Future Directions in Urban Design as Public Policy: Reassessing Best Practice Principles for Design Review and Development Management

References

• Adams, D., and S. Tiesdell. 2010. “Planners as Market Actors: Rethinking State–Market Relations in Land and Property.” Planning Theory & Practice 11 (2): 187–207. doi:10.1080/14649351003759631.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, D., S. Tiesdell, and J. T. White. 2013. “Smart Parcelization and Place Diversity: Reconciling Real Estate and Urban Design Priorities.” Journal of Urban Design 18 (4): 459–477. doi:10.1080/13574809.2013.824367.
   Google Scholar
• Architecture and Design Scotland. 2014. Design Skills Symposium 2014. Edinburgh: Architecture and Design Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• ASLA. 2011. “2011 ASLA Professional Awards.” ASLA. Accessed 19th August 2014. http://www.asla.org/2011awards/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, J. 1974. Urban Design as Public Policy: Practical Methods for Improving Cities. New York: Architectural Record.
   Google Scholar
• Barth, J. R. 2009. The Rise and Fall of the U.S. Mortgage and Credit Markets: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Meltdown. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, P. 2014. “Flood Crisis: Dredging is a Simplistic Response to a Complex Problem.” The Guardian. Accessed 12th February 2014. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/feb/12/flood-crisis-dredging-climate-change.
   Google Scholar
• Bentley, I. 1990. “Ecological Urban Design.” Architects' Journal 192 (24): 69–71.
   Google Scholar
• Bentley, I., A. Alcock, P. Murrain, S. McGlynn, and G. Smith. 1985. Responsive Environments: A Manual for Designers. Oxford: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berelowitz, L. 2005. Dream City: Vancouver and the Global Imagination. Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre.
   Google Scholar
• Blaesser, B. W. 1994. “The Abuse of Discretionary Power.” In Design Review: Challenging Urban Aesthetic Control, edited by B. C. Scheer and W. F. E. Preiser. New York: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, S., and M. Thompson-Fawcett. 2007. “Public Participation and New Urbanism: A Conflicting Agenda?” Planning Theory & Practice 8 (4): 449–472. doi:10.1080/14649350701664689.
   Google Scholar
• CABE. 2010. Large Scale Urban Design: Getting the Big Picture Right. London: Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, M. 2009. “Design Coding and the Creative, Market and Regulatory Tyrannies of Practice.” Urban Studies 46 (12): 2643–2667. doi:10.1177/0042098009344226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona, M. 2014. “The Place-shaping Continuum: A Theory of Urban Design Process.” Journal of Urban Design 19 (1): 2–36. doi:10.1080/13574809.2013.854695.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, M., C. De Magalhães, and M. Edwards. 2002. “Stakeholder Views on Value and Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design 7 (2): 145–169. doi:10.1080/1357480022000012212.
   Google Scholar
• City of Chicago. 2008. Adding Green to Urban Design: A City for Us and Future Generations. Chicago: City of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• City of Toronto. 2009. Toronto Green Roof Construction Standard: Supplementary Gudielines. Toronto: City of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Condon, P. 2008. Design Charrettes for Sustainable Communities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, T., and D. Adams. 2012. Places Need Leaders. Edinburgh: Architecture and Design Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• DCLG. 2006. Code for Sustainable Homes. London: DCLG.
   Google Scholar
• DCLG. 2014. Next Steps to Zero Carbon Homes – Allowable Solutions. Government Response and Summary of Responses to Consultation. London: DCLG.
   Google Scholar
• DCLG. 2014a. “Giving Communities More Power in Planning Local Development.” DCLG. Accessed 15th August 2014. https://www.gov.uk/government/policies/giving-communities-more-power-in-planning-local-development/supporting-pages/neighbourhood-planning.
   Google Scholar
• DEFRA. 2014. “Sustainable Drainage Newsletter, July 2014.” DEFRA. Accessed 13th August 2014. http://www.susdrain.org/files/News/defra_july_suds_newsletter.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ellin, N. 2006. Integral Urbanism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Farr, D. 2008. Sustainable Urbanism: Urban Design with Nature. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Felson, A. J. 2013. “The Design Process as a Framework for Collaboration between Ecologists and Designers.” In Resilience in Ecology and Urban Design: Linking Theory and Practice for Sustainable Cities, edited by S. T. A. Pickett, et al. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, J. 2006. Planning the Good Community: New Urbanism in Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, J. L. 2009. “Experiential Planning: A Practitioner's Account of Vancouver's Success.” Journal of the American Planning Association 75 (3): 358–370. doi:10.1080/01944360902965875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hack, G., and L. Sagalyn. 2011. “Value Creation through Urban Design.” In Urban Design in the Real Estate Development Process, edited by S. Tiesdell and D. Adams. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, A. 1996. Design Control: Towards a New Approach. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1997. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hester, R. 2008. Design for Ecological Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hurricane Sandy Rebuilding Task Force. 2013. “What is Rebuild by Design?” Hurricane Sandy Rebuilding Task Force. Accessed 19th October 2014. http://www.rebuildbydesign.org/what-is-rebuild-by-design/.
