3,833
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The glocalization of physical education assessment discourse

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1-16 | Received 08 May 2021, Accepted 10 Aug 2021, Published online: 06 Sep 2021

References

  • AIESEP. (2020). The AIESEP position statement on physical education assessment. Retrieved June 30, 2021, from https://aiesep.org/scientific-meetings/position-statements/
  • Annerstedt, C., & Larsson, S. (2010). ‘I have my own picture of what the demands are … ’: Grading in Swedish PEH – problems of validity, comparability and fairness. European Physical Education Review, 16(2), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X10381299
  • Are Trippestad, T. (2015). The glocal teacher: The paradox agency of teaching in a glocalized world. Policy Futures in Education, 14(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210315612643
  • Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093022000043065
  • Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., Braun, A., Perryman, J., & Hoskins, K. (2012). Assessment technologies in schools: ‘deliverology’ and the ‘play of dominations’. Research Papers in Education, 27(5), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2010.550012
  • Barker, D. (2019). In defence of white privilege: Physical education teachers’ understandings of their work in culturally diverse schools. Sport, Education and Society, 24(2), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2017.1344123
  • Borghouts, L. B., Slingerland, M., & Haerens, L. (2017). Assessment quality and practices in secondary PE in the Netherlands. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 22(5), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2016.1241226
  • Brooks, J. S., & Normore, A. H. (2010). Educational leadership and globalization: Literacy for a glocal perspective. Educational Policy, 24(1), 52–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904809354070
  • Carlgren, I. (2016). Skuggan. Undervisning och läroplanens janusansikte [The shadow. Teaching and the Janus face of the curriculum.] Skola och Samhälle. Retrieved March 24, 2021, from www.skolaochsamhälle.se.
  • Dewey, J. (1997). Experience and education. Touchstone. (Original work published 1938)
  • Dinan-Thompson, M., & Penney, D. (2015). Assessment literacy in primary physical education. European Physical Education Review, 21(4), 485–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X15584087
  • Dyson, B. (2014). Quality physical education: A commentary on effective physical education teaching. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 85(2), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2014.904155
  • El Bouhali, C. (2015). The OECD neoliberal governance: Policies of international testing and their impact on global education systems. In A. Abdi, L. Schultz, & T. Pillay (Eds.), Decolonizing global citizenship education (pp. 119–129). Brill Sense.
  • Engel, L. C., & Rutkowski, D. (2020). Pay to play: What does PISA participation cost in the US? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 41(3), 484–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2018.1503591
  • Englund, T. (2007). Om relevansen av begreppet didaktik [On the relevance of didactics.]. Acta Didactica Norge, 1(1), 02–10. https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.1013
  • Exley, S., Braun, A., & Ball, S. (2011). Global education policy: Networks and flows. Critical Studies in Education, 52(3), 213–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2011.604079
  • Forsberg, E. (2014). Utbildningens bedömningskulturer i granskningens tidevarv [Education assessment cultures in the audit era.]. Utbildning & Demokrati–Tidskrift för Didaktik och Utbildningspolitik, 23(3), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.48059/uod.v23i3.1024
  • Gray, J., O’Regan, J. P., & Wallace, C. (2018). Education and the discourse of global neoliberalism. Language and Intercultural Communication, 18(5), 471–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2018.1501842
  • Gundem, B. B. (2011). Europeisk didaktikk. Tenkning og viten [European didactics. Thinking and knowing.] Universitetsforlaget.
  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
  • Hay, P. J., & Penney, D. (2013). Assessment in physical education. A sociocultural perspective. Routledge.
  • Hopmann, S. (2007). Restrained teaching: The common core of didaktik. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2007.6.2.109
  • Hudson, B. (2002). Holding complexity and searching for meaning: Teaching as reflective practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270110086975
  • Hursh, D. (2007). Assessing no child left behind and the rise of neoliberal education policies. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 493–518. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207306764
  • Lewis, S., Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2016). PISA for schools: Topological rationality and new spaces of the OECD’s global educational governance. Comparative Education Review, 60(1), 27–57. https://doi.org/10.1086/684458
  • Lingard, B. (2021a). The changing and complex entanglements of research and policy making in education: Issues for environmental and sustainability education. Environmental Education Research, 27(4), 498–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1752625
  • Lingard, B. (2021b). Multiple temporalities in critical policy sociology in education. Critical Studies in Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2021.1895856
  • Lipman, P. (2004). High stakes education: Inequality, globalization, and urban school reform. Routledge Falmer.
  • López-Pastor, V. M., Kirk, D., Lorente-Catalán, E., MacPhail, A., & Macdonald, D. (2013). Alternative assessment in physical education: A review of international literature. Sport, Education and Society, 18(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2012.713860
  • Lorente-Catalán, E., & Kirk, D. (2016). Student teachers’ understanding and application of assessment for learning during a physical education teacher education course. European Physical Education Review, 22(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X15590352
  • Lundgren, U. P. (1972). Frame factors and the teaching process. A contribution to curriculum theory and theory on teaching. Almqvist & Wiksell.
  • Lundgren, U. P. (2015). When curriculum theory came to Sweden. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2015(1), 27000. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.27000
  • Macdonald, D. (2011). Like a fish in water: Physical education policy and practice in the era of neoliberal globalization. Quest (Grand Rapids, Mich ), 63(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2011.10483661
  • MacPhail, A., & Halbert, J. (2010). ‘We had to do intelligent thinking during recent PE’: Students’ and teachers’ experiences of assessment for learning in post-primary physical education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(1), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903565412
  • Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography – describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132516
  • Miller, T. (1993). The well-tempered self: Citizenship, culture and the postmodern subject. John Hopkins University Press.
  • OECD. (2021). Skills beyond school. Retrieved June 28, 2021, from https://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/ definitionandselectionofcompetenciesdeseco.htm
  • Öhman, J. (2014). Om didaktikens möjligheter – ett pragmatiskt perspektiv [The possibilities of didactics – a pragmatist perspective.]. Utbildning & Demokrati, 23(3), 33–52.
  • Penney, D., Brooker, R., Hay, P. J., & Gillespie, L. (2009). Curriculum, pedagogy and assessment: Three message systems of schooling and dimensions of quality physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 14(4), 421–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573320903217125
  • Piaget, J. (1980). The psychogenesis of knowledge and its epistemological significance. In M. Piatelli-Palmarini (Ed.), Language and learning (pp. 23–34). Harvard University Press.
  • Pike, G. (2015). Re-imagining global education in the neoliberal age: Challenges and opportunities. In R. Reinolds, J. Bradbery, J. Brown, K. Carroll, D. Donnelly, K. Ferguson-Patrick, & S. Macqueen (Eds.), Contesting and constructing international perspectives in global education (pp. 9–25). Brill Sense.
  • Quennerstedt, M. (2019). Physical education and the art of teaching: Transformative learning and teaching in physical education and sports pedagogy. Sport, Education and Society, 24(6), 611–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2019.1574731
  • Quennerstedt, M., & Larsson, H. (2015). Learning movement cultures in physical education practice. Sport, Education and Society, 20(5), 565–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2014.994490
  • Redelius, K., & Hay, P. J. (2012). Student views on criterion-referenced assessment and grading in Swedish physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 17(2), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2010.548064
  • Redelius, K., Quennerstedt, M., & Öhman, M. (2015). Communicating aims and learning goals in physical education: Part of a subject for learning? Sport, Education and Society, 20(5), 641–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2014.987745
  • Rink, J., & Mitchell, M. (2002). High stakes assessment: A journey into unknown territory. Quest (Grand Rapids, Mich ), 54(3), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2002.10491775
  • Rizvi, F. (2017). Globalization and the neoliberal imaginary of educational reform. Education research and foresight: Working papers.
  • Robertson, R. (1995). Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernities (pp. 25–44). Sage.
  • Rutkowski, D. (2015). The OECD and the local: PISA-based test for schools in the USA. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5), 683–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.943157
  • Rutkowski, D., Thompson, G., and Rutkowski, L. (2020). Understanding the policy influence of international large-scale assessments in education. In H. Wagemaker (Ed.), Reliability and validity of international large-scale assessment (pp. 261–279). IEA Research for Education, Springer E-book. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53081-5
  • Sivesind, K. (2013). Mixed images and merging semantics in European curricula. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(1), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.757807
  • Spord-Borgen, J., & Hjardemaal, F. R. (2017). From general transfer to deep learning as argument for practical aesthetic school subjects? Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 3(3), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2017.1352439
  • Spring, J. (2008). Research on globalization and education. Review of Educational Research, 78(2), 330–363. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308317846
  • Stromquist, N. P., & Monkman, K. (2014). Globalization and education: Integration and contestation across cultures. Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Sundberg, D., & Wahlström, N. (2012). Standards-based curricula in a denationalised conception of education: The case of Sweden. European Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 342–356. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.3.342
  • Svennberg, L., Meckbach, J., & Redelius, K. (2014). Exploring PE teachers’‘gut feelings’. An attempt to verbalize and discuss teachers’ internalised grading criteria. European Physical Education Review, 20(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X13517437
  • Swedish National Agency for Education. (2011). The national curriculum for compulsory school. Norstedts.
  • Thorburn, M. (2007). Achieving conceptual and curriculum coherence in high-stakes school examinations in physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 12(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980701282076
  • Tolgfors, B. (2018). Different versions of assessment for learning in the subject of physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(3), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1429589
  • Tolgfors, B., & Öhman, M. (2016). The implications of assessment for learning in physical education and health. European Physical Education Review, 22(2), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X15595006
  • Torrance, H. (2011). Using assessment to drive the reform of schooling: Time to stop pursuing the chimera? British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(4), 459–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2011.620944
  • Torrance, H. (2012). Formative assessment at the crossroads: Conformative, deformative and transformative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 38(3), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.689693
  • Torrance, H. (2017). Blaming the victim: Assessment, examinations, and the responsibilisation of students and teachers in neo-liberal governance. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 38(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.1104854
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (2012). Thought and language. MIT Press. (Original work published 1986)
  • Wahlström, N. (2016). A third wave of European education policy: Transnational and national conceptions of knowledge in Swedish curricula. European Educational Research Journal, 15(3), 298–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116643329
  • Weber, E. (2007). Globalization, “glocal” development, and teachers’ work: A research agenda. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 279–309. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430303946
  • Westbury, I. (2000). Teaching as a reflective practice: What might didaktik teach curriculum? In I. Westbury, S. Hopman, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice. The German didaktik tradition (pp. 15–39). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001