From Individualism to Co-construction and Back Again: Rethinking Research Methodology for Children with Profound and Multiple Learning Disabilities

References

• Abbott, D. (2012). Other voices, other rooms: Reflections on talking to young men with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and their families about transition to adulthood. Children & Society, 26, 241–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford, B. (2012). Working on well-being: Researcher's experiences of a participative approach to understanding the subjective well-being of disabled young people. Children & Society, 26, 234–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewster, S. J. (2004). Putting words into their mouths? Interviewing people with learning disabilities and little/no speech. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 166–169.
   Google Scholar
• Brydon-Miller, M., Kral, M., Maguire, P., Noffke, S., & Sabhlok, A. (2011). Jazz and the Banyan Tree. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, J. (2012). Some kids climb up; Some kids climb down: Culturally constructed play-worlds of children with impairments. Disability & Society, 27, 965–981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, L., Watson, J., & Murphy, J. (2004) Talking Mats: A focus group tool for people with learning disability. Communication Matters, 18, 33–35.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, C., & Wind-Cowie, S. (2005). Profound and multiple learning difficulties. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, P. H., & James, A. (2008). Research with children: Perspectives and practices. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cocks, A. (2008). Researching the lives of disabled children: The process of participant observation in seeking inclusivity. Qualitative Social Work, 7, 163–180.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coupe O'Kane, J., & Goldbart, J. (1998). Communication before speech: Development and assessment. London: David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Denis, J., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Maes, B. (2011). Self-injurious behavior in people with profound intellectual disabilities: A meta-analysis of single-case studies. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 911–923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgerton, R. B. (1993). The cloak of competence. Berkley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, M. (2004). Inclusion at the crossroads. London: David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Fergusson, A., Howley, M., & Rose, R. (2008). Responding to the mental health needs of young people with profound and multiple learning disabilities and autistic spectrum disorders: Issues & challenges. Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 5, 240–251.
   Google Scholar
• Foreman, P., Arthur-Kelly, M., Pascoe, S., & Smyth King, B. (2004). Evaluating the educational experiences of students with profound and multiple disabilities in inclusive and segregated classroom settings: An Australian perspective. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 29, 183–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., Clough, P., & Moore, M. (2004). Researching life stories: Method, theory and analyses in a biographical age. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Green, C. W., & Reid, D. H. (1996). Defining, validating, and increasing indices of happiness among people with profound multiple disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, R. L., & Zangwill, O. L. (1987). The Oxford companion to the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O'Reilly, M. F., & Oliva, D. (2005) Microswitch programs for persons with multiple disabilities: An overview of the responses adopted for microswitch activation. Cognitive Processing, 6, 177–188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., O'Reilly, M. F., Cuvo, A. J., Singh, N. N., Sigafoos, J., & Didden, R. (2007). PECS and VOCAs to enable students with developmental disabilities to make requests: An overview of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28(5), 468–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mechling, L. C. (2006). Comparison of the effects of three approaches on the frequency of stimulus activations, via a single switch, by students with profound intellectual disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 40, 94–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014) Qualitative data analysis—A methods sourcebook. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. (2010). I know how I feel: Listening to young people with life-limiting conditions who have learning and communication impairments. Qualitative Social Work, 9, 185–203.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. (2003). Including all children: Finding out about the experiences of children with communication and/or cognitive impairments. Children & Society, 17, 337–348.
   Google Scholar
• Neilson, A., Hogg, J., Malek, M., & Rowley, D. (2000). Impact of surgical and orthotic intervention on the quality of life of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities and their carers. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 13, 216–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nind, M., & Hewett, D. (2001). A practical guide to intensive interaction. Kidderminster: British Institute of Learning Difficulties (BILD) Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pawlyn, J., & Carnaby, S. (2009). Profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: Nursing complex needs. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Punch, S. (2002). Research with children: The same or different from research with adults?Childhood—a Global Journal of Child Research, 9, 321–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, D. H., Phillips, J. F., & Green, C. W. (1991). Teaching persons with profound multiple handicaps: A review of the effects of behavioral research. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 319–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (1979) Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, M. D., Smanger, J. P., & Saunders, R. R. (2003). Improving methodological and technological analyses of adaptive switch use of individuals with profound multiple impairments. Behavioral Interventions, 18, 227–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scope. (2013). Profound and multiple learning disabilities/difficulties (PMLD). Retrieved February 10, 2013, from http://www.scope.org.uk/services/education-and-learning/schools/meldreth-manor/pmld
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. (2010) The PMLD ambiguity: Articulating the life-worlds of children with profound and multiple learning difficulties. Exeter: Graduate School of Education, University of Exeter.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, B., & Watson, D. (2014). The PMLD Ambiguity: Articulating the life-worlds of children with profound and multiple learning disabilities. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Tadema, A. C., & Vlaskamp, C. (2010). The time and effort in taking care for children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: A study on care load and support. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 41–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, J. C., Patterson, T. G., & Kennedy, C. H. (2003). Identifying specific sensory modalities maintaining the stereotypy of students with profound multiple disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24, 433–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tisdall, K. (2012). The challenge and challenging of childhood studies? Learning from disability studies and research with disabled children. Children & Society, 26, 181–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C., & Aitken, K. J. (2001). Infant intersubjectivity: Research, theory, and clinical applications. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 3–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tullis, C. A., Cannella-Malone, H. I., Basbigill, A. R., Yeager, A., Fleming, C. V., Payne, D., & Wu, P. (2011). Review of the choice and preference assessment literature for individuals with severe to profound disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 576–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlaskamp, C., & Cuppen-Fonteine, H. (2007). Reliability of assessing the sensory perception of children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: A case study. Child: Care, Health and Development, 33, 547–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, J. (2003). Creating a responsive environment for people with profound and multiple learning difficulites (2nd ed.). London: David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, J. (2004). Ascertaining the views of people with profound and multiple learning disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 175–179.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, N. (2012). Theorising the lives of disabled children: How can disability theory help?Children & Society, 26, 192–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehurst, T. (2006). Liberating silent voices—Perspectives of children with profound and complex learning needs on inclusion. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 55–61.
   Google Scholar