Parliamentary current questions’ constituency focus under times of crisis: an examination of the Greek case

References

• André, A., Depauw, S., & Martin, S. (2015). Electoral systems and legislators’ constituency effort: The mediating effect of electoral vulnerability. Comparative Political Studies, 48(4), 464–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414014545512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäck, H., & Debus, M. (2018). Representing the region on the floor: Socioeconomic characteristics of electoral districts and legislative speechmaking. Parliamentary Affairs, 71(1), 73–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäck, H., Debus, M., & Fernandes, J. M. (in press). Politics of legislative debate. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, M., Debus, M., & Klingelhöfer, T. (2017). Keeping one’s seat: The competitiveness of MP renomination in mixed-member electoral systems. The Journal of Politics, 79(3), 979–994. https://doi.org/10.1086/690945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, C. (2020). Gatekeeping the plenary floor: Discourse network analysis as a novel approach to party control. Politics and Governance, 8(2), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i2.2611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenau, J., & Lauderdale, B. E. (2018). Never let a good crisis go to waste: Agenda setting and legislative voting in response to the EU crisis. The Journal of Politics, 80(2), 462–478. https://doi.org/10.1086/694543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghetto, E., Santana-Pereira, J., & Freire, A. (2020). Parliamentary questions as an instrument for geographic representation: The hard case of Portugal. Swiss Political Science Review, 26(1), 10–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosco, A., & Verney, S. (2012). Electoral epidemic: The political cost of economic crisis in Southern Europe, 2010–11. South European Society and Politics, 17(2), 129–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2012.747272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, S., & Farrell, D. M. (1993). Legislator shirking and voter monitoring: Impacts of European parliament electoral systems upon legislator-voter relationships. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1993.tb00447.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, J. M. (2007). Competing principals, political institutions, and party unity in legislative voting. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00239.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, J. M., & Shugart, M. S. (1995). Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies, 14(4), 417–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(94)00035-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, D. M., & Webb, P. (2000). Political parties as campaign organizations. In R. J. Dalton & M. P. Wattenberg (Eds.), Parties without partisans: Political change in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford University Press on Demand (pp. 102–128).
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, J. M., Geese, L., & Schwemmer, C. (2019). The impact of candidate selection rules and electoral vulnerability on legislative behaviour in comparative perspective. European Journal of Political Research, 58(1), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, J. M., Leston-Bandeira, C., & Schwemmer, C. (2018). Election proximity and representation focus in party-constrained environments. Party Politics, 24(6), 674–685. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817689955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, J. M., & Magalhães, P. C. (2020). Does economic and political integration undermine representative democracy? In R. Rohrschneider & J. Thomassen (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Representation in Liberal Democracies (pp. 647–654).
   Google Scholar
• Freire, A., Lisi, M., Andreadis, I., & Viegas, J. M. (Eds.). (2016). Political representation in times of bailout: Evidence from Greece and Portugal. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gemenis, K., & Nezi, R. (2015). Government–opposition dynamics during the economic crisis in Greece. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 21(1), 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2014.939562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2007). Is there a (viable) crucial-case method? Comparative Political Studies, 40(3), 231–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006290784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, C., & Mortensen, P. B. (2010). Who sets the agenda and who responds to it in the Danish parliament? A new model of issue competition and agenda-setting. European Journal of Political Research, 49(2), 257–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01897.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazan, R. Y., & Rahat, G. (2010). Democracy within parties: Candidate selection methods and their political consequences. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heitshusen, V., Young, G., & Wood, D. M. (2005). Electoral context and MP constituency focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. American Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00108.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, A., & Benoit, K. (2015). The most unkindest cuts: Speaker selection and expressed government dissent during economic crisis. The Journal of Politics, 77(4), 1157–1175. https://doi.org/10.1086/682670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, A., & Mikhaylov, S. J. (2020). Intra-cabinet politics and fiscal governance in times of austerity. Political Science Research and Methods, 8(3), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2019.40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Immergut, E. M., & Abou-Chadi, T. (2014). How electoral vulnerability affects pension politics: Introducing a concept, measure and empirical application. European Journal of Political Research, 53(2), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kartalis, Y., & Lobo, M. C. (in press). Greece: Debates in a party-dominated system with clientelistic underpinnings. In H. Bäck, M. Debus, & J. M. Fernandes (Eds.), Politics of legislative debate. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karvonen, L. (2010). The personalisation of politics: A study of parliamentary democracies. ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kellermann, M. (2016). Electoral vulnerability, constituency focus, and parliamentary questions in the House of Commons. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khramov, M. V., & Lee, M. J. R. (2013). The Economic Performance Index (EPI): An intuitive indicator for assessing a country's economic performance dynamics in an historical perspective. International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Kinski, L., & Crum, B. (2020). Transnational representation in EU national parliaments: Concept, case study, research agenda. Political Studies, 68(2), 370–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719848565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maatsch, A. (2016). Drivers of political parties’ voting behaviour in European economic governance: The ultimate decline of the economic cleavage? West European Politics, 39(4), 648–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1129491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. (2003). Rethinking representation. American Political Science Review, 97(4), 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, S. (2011). Using parliamentary questions to measure constituency focus: An application to the Irish case. Political Studies, 59(2), 472–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00885.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, S. (2014). Why electoral systems don’t always matter: The impact of ‘mega-seats’ on legislative behaviour in Ireland. Party Politics, 20(3), 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811436061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morlino, L., & Raniolo, F. (2017). The impact of the economic crisis on South European democracies. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• OSCE. (2019, April 10–12). Greece parliamentary elections October 2019 (ODIHR Needs Assessment Mission Report). Retrieved June 12, 2021, from https://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/greece/420839?download=true
   Google Scholar
• Pedrazzani, A., Pellegata, A., & Pinto, L. (2018). Economic crisis and lawmaking. The impact of crisis on legislative agenda in Italy. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 24(3), 315–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2018.1516605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation (Vol. 75). University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Proksch, S. O., & Slapin, J. B. (2012). Institutional foundations of legislative speech. American Journal of Political Science, 56(3), 520–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00565.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proksch, S. O., & Slapin, J. B. (2015). The politics of parliamentary debate. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, B. E. (2011). Behavioural consequences of restrictions on plenary access: Parliamentary questions in the Norwegian Storting. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(3), 382–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2011.595131
   Google Scholar
• Russo, F. (2011). The constituency as a focus of representation: Studying the Italian case through the analysis of parliamentary questions. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(3), 290–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2011.595122
   Google Scholar
• Saalfeld, T. (2003). Members of parliament and governments in Western Europe: Agency relations and problems of oversight. European Journal of Political Research, 37(3), 353–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00517
   Google Scholar
• Saalfeld, T. (2011). Parliamentary questions as instruments of substantive representation: Visible minorities in the UK House of Commons, 2005–10. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(3), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2011.595121
   Google Scholar
• Sommet, N., & Morselli, D. (2017). Keep calm and learn multilevel logistic modeling: A simplified three-step procedure using Stata, R, Mplus, and SPSS. International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S., Penner, E., & Blidook, K. (2009). Constituency influence in parliament. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 42(3), 563–591. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423909990059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm, K. (1997). Rules, reasons and routines: Legislative roles in parliamentary democracies. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 3(1), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572339708420504
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, R., & Costello, R. (2017). Governing together in good and bad economic times: The fulfilment of election pledges in Ireland. Irish Political Studies, 31(2), 182–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2016.1149066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlke, J. C., Eulau, H., & Buchanan, W. (1962). The legislative system: Explorations in legislative behavior. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wiberg, M. (1995). Parliamentary questioning: Control by communication. In H. Döring (Ed.), Parliaments and majority rule in Western Europe (pp. 179–222). Frankfurt: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Winzen, T. (2013). European integration and national parliamentary oversight institutions. European Union Politics, 14(2), 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116512467088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zittel, T., Nyhuis, D., & Baumann, M. (2019). Geographic representation in party-dominated legislatures: A quantitative text analysis of parliamentary questions in the German Bundestag. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 44(4), 681–711. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar