Legislative voting in the pork-dominant parliament: evidence from the Philippine House of Representatives

References

• Anderson, B. (1998). Cacique democracy in the Philippines. In The spectre of comparisons: Nationalism, Southeast Asia, and the world (pp. 192–226). London, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Banfield, E. C., & Wilson, J. Q. (1963). City politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowler, S., Farrell, D. M., & Katz, R. S. (Eds.). (1999). Party discipline and parliamentary government. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, J. M. (2007). Competing principals, political institutions, and party unity in legislative voting. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 92–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00239.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, J. M., & Shugart, M. S. (1995). Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies, 14(4), 417–439. doi: 10.1016/0261-3794(94)00035-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, W. R., Golder, M., & Golder, S. N. (2009). Principles of comparative politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, G. W., & McCubbins, M. D. (1993). Legislative leviathan: Party government in the House. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Desposato, S. W. (2001). Institutional theories, societal realities, and party politics in Brazil (Ph.D.). University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Desposato, S. W. (2006). Parties for rent? Ambition, ideology, and party switching in Brazil’s chamber of deputies. American Journal of Political Science, 50(1), 62–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00170.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diermeier, D., & Feddersen, T. J. (1998). Cohesion in legislatures and the vote of confidence procedure. American Political Science Review, 92(3), 611–621. doi: 10.2307/2585484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, J. C. (2001). Elections and democratization in the Philippines. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haspel, M., Remington, T. F., & Smith, S. S. (1998). Electoral institutions and party cohesion in the Russian Duma. The Journal of Politics, 60(2), 417–439. doi: 10.2307/2647916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herron, E. S. (2002). Electoral influences on legislative behavior in mixed-member systems: Evidence from Ukraine’s Verkhovna Rada. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 27(3), 361–382. doi: 10.2307/3598568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicken, A. D. (2002). Party systems, political institutions and policy: Policymaking in developing countries (Ph.D.). University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Hicken, A. D. (2009). Building party systems in developing democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hicken, A. D., & Simmons, J. W. (2008). The personal vote and the efficacy of education spending. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 109–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00302.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, S. (2004). Electoral institutions and legislative behavior: Explaining voting defection in the European Parliament. World Politics, 56(2), 194–223. doi: 10.1353/wp.2004.0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchcroft, P. (1998). Booty capitalism: The politics of banking in the Philippines. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jun, H. W., & Hix, S. (2010). Electoral systems, political career paths and legislative behavior: Evidence from South Korea’s mixed-member system. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 11(2), 153–171. doi: 10.1017/S1468109910000058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasuya, Y. (2009). Presidential bandwagon: Parties and party systems in the Philippines. Pasig City: Anvil Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kunicova, J., & Remington, T. F. (2008). Mandates, parties and dissent: Effect of electoral rules on parliamentary party cohesion in the Russian State Duma, 1994–2003. Party Politics, 14(5), 555–574. doi: 10.1177/1354068808093390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land, C. H. (1965). Leaders, factions, and parties: The structure of Philippine parties [Monograph Series No. 6]. Yale University Southeast Asia Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, D. R. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montinola, G. R. (1999). Parties and accountability in the Philippines. Journal of Democracy, 10(1), 126–140. doi: 10.1353/jod.1999.0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemoto, K. (2009). Committing to the party: The costs of governance in East Asian Democracies (Ph.D.). University of California, San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Nemoto, K., Krauss, E. S., & Pekkanen, R. (2008). Policy dissension and party discipline: The July 2005 vote on postal privatization in Japan. British Journal of Political Science, 38(3), 499–525. doi: 10.1017/S0007123408000252
   Google Scholar
• Nokken, T. P. (2000). Dynamics of congressional loyalty: Party defection and roll-call behavior, 1947–97. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25(3), 417–444. doi: 10.2307/440414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Dwyer, C. (2006). Runaway state-building: Patronage politics and democratic development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paras, C. L., & Santos, L. P. (1996). Primer on the Philippine Congress. San Juan: Paragon Printing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, T., Tabellini, G., & Trebbi, F. (2003). Electoral rules and corruption. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 958–989. doi: 10.1162/154247603322493203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quimpo, N. G. (2005). Review: Oligarchic patrimonialism, Bossism, electoral clientelism, and contested democracy in the Philippines. Comparative Politics, 37(2), 229–250. doi: 10.2307/20072884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. (1972). Comparative political corruption. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, J. H. (2013). Electoral system choice and parties in new democracies: Lessons from the Philippines and Indonesia. In D. Tomsa, & A. Ufen (Eds.), Party politics in Southeast Asia: Clientelism and electoral competition in Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines (pp. 101–119). Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, J. H. (2015). Voter demands for patronage: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of East Asian Studies, 15(1), 127–151. doi: 10.1017/S1598240800004197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, J. H. (2017). The choice of candidate-centered electoral systems in new democracies. Party Politics, 23(2), 160–171. doi: 10.1177/1354068815581539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidel, J. T. (1997). Philippine politics in town, district, and province: Bossism in Cavite and Cebu. The Journal of Asian Studies, 56(4), 947–966. doi: 10.2307/2658295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieberer, U. (2010). Behavioral consequences of mixed electoral systems: Deviating voting behavior of district and list MPs in the German Bundestag. Electoral Studies, 29(3), 484–496. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar