Space syntax: consolidation and transformation of an urban research field

References

• Dalton, R. 2003. “The Secret is to Follow Your Nose. Route Path Selection and Angularity.” Environment and Behavior 35 (1): 107–131.10.1177/0013916502238867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhanani, A., L. Tarkhanyan, and L. Vaughan. 2017. “Estimating Pedestrian Demand for Active Transport Evaluation and Planning.” Transportation Research Part a: Policy and Practice 103: 54–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwimirnani, P., and K. Karimi 2017 “Space after Dark: Measuring the Impact of Public Lighting at Night on Visibility, Movement, and Spatial Configuration in Urban Parks.” In: Proceedings of the 11 th Space Syntax Symposium, Lisbon, July 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, P., E. Fridrisch, and K. Karimi (2012) “Origin-Destination Weighting in Agent Modelling for Pedestrian Movement Forecasting.” In: Eighth International Space Syntax Symposium. Santiago, Chile, January 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. 1977. “A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness.” Sociometry. 40 (1): 35–41.10.2307/3033543
   Google Scholar
• Gil, J., T. Varoudis, K. Karimi, and A. Penn 2015.” The Space Syntax Toolkit: Integrating DepthmapX and Exploratory Spatial Analysis Workflows in QGIS.” In: The Proceedings of the 10th International Space Syntax Symposium, London, 13 July 2015. Space Syntax Laboratory, The Bartlett School of Architecture, UCL. p. 148, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B. 1996 Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B. 2001. “Centrality as a Process: Accounting for Attraction Inequalities in Deformed Grids.” Urban Design International. 4 (3): 107–127.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., and J. Hanson. 1984. The Social Logic of Space. Reprint: Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511597237
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., and S. Iida. 2005. “Network and Psychological Effects in Urban Movement.” In Spatial Information Theory, edited by David Hutchison and Takeo Kanade, 475–490. Berlin / Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/11556114
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., and A. Penn. 1996. “Cities as Movement Economies.” Urban Design International. 1 (1): 49–60.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., R. Burdett, J. Peponis, and A. Penn. 1987. “Creating Life: Or, Does Architecture Determine Anything?” Architecture & Behaviour 3 (3): 233–250.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., A. Penn, J. Hanson, T. Grajewski, et al. 1993. “Natural Movement: Or, Configuration and Attraction in Urban Pedestrian Movement.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 20: 29–66.10.1068/b200029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi, K. 2002. “Iranian Organic Cities Demystified; a Unique Urban Experience or an Organic City like Others.” Built Environment 28 (3): 187–202.
   Google Scholar
• Karimi, K. 2012. “A Configurational Approach to Analytical Urban Design: ‘Space Syntax’ Methodology.” URBAN DESIGN International 17 (4): 297–318.10.1057/udi.2012.19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi, K., and E. Parham 2012. “An Evidence Informed Approach to Developing an Adaptable Regeneration Programme for Declining Informal Settlements.” In: Eighth International Space Syntax Symposium, Santiago, Chile, January 2012.
   Google Scholar
• De Koning, R. E., A. Van Nes, Y. Ye, and H.-J. Roald 2017 “Strategies for Integrated Densification with Urban Qualities: Combining Space Syntax with Building Density, Land Usage, Public Transport and Property Rights in Bergen City.” In: Proceedings of the 11th Space Syntax Symposium, Lisbon, July 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, L. 2010. “Spatial Capital. Journal of Space.” Syntax 1 (1): 30–40.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, L., M. Giusti, and S. Barthel. 2016. “Cognitive Affordances in Sustainable Urbanism: Contributions of Space Syntax and Spatial Cognition.” Journal of Urban Design 21 (4): 439–452. doi:10.1080/13574809.2016.1184565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maureira, V., and K. Karimi. 2017. “The Everyday and the Post-Disaster Urban Systems as One Thing:A Configurational Approach to Enhance the Recovery and Resilience of Cities Affected by Tsunamis.” In: Proceedings of the 11th Space Syntax Symposium, Lisbon, July 2017.
   Google Scholar
• McCahil, C., and N. Garrick (2008) The Applicability of Space Syntax to Bicycle Facility Planning. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. [Online] 2074, 46–51. Available from: doi:10.3141/2074-06.
   Google Scholar
• Penn, A. 2008. “Architectural Research.” In: Advanced Research Methods in the Built Environment, edited by Andrew Knight and Les Ruddock, 14–27. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Penn, A., B. Hillier, D. Banister, and J. Xu. 1998. “Configurational Modelling of Urban Movement Networks.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 25 (1): 59–84.10.1068/b250059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penn, A., J. Desyllas, and L. Vaughan. 1999. “The Space of Innovation: Interaction and Communication in the Work Environment.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 26: 193–218.10.1068/b4225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raford, N., A. Chiaradia, and J. Gil. 2007. Space Syntax: The Role of Urban Form in Cyclist Route Choice in Central London. [Online]. Accessed June 17 2012. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8qz8m4fz#page-3
   Google Scholar
• Sailer, K., A. Budgen, N. Lonsdale, and A. Turner, et al. 2008. Evidence-Based Design: Theoretical and Practical Reflections of an Emerging Approach in Office Architecture. [Online] Accessed December 2 2011. http://drs2008.designinquiry.wikispaces.net/
   Google Scholar
• Shen, Y., and K. Karimi. June 2016. “(2016) Urban Function Connectivity: Characterisation of Functional Urban Streets with Social Media Check-in Data.” Cities 55: 9–21.10.1016/j.cities.2016.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahle, A., L. Marcus, and A. Karlstrom. 2008. “Geographic Accessibility with Axial Lines in GIS.” In: Proceedings 5th Space Syntax Symposium, Delft, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, A., M. Doxa, D. O'Sullivan, and A. Penn. 2001. “From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28: 103–121.10.1068/b2684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, A., A. Penn, and Alasdair. 2002. “Encoding Natural Movement as an Agent-Based System: An Investigation into Human Pedestrian Behaviour in the Built Environment.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 29 (4): 473–490.10.1068/b12850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, L., and S. Arbaci. 2011. “The Challenges of Understanding Urban Segregation.” Built Environment 37 (2): 128–138.10.2148/benv.37.2.128
   Google Scholar