Teacher–student interaction, empathy and their influence on learning in swimming lessons

References

• Arnoldi, J. (2006). Autopoiesis. Theory, Culture and Society, 23(2–3), 116–117. doi:10.1177/026327640602300220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avila, L. T-G., Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Positive social comparative feedback enhances motor learning in children. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13, 849–853. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badami, R., Vaezmousavi, M., Wulf, G., & Namazizadeh, M. (2011). Feedback after good versus poor trials affect intrinsic motivation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82, 360–364. doi:10.1080/02701367.2011.10599765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, D. M., Barker-Ruchti, N., & Pühse, U. (2013). Constructive readings of interactive episodes: Examining ethics in physical education from a social constructionist perspective. Sport, Education and Society, 18, 511–526. doi:10.1080/13573322.2011.601290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, D., Quennerstedt, M., & Annerstedt, C. (2013). Inter-student interactions and student learning in health and physical education: A post-Vygotskian analysis. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/17408989.2013.868875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baerveldt, C., & Verheggen, T. (1999). Enactivism and the experiential reality of culture: Rethinking the epistemological basis of cultural psychology. Culture & Psychology, 5, 183–206. doi:10.1177/1354067X9952006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg, A. (2000). Enactivism: A personal interpretation. Retrieved from http://www.ioe.stir.ac.uk/docs/BeggEnactivism.doc
   Google Scholar
• Castañer, M., Camerino, O., Anguera, M. T., & Jonsson, G. K. (2013). Kinesics and proxemics communication of expert and novice PE teachers. Quality & Quantity, 47, 1813–1829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W. Y., & Cone, T. (2003). Links between children's use of critical thinking and an expert teacher's teaching in creative dance, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 22, 169–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clanet, J. (2002). Gestion et organisation de l’interaction maître-élèves. In P. Bressoux (Ed.), Les stratégies des enseignants en situation d’interaction [Management and organisation of teacher-students interaction] (Note de synthèse pour cognitique: Programme Ecole et Sciences cognitives) (pp. 77–108). Bordeaux: Institut de cognitique. Retrieved from http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/00/17/90/PDF/Bressoux.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Colombetti, G. (2014). The feeling body: Affective science meets the enactive mind. Boston, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, B. (2010). In search of profound empathy in learning relationships: Understanding the mathematics of moral learning environments. Journal of Moral Education, 39(1), 79–99. doi:10.1080/03057240903528717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, B. (2011). Empathy in education: Engagement, values and achievement. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2003). Why aren’t they getting this? Working through the regressive myths of constructivist pedagogy. Teaching Education, 14(2), 123–140. doi:10.1080/1047621032000092922
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2007). Complexity, science and education: Reconceptualizing the teacher's role in learning. Interchange, 38(1), 53–67. doi:10.1007/s10780-007-9012-5
   Google Scholar
• De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making an enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6, 485–507. doi:10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9
   Google Scholar
• De Jaegher, H., & Froese, T. (2009). On the role of social interaction in individual agency. Adaptive Behavior, 17, 444–460. doi:10.1177/1059712309343822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, J. T. (1990). The practice of questioning. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dumazeau, C., & Karsenty, L. (2008). Communications distantes en situation de travail : favoriser l’établissement d’un contexte mutuellement partagé [Remote communications at work: Towards a mutually shared context]. Travail Humain, 71, 225–252. doi:10.3917/th.713.0225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ensergueix, P. J., & Lafont, L. (2010). Reciprocal peer tutoring in a physical education setting: Influence of peer tutor training and gender on motor performance and self-efficacy outcomes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25, 222–242. doi:10.1007/s10212-009-0010-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T. J. (2001). Work knowing “On the Fly”: Enterprise cultures and co-emergent epistemology. Studies in Continuing Education, 23, 243–259. doi:10.1080/01580370120101993
   Google Scholar
• Fogel, A., & Garvey, A. (2007). Alive communication. Infant Behavior & Development, 30, 251–257. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2007.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrest, G. (2014). Questions and answers: Understanding the connections between questioning and knowledge in game-centred approaches. In R. L. Light, J. Quay, S. Harvey & A. Mooney (Eds.), Contemorary developments in games teaching (pp. 167–177). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gal-Petitfaux, N. (2000). Typicalité dans la signification et l’organisation de l’intervention des professeurs d’éducation physique et sportive en situation d’>enseignement de la natation sportive: le cas des situations de nage en “file indienne” [Typicality in the signification and the management of physical education teachers' interventions in swimming lessons] ( Doctoral dissertation). Université de Montpellier 1, Montpellier.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1972). Interactions ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Gouju, J.-L., Vermersch, P., & Bouthier, D. (2007). A psycho-phenomenological approach to sport psychology: The presence of the opponents in hurdle races. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 19, 173–186. doi:10.1080/10413200601185172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guérin, J., Riff, J., & Testevuide, S. (2004). Étude de l’activité située des collégiens en cours d’EPS: une opportunité pour examiner les conditions de validité des entretiens d’autoconfrontation [Study of situated activity of students in physical education lessons: An opportunity to examine the valid conditions of self-confrontations interview]. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 147, 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Holton, D. (2010, May). Embodied cognition and enactivism: Implications for constructivism and concaptual change. Paper presented at, Understanding Complex ecologies in a changing world: American Education Research Association Annual Conference, Denver, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, J., & Wilburn, D. (2005). The embodiment of learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37, 745–760. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2005.00154.x
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1962). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology (W. R. Boyce Gibson, Trans.). London: Collier, Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jowett, S., & Poczwardowski, A. (2007). Understanding the coach-athlete relationship. In S. Jowett & D. Lavallee (Eds.), Social psychology in sport (pp. 3–14). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Kopp, S., Tepper, P., & Cassell, J. (2004, October). Towards integrated microplanning of language and iconic gesture for multimodal output. Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI) 2004. Penn State University, State College, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-A. (2007). Third turn position in teacher talk: Contingency and the work of teaching. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 1204–1230. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. New York, NY: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Lémonie, Y., Gouju, J.-L., & David, B. (2007). Les interactions comme construction d’un espace d’intercompréhension partagée [Interactions as construction of a shared understanding. The case of teaching swimming]. Le cas de l’enseignement de la natation sportive. eJRIEPS, 11, 89–105.
   Google Scholar
• Light, R. (2010). A cross-cultural study on meaning and the nature of children's experiences in Australian and French swimming clubs. Asia-pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 1(3–4), 37–43. doi:10.1080/18377122.2010.9730336
   Google Scholar
• Light, R. L. (2013). Game sense: Pedagogy for performance, participation and enjoyment. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Light, R. L., Evans, J. R., Harvey, S., & Hassanin, R. (2015). Advances in rugby coaching: An holistic approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Light, R. L., Harvey, S., & Mouchet, A. (2014). Improving ‘at-action’ decision-making in team sports through a holistic coaching approach. Sport, Education and Society, 19, 258–275. doi:10.1080/13573322.2012.665803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, R. L., & Kentel,, J. A. (2013). Mushin: Learning in technique-intensive sport as uniting mind and body through complex learning theory. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/17408989.2013.868873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, R., & Wallian, N. (2008). A constructivist-informed approach to teaching swimming. Quest, 60, 387–404. doi:10.1080/00336297.2008.10483588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Losoya, S. H., & Eisenberg, N. (2003). Affective empathy. In J. A. Hall & F. J. Bernieri (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 21–43). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lyle, J. (2003). Stimulated recall: A report on its use in naturalistic research. British Educational Research Journal, 29, 861–878. doi:10.1080/0141192032000137349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston, MA: Shambhala.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, M. C., Fry, J. M., Wright, S. C., Tan, C. W. K., & Rossi, T. (2008). Structuring time and questioning to achieve tactical awareness in games lessons. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 13, 231–249. doi:10.1080/17408980701345766
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Mouchet, A. (2005). Subjectivity in the articulation between strategy and tactics in team sports: An example in rugby. Italian Journal of Sport Science, 12, 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Mouchet, A. (2014). Subjectivity as a resource for improving players’ decision making in team sport. In R. L. Light, J. Quay, S. Harvey, & A. Mooney (Eds.), Contemporary developments in games teaching (pp. 149–166). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nicaise, V., & Cogérino, G. (2008). Les feedback émis par l’enseignant(e) d’EPS et perçus par les élèves: Quelle similarité? [Teacher's feed-back and students' perception. What similarity?] Staps, 81(3), 35–53. doi:10.3917/sta.081.0035
   Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petitmengin, C. (2006). Describing one's subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 5, 229–269. doi:10.1007/s11097-006-9022
   Google Scholar
• Poizat, G., Seve, C., & Rossard, C. (2006). Influencing opponent's judgments during competitive interactions: An example in table tennis. European Review of Applied Psychology/Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee, 56, 167–178. doi:10.1016/j.erap.2005.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poizat, G., Seve, C., Serres, G., & Saury, J. (2008). Analysis of contextual information sharing in two types of sport interaction cooperative and competitive. Travail Humain, 71, 323–357. doi:10.3917/th.714.0323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prain, V., & Hickey, C. (1995). Using discourse analysis to change physical education. Quest, 47(1), 76–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2002). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning. In S. Hutchinson, B. Moon, & A. S. Mayes (Eds.), Teaching, learning and the curriculum in secondary schools: A reader (pp. 38–45). London and New York: The Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, T. (2002). The public availability of actions and artefacts. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 299–316. doi:10.1023/A:1021214827446
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Salembier, P., & Zouinar, M. (2004). Intelligibilité mutuelle et contexte partagé. Inspirations conceptuelles et réductions technologiques. @ctivités, 1(2), 64–85. Retrieved from http://www.activites.org/v1n2/salembier.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Samurçay, R., & Rabardel, P. (2004). Modèles pour l’analyse de l’activité et des compétences, propositions [Models for analysing activity and competency: Proposals]. In R. Samurçay & P. Pastré (Eds.), Recherches en didactique professionnelle [Research in professional didactics] (pp. 163–180). Toulouse: Octares.
   Google Scholar
• Schütz, A. (1998). Éléments de sociologie phénoménologique [Elements of phenomenological sociology]. Paris: L'Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe, T. S., Hawkins, A. H., & Lounsberry, M. (1998). Using technology to study human interaction: Practice and implications of a sequential behavior approach. Quest, 50, 389–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, H. (2014). Mathematical interaction shaped by communication, epistemological constraints and enactions. ZDM Mathematics Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0629-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, K. J., Kantak, S. S, & Burtner, P. A. (2008). Motor learning in children: Feedback effects on skill acquisition. Physical Therapy, 88, 720–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudel, P., Haughian, L., & Wade, G. (1996). L’utilisation de la technique de rappel stimulé pour mieux comprendre le processus d’intervention de l'entraîneur en sport [The use of stimulated recall interview to understand the processes of intervention of trainers in sport]. Revue des sciences de l'éducation, XXII, 503–522.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Maren, J.-M. (1996). Méthodes de recherches pour l'éducation [Methods of research in education]. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
   Google Scholar
• Van Vliet, P. M., & Wulf, G. (2006). Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: What is the evidence? Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 831–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Varvey, J. (2009). From hermeneutics to the translation classroom: Current perspective on effective learning. Translation and Interpreting, 1(1), 27–43.
   Google Scholar
• Vermersch, P. (1994). L’entretien d’explicitation [The explicitation interview]. Paris: ESF Editeur.
   Google Scholar
• Vermersch, P. (1999). Pour une psychologie phénoménologique [Toward a phenomenological psychology]. Psychologie Française, 44(1), 7–18.
   Google Scholar
• Vollemeyer, R., & Rheinberg, F. (2005). A surprising effect of feedback on learning. Learning and Instruction, 15, 589–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Glasersfled, E. (1998). Why constructivism must be radical. In M. Larochelle, N. Bednarz, & J. Garrison (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 23–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S., Grenier, M., & Seaman, J. (2010). An interdisciplinary view and analysis of “constructivism” in kinesiology. Quest, 62, 202–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, J., & Forrest, G. (2007). A social semiotic analysis of knowledge construction and games centred approaches to teaching. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 12, 273–287. doi:10.1080/17408980701610201
   Google Scholar