4,426
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Physical education in Tunisia: teachers' practical epistemology, students' positioning and gender issues

, &

References

  • Amade-Escot, C. (2005). The critical didactic incidents as a qualitative method of research to analyze the content taught. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 24(2), 127–148.
  • Amade-Escot, C. (2006). Student learning within the didactique tradition. In D. Kirk, M. O'Sullivan, & D. Macdonald (Eds.), The handbook of physical education (pp. 347–365). London: SAGE.
  • Amade-Escot, C., Elandoulsi, S., & Verscheure, I. (2012). Gender positioning as an analytical tool for the studying of learning in physical education didactics. Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research, Cádiz, 18–21 September.
  • Aubert, J. (2003). Représentations et conduites d'élèves de collège en gymnastique scolaire [Students' representations and performance in school gymnastics]. In C. Amade-Escot (Ed.), Didactique de l'éducation physique – Etat des recherches (pp. 309–323). Paris: Editions Revue EP.S., Recherches et Formation.
  • Barker, D., Quennerstedt, M., & Annerstedt, C. (2015). Learning through group work in physical education: A symbolic interactionistic approach. Sport, Education and Society, 20, 604–623. doi:10.1080/13573322.2014.962493
  • Bedhioufi, H. (2002). Attitudes et représentations liées aux pratiques sportives de la femme tunisienne. In B. Erraïs & M.C. Lanfranchi (Eds.), Femmes et sport dans les pays méditerranéens (pp. 272–277). Nice: AFSCM, European Council.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le sens pratique. Paris: Les éditions de Minuit.
  • Davisse, A., & Louveau C. (1998). Sports, école, société : la différence des sexes. Paris: L'Harmattan.
  • Elandoulsi, S. (2011). L’épistémologie pratique des professeurs : Effets de l’expérience et de l’expertise dans l'enseignement de l’Appui Tendu Renversé en mixité. Analyse comparée de 3 enseignants d’EPS en Tunisie ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Université Toulouse Le-Mirail, Toulouse.
  • Ennis, C. D. (1999). Creating a culturally relevant curriculum for disengaged girls. Sport, Education and Society, 4, 31–49. doi:10.1080/1357332990040103
  • Erraïs, B. (2002). Culture patriarcale méditerranéenne, corps féminin tabou et pratique sportive. In B. Erraïs & M. C. Lanfranchi (Dir.), Femmes et sport dans les pays méditerranéens (pp. 23–32). Nice: AFSCM, European Council.
  • Evans, J., Davies, B., & Penney, D. (1996). Teachers, teaching and the social construction of gender relations. Sport, Education and Society, 1, 165–185.
  • Flintoff, A., & Scraton, S. (2006). Girls and physical education. In D. Kirk, M. O'Sullivan, & D. Macdonald (Eds.), Handbook of research in physical education (pp. 767–783). London: SAGE.
  • Goirand, P. (1996). Evolution historique des objets techniques en gymnastique [Historical development of acrobatic gymnastics techniques]. In P. Goirand & J. Metzler (Eds.), Techniques sportives et culture scolaire: une histoire culturelle du sport [Sport techniques and school culture: a cultural history of sport] (pp. 99–144). Paris: Editions Revue EP.S.
  • Griffin, P. S. (1983) “Gymnastics is a girl's thing”: Student participation and interaction patterns in a middle school gymnastics unit. In T. Templin & J. K. Olson (Eds.), Teaching physical education (pp. 71–85). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1999). Positioning theory: moral contexts of intentional action. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Hennings, J., Wallhead, T. L., & Byra, M. (2010). A didactic analysis of student content learning during the reciprocal style of teaching. Journal on Teaching Physical Education, 29(3), 227–244.
  • Kirk, D. (2010). Physical education futures. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
  • Lachheb, M. (2008). L'idéaltype du corps dans l'enseignement de l'éducation physique tunisienne contemporaine. Education et Sociétés, 22(2), 145–159.
  • Larsson, H., Fagrell, B., & Redelius, K. (2009). Queering physical education. Between benevolence towards girls and a tribute to masculinity. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 14(1), 1–17. doi:10.1080/17408980701345832
  • Ligozat, F. (2011). The development of comparative didactics & joint action theory in the context of the French-speaking subject didactiques. Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research, Berlin, 13–16 September.
  • MJES (1990). Instructions Officielles de l’Education Physique et Sportive dans l'enseignement secondaire. Ministère de la Jeunesse, de l’Enfance et du Sport, Direction de l’Education Physique. Tunis: Centre de documentation et d'information.
  • Mauss, M. (1934). Les techniques du corps. In M. Mauss (Ed.), Sociologie et anthropologie (pp. 363–386). Paris: PUF.
  • Penney, D. (2002). Gender and physical education. Contemporary issues and future directions. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Quennerstedt, M. (2013). Practical epistemologies in physical education practice. Sport, Education and Society, 18, 311–333.
  • Quennerstedt, M., Annerstedt, C., Barker, D., Karlefors, I., Larsson, H., Redelius, K., & Ohman, M. (2014). What did they learn in school today? A method for exploring aspects of learning in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 20(2), 282–302. doi:10.1177/1356336X14524864
  • Quennerstedt, M., Öhman, J., & Öhman, M. (2011). Investigating learning in physical education – a transactional approach. Sport, Education and Society, 16, 159–177.
  • Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rovegno, I. (1995). Theoretical perspectives on knowledge and learning and a student teacher's pedagogical content knowledge of dividing and sequencing subject matter. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 14, 283–304.
  • Schubauer-Leoni, M. L. (1996). Etude du contrat didactique pour des élèves en difficulté en mathématiques. Problématique didactique et/ou psychosociale. In C. Raisky & M. Caillot (Eds.), Au-delà des didactiques le didactique: débats autour de concepts fédérateurs (pp. 159–189). Bruxelles: De Boeck, Perspectives en éducation.
  • Sensevy, G. (2007). Des catégories pour décrire et comprendre l'action didactique. In G. Sensevy & A. Mercier (Eds.), Agir ensemble. L’action didactique conjointe du professeur et des élèves (pp. 13–49). Rennes: Presses Universitaires.
  • Verscheure, I., & Amade-Escot, C. (2007). The gendered construction of physical education content as the result of the differentiated didactic contract. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 12(3), 245–272. doi:10.1080/17408980701610185
  • Wallhead, T., & O'Sullivan, M. (2007). A didactic analysis of content development during the peer teaching tasks of a sport education season. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 12(3), 225–243. doi:10.1080/17408980701610177
  • Ward, G., & Quennerstedt, M. (2015). Knowing in primary physical education in the UK: Negotiating movement culture. Sport, Education and Society, 20, 588–603. doi:10.1080/13573322.2014.975114
  • Whitson, D. (1994). The embodiment of gender: discipline, domination and empowerment. In S. Birrell & S. Cole (Eds.), Women, sport and culture (pp. 353–371). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Wright, J. (1997). The construction of gendered contexts in single sex end co-educational physical education lessons. Sport, Education and Society, 2, 55–72.
  • Zouabi, M. (2005). Sport and physical education in Tunisia. In U. Pühse & M. Gerber (Eds.), International comparison of physical education. Concepts, problems and prospects (pp. 673–685). Oxford: Meyer & Meyer Sport.