Legislative electoral incumbent defeats: Cues from Ghana

References

• Agomor, K. S. (2019). Understanding the origins of political duopoly in Ghana's fourth republic democracy. African Social Science Review, 10(1), 59–84. https://digitalscholarship.tsu.edu/assr/vol10/iss1/4
   Google Scholar
• Ariga, K. (2010). Entrenched incumbents, irresponsible parties? Comparative analysis of incumbency advantage across different electoral systems [Ph.D. dissertation]. University of Michigan, USA. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/77907/kariga_1.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Ariga, K. (2015). Incumbency disadvantage under electoral rules with intraparty competition: Evidence from Japan. The Journal of Politics, 77(3), 874–887. https://doi.org/10.1086/681718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskaran, T., & Lopes da Fonseca, M. (2016). Electoral thresholds and political representation. Public Choice, 169(1), 117–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-016-0378-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bob-Milliar, G. M., & Bob-Milliar, G. K. (2010). The economy and intra-party competition: Presidential primaries in the New Patriotic Party of Ghana. African Review of Economics and Finance, 1(2), 51–71.
   Google Scholar
• Bonneau, C. W. (2005). Electoral verdicts. American Politics Research, 33(6), 818–841. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X04273414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles, J., & Marx, B. (2022). Turnover and accountability in Africa's Parliaments. NBER Working Paper 29766, CEPR DP 17047.
   Google Scholar
• Bwalya, J., & Maharaj, B. (2018). Not to the highest bidder: The failure of incumbency in the Zambian 2011 elections. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 36(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2017.1369014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, J. L., Engstrom, E. J., & Roberts, J. M. (2007). Candidate quality, the personal vote, and the incumbency advantage in congress. American Political Science Review, 101(2), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055407070311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheeseman, N. (2010). African elections as vehicles for change. Journal of Democracy, 21(4), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2010.0019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheeseman, N. (2015). Democracy in Africa: Successes, failures, and the struggle for political reform (Vol. 9). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheeseman, N., Lynch, G., & Willis, J. (2017). Ghana: The ebbing power of incumbency. Journal of Democracy, 28(2), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, S., & Landa, D. (2009). Do the advantages of incumbency advantage incumbents? The Journal of Politics, 71(4), 1481–1498. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609990223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyampo, R. E., & Graham, E. (2014). Constitutional hybridity and constitutionalism in Ghana. Africa, 6(2), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09744053.2014.916846
   Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, J., & Kern, H. L. (2008). Incumbency as a source of spillover effects in mixed electoral systems: Evidence from a regression-discontinuity design. Electoral Studies, 27(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2007.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holder, R., Loertscher, S., & Rohner, D. (2010). Inefficient policies and incumbency advantage. Journal of Public Economics, 94(9-10), 761–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichino, N., & Nathan, N. L. (2013). Do primaries improve electoral performance? Clientelism and intra-party conflict in Ghana. American Journal of Political Science, 57(2), 428–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00624.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. B., Petersheim, M. J., & Wasson, J. T. (2010). Divisive primaries and incumbent general election performance: prospects and costs in U.S. house races. American Politics Research, 38(5), 931–955. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X09345823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall, C., & Rekkas, M. (2012). Incumbency advantages in the Canadian parliament. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne D'économique, 45(4), 1560–1585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5982.2012.01739.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klašnja, M. (2015). Corruption and the incumbency disadvantage: Theory and evidence. Journal of Politics, 77(4), 928–942. https://doi.org/10.1086/682913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klašnja, M., & Titiunik, R. (2017). The incumbency curse: Weak parties, term limits, and unfulfilled accountability. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, J. (2008). Incumbent vulnerability and challenger entry in statewide elections. American Politics Research, 36(1), 108–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X07300908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M., & Stegmaier, M. (2008). The economic vote in transitional democracies. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 18(3), 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457280802227710
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, S. I. (2010). What accountability pressures do MPs in Africa face, and how do they respond? Evidence from Ghana. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 48(1), 117–142. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X09990243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, S. I., & Zhou, Y. (2009). Co-optation despite democratization in Ghana. In J. D. Barkan (Ed.), Legislative power in emerging African democracies (pp. 147–176). Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, B. (2014). Incumbency disadvantages in African politics? Regression discontinuity evidence from Zambian elections. SSRN.
   Google Scholar
• Molina, J. (2001). The electoral effect of underdevelopment: government turnover and its causes in Latin–American, Caribbean, and industrialized countries. Electoral Studies, 20(3), 427–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(00)00030-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opalo, K. O. (2017). Legislative independence and incumbent electoral advantage: Evidence from parliamentary elections in Kenya. SSRN, 2906382. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2906382
   Google Scholar
• Osei, A. (2013). Political parties in Ghana: agents of democracy? Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 31(4), 543–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2013.839227
   Google Scholar
• Posner, D. (2005). Institutions and ethnic politics in Africa. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2006). The incumbent in the living room: The rise of television and the incumbency advantage in U.S. House elections. The Journal of Politics, 68(3), 657–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00452.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sishuwa, S. (2011). Defying the incumbency theory: Explaining Sata's victory in 2011 Zambian Elections. http://democracyinafrica.org/defying-the-incumbency-theory.
   Google Scholar
• Uppal, Y. (2009). The disadvantaged incumbents: estimating incumbency effects in Indian state legislatures. Public Choice, 138(1-2), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9336-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Cranenburgh, O. (2011). Democracy promotion in Africa: The institutional context. Democratization, 18(2), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.553364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, N. (2007). The path from neopatrimonialism: Democracy and clientelism in Africa today.
   Google Scholar
• Whitfield, L. (2009). ‘Change for a better Ghana’: Party competition, institutionalization, and alternation in Ghana's 2008 elections. African Affairs, 108(433), 621-641. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adp056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar