Vehicles of opposition influence or agents of the governing majority? Legislative committees and private members’ bills in the Hungarian Országgyűlés and the Israeli Knesset

References

• André, A., Depauw, S., & Martin, S. (2016). Trust is good, control is better: Multiparty government and legislative organization. Political Research Quarterly, 69(1), 108–120. doi: 10.1177/1065912915623639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, R., & Cox, G. (2012). Shadowing ministers: Monitoring partners in coalition government. Comparative Political Studies, 45(2), 220–236. doi: 10.1177/0010414011421309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland, G. W., & Patterson, S. C. (Eds.). (1994). Parliaments in the modern world: Changing institutions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, G. (2006). The organization of democratic legislatures. In B. R. Weingast & D. A. Wittman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political economy (pp. 141–161). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, G., & McCubbins, M. (1993). Legislative leviathan. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Döring, H. (1995). Parliaments and majority rule in Western Europe. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Friedberg, C. (2010). The Knesset committees in oversight perspective: A failure foretold? Iyunim Betkumat Israel, 20, 49–79.
   Google Scholar
• Friedberg, C. (2013). The Knesset as a legislative body – Diagnosis and recommendations. In G. Rahat, S. Barnea, C. Friedberg, & O. Kenig (Eds.), Reforming Israel's political system (pp. 560–577). Jerusalem: Am Oved and the Israel Democracy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Friedberg, C. (2016). How to improve the Knesset as a legislative and an oversight body. Recommendations paper. Jerusalem: The Israel Democracy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Friedberg, C., & Hazan, R. Y. (2009). Legislative oversight of the executive branch in Israel: Current status and proposed reform. Jerusalem: The Israel Democracy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ilonszki, G. (2011). From minimum to subordinate: A final Verdict? The Hungarian parliament, 1990–2010. Journal of Legislative Studies, 13(1), 38–58. doi: 10.1080/13572330601165261
   Google Scholar
• Ilonszki, G., & Jager, K. (2011). Hungary: Changing government advantages – Challenging a dominant executive. In B. E. Rasch & G. Tsebelis (Eds.), Role of the governments in legislative agenda setting (pp. 95–110). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Khmelko, I. S. (2011). Internal organization of post-communist parliaments over two decades: Leadership, parties and committees. Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(2), 193–214. doi: 10.1080/13572334.2011.574026
   Google Scholar
• Kiewet, R., & McCubbins, M. (1991). The logic of delegation: Congressional parties and the appropriations process. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D.-H., & Loewenberg, G. (2005). The role of parliamentary committees in coalition governments. Comparative Political Studies, 38(9), 1104–1129. doi: 10.1177/0010414005276307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longley, L. D., & Davidson, R. H. (1998). The new roles of parliamentary committees. London: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, S. (2010). The committee system. In M. MacCarthaigh & M. Manning (Eds.), The houses of the Oireachtas: Parliaments in Ireland (pp. 285–302). Dublin: Institute of Public Administartion.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, S. (2011). Electoral institutions, the personal vote and legislative organization. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 36(3), 339–361. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-9162.2011.00018.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattson, I., & Strom, K. (1995). Parliamentary committees. In H. Doring (Ed.), Parliaments and majority rule in Western Europe (pp. 249–307). New York, NY: St Martin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mickler, T. (2017). Committee autonomy in parliamentary systems: Coalition logic or congressional rationales? The Journal of Legislative Studies, 23(3), 367–391. doi: 10.1080/13572334.2017.1359941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolenyi, C. (in press). “ The decline of the Hungarian legislature since 2010​.” In I. Khmelko, F. Stapenhurst, & M. Mezey (Eds.), Strong executives and weak parliaments: Legislative decline in the 21st century. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, D. (1980). The legislative approach. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, D., & Michael, M. (Eds.). (1991). Legislatures in the policy process: The dilemmas of economic policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, M. (1990). Committees in legislatures. In P. Norton (Ed.), Legislatures (pp. 237–271). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weingast, B., & William, M. (1988). The industrial organization of Congress. Journal of Political Economy, 96(1), 132–163. doi: 10.1086/261528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylaoutien, S., & Hallerberg, M. (2009). The role of parliamentary committees in the Budgetary process in central and Eastern European countries. In S. Ganghof, C. Honnige, & C. Stecker (Eds.), Parlamnte, Agendasetzung und Vetospieler: Festschrift fur Herbert Doring (pp. 147–174). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Zubek, R. (2008). Parties, rules and government legislative control in central Europe: The case of Poland. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 41(2), 147–161. doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2008.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zubek, R. (2011). Negative agenda control and executive-legislative Relations in East central Europe, 1997–2008. Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(2), 172–192. doi: 10.1080/13572334.2011.574025
   Google Scholar