1,252
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

‘All the places we were not supposed to go’: a case study of formative class and gender habitus in adventure climbing

References

  • Beedie, P. (2008). Legislators and interpreters: An examination of changes in philosophical interpretations of being a mountaineer. In M. McNamee (Ed.), Philosophy, risk and adventure sports (pp. 25–42). London: Routledge.
  • Bisson, C., & Luckner, J. (1996). Fun in learning: The pedagogical role of fun in adventure education. Perspectives. Journal of Experiential Education, 19(2), 108.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). Logic of practice. Oxford: Polity Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine domination. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Oxford: Polity Press.
  • Breivik, G. (1999). Sensation seeking in sport. Oslo: Norges idrettshogskole.
  • Breivik, G. (2008). The quest for excitement and the safe society. In M. McNamee (Ed.), Philosophy, risk and adventure sports (pp. 10–24). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Breivik, G. (2010). Trends in adventure sports in a post-modern society. Sport in Society, 13, 260–273. doi:10.1080/17430430903522970
  • Brown, D. (2006). Pierre Bourdieu's “masculine domination” thesis and the gendered body in sport and physical culture. Sociology of Sport Journal, 23, 162–188.
  • Brown, D. (2009). The big drum: The mutability of a sporting habitus: Mountaineering in Scotland as a case study. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 44, 315–330. doi:10.1177/1012690209343627
  • Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. London: Polity Press.
  • Crist, J. D., & Tanner, C. A. (2003). Interpretation/analysis methods in hermeneutic interpretive phenomenology. Nursing research, 52, 202–205.
  • Crossley, N. (2008). Social class. In M. Grenfell (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu key concepts (pp. 87–99). Durham: Acumen.
  • Dowling Naess, F. J. (1996). Life events and curriculum change: The life history of a Norwegian physical educator. European Physical Education Review, 2, 41–53. doi:10.1177/1356336X9600200105
  • Fletcher, R. (2008). Living on the edge: The appeal of risk sports for the professional middle class. Sociology of Sport Journal, 25, 310–330.
  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1983). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Tavistock.
  • Holland-Smith, D., & Olivier, S. (2013). ‘You don't understand us!’ An inside perspective on adventure climbing. Sport in Society, 16, 1091–1104. doi:10.1080/17430437.2013.790889
  • Howitt, K. (2004). ‘The code of practice for Scottish sport climbing’. The Scottish Mountaineer, 25, 13.
  • Humberstone, B. (2011). Embodiment and social and environmental action in nature-based sport: Spiritual spaces. Leisure Studies, 30, 495–4512. doi:10.1080/02614367.2011.602421
  • Jones, R. L., Armour, K. M., & Potrac, P. (2003). Constructing expert knowledge: A case study of a top-level professional soccer coach. Sport, Education and Society, 8, 213–229. doi:10.1080/13573320309254
  • Krais, B. (2006). Gender, sociological theory and Bourdieu's sociology of practice. Theory, Culture and Society, 23(6), 119–134. doi:10.1177/0263276406069778
  • Llewellyn, D. J., Sanchez, X., Asghar, A., & Jones, G. (2008). Self-efficacy, risk taking and performance in rock climbing. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 75–81. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.03.001
  • Lyng, S. (2005). ‘Edgework and the risk-taking experience’. In S. Lyng (Ed.), Edgework: The sociology of risk-taking (pp. 3–17). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • May, T. (2000). A future for critique? Positioning, belonging and reflexivity. European Journal of Social Theory, 3, 175–137. doi:10.11777/132684310022224741
  • McLeod, J. (2005). Feminist re-reading Bourdieu: Old debates and new questions about gender habitus and gender change. Theory and Research in Education, 3(11), 11–30. doi:10.1177/1477878505049832
  • McNamee, M. (2008). Philosophy, risk and adventure sports. London: Routledge.
  • McNay, L. (1999). Gender, habitus and the field: Pierre Bourdieu and the limits of reflexivity. Theory Culture Society, 16(1), 95–117. doi:10.1177/026327699016001007
  • Midol, N., & Broyer, G. (1995). Towards an anthropological analysis of new sport cultures: The case of whiz sports in France. Sociology of Sport Journal, 12, 204–212.
  • Miles, J. C., & Priest, S. (1990). Adventure education. State College, PA: Venture.
  • Mintel. (2000). Extreme sports, leisure intelligence. London: Mintel International Group.
  • Mortlock, C. (1984). Adventure alternative. Milnthorpe Cumbria England: Cicerone Press.
  • Mottier, V. (2002). Masculine domination. Gender and power in Bourdieu's writings. Feminist theory. London: SAGE.
  • Ohi, F. (2000). Are social classes still relevant to analyse sport groupings in “postmodern” society? An analysis referring to P. Bourdieu's theory. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 10, 146–155.
  • Relay, D. (1997). Feminist theory, habitus and social class: Disrupting notions of classlessness. Women's Studies International Forum, 20, 225–233.
  • Rinehart, R. E. (2000). ‘Emerging arriving sports: Alternative sports, inside and out. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Roberts, B. (2002). Biographical research. Buckingham and Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
  • Skeggs, B. (2004). Context and background: Pierre Bourdieu's analysis of class, gender and sexuality. The Sociological Review, 52(2), 19–33.
  • Sparkes, A. C. (1998). ‘Validity in qualitative enquiry and the problem with criteria’: ‘Implications for sport psychology’. The Sport Psychologist, 12, 63–86.
  • Tejada-Flores, L. (1978). ‘Games climbers play’. In K. Wilson (Ed.), Games climbers play (pp. 19–27). London: Diadem.
  • Thorpe, H. (2005). Jibbing the gender order: Females in the snowboarding culture. Sport in Society, 8(1), 76–100. doi:10.1080/1743043052000316632
  • Thorpe, H. (2009). Bourdieu, feminism and female physical culture: Gender reflexivity and the habitus-field complex. Sociology of Sport Journal, Human Kinetics, Inc., 26, 491–516.
  • Tufford, L., & Newman, P. (2010). Bracketing in qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work, 11, 80–96. doi:10.1177/1473325010368316
  • Van Manen, M. (1997). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London, ON: Althouse Press.
  • Warde, A. (2004). Practice and field: Revising Bourdieusian concepts (CRIC Discussion Paper No. 65). Manchester: University of Manchester.
  • West, A., & Allin, L. (2010). Chancing your arm: The meaning of risk in rock climbing. Sport in Society, 13, 234–248.
  • Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labour. Farnborough: Saxon House.
  • Zuckerman, M., & Kuhlman, M. (2000). Personality and risk-taking: Common biosocial factors. Journal of Personality, 6, 99–1029.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.