References
- ABC Color. (2011, March 16). Oficialismo negociará ‘paquete’ que incluya apoyo a Venezuela y Unasur. https://www.abc.com.py/edicion-impresa/politica/oficialismo-negociara-paquete-que-incluya-apoyo-a-venezuela-y-unasur-258871.html
- Alcántara Saéz, M., & Garcia Montero, M. (2008). Institutions and Politicians: an analysis of the factors that determine presidential legislative success. https://kellogg.nd.edu/publications/workingpapers/WPS/348.pdf
- Alemán, E., & Calvo, E. (2008). Analyzing legislative success in Latin America: The case of Argentina. In G. O'Donnell, J. Tulchin, & A. Varas (Eds.), New voices in the study of democracy (pp. 7–37). Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars: Woodrow Wilson Center.
- Alemán, E., & Navia, P. (2009). Institutions and legislative success of strong presidents: An analysis of government bills in Chile. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 15(4), 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330903302471
- Alemán, E., & Tsebelis, G. (2005). The origins of presidential conditional agenda-Setting power in Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 40(2), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2005.0017
- Altman, D. (2000). Politics of coalition formation and survival in multiparty presidential democracies: Uruguay 1989–1999. Party Politics, 6(3), 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068800006003001
- Amorim Neto, O. (2006). The presidential calculus, executive policy making and Cabinet formation in the Americas. Comparative Political Studies, 39(4), 415–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005282381
- Amorim Neto, O., & Malamud, A. (2015). What Determines foreign policy in Latin America? Systemic versus domestic factors in Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico, 1946–2008. Latin American Politics and Society, 57(4), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2015.00286.x
- Arnold, C., Doyle, D., & Wiesehomeier, N. (2017). Presidents, policy Compromise, and legislative success. The Journal of Politics, 79(2), 380–395. https://doi.org/10.1086/688080
- Baldez, L., & Carey, J. (1999). Presidential agenda control and spending policy: Lessons from general pinochet's constitution. American Journal of Political Science, 43(1), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991784
- Baldwin, R., & Magee, C. (2000). Congressional trade votes: From NAFTA approval to fast-track defeat. Institute for International Economics.
- Barrett, A., & Eshbaugh-Soha, M. (2007). Presidential success on the substance of legislation. Political Research Quarterly, 60(1), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912906298605
- Berry, W. D., DeMeritt, J. H., & Esarey, J. (2010). Testing for interaction in binary logit and probit models: Is a product term essential? American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 248–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00429.x
- Bond, J., & Fleisher, R. (1990). The president in the legislative arena. University of Chicago Press.
- Burges, S., & Chagas, F. (2017). The importance of presidential leadership for Brazilian foreign policy. Policy Studies, 38(3), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1290228
- Calvo, E. (2007). The responsive legislature: Public opinion and law making in a highly disciplined legislature. British Journal of Political Science, 37(02), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123407000130
- Canes-Wrone, B. (2004). The public presidency, personal approval ratings, and policy making. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 34(3), 477–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2004.00208.x
- Canes-Wrone, B., Howell, W., & Lewis, D. (2008). Toward a broader understanding of presidential power: A reevaluation of the two-presidencies thesis. The Journal of Politic, 70(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381607080061
- Cárdenas, M., Junguito, R., & Pachón, M. (2008). Political institutions and policy outcomes in Colombia: The effects of the 1991 constitution. In E. Estein & M. Tommasi (Eds.), Policymaking in Latin America: How politics shapes policies (pp. 199–242). Inter American Development Bank.
- Chaisty, P., Cheeseman, N., & Power, T. (2014). Rethinking the presidentialism debate: Conceptualizing coalitional politics in cross-regional perspective. Democratization, 21(1), 72–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.710604
- Chasquetti, D. (2014). Parlamento y carreras legislativas en Uruguay. Un estudio sobre reglas, partidos y legisladores en las cámaras. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales – UdelaR.
- Chaudoin, S., Milner, H., & Pang, X. (2015). International systems and domestic politics: Linking complex interactions with empirical models in international relations. International Organization, 69(2), 275–309. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818314000356
- Cheibub, J., Przeworski, A., & Saiegh, S. (2004). Government coalitions and legislative success under presidentialism and parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science, 34(4), 565–587. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123404000195
- Conley, R. (1999). Drealing presidential fast-track authority: The impact of constituency pressures and political Ideology on trade policy in Congress. Political Research Quarterly, 52(4), 785–799. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299905200406
- Cox, G., & McCubbins, M. (1992). Legislative Leviathan. Cambridge University Press.
- Cox, G., & McCubbins, M. (2001). The institutional determinants of economic policy outcomes. In S. Haggard & M. McCubbins (Eds.), Presidents, parliaments, and policy (pp. 21–63). Cambridge University Press.
- Cox, G., & Morgenstern, S. (2001). Latin America’s reactive assemblies and proactive presidents. Comparative Politics, 33(2), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.2307/422377
- Cox, G. W., & McCubbins, M. (2005). Setting the agenda: Responsible party government in the US house of representatives. Cambridge University Press.
- Dahl, R. (1950). Congress and foreign policy. Norton.
- Darrieux, R. (2019). Political institutions and the legislative success of Brazilian presidents: An analysis of the Cardoso, Lula and Rousseff Governments. Brazilian Political Science Review, 13(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201900010004
- Diniz, S. (2005). Interações entre os Poderes Executivo e Legislativo no Processo Decisório: Avaliando o Sucesso e o Fracasso Presidencial. Dados – Revista de Ciências Sociais, 48(1), 333–369. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0011-52582005000200004
- Diniz, S. (2012). O senado federal e a deliberação de atos internacionais no presidencialismo brasileiro. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 27(80), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-69092012000300010
- Escobar, F., & Gonzáles, C. (2012). El papel de los partidos políticos en la política exterior colombiana. In E. Jost (Ed.), Colombia: ¿una potencia en desarrollo? Escenarios y desafíos para su política exterior (pp. 227–248). Konrad Adenauer.
- Eshbaugh-Soha, M. (2005). The politics of presidential agendas. Political Research Quarterly, 58(2), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290505800206
- Eshbaugh-Soha, M. (2010). The importance of policy scope to presidential success in Congress. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 40(4), 708–724. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2010.03807.x
- Estrada, P. (2018, June 25). Fernando Lugo: O golpe do Paraguai foi contra a integração da América Latina. Brasil de Fato. Retrieved from: https://www.brasildefato.com.br/2018/06/25/fernando-lugo-o-golpe-do-paraguai-foi-contra-a-integracao-da-america-latina
- Feliú, P. (2019). Partidos políticos y política exterior en América Latina. Revista mexicana de ciencias políticas y sociales, 64(235), 353–393. https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.2448492xe.2019.235.63207
- Feliú, P., & Urdinez, F. (2017). ¿Hay dos presidentes en argentina?: un análisis comparativo del apoyo legislativo en las políticas exterior y doméstica (2001-2014). Revista de ciencia política (Santiago), 37(1), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2017000100005
- Ferrari, D. (2011). O Congresso Nacional e a Apreciação de Tratados Internacionais entre 1999 e 2006. In J. Moíses (Ed.), O Papel do Congresso Nacional no Presidencialismo de Coalizão (pp. 75–90). Konrad-Adenauer.
- Figueiredo, A., Salles, D., & Vieira, M. (2009). Political and institutional determinants of the executive’s legislative success in Latin America. Brazilian Political Science Review, 3(2), 155–171.
- Fleisher, R., Bond, J., Krutz, G., & Hanna, S. (2000). The demise of the two presidencies. American Politics Quarterly, 28(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X00028001001
- Flores, R. (2008). La Relación Entre El Ejecutivo Y El Congreso En Materia de Politica Exterior Durante El Sexenio de Vicente Fox: Cooperación O Conflicto? Política Y Gobierno, 15(1), 113–158.
- Follietti, G. (2005). La participación argentina en Haití: el papel del Congreso. Revista Fuerzas Armadas y Sociedad, 19(1), 37–56.
- García Montero, M. (2009). Presidentes y Parlamentos ¿quién controla la actividad legislativa en América Latina? Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
- Gibbs, C. (2009). Presidential success in congress: Factors that determine the president's ability to influence congressional voting. Honors Projects, 35. Retrieved from: http://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/polisci_honproj/35
- Gustavsson, J. (1999). How should we study foreign policy change? Cooperation and Conflict, 34(1), 73–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/00108369921961780
- Henisz, W., & Mansfield, E. (2006). Votes and vetoes: He political determinants of commercial openness. International Studies Quarterly, 50(1), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00398.x
- Hiroi, T., & Rennó, L. (2018). Disentangling legislative duration in coalitional presidential systems. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 24(4), 475–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2018.1540118
- Holsti, O., & Rosenau, J. (1986). Consensus lost, consensus regained? Foreign policy beliefs of American leaders, 1976-1980. International Studies Quarterly, 30(4), 375–409. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600641
- Huddy, L. (2013). From group identity to political cohesion and commitment. In L. Huddy, D. Sears, & J. Levy (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of political Psychology (pp. 737–773). Oxford University Press.
- Jenne, N., Schenoni, L., & Urdinez, F. (2017). Of words and deeds: Latin American declaratory regionalism, 1994–2014. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 30(2), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2017.1383358
- King, G. (1986). Political parties and foreign policy: A structuralist approach. Political Psychology, 7(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791158
- Kupchan, C., & Trubowitz, P. (2007). The demise of liberal internationalism in the United States. International Security, 32(2), 7–44. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2007.32.2.7
- Laakso, M., & Taagepera, R. (1979). Effective number of parties: A measure with application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 12(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041407901200101
- Lambert, P. (2016). The myth of the good neighbour: Paraguay's uneasy relationship with Brazil. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 35(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.12410
- Lima, M., & Santos, F. (2001). O Congresso e a Política Exterior. Lua Nova, 52, 121–150. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-64452001000100006
- Lindsay, J. (2003). Deference and defiance: The shifting rhythms of executive – legislative relations in foreign policy. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 33(3), 530–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/1741-5705.00005
- Long, S., & Freese, J. (2014). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. Stata press.
- Mack, W., DeRouen, K., & Lanoue, D. (2013). Foreign policy and presidential support in Congress. Foreign Policy Analysis, 9(1), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2011.00166.x
- Mainwaring, S. (1997). Multipartism, Robust Federalism, and presidentialism in Brazil. In S. Mainwaring & M. Shugart (Eds.), Presidentialism and democracy in Latin America (pp. 55–109). Cambridge University Press.
- Malamud, A. (2014). Presidentialist decision making in Latin American foreign policy: Examples from regional integration processes. In J. Domínguez & A. Covarrubias (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Latin America in the World (pp. 112–123). Routledge.
- Marshall, B., & Pacelle, R. (2005). Revisiting the two presidencies The strategic use of executive orders. American Politics Research, 33(1), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X04266816
- McCormick, J., & Wittkopf, E. (1992). At The water’s edge. Effects of party, ideology, and issues on congressional foreign policy voting, 1947-1988. American Politics Quarterly, 20(1), 26–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X9202000102
- McCormick, J., Wittkopf, E., & Danna, D. (1997). Politics and bipartisanship at the water`s edge: A note on Bush and Clinton. Polity, 30(1), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235323
- Meernik, J. (1993). Presidential support in Congress: Conflict and consensus on foreign and defense policy. The Journal of Politics, 55(3), 569–587. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131989
- Mello, E., & Spektor, M. (2018). Brazil: The costs of multiparty presidentialism. Journal of Democracy, 29(2), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0031
- Milner, H., & Tingley, D. (2015). Sailing the water’s edge: American foreign policy and domestic politics. Princeton University Press.
- Molinas, J., Pérez-Liñan, A., & Saiegh, S. (2004). Political Institutions, policymaking processes, and policy outcomes in Paraguay, 1954-2003. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago), 24(2), 67–93. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2004000200004
- Monroy, M., & Sánchez, F. (2017). Foreign policy analysis and the making of plan Colombia. Global Society, 31(2), 245–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2016.1269057
- Mora, F., & Hey, J. (2003). Latin American and Caribbean foreign policy. Rowman and Littlefield.
- Neiva, P. (2011). Coesão e Disciplina Partidária no Senado Federal. Dados – Revista de Ciências Sociais, 54(2), 289–318. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0011-52582011000200003
- Neves, J. (2003). O Papel do Legislativo nas Negociações do MERCOSUL e da ALCA. Contexto Internacional, 25(1), 103–138. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-85292003000100004
- Onuki, J., Feliú, P., & Oliveira, A. (2009). Political parties, foreign policy and ideology: Argentina and Chile in comparative perspective. Brazilian Political Science Review, 4.
- Palau, M., & Ortega, G. (2008). Paraguay: El nuevo escenario de disputa de los intereses populares. CLACSO.
- Payne, M., Zovatto, D., Florez, C., & Zavala, A. (2003). La política importa. Democracia y desarrollo en América Latina. BID.
- Pérez-Liñán, A. (2018). Impeachment or Backsliding? Threats to democracy in the twenty-first century. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 33(98), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1590/339801/2018
- Pérez-Liñán, A., & Polga-Hecimovich, J. (2012, July). Political elites, democratic breakdown, and presidential instability in Latin America. Paper presented at the International Political Science Association (IPSA) Conference, Madrid.
- Prins, B., & Marshall, B. (2001). Congressional support of the president: A comparison of foreign, defense, and domestic policy decision making during and after the Cold War. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 31(4), 660–678. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0000-0000.2001.00192.x
- Raile, E., Pereira, C., & Power, T. (2011). The executive toolbox: Building legislative support in a multiparty presidential regime. Political Research Quarterly, 64(2), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912909355711
- Ripley, R., & Lindsay, J. (1993). Congress resurgent: Foreign and defense policy on Capitol Hill. University of Michigan Press.
- Rose, G. (1998). Review: Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy. World Politics, 51(1), 144–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100007814
- Rudalevige, A. (2002). Managing the president’s program: Presidential leadership and legislative policy formulation. Princeton University Press.
- Samuels, D., & Matthew, S. (2003). Presidentialism, elections and representation. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15(1), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692803151002
- Sanchez, L. (2014). Éxito y participación legislativa en materia de política exterior. El Congreso de la Nación Argentina, un estudio de caso. Revista Mexicana de Análisis Político y Administración Pública, 3(2), 71–92.
- Santos, M., Perez-linan, A., & Garcia Montero, M. (2014). El control presidencial de la agenda legislativa en América Latina. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago), 34(3), 511–536. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2014000300001
- Senado. (2011, June 9). Diario de Sesiones. [Written report of proceedings in the Senate floor]. Sistema de Informaciones Legislativas. Retrieved from: http://silpy.congreso.gov.py/sesion/1518
- Shugart, M. (2008). Comparative executive-legislative relations. In S. Binder, R. Rhodes, & B. Rockman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political institutions (pp. 344–365). Oxford University Press.
- Shugart, M., & Carey, M. (1992). Presidents and assemblies: Constitutional design and electoral dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
- Shugart, M., & Haggard, S. (2001). Institutions and public policy in presidential systems. In S. Haggard & M. McCubbins (Eds.), Presidents, parliaments, and policy (pp. 64–102). Cambridge University Press.
- Sinclair, B. (1993). Congressional party leaders in the foreign and defense policy Arena. In R. Ripley & J. Lindsay (Eds.), Congress resurgent: Foreign and defense policy on Capitol Hill (pp. 207–234). University of Michigan Press.
- Stuhldreher, A. (2003). Régimen Político y Política Exterior en Argentina: El caso del primer gobierno de Carlos Menem (1989-1995). Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 22, 79–101.
- Tayfur, M. (1994). Main approaches to the study of foreign policy: A review. METU Studies in Development, 21(1), 113–141.
- Wildavsky, A. (1966). The two presidencies. Trans-Action, 4, 7–14.
- Yates, J., & Whitford, A. (1998). Presidential power and the United States Supreme Court. Political Research Quarterly, 51(2), 539–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299805100212