Dynamic roll call analysis of parties’ ideological positions in the Czech Republic

References

• Aldrich, J. H., Montgomery, J. M., & Sparks, D. B. (2014). Polarization and ideology: Partisan sources of low dimensionality in scaled roll call analyses. Political Analysis, 22(4), 435–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, D. A., Bakker, R., Carroll, R., Hare, C., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2014). Analyzing spatial models of choice and judgment with R. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, R., De Vries, C., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Marks, G., … Vachudova, M. (2015a). Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill Expert Survey trend file, 1999-2010. Party Politics, 21(1), 143–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, R., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Marks, G., Polk, J., … Vachudova, M. (2015b). 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey. Version 2015.1. Available on chesdata.eu. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Balík, S., & Hloušek, V. (2016). The development and transformation of the Czech party system after 1989. Acta Politologica, 8(2), 103–117.
   Google Scholar
• Barberá, P. (2015). Birds of the same feather tweet together: Bayesian ideal point estimation using twitter data. Political Analysis, 23(1), 76–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right. Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531–1542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrubba, C., Gabel, M., & Hug, S. (2008). Legislative voting behavior, seen and unseen: A theory of roll-call vote selection. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 33(4), 543–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charvát, J. (2014). The Czech party system change since 2010: From fragile stability to stable fragility. Revista de Stiinte Politice, 41, 141–154.
   Google Scholar
• Chytilek, R., & Eibl, O. (2011). České politické strany v politickém prostoru. Sociologický časopis, 47(1), 61–88.
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, J., Jackman, S., & Rivers, D. (2004). The statistical analysis of roll call data. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 355–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CVVM. (2005). Naše společnost 2002 - listopad. Version 1.0. Available on nesstar.soc.cas.cz. Sociologický ústav Akademie věd ČR: Praha.
   Google Scholar
• CVVM. (2006). Naše společnost 2006 - listopad. Version 1.0. Available on nesstar.soc.cas.cz. Sociologický ústav Akademie věd ČR: Praha.
   Google Scholar
• CVVM. (2011). Naše společnost 2010 - prosinec. Version 1.0. Available on nesstar.soc.cas.cz. Sociologický ústav Akademie věd ČR: Praha.
   Google Scholar
• CVVM. (2014). Naše společnost 2013 - prosinec. Version 1.0. Available on nesstar.soc.cas.cz. Sociologický ústav Akademie věd ČR: Praha.
   Google Scholar
• CVVM. (2015). Naše společnost 2014 - prosinec. Version 1.0. Available on nesstar.soc.cas.cz. Sociologický ústav Akademie věd ČR: Praha.
   Google Scholar
• CVVM. (2017). Naše společnost 2017 - leden. Version 1.0. Available on nesstar.soc.cas.cz. Sociologický ústav Akademie věd ČR: Praha.
   Google Scholar
• Czech Statistical Office. (2018). Results of elections and referendums. Retrieved from http://volby.cz/index_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. (2008). The quantity and the quality of party systems. Party system polarization, its measurement, and its consequences. Comparative Political Studies, 41(7), 899–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deegan-Krause, K., & Haughton, T. (2010). A fragile stability. The institutional roots of low party system volatility in the Czech Republic, 1990–2009. Czech Journal of Political Science, 17(3), 227–241.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science, 7(4), 457–511.
   Google Scholar
• Hájek, L. (2017). Left, right, left, right … centre: Ideological position of Andrej Babiš’s ANO. Czech Journal of Political Science, 24(3), 275–301.
   Google Scholar
• Hájek, L. (2018). Dimensions of politics in the Czech Republic. Czech Journal of Political Science, 25(2), 131–151.
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, S. (2012). Dynamics of new party formation in the Czech Republic 1996–2010: Looking for the origins of a ‘political earthquake’. East European Politics, 28(2), 119–143.
   Google Scholar
• Havlík, V. (2014). Výsledky voleb. In V. Havlík (Ed.), Volby do Poslanecké sněmovny 2013 (pp. 141–160). Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
   Google Scholar
• Havlík, V., & Kopeček, L. (2008). Krize vládnutí v České republice. Analýza působení volebního a stranického systému a návrhy možných řešení. Politologický časopis, 15(3), 183–205.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S., & Noury, A. (2016). Government-opposition or left-right? The institutional determinants of voting in legislatures. Political Science Research and Methods, 4(2), 249–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hloušek, V. (2010). Seeking a type: The Czech party system after 1989. Politics in Central Europe, 6(1), 90–109.
   Google Scholar
• Hloušek, V., & Kopeček, L. (2008). Cleavages in the contemporary Czech and Slovak politics. Between persistence and change. East European Politics and Societies, 22(3), 518–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ieraci, G. (2012). Government alternation and patterns of competition in Europe: Comparative data in search of explanations. West European Politics, 35(3), 530–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IVVM. (2005a). Listopad 1993 - Kontinuální měsíční výzkum IVVM. Version 1.0. Available on nesstar.soc.cas.cz. Sociologický ústav Akademie věd ČR: Praha.
   Google Scholar
• IVVM. (2005b). Listopad 1998 - Kontinuální měsíční výzkum IVVM. Version 1.0. Available on nesstar.soc.cas.cz. Sociologický ústav Akademie věd ČR: Praha.
   Google Scholar
• IVVM. (2005c). Prosinec 1996 - Kontinuální měsíční výzkum IVVM. Version 1.0. Available on nesstar.soc.cas.cz. Sociologický ústav Akademie věd ČR: Praha.
   Google Scholar
• Juhl, S. (2019). Measurement uncertainty in spatial models: A Bayesian dynamic measurement model. Political Analysis, 27(3), 302–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopeček, L. (2015). Deformace demokracie? Opoziční smlouva a česká politika 1998-2002. Brno: Barrister & Principal.
   Google Scholar
• Kopeček, L., Hloušek, V., Chytilek, R., & Svačinová, P. (2018). Já platím, já rozhoduji!: Političtí podnikatelé a jejich strany. Brno: B&P Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kopeček, L., & Svačinová, P. (2015). Kdo rozhoduje v českých politických stranách? Vzestup nových politických podnikatelů ve srovnávací perspektivě. Středoevropské politické studie, 17(2), 178–211.
   Google Scholar
• Kubát, M. (1998). Volby, fragmentace a polarizace stranického systému a politická nestabilita v České republice. Politologický časopis, 5(3), 231–243.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, M., & Taagepera, R. (1979). “Effective” number of parties. A measure with application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 12(1), 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, M., Benoit, K., & Garry, J. (2003). Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 311–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebedová, E. (2014). Voliči, stranická polarizace a její vývoj od roku 1993. Naše společnost, 12(1), 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Linek, L. (2014). Čistá a celková volební volatilita v Česku v letech 1990-2013: Stejný koncept, odlišná měření a podobné závěry. Acta Politologica, 6(1), 24–38.
   Google Scholar
• Linek, L., Chytilek, R., & Eibl, O. (2016). Obrana, akvizice, či nesoutěž? Jak se měnila podoba a intenzita soutěže mezi českými stranami v letech 2006–2014? Sociologický časopis, 52(5), 647–677.
   Google Scholar
• Linek, L., & Lacina, T. (2011). Co ovlivňuje jednotnost hlasování českých poslaneckých klubů? Politologický časopis, 18(2), 91–110.
   Google Scholar
• Linek, L., & Lyons, P. (2013). Dočasná stabilita? Volební podpora politických stran v České republice v letech 1990-2010. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON), Sociologický ústav Akademie věd ČR.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. M., & Rokkan, S. (Eds.). (1967). Party systems and voter alignments: Cross-national perspectives. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, S., Gervasoni, C., & Espaňa-Najera, A. (2017). Extra- and within-system electoral volatility. Party Politics, 23(6), 623–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (1997). Party system change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2008). Electoral volatility and the Dutch party system: A comparative perspective. Acta Politica, 43(2-3), 235–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markowski, R. (1997). Political parties and ideological spaces in East Central Europe. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 30(3), 221–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. D., & Quinn, K. M. (2002). Dynamic ideal point estimation via Markov chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999. Political Analysis, 10(2), 134–153.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A. D., Quinn, K. M., & Park, J. H. (2011). MCMCpack: Markov chain Monte Carlo in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 42(9), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novák, M. (1999). Utváření stranického systému v českých zemích. Analýza dosavadních trendů a výhledy do budoucna. Politologický časopis, 6(2), 133–145.
   Google Scholar
• Parlament České republiky. (2018). Data Poslanecké sněmovny a Senátu. Retrieved from https://www.psp.cz/sqw/hp.sqw?k=1300
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, M. N. (1979). The dynamics of European party systems: Changing patterns of electoral volatility. European Journal of Political Research, 7(1), 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, K. T. (2000). Nonparametric unfolding of binary choice data. Political Analysis, 8(3), 211–237.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, K. T. (2005). Spatial models of parliamentary voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (1985). A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(2), 357–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (1991). Patterns of congressional voting. American Journal of Political Science, 35(1), 228–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2001). D-nominate after 10 years: A comparative update to congress: A political-economic history of roll-call voting. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 26(1), 5–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, E. N., & Tucker, J. A. (2014). Revisiting electoral volatility in post-communist countries: New data, new results and new approaches. British Journal of Political Science, 44(1), 123–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rae, D. W. (1967). The political consequences of electoral laws. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, S. A. (1925). Behavior of legislative groups: A method of measurement. Political Science Quarterly, 40(1), 60–72.
   Google Scholar
• Riker, W. H. (1962). The theory of political coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. (2003). Demythologising the Czech opposition agreement. Europe-Asia Studies, 55(8), 1273–1303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, D. B. (1976). A theory of party competition. New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Rovny, J. (2013). Where do radical right parties stand? Position blurring in multidimensional competition. European Political Science Review, 5(1), 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and party systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shor, B., & McCarty, N. (2011). The ideological mapping of American legislatures. American Political Science Review, 105(3), 530–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikk, A. (2005). How unstable? Volatility and the genuinely new parties in Eastern Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 44(3), 391–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, D. E. (1963). Spatial models of party competition. American Political Science Review, 57(2), 368–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strmiska, M. (2000). The Czech multipartism in the late 1990s. Some remarks. Středoevropské politické studie, 2(2), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Strmiska, M. (2007). The Czech party system: A few observations on the properties and working logic of the Czech party arrangement. In V. Hloušek & R. Chytilek (Eds.), Parliamentary elections and party landscape in the Visegrad Group countries (pp. 107–115). Brno: CDK.
   Google Scholar
• Volkens, A., Lehmann, P., Matthiefl, T., Merz, N., & Regel, S. (2016). The manifesto data collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2016b. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).
   Google Scholar
• Wintr, J. (2010). Česká parlamentní kultura. Auditorium: Praha.
   Google Scholar