Urban river design and aesthetics: a river restoration case study from the UK

References

• Åberg, U. E., and S. Tapsell. 2013. “Revisiting the River Skerne: The Long-Term Social Benefits of River Rehabilitation.” Landscape and Urban Planning 113: 94–103. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, W. M., M. R. Perrow, and A. Carpenter. 2004. “Conservation and Champions: River Managers and the River Restoration Discourse in the United Kingdom.” Environment and Planning A 36: 1929–1942. doi:10.1068/a3637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augoyard, J.-F., and H. Torgue. 2008. Sonic Experience: A Guide to Everyday Sounds. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, J. 2008. “Aesthetic and Other Values in the Rural Landscape.” Environmental Values 17: 221–238. doi:10.3197/096327108X303864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, W. E., and J. E. Gardiner. 2005. “Stooking the Peanuts: Historical Agriculture and the Management of a Dying Seasonal Landscape, North-East New South Wales, Australia.” Landscape Research 30: 193–220. doi:10.1080/01426390500044366.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, E. 2003. Aesthetics of the Natural Environment. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, E. 2008. “Aesthetic Character and Aesthetic Integrity in Environmental Conservation.” In Environmental Ethics: An Anthology, edited by A. Light and H. Rolston III, 397–412. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Buijs, A. E. 2009. “Public Support for River Restoration. a Mixed-Method Study into Local Residents’ Support for and Framing of River Management and Ecological Restoration in the Dutch Floodplains.” Journal of Environmental Management 90: 2680–2689. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.02.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, A. 2000. Aesthetics and the Environment: The Appreciation of Nature, Art and Architecture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coeterier, J. F. 1996. “Dominant Attributes in the Perception and Evaluation of the Dutch Landscape.” Landscape and Urban Planning 34: 27–44.10.1016/0169-2046(95)00204-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, J. 1987. “Reflections on Goals and on the Relationship between Theory and Practice.” In Restoration Ecology: A Synthetic Approach to Ecological Research, edited by W. Jordan III, M. E. Gilpin, and J. D. Aber, 329–336. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson, K. 2001. ‘Maintenance of River Skerne Restoration Site’, Letter of Management Amendment Addressed to Darlington Borough Council, 14th June 2001. Darlington: Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Eden, S., and S. Tunstall. 2006. “Ecological versus Social Restoration? How Urban River Restoration Challenges but Also Fails to Challenge the Science—Policy Nexus in the United Kingdom.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 24: 661–680.10.1068/c0608j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden, S., S. M. Tunstall, and S. M. Tapsell. 1999. “Environmental Restoration: Environmental Management or Environmental Threat?” Area 31: 151–159. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.1999.tb00180.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden, S., S. M. Tunstall, and S. M. Tapsell. 2000. “Translating Nature: River Restoration as Nature - Culture.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 18: 257–273. doi:10.1068/d180257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, R. 1997. Faking Nature: The Ethics of Environmental Restoration. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gobster, P. H. 2001. “Visions of Nature: Conflict and Compatibility in Urban Park Restoration.” Landscape and Urban Planning 56: 35–51. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00164-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargrove, E. C. (2008). “The Historical Foundations of American Environmental Attitudes.” In Nature, Aesthetics, and Environmentalism: From Beauty to Duty, edited by A. Carlson, and S. Lintott, 29–48. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hepburn, R. W. 2004. “Contemporary Aesthetics and the Neglect of Natural Beauty.” In The Aesthetics of Natural Environments, edited by A. Carlson, and A. Berleant, 43–62. Peterborough: Broadview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgs, E. 2003. Nature by Design: People, Natural Process, and Ecological Restoration. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, R. J., and J. A. Harris. 2001. “Restoration Ecology: Repairing the Earth's Ecosystems in the New Millennium.” Restoration Ecology 9: 239–246. doi:10.1046/j.1526-100x.2001.009002239.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan III, W. R. 2003. The Sunflower Forest: Ecological Restoration and the New Communion with Nature. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, H. 2008. Natural Beauty: A Theory of Aesthetics beyond the Arts. Peterborough: Broadview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Motloch, J. L. 2000. Introduction to Landscape Design. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, D., and R. Vivash. 1998. Revetment Techniques Used on the River Skerne Restoration Project. R&D Technical Report for the River Restoration Centre. Bristol: Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Nassauer, J. I. 1995. “Messy Ecosystems, Orderly Frames.” Landscape Journal 14: 161–170.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, J., A. Holland, and A. Light. 2008. Environmental Values. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Piégay, H., K. J. Gregory, V. Bondarev, A. Chin, N. Dahlstrom, A. Elosegi, S.V. Gregory, et al. 2005. “Public Perception as a Barrier to Introducing Wood in Rivers for Restoration Purposes.” Environmental Management 36: 665–674. doi:10.1007/s00267-004-0092-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RPA. 1997. Benefit Analysis of River Restoration on the River Cole and River Skerne. Draft Report, November 1997, prepared for the River Restoration Project. Loddon: Risk & Policy Analysts Limited.
   Google Scholar
• RRC. 1998. River Skerne: Restored 1995/98. Bedfordshire: The River Restoration Centre.
   Google Scholar
• RRC. 2002. Manual of River Restoration Techniques. Cranfield: The River Restoration Centre.
   Google Scholar
• RRP. 1995a. River Skerne Public Perception Survey: Stage Two. Enfield: Flood Hazard Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• RRP. 1995b. River Restoration: Benefits for Integrated Catchment Management. UK Monitoring Programme Year 1 (1994) Interim Report. Huntingdon: River Restoration Project.
   Google Scholar
• RRP. 1996. River Skerne Restoration Project Reach Site Management Plan. Huntingdon: River Restoration Project.
   Google Scholar
• Schauman, S. 1998. “The Garden and the Red Barn: The Pervasive Pastoral and Its Environmental Consequences.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 56: 181–190.10.2307/432256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SER. 2004. The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration. Tucson, AZ: Society for Ecological Restoration International. www.ser.org
   Google Scholar
• SGS Environment. 1994. River Restoration: Benefits for Integrated Catchment Management. LIFE Programme of the Commission of the European Communities Priority Action A2 V: River Skerne Darlington Landscape Assessment. Durham: SGS Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Tunstall, S. 1994. Institutional Aspects of River Restoration in the UK. Report to the River Restoration Project. Middlesex University: Flood Hazard Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Tunstall, S. M., S. M. Tapsell, and S. Eden. 1999. “How Stable Are Public Responses to Changing Local Environments? A 'Before' and 'After' Case Study of River Restoration.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 42: 527–545. doi:10.1080/09640569911046.
   Google Scholar
• Vivash, R., and J. Biggs. 1994. Site Appraisal for River Restoration. Report to English Nature, River Restoration Project, February 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Wohl, E., S. N. Lane, and A. C. Wilcox. 2015. “The Science and Practice of River Restoration.” Water Resources Research 51: 5974–5997 doi:10.1002/2014WR016874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolley, J. T., and M. V. McGinnis. 2000. “The Conflicting Discourses of Restoration.” Society & Natural Resources 13: 339–357. doi:10.1080/089419200279009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolsey, S., F. Capelli, T. Gonser, E. Hoehn, M. Hostmann, B. Junker, A. Paetzold, et al. 2007. “A Strategy to Assess River Restoration Success.” Freshwater Biology 52: 752–769. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01740.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar