Pluralist production of urban form: towards a parametric development control for unity in diversity

References

• Abada, G. 2002. “Heterogeneity within Homogeneity: Fragmentation and the Possible Re-Coherence of Traditional Urban Forms in Cairo.” Gber 3 (4): 18–29.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, C. 1966. “A City Is Not A Tree.” Design 206: 46–55.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, C. 2002. The Nature of Order- Book 2: The Process of Creating Life. Berkeley: Center for Environmental Structure.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, C., H. Neis, A. Anninou, and I. King. 1987. A New Theory of Urban Design. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, C., M. Silverstein, S. Angel, S. Ishikawa, and D. Abrams. 1975. The Oregon Experiment. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Appleyard, D. 1976. Planning a Pluralist City. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, E. 1967 [1974]. Design of Cities. New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Beirão, J. N., P. Nourian, and B. Mashhoodi. 2011. “Parametric Urban Design: Interactive Tools for Supporting Urban Design Decision Making”. In the Proceedings of the 29th Conference on Education in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe – eCAADe 2011, edited by T. Zupancic, 225–234, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.
   Google Scholar
• Benfield, F. K., J. Terris, and N. Vorsanger. 2001. Solving Sprawl: Models of Smart Communities across America. New York: Natural Resource Defense Council.
   Google Scholar
• Biddulph, M. 1996. “An Evaluation of a Private Sector Residential Layout Guide.” Urban Design International 1: 45–162.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, P. 2003. “Controlling Development: Certainty and Discretion in Europe, the USA and Hong Kong.” London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, M. C. 2015. “On Modelling Complexity and Urban Form.” AD Architectural Design 85 (6): 54–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CABE (Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment). 2005. Design Coding: Testing Its Use in England. London: CABE.
   Google Scholar
• Caliskan, O. 2009. “Pattern Formation in Planned Urban Peripheries: A Typomorphological Approach for Design.” In URBANISM PhD Research 2008-2010, edited by F. D. van der Hoeven, 40–63. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caliskan, O. 2017. “Parametric Design in Urbanism: A Critical Reflection.” Planning Practice and Research 32 (4): 417–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, K. 2010. “Briefing: Making Massive Small Change.” Urban Design and Planning 163: 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, K. 2018. Making Massive Small Change: Ideas, Tools, Tactics: Building the Urban Society We Want. London: Chelsea Green Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, M., S. Carmona, and N. Gallent. 2003. Delivering New Homes: Processes, Planners and Providers. London and NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, M., S. Marshall, and Q. Stevens. 2006. “Design Codes: Their Use and Potential.” Progress in Planning 65: 209–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duany, A. 2002. “Introduction to the Special Issue: The Transect.” Journal of Urban Design 7 (3): 251–260.
   Google Scholar
• Duany, A., and E. Talen. 2002. ““Transect Planning”. Journal of the American Planning Association 68 (3): 245–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essex Planning Officers Association. 1997. The Essex Design Guide for Residential and Mixed-Use Areas. Essex County Hall, Chelmsford: Essex.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, A. 1997. “Design for Change: Flexible Planning Strategies for the 1990s and Beyond.” Journal of Urban Design 2 (3): 277–295.
   Google Scholar
• Gillham, O. 2002. The Limitless City: A Primer on the Urban Sprawl Debate. Washington: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodfellow, T. 2013. “Planning and Development Regulation amid Rapid Urban Growth: Explaining Divergent Trajectories in Africa.” Geoforum 48: 83–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, C. P. 2008. The Genealogy of Cities. Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, K. 2010. “Urban Morphological Regions and Urban Landscape Management: The Case of Central Auckland, New Zealand.” Urban Design International 15 (3): 148–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, A. C. 1996. Design Control: Towards A New Approach. Oxford: Butterworth Architecture.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, T. 2008. “The Form-Based Development Plan: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice in Urban Morphology.” Urban Morphology 12 (2): 77–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward, R. 1993. “Talking Tissues.” In Making Better Places: Urban Design Now, edited by R. Hayward and S. McGlynn, 24–29. Oxford: Butterworth.
   Google Scholar
• Hurtt, S. 1983. “Conjectures on Urban Form: The Cornell Urban Design Studio 1963-1982.” Cornell Journal of Architecture 2: 54–78.
   Google Scholar
• Inostroza, L., R. Baur, and E. Csaplovics. 2013. “Urban Sprawl and Fragmentation in Latin America: A Dynamic Quantification and Characterization of Spatial Patterns.” Journal of Environmental Management 115: 87–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 1961 [2000]. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. London: Pimli.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A., and D. Appleyard. 1987. “Toward an Urban Design Manifesto.” Journal of the American Planning Association 53 (1): 112–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krier, L. 1979a. “Cities within the City – Les Quartiers.” AD Architectural Design 49: 18–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krier, R. 1979b. Urban Space. New York: Rizzoli.
   Google Scholar
• Labbé, D., and J.-A. Boudreau. 2011. “Understanding the Causes of Urban Fragmentation in Hanoi: The Case of New Urban Areas.” International Development Planning Review 33 (3): 273–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. C. M. 2016. Common Frameworks: Rethinking the Developmental City in China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Graduate School of Design.
   Google Scholar
• Llabres, E., and E. Roco. 2012. “In Progress: Relational Urban Model.” Urban Design International 17 (4): 319–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, T., and C. Crawford. 2011. “Plot Logic: Character-Building Through Creative Parcelisation.” In Urban Design in the Real Estate Development Process, edited by S. Tiesdell and D. Adams, 92–113. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mehaffy, M. 2008. “Generative Methods in Urban Design: A Progress Assessment.” Journal of Urbanism 1 (1): 57–75.
   Google Scholar
• Mehaffy, M. 2011. “A City Is Not A Rhinoceros: On the Aims and Opportunities of Morphogenetic Urban Design.” Built Environment 37 (4): 479–496.
   Google Scholar
• Mehaffy, M., S. Porta, Y. Rofè, and N. Salingaros. 2010. “Urban Nuclei and the Geometry of Streets: The ‘Emergent Neighborhoods’ Model.” Urban Design International 15: 22–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meulder, B. D. 2008. “Old Dispersions and Scenes for the Production of Public Space the Constructive Margins of Secondarity.” AD Architectural Design 78 (1): 28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Monson, K. 2008. “String Block Vs Superblock Patterns of Dispersal in China.” AD Architectural Design 78 (1): 46–53.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, A. E. J. 1979. History of Urban Form: Before the Industrial Revolutions. New York: Halsted Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A., J. Duncan, C. Mullen, and K. Bishop. 1995. Growth Management: Principles and Practices. Chicago IL: Planners Press, APA.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, S. 1979. “Urban Design Tactics.” AD Profiles 20: 76–82.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, S., and B. Littenberg. 2020. Space and Anti-Space: The Fabric of Place, City and Architecture. New York: ORO Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Punter, J. 2011. “Urban Design and the English Urban Renaissance 1999–2009: A Review and Preliminary Evaluation.” Journal of Urban Design 16 (1): 1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Punter, J., and M. Carmoma. 1997. “Design Policies in Local Plans.” Town Planning Review 68 (2): 165–193.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, Z. 2010. “Without Zoning: Urban Development and Land Use Controls in Houston.” Cities 27: 31–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, Z. 2013. “Master Plan, Plan Adjustment and Urban Development Reality under China’s Market Transition: A Case Study of Nanjing.” Cities 30: 77–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, C., and F. Koetter. 1978. Collage City. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, B. D. 2017. The Largest Art: A Measured Manifesto for A Plural Urbanism. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salingaros, N. 2000. “Complexity and Urban Coherence.” Journal of Urban Design 5: 291–316.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, P. 2009. “Parametricism-A New Global Style for Architecture and Urban Design.” AD Architectural Design 79 (4): 14–23.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, R., and E. Verbakel. 2008. “Urbanism Without Density.” AD Architectural Design 78 (1): 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 2018. Building and Dwelling: Ethics for the City. New York: FSG.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, D. G. 2005. Recombinant Urbanism: Conceptual Modelling in Architecture, Urban Design, and City Theory. Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Siksna, A. 1997. “The Effects of Block Size and Form in North American and Australian Cities.” Urban Morphology 1: 19–33.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, R. C., and L. M. E. Amorim. 2010. “Parametric Urbanism: Emergence, Limits and Perspectives of A New Trend in Urban Design Based on Parametric Design Systems.” VIRUS 3. accessed in August 2018. http://www.nomads.usp.br/virus/virus03/PDF/submitted/2_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sorkin, M. 2011. All over the Map Writing on Buildings and Cities. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Tachieva, G. 2010. Sprawl Repair Manual. Washington: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E. 2002. “Help for Urban Planning: The Transect Strategy.” Journal of Urban Design 7 (3): 293–312.
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E. 2008. Design for Diversity: Exploring Socially Mixed Neighborhoods. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. 2004. “Planning for A Better Future.” Habitat Debate 10 (4): 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• TKA Architecture + Urban Design. 2005. Stedenbouwkundige Randvoorwaarden. 3T4 EN 3T Urban Design Preconditions. Project Report. Almere, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Trancik, R. 1986. Finding Lost Space: Theories of Urban Design. New York: Van Nostrand.
   Google Scholar
• Trummer, P. 2011. “Associative Design: From Type to Population.” In Computational Design Thinking, edited by A. Menges and S. Ahlquist, 94–101. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ukoje, J. E. 2016. “Impacts of Rapid Urbanisation in the Urban Fringe of Lokoja, Nigeria.” Journal Of Geography And Regional Planning 9 (10): 185–194.
   Google Scholar
• UN Conference on Human Settlements. 2016. “HABITAT III Policy Paper 6 – Urban Spatial Strategies: Land Market and Segregation,” Accessed December 2020. http://uploads.habitat3.org/hb3/PU6-HABITAT-III-POLICY-PAPER.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ungers, O. M., R. Koolhaas, P. Riemann, H. Koolhoff, and A. Ovaska. 1979. “Die Stadt in der Stadt: Berlin Das Grüne Stadtarchipel.” In The City in the City: Berlin, the Green Urban Archipelago, edited by F. Hertweck and S. Marot, 81–130. Zurich: Lars Muller.
   Google Scholar
• Ünlü, T. 2011. “Towards the Conceptualization of Piecemeal Urban Transformation: The Case of Mersin, Turkey.” Built Environment 37 (4): 445–461.
   Google Scholar
• Venturi, R., D. S. Brown, and S. Izenour. 1972. Learning from Las Vegas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verebes, T., ed. 2014. Masterplanning the Adaptive City: Computational Urbanism in the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, C. 2012. “Spatial Planning and Territorial Governance: Managing Urban Development in A Rapid Growth Context.” Urban Research & Practice 5 (1): 44–46.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, D. 2007. Designing Community: Charrettes, Masterplans and Form-based Codes. Oxford: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodbury, R. 2010. Elements of Parametric Design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yankson, P. W. K., and K. V. Gough. 1999. “The Environmental Impact of Rapid Urbanization in the Peri-Urban Area of Accra, Ghana”. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography 99 (1): 89–100.
   Google Scholar