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, T. 2004. “Post-industrialism, Post-modernism and the Reproduction of Vancouver's Central Area: Retheorising the 21st-century City.” Urban Studies 41 (10): 1953–1982. doi:10.1080/0042098042000256332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, A. 2005. “SuDS—Innovation Or a Tried and Tested Practice?.” Proceedings of the ICE - Municipal Engineer 158 (2): 115–122. doi:10.1680/muen.2005.158.2.115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., and R. V. George. 2002. “Fallacious Argumentation in Design Review.” Urban Design International, 7: 83–95. doi:10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000070.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, R. T. 1988. Law in Urban Design and Planning: The Invisible Web. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
   Google Scholar
• Landscape Institute. 2014. “Open Letter with Regard Water Management in England and Wales.” Landscape Institute. Accessed 18th May 2014. http://www.landscapeinstitute.org/PDF/LettertoPrimeMinisterFeb14.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, U., and J. Laidley. 2008. “Old Mega-projects Newly Packaged? Waterfront Redevelopment in Toronto.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 (4): 786–803. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00830.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Local Government Association. 2012. “Practical Ways to Engage with Your Community.” Local Government Association. Accessed 23rd June 2014. http://www.local.gov.uk/localism-act/-/journal_content/56/10180/3510950/ARTICLE.
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., and L. Pratchett. 2012. “Local Governance under the Coalition Government: Austerity, Localism and the ‘Big Society’.” Local Government Studies 38 (1): 21–40. doi:10.1080/03003930.2011.642949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A. 2006. “Roles and Challenges of Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design 11 (2): 173–193. doi:10.1080/13574800600644035.
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, J. 2014. “‘Worse than Useless’: Flood-affected Locals on the Somerset Levels Blame Plight on Environmental Agency.” The Independent. Accessed 4th February 2014. http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/nature/worse-than-useless-floodaffected-locals-on-the-somerset-levels-blame-plight-on-environmental-agency-9107642.html.
   Google Scholar
• Metro Vancouver. 2011. Metro Vancouver 2040: Shaping Our Future: Regional Growth Strategy Bylaw Number 1136, 2010. Burnaby, BC: Metro Vancouver.
   Google Scholar
• Nasar, J. L., and P. Grannis. 1999. “Design Review Reviewed: Administrative versus Discretionary Methods.” Journal of the American Planning Association 65 (4): 424–433. doi:10.1080/01944369908976072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCE. 2014. “Delays Dog Sustainable Drainage Standards.” New Civil Engineer. Accessed 10th January 2014. http://www.nce.co.uk/news/water/delays-dog-sustainable-drainage-standards/8657472.article.
   Google Scholar
• NCI. 2011. “The National Charrette System™.” NCI. Accessed 10th June 2014 http://www.charretteinstitute.org/charrette.html.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, P., T. Beatley, and H. Boyer, eds. 2009. Resilient Cities: Responding to Peak Oil and Climate Change. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, H. 2014. “Poor Doors: The Segregation of London's Inner-city Flat Dwellers.” The Guardian. Accessed 25th July 2014. http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/jul/25/poor-doors-segregation-london-flats.
   Google Scholar
• Palazzo, D., and F. Steiner. 2011. Urban Ecological Design: A Process for Regenerative Places. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, M., M. Ball, N. Blake, and T. Key. 2009. The Credit Crunch and Regeneration: Impact and Implications. London: DCLG.
   Google Scholar
• PAS. 2014. “Charretteplus™.” Planning Aid Scotland. Accessed 10th June 2014. http://www.planningaidscotland.org.uk/charretteplus/.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. 2014. “Pushing Austerity: State Failure, Municipal Bankruptcy and the Crises of Fiscal Federalism in the USA.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 7 (1): 17–44. doi:10.1093/cjres/rst018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett, S. T. A., M. L. Cadenasso, and B. McGrath. 2013. “Ecology of the City as a Bridge to Urban Design.” In Resilience in Ecology and Urban Design: Linking Theory and Practice for Sustainable Cities, edited by S. T. A. Pickett, M. L. Cadenasso, and B. McGrath. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Punter, J. 1999. Design Guidelines in American Cities: A Review of Design Policies and Guidance in Five West Coast Cities. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Punter, J. 2002. “Urban Design as Public Policy: Evaluating the Design Dimension of Vancouver's Planning System.” International Planning Studies 7 (4): 265–282. doi:10.1080/1356347022000027710.
   Google Scholar
• Punter, J. 2003. The Vancouver Achievement: Urban Planning and Design. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Punter, J. 2005. “Urban Design in Central Sydney 1945–2002: Laissez-Faire and Discretionary Traditions in the Accidental City.” Progress in Planning 63 (1): 11–160. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2004.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punter, J. 2007. “Developing Urban Design as Public Policy: Best Practice Principles for Design Review and Development Management.” Journal of Urban Design 12 (2): 167–202. doi:10.1080/13574800701306195.
   Google Scholar
• Punter, J. 2010. “The Recession, Housing Quality and Urban Design.” International Planning Studies 15 (3): 245–263. doi:10.1080/13563475.2010.509478.
   Google Scholar
• Punter, J., and M. Carmona. 1997. The Design Dimension of Planning: Theory, Content and Best Practice. London: E & FN Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Roggema, R. 2014. “The Design Charrette.” In The Design Charrette: Ways to Envision Sustainable Futures, edited by R. Roggema. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Scheer, B. C. 1994. “Introduction: The Debate on Design Review.” In Design Review: Challenging Urban Aesthetic Control, edited by B. C. Scheer and W. F. E. Preiser. New York: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Scheer, B. 2011. “Metropolitan form and Landscape Urbanism.” In Companion to Urban Design, edited by T. Banerjee and A. Loukaitous-Sideris. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scheer, B. C., and W. F. E. Preiser, eds. 1994. Design Review: Challenging Urban Aesthetic Control. New York: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. 2014. “SSCI Charrette Mainstreaming Programme.” Scottish Government. Accessed 23rd August 2014. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Built-Environment/AandP/Projects/SSCI/Mainstreaming.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. 2014a. “Strategic Planning.” Scottish Government. Accessed 13th August 2014 http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Built-Environment/planning/Development-Planning/Strategic-Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. 2014b. “Skills: Drawing Places.” Scottish Government. Accessed 25th August 2014. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Built-Environment/AandP/Skills.
   Google Scholar
• SEPA. 2014. “Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS).” SEPA. Accessed: August 12th 2014. http://www.sepa.org.uk/water/water_regulation/regimes/pollution_control/suds.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S., M. Munro, and H. Christie. 2006. “Performing (Housing) Markets.” Urban Studies 43 (1): 81–98. doi:10.1080/00420980500409276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• susDrain. 2012. “Sustainable Drainage.” susDrain. Accessed 13th August 2014. http://www.susdrain.org/delivering-suds/using-suds/background/sustainable-drainage.html.
   Google Scholar
• The Farrell Review. 2014. “The Farrell Review of Architecture and the Built Environment.” The Farrell Review. Accessed June 26th, 2014. http://www.farrellreview.co.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson-Fawcett, M. 2003. “A New Urbanist Diffusion Network: The Americo-European Connection.” Built Environment 29 (3): 253–270. doi:10.2148/benv.29.3.253.54283.
   Google Scholar
• Tiesdell, S., and D. Adams. 2011. “Real Estate Development, Urban Design and the Tools Approach to Public Policy.” In Urban Design in the Real Estate Development Process, edited by S. Tiesdell and D. Adams. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Turley. 2014. “Neighbourhood Planning: Plan and Deliver?” Turley. Accessed 15th August 2014. http://www.turley.co.uk/sites/default/files/uploads/news/Turley_%20Neighbourhood%20Planning_March_2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, D. 2007. Designing Community: Charrettes, Masterplans and Form-based Codes. Oxford: Architecture Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wates, N. 2014. The Community Planning Handbook. 2nd ed. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, S. M. 2013. Planning for Sustainability: Creating Livable, Equitable and Ecological Communities. 2nd ed. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wild, T. C., C. Jefferies, and B. J. D'Arcy. 2002. SUDS in Scotland – the Scottish SUDS Database. Edinburgh: Scotland and Northern Ireland Forum for Environmental Research (SNIFFER).
   Google Scholar
• Wiles, C. 2014. “Why the NIMBY's Are Winning the UK's Housing Battles.” Guardian Professional. Accessed 22nd April 2014. http://www.theguardian.com/housing-network/2014/apr/22/nimbys-winning-housing-battles.
   Google Scholar