supranational party system: A study in Institutional Development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511606083
   Google Scholar
• Kreppel, A. (2011). Looking ‘up’, ‘down’ and ‘sideways’: Understanding EU institutions in context. West European Politics, 34(1), 167–179. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2011.523551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreppel, A. (2013). Legislative implications of the Lisbon treaty: The (potential) role of ideology. West European Politics, 36(6), 1178–1198. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2013.826024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreppel, A., & Oztas, B. (2017). Leading the band or just playing the tune? Reassessing the agenda-setting powers of the European Commission. Comparative Political Studies, 50(8), 1118–1150. doi: 10.1177/0010414016666839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahr, E., & Ringe, N. (2016). Explaining the European Parliament’s legislative clout. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 26, 25–47. doi: 10.1007/s41358-016-0021-8
   Google Scholar
• Moury, C. (2007). Explaining the European Parliament’s right to appoint and invest the commission. West European Politics, 30(2), 367–391. doi: 10.1080/01402380701239889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mühlböck, M. (2013). Linking Council and European Parliament? Voting unity of national parties in bicameral EU decision-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(4), 571–588. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2012.718889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mühlböck, M., & Rittberger, B. (2015). The Council, the European Parliament, and the paradox of inter-institutional cooperation. European Integration Online Papers (EIOP), 19(4), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Pogge, T. W. (1997). Creating supra-national institutions democratically: Reflections on the European Union’s “democratic deficit”. Journal of Political Philosophy, 5(2), 163–182. doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00029
   Google Scholar
• Priestly, J. (2008). Six battles that shaped Europe’s Parliament. New York: John Harper Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, A. (2011). Early conclusion in bicameral bargaining: Evidence from the co-decision legislative procedure of the European Union. European Union Politics, 12(1), 41–64. doi: 10.1177/1465116510388675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reh, C., Héritier, A., Bressanelli, E., Koop, C. (2013). The informal politics of legislation: Explaining secluded decision making in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies, 46(9), 1112–1142. doi: 10.1177/0010414011426415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittberger, B. (2003). The creation and empowerment of the European Parliament the creation and empowerment of the European Parliament. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(2), 203–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosén, G. (2016). A match made in heaven? Explaining patterns of cooperation between the Commission and the European Parliament. Journal of European Integration, 38(4), 409–424. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2016.1141903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slapin, J. B. (2014). Measurement, model testing, and legislative influence in the European Union. European Union Politics, 15(1), 24–42. doi: 10.1177/1465116513492896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey, J. (2003). Displacement of the Council via informal dynamics? Comparing the Commission and Parliament. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(6), 936–955. doi: 10.1080/1350176032000148379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, R. (2011). Resolving controversy in the European Union: Legislative decision-making before and after enlargement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, R., Arregui, J., Leuffen, D., Costello, R., Cross, J., Hertz, R., & Jensen, T. (2012). A new dataset on decision-making in the European Union before and after the 2004 and 2007 enlargements (DEUII). Journal of European Public Policy, 19(4), 604–622. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2012.662028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. (1994). The power of the European Parliament as a conditional agenda setter. American Political Science Review, 88(1), 128–142. doi: 10.2307/2944886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G., & Garrett, G. (2001). The institutional foundations of intergovernmentalism and supranationalism in the European Union. International Organization, 55(02), 357–390. doi: 10.1162/00208180151140603
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G., & Money, J. (1997). Bicameralism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wøien, H. V. (2004). Incomplete information and bargaining in the EU: An explanation of first-reading non-agreements. European Union Politics, 15(4), 472–495. doi: 10.1177/1465116514541555
   Google Scholar