949
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The (in)visibility of gender knowledge in the Physical Activity and Sport Science degree in Spain

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 324-338 | Received 08 Oct 2015, Accepted 05 Jun 2016, Published online: 27 Jun 2016

References

  • Alfaro, É, & Vázquez, B. (2007). La formación con perspectiva de género en los estudios de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte. Paper presented at the Seminario ‘Mujer y Deporte’, Madrid.
  • Amsterdam, N., Knoppers, A., Claringbould, I., & Jongmans, M. (2012). ‘It’s just the way it is … ’ or not? How physical education teachers categorise and normalise differences. Gender and Education, 24(7), 783–798. doi:10.1080/09540253.2012.677013.
  • ANECA. (2005). Libro Blanco título de grado en Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte [White book in physical activity and sport science degree]. Madrid: Author.
  • ANECA. (2012). Guía de apoyo para la elaboración de la memoria de verificación de títulos oficiales universitarios [Guideline for developing the official university titles report]. Madrid: Author.
  • Anguita, R. (2011). El reto de la formación del profesorado para la igualdad [Teachers’ challenges education for equality]. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 14(1), 43–51. Retrieved from www.aufop.com.
  • Aristizabal, P., & Vizcarra, M. T. (2012). Llustration of gender stereotypes in the initial stages of teacher training education. Education, 2(7), 347–355. doi:10.5923/j.edu.20120207.19.
  • Arnot, M. (1982). Male hegemony, social class and women’s education. Journal of Education, 164(1), 64–89. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/42772889. doi: 10.1177/002205748216400106
  • Arnot, M. (2002). The complex gendering of invisible pedagogies: Social reproduction or empowerment? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(4), 583–593. doi:10.1080/0142569022000038431.
  • Arreman, I. E., & Weiner, G. (2007). Gender, research and change in teacher education: A Swedish dimension. Gender and Education, 19(3), 317–337. doi:10.1080/09540250701295478.
  • Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. London: Routledge.
  • Bernstein, B. (1990). The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London: Routledge.
  • Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique. Boston: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Buitendijk, S., & Maes, K. (2015). Gendered research and innovation. Retrieved from www.leru.org.
  • David, M. (2014). Feminism, gender and universities: Politics, passion and pedagogies. Farnham: Ashgate.
  • Davies, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword. A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67–85. doi:10.1177/1464700108086364.
  • Delamont, S. (2014). The heavy shadow? Bernstein and his legacy. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35(3), 469–474. doi:10.1080/01425692.2014.893073.
  • Department for Education. (2015). Carter review of initial teacher training. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/carter-review-of-initial-teacher-training.
  • Dewar, A. (1990). Oppression and privilege in physical education: Struggles in the negotiation of gender in a university programme. In D. Kirk & R. Tinning (Eds.), Physical education, curriculum and culture (pp. 67–99). London: Falmer Press.
  • Donoso, T., & Velasco, A. (2013). Por qué una propuesta de formación en perspectiva de género en el ámbito universitario? [Why a proposal for gender training at university?]. Profesorado. Revista de curriculum y formación del profesorado, 17(1), 71–88. Retrieved from http://www.ugr.es/~recfpro/rev171ART5.pdf.
  • Dowling, F. (2008). Getting in touch with our feelings: The emotional geographies of gender relations in PETE. Sport, Education and Society, 13(3), 247–266. doi:10.1080/13573320802200560.
  • Dowling, F. (2011). Are the PE teacher identities fit for postmodern schools or are they clinging to modernist notions of professionalism? A case study of Norwegian PE teacher students emerging professional identities. Sport, Education and Society, 16(2), 201–222. doi:10.1080/13573322.2011.540425.
  • Dowling, F. (2013). Teacher educator’s gendered workplace tales. In G. Pfister & M. K. Sisjord (Eds.), Gender and sport. Changes and challenges (pp. 217–231). Münster: Waxmann.
  • Enright, E., & O’Sullivan, M. (2010). Can I do it in my pyjamas? Negotiating a physical education curriculum with teenage girls. European Physical Education Review, 16(3), 203–222. doi:10.1177/1356336X10382967.
  • Equal Opportunities Commission. (1989). Formal investigation report: Initial teacher education in England and Wales. Manchester: Author.
  • Evans, J., & Davies, B. (2014). Physical education PLC: Neoliberalism, curriculum and governance. New directions for PESP research. Sport, Education and Society, 19(7), 869–884. doi:10.1080/13573322.2013.850072.
  • Flintoff, A. (1993). Gender, physical education and initial teacher education. In J. Evans (Eds.), Equality, education and physical education (pp. 184–204). London: Falmer.
  • Flintoff, A., & Fitzgerald, H. (2012). Theorizing difference and in(equality) in physical education, youth sport and health. In F. Dowling, H. Fitzgerald, & A. Flintoff (Eds.), Equity and difference in physical education, youth sport and health: A narrative approach (pp. 11–36). London: Routledge.
  • Francis, B. (2006). The nature of gender. In C. Skelton, B. Francis, & L. Smulyan (Eds.), The sage handbook of gender and education (pp. 7–17). London: Sage.
  • Gore, J. (1993). The struggle for pedagogies: Critical and feminist discourses as regimes of truth. London: Routledge.
  • Gorely, T., Holroyd, R., & Kirk, D. (2003). Muscularity, the habitus and the social construction of gender: Towards a gender-relevant physical education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(4), 429–448. doi:10.1080/0142569032000109350.
  • Hay, P. J., & Macdonald, D. (2010). The gendering of abilities in senior PE. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 15(3), 271–285. doi:10.1080/17408980903150147.
  • Kårhus, S. (2010). Physical education teacher education on the education market – who’s defining what physical education teachers need to know? Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 15(3), 227–241. doi:10.1080/17408980903150139.
  • Kårhus, S. (2012). Providers, consumers and the horizons of the possible: A case study of marketization and physical education teacher education pedagogical discouse. Sport, Education and Society, 17(2), 245–259. doi:10.1080/13573322.2011.607953.
  • Kirk, D., & Macdonald, D. (2001). The social construction of PETE in higher education: Toward a research agenda. Quest, 53, 440–456. doi:10.1080/00336297.2001.10491757.
  • Macdonald, D., Kirk, D., & Braiuka, S. (1999). The social construction of the physical activity field at the school/university interface. European Physical Education Review, 5(1), 31–52. doi:10.1177/1356336×990051003.
  • Maguire, M. (2006). Gender, education and development. In C. Skelton, B. Francis, & L. Smulyan (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of gender and education (pp. 93–108). London: Sage.
  • Márcia, A., Soler, S., Costes, A., & Lavega, P. (2013). Está bolonia en Cataluña? Configuración y desarrollo del nuevo plan de estudios en CAFyD en el INEFC: un estudio de caso [Is ‘bologna’ in Cataluña? Configuration and development of the new curriculum in the physical activity and sport sciences degree at the INEFC: A case study]. Ágora para la EF y el Deporte, 15(2), 96–112. Retrieved from http://agora-revista.blogs.uva.es/files/2013/11/agora_15_2b_marcia_et_al.pdf.
  • Oliver, K., & Kirk, D. (2014). Towards an activist approach to research and advocacy for girls and physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, doi:10.1080/17408989.2014.895803.
  • Organic Law. (3/2007, March 22). Effective Equality between men and women, BOE 71 § 6115 (2007).
  • Organic Law. (4/2007, April 12). Universities, BOE 89 § 7786 (2007).
  • Paechter, C. (2000). Changing school subjects: Power, gender and curriculum. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Penney, D., & Evans, J. (1999). Politics, policy and practice in physical education. London: Routledge.
  • Pezzi, P., López, I., Marchant, A., Méndez, M. T., Ramos, E. M., Ruiz, M. B., & Ybáñez, P. (2011). Universidad y feminismo: la integración transversal de los estudios de género en las prácticas docentes en Humanidades. Paper presented at the I Congreso Internacional Educación para la igualdad: Género y Sexualidades, Granada.
  • Pfister, G. (2010). Women in sport – gender relations and future perspectives. Sport in Society, 13(2), 234–248. doi:10.1080/17430430903522954.
  • Prat, M., & Flintoff, A. (2012). Taking the pulse of gender equity: A case study of physical education teacher education. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 15(3), 69–83. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=217026228001.
  • Scraton, S. (2013). Feminism and physical education: Does gender still matter? In G. Pfister & M. K. Sisjord (Eds.), Gender and sport. Changes and challenges (pp. 199–216). Münster: Waxmann Verlag GmbH.
  • Scraton, S., & Flintoff, A. (2013). Gender, feminist theory, and sport. In D. L. Andrews & B. Carrington (Eds.), A companion to sport (pp. 96–111). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Singh, P. (2002). Pedagogising knowledge: Bernstein’s theory of the pedagogic device. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(4), 571–582. doi:10.1080/0142569022000038422.
  • Skelton, C., Francis, B., & Smulyan, L. (2006). The sage handbook of gender and education. London: Sage.
  • Soler, S. (2009). Reproduction, resistance and change processes of traditional gender relationships in physical education: The case of football. Cultura y Educación, 21(1), 31–42. doi:10.1174/113564009787531253.
  • Svendsen, A. M., & Svendsen, J. T. (2014). Teacher or coach? How logics from the field of sports contribute to the construction of knowledge in physical education teacher education pedagogical discourse through educational texts. Sport. Education and Society, doi:10.1080/13573322.2014.956713.
  • Tomás, M. (2012). Conflictos en las universidades por razones de planes de estudios nuevos [Conflicts in universities for reasons of planned new studies]. In A. de la Herrán & J. Paredes (Eds.), Promover el cambio pedagógico en la universidad (pp. 151–168). España: Pirámide.
  • Van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Vertinsky, P. A. (1992). Reclaiming space, revisioning the body: The quest for gender-sensitive physical education. Quest, 44(3), 373–396. doi:10.1080/00336297.1992.10484063.
  • Webb, L., & Macdonald, D. (2007). Techniques of power in physical education and the underrepresentation of women in leadership. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 26(3), 279–297. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=s3h&AN=25732278&site=ehost-live&scope=site. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.26.3.279
  • Weiner, G. (2000). A critical review of gender and teacher education in Europe. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 8(2), 233–247. doi:10.1080/14681360000200091.
  • Whatman, S., & Singh, P. (2013). Constructing health and physical education curriculum for indigenous girls in a remote Australian community. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, doi:10.1080/1748989.2013.868874.
  • With-Nielsen, N., & Pfister, G. (2011). Gender constructions and negotiations in physical education: Case studies. Sport, Education and Society, 16(5), 645–664. doi:10.1080/13573322.2011.601145.
  • Wright, J. (2002). Physical education teacher education: Sites of progress or resistance. In D. Penney (Eds.), Gender and physical education. Contemporary issues and future directions (pp. 190–207). London: Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.