Disabled Children and Child Protection: Learning From