If there is nothing else to say: the local content of interpellations

References

• Allmark, L. (2012). More than rubber-stamps: The consequences produced by legislatures in non-democratic states beyond latent legitimation. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 18(2), 184–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2012.673064
   Google Scholar
• Bailer, S., Breunig, C., Giger, N., & Wüst, A. M. (2022). The diminishing value of representing the disadvantaged: Between group representation and individual career paths. British Journal of Political Science, 52(2), 535–552. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. (2009). Agendas and instability in American politics (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, D. (1991). The legitimacy of power. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Boda, Z., & Sebők, M. (2015). Előszó: A Hungarian comparative agendas project Bemutatása. Politikatudományi Szemle, 24(4), 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Bódiné Beliznai, K., & Mezey, B. (2003). Az Országgyűlés. In B. Mezey (Ed.), Magyar alkotmánytörténet (pp. 107–119). Osiris Kiadó.
   Google Scholar
• Bogaards, M. (2009). How to classify hybrid regimes? Defective democracy and electoral authoritarianism. Democratization, 16(2), 399–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340902777800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooker, P. (2014). Non-democratic regimes (3rd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, B., Ferejohn, J., & Fiorina, M. (1987). The personal vote: Constituency service and electoral independence. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, J. M., & Shugart, M. S. (1995). Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies, 14(4), 417–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(94)00035-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chee, C. H. (1976). The role of parliamentary politicians in Singapore. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 1(3), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.2307/439506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantelos, J. (2010). Playing the field: Federalism and the politics of venue shopping in the United States and Canada. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 40(3), 460–483. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjq010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Knutsen, C. H., Lindberg, S. I., Teorell, J., Alizada, N., Altman, D., Bernhard, M., Cornell, A., Fish, M. S., Gastaldi, L., Gjerløw, H., Glynn, A., Hicken, A., Hindle, G., Ilchenko, N., Krusell, J., Lührmann, A., Maerz, S. F., et al. (2021a). V-Dem [Country– Year/Country– Date] Dataset v11.1, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemds21
   Google Scholar
• Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Knutsen, C. H., Lindberg, S. I., Teorell, J., Altman, D., Bernhard, M., Cornell, A., Fish, M. S., Gastaldi, L., Gjerløw, H., Glynn, A., Hicken, A., Lührmann, A., Maerz, S. F., Marquardt, K. L., McMann, K., Mechkova, V., Paxton, P., & Ziblatt, D. (2021b). V-Dem Codebook v11.1, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.
   Google Scholar
• De Giorgi, E. (2015). Conclusions: Great recession, great cooperation? The Journal of Legislative Studies, 21(1), 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2014.939560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eulau, H. (1962). The legislator as representative: Representational roles. In J. C. Wahlke, B. Eulau-Heinz, & L. C. William-Ferguson (Eds.), The legislative system: Explorations in legislative behavior (pp. 267–286). John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Föglein, G., Mezey, B., & Révész, T. M. (2003). Az Országgyűlés. In B. Mezey (Ed.), Magyar alkotmánytörténet (pp. 315–357). Osiris Kiadó.
   Google Scholar
• Guiraudon, V. (2000). European integration and migration policy: Vertical policy-making as venue shopping. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(2), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horváth, A. (2003). A szovjet típusú államberendezkedés Magyarországon (1949–1956). In B. Mezey (Ed.), Magyar alkotmánytörténet (pp. 463–483). Osiris Kiadó.
   Google Scholar
• Huwyler, O., Tatham, M., & Blatter, J. (2018). Party politics, institutions, and identity: The dynamics of regional venue shopping in the EU. West European Politics, 41(3), 754–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1404822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilonszki, G. (2009). Képviselők és képviselet Magyarországon a 19. és 20. században, DVD Appendix, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.
   Google Scholar
• Ionescu, G. (1972). Comparative communist politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kaunert, C., & Léonard, S. (2012). The development of the EU asylum policy: Venue-shopping in perspective. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(9), 1396–1413. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.677191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukorelli, I. (1989). Az országgyűlési képviselők jogállása. Közgazdasági és Jogi Könyvkiadó.
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism. Hybrid regimes after the cold war. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2002.0026
   Google Scholar
• Malesky, E., & Schuler, P. (2011). The single-party dictator’s dilemma: Information in elections without opposition. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 36(4), 491–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-9162.2011.00025.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. W., & Vanberg, G. (2014). Legislative institutions and coalition government. In S. Martin, T. Saalfeld, & K. Strøm (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of legislative studies (pp. 437–455). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, S. (2011a). Using parliamentary questions to measure constituency focus: An application to the Irish case. Political Studies, 59(2), 472–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00885.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, S. (2011b). Parliamentary questions, the behaviour of legislators, and the function of legislatures: An introduction. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(3), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2011.595120
   Google Scholar
• M. Balázs, Á. (2021). The traditional authoritarianism of the interwar period (1920–1944). In M. Sebők & Z. Boda (Eds.), Policy agendas in autocracy, and hybrid regimes. The case of Hungary (pp. 119–164). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mezey, M. (1990). Classifying legislatures. In P. Norton (Ed.), Legislatures (pp. 149–176). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Molnár, C. (2021). The pre-war era of proto-parliamentarism (1867–1918). In M. Sebők & Z. Boda (Eds.), Policy agendas in autocracy, and hybrid regimes. The case of Hungary (pp. 77–117). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Molnár, C., & Ring, O. (2021). Hungarian regimes and their institutional characteristics. In M. Sebők & Z. Boda (Eds.), Policy agendas in autocracy, and hybrid regimes. The case of Hungary (pp. 33–62). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Molnár, C., & Sebők, M. (2021). The data and methods of the Hungarian comparative agendas project. In M. Sebők & Z. Boda (Eds.), Policy agendas in autocracy, and hybrid regimes. The case of Hungary (pp. 63–73). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Morlino, L. (2009). Are there hybrid regimes? Or are they just an optical illusion? European Political Science Review, 1(2), 273–296. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773909000198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, D. N. (1982). Communist legislatures and communist politics. In Daniel Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Papp, Z. (2011). A választókerület helye a magyar parlamenti képviselők szerepfelfogásában. In K. Bozsonyi, Z. Enyedi, R. Tardos, & T. Závecz (Eds.), Részvétel, képviselet, politikai változás (pp. 291–312). Századvég-DKMKA.
   Google Scholar
• Papp, Z. (2016). Shadowing the elected: Mixed-member incentives to locally oriented parliamentary questioning. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 22(2), 216–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2016.1163880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, S. C., & Copeland, G. W. (1994). Parliaments in the twenty-first century. In S. C. Patterson & G. W. Copeland (Eds.), Parliaments in the modern world (pp. 1–11). The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pemstein, D., Marquardt, K. L., Tzelgov, E., Wang, Y., Medzihorsky, J., Krusell, J., Miri, F., & von Römer, J. (2021). The V-Dem measurement model: Latent variable analysis for cross-national and cross-temporal expert-coded data. In V-Dem Working Paper, no. 21, 6th edition. University of Gothenburg: Varieties of Democracy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Pesti, S. (2002). Az újkori magyar parlament. Osiris Kiadó.
   Google Scholar
• Pokornyi, Z., & Sághy, E. (2021). The policy agendas of liberal and illiberal democracy (1990–2018). In M. Sebők & Z. Boda (Eds.), Policy agendas in autocracy, and hybrid regimes. The case of Hungary (pp. 207–244). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, G. B. Jr., Dalton, R. J., & Strøm, K. (2015). Comparative politics today. A word view (7th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, B. E. (2009). Opposition parties, electoral incentives and the control of government ministers: Parliamentary questioning in Norway. In S. Ganghof, C. Hönnige, & C. Stecker (Eds.), Parlamente, agendasetzung und vetospieler (pp. 199–214). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ring, O. (2021). Agenda dynamics in socialist autocracy (1957–1989). In M. Sebők & Z. Boda (Eds.), Policy agendas in autocracy, and hybrid regimes. The case of Hungary (pp. 165–205). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, F. (2011). The constituency as a focus of representation: Studying the Italian case through the analysis of parliamentary questions. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(3), 290–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2011.595122
   Google Scholar
• Schuler, P., & Malesky, E. J. (2014). Authoritarian legislatures. In S. Martin, T.-S. Saalfeld, & W. Kaare (Eds.), Oxford handbook of legislative studies (pp. 677–696). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sebők, M., & Berki, T. (2018). Punctuated equilibrium in democracy and autocracy: An analysis of Hungarian budgeting between 1868 and 2013. European Political Science Review, 10(4), 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773918000115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebők, M., & Boda, Z. (Eds.). (2021). Policy agendas in autocracy, and hybrid regimes. The case of Hungary. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sebők, M., M. Balázs, Á., & Molnár, C. (2022). Punctuated equilibrium and progressive friction in socialist autocracy, democracy and hybrid regimes. Journal of Public Policy, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X21000143
   Google Scholar
• Sebők, M., Molnár, C., & Kubik, B. (2017). Exercising control and gathering information: The functions of interpellations in Hungary (1990–2014). The Journal of Legislative Studies, 23(4), 465–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2017.1394734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, M. D., & Olson, D. M. (1980). Evolution of a minimal parliament: Membership and committee changes in the Polish Sejm. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 5(2), 211–232. https://doi.org/10.2307/439541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skilling, H. G. (1952). The Czechoslovak constitutional system: The soviet impact. Political Science Quarterly, 67(2), 198–224. https://doi.org/10.2307/2145722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlke, J. C. (1962). Theory: A framework for analysis. In J. C. Wahlke, H.-B. Eulau, F. William, & C. Leroy (Eds.), The legislative system: Explorations in legislative behavior (pp. 3–28). John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• White, S. (1980). The USSR supreme soviet: A developmental perspective. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 5(2), 247–274. https://doi.org/10.2307/439543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S. (1982). Some conclusions. In D. N. Nelson & S. L. White (Eds.), Communist legislatures in comparative perspective (pp. 191–196). The Macmillan Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Wiberg, M. (1995). Parliamentary questioning: Control by communication? In H. Döring (Ed.), Parliaments and majority rule in Western Europe (pp. 179–222). Mannheim Centre for European Social Research.
   Google Scholar