Questioning scrutiny: the effect of Prime Minister’s Questions on citizen efficacy and trust in parliament

References

• Bates, S. R., Kerr, P., Byrne, C., & Stanley, L. (2014). Questions to the prime minister: A comparative study of PMQs from Thatcher to Cameron. Parliamentary Affairs, 67(2), 253–280. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BBC. (2015, January 18). Pienaar’s politics. Radio 5 Live.
   Google Scholar
• Bercow, J. (2010, September 15). Speech to the centre for parliamentary studies. Viewed July 18, 2019, https://www.parliament.uk/business/commons/the-speaker/speeches/speeches/speech-to-the-centre-for-parliamentary-studies/
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, S., & John, P. (2016). Policy representation by party leaders and followers: What drives UK Prime Minister’s Questions? Government and Opposition, 51(1), 59–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2015.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, T. (2010). A journey. HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The managerial grid. Gulf.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, P., & Strawson, W. (2020). Can’t answer? Won’t answer? An analysis of equivocal responses by Theresa May in Prime Minister’s Questions. Parliamentary Affairs, 73(2), 429–449. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsz003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, P., & Waddle, M. (2019). The impact of quoting members of the public in Prime Minister’s Questions. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 7(1), 56–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celis, K., & Wauters, B. (2010). Pinning the butterfly: Women, blue-collar and ethnic minority MPs vis-à-vis parliamentary norms and the parliamentary role of the group representative. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 16(3), 380–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2010.498106
   Google Scholar
• Chanin, M. N., & Schneer, J. A. (1984). A study of the relationship between Jungian personality dimensions and conflict-handling behavior. Human Relations, 37(10), 863–879. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678403701006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, H. D., & Acock, A. C. (1989). National elections and political attitudes: The case of political efficacy. British Journal of Political Science, 19(4), 551–562. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400005639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crewe, E. (2015). The House of Commons: An anthropology of MPs at work. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenge, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dyck, J. J., & Lascher, E. L. (2009). Direct democracy and political efficacy reconsidered. Political Behavior, 31(3), 401–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9081-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, S. E. (1985). Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: A panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(4), 891–913. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, M. N., & Norton, P. (1993). Parliamentary questions. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, R., Simon, T. T., Currall, S. C., & James, T. C. (2000). What goes around comes around: The impact of personal conflict style on work conflict and stress. The International journal of conflict management, 11(1), 32–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallup. (2019). Confidence in institutions. Viewed July 29, 2019. https://news.gallup.com/poll/1597/
   Google Scholar
• Hansard Society. (2014). Tuned in or turned off? Public attitudes to Prime Minister’s Questions. Viewed March 8, 2017. https://assets.ctfassets.net/u1rlvvbs33ri/v5KOp60C6Os0y2MYiMYyg/da0ce4465c346bb592fde93de3550b3c/Publication__Tuned-in-or-Turned-off-Public-attitudes-to-PMQs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hansard Society. (2019). Audit of political engagement. Viewed July 30, 2019. https://www.hansardsociety.org.uk/publications/reports/audit-of-political-engagement-16
   Google Scholar
• Hazarika, A., & Hamilton, T. (2018). Punch & Judy politics: An insider’s guide to Prime Minister’s Questions. Bitback Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (1995). Congress as public enemy: Public attitudes toward American institutions. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy: Americans' beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hiel, A. V., & Mervielde, I. (2002). Explaining conservative beliefs and political preferences: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(2), 965–976. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00250.x
   Google Scholar
• Immelman, A. (2003). Personality in political psychology. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (pp. 599–625). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• The Independent. (2018). ‘Abolish the thing!’ Chuka Umunna says ‘completely useless’ PMQs tradition should be scrapped. Retrieved December 20, 2018, from https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/pmqs-chuka-umunna-itv-robert-peston-video-182742
   Google Scholar
• Institute for Government. (2015). Parliamentary scrutiny of government. Retrieved August 8, 2019, from https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publications/parliamentary-scrutiny-government
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, C. D., Levine, H. G., & Federico, C. M. (2017). Open versus closed: Personality, identity, and the politics of redistribution. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, C. D., & Wronski, J. (2015). Personality dispositions and political preferences across hard and easy issues. Political Psychology, 36(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelso, A., Bennister, M., & Larkin, P. (2016). The shifting landscape of prime ministerial accountability to Parliament: An analysis of Liaison Committee scrutiny sessions. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18(3), 740–754. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148116633438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leston-Bandeira, C. (2012). Studying the relationship between parliament and citizens. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 18(3-4), 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2012.706044
   Google Scholar
• Lovenduski, J. (2012). Prime Minister’s Questions as political ritual. British Politics, 7 (4), 314–340. https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2012.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenberg, G. (1971). Modern parliaments: Change or decline? Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, S. (2011). Parliamentary questions, the behaviour of legislators, and the function of legislatures: An introduction. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(3), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2011.595120
   Google Scholar
• Montoya-Weiss, M. M., Massey, A. P., & Song, M. (2001). Getting it together: Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1251–1262. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. (2014). (Im)politeness during Prime Minister’s Questions in the U.K. parliament. Pragmatics and Society, 5 (1), 76–104. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.5.1.04mur
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 838–855. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C., & Reeves, B. (2005). The new videomalaise: Effects of televised Incivility on political trust. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2013). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2017).Is western democracy backsliding? Diagnosing the risks. HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP17-012, March. https://www.hks.harvard.edu/publications/western-democracy-backsliding-diagnosing-risks
   Google Scholar
• Norton, P. (1993). Questions and the role of parliament. In M. N. Franklin & P. Norton (Eds.), Parliamentary questions (pp. 194–207). Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, P. (2012). Parliament and citizens in the United Kingdom. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 18(3-4), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2012.706053
   Google Scholar
• Norton, P. (2013). Parliament in British politics (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, D. C. W., & Richter, C. M. (2018). Back from Holyrood: How mixed-member proportional representation and ballot structure shape the personal vote. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 20(3), 674–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148118762279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahim, M. A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 368–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahim, M. A. (2010). Managing conflict in organization. Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rudolph, T. J., Gangl, A., & Stevens, D. (2000). The effects of efficacy and emotions on campaign involvement. The Journal of Politics, 62(4), 1189–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rush, M., & Giddings, P. (2011). Parliamentary socialisation. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, E. E. (1942). Party government. Farrar & Rinehart.
   Google Scholar
• Shephard, M., & Braby, D. (2020). Questions to the PM versus questions by the PM: An examination of the state and nature of “punch and Judy” politics during PMQs at Westminster. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 26(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2020.1727668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, K., & Killman, R. (1974). Thomas-Killman conflict mode instrument. CPP, Inc
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, K. W., Thomas, G. F., & Schaubhut, N. (2008). Conflict styles of men and women at six organization levels. International Journal of Conflict Management, 19(2), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1108/10444060810856085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulbig, S. G., & Funk, C. L. (1999). Conflict avoidance and political participation. Political Behavior, 21(3), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022087617514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, N. A., Gregorowicz, K., & Groenendyk, E. W. (2009). Efficacy, emotions, and the habit of participation. Political Behavior, 31(3), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9076-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchione, M., & Caprara, G. V. (2009). Personality determinants of political participation: The contribution of traits and self-efficacy beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(4), 487–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.11.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddle, M., Bull, P., & Böhnke, J. R. (2019). “He is just the nowhere man of British politics”: Personal attacks in Prime Minister’s Questions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X18767472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Womack, D. (1988). A review of conflict instruments in organizational settings. Management Communication Quarterly, 1(3), 437–445.
   Google Scholar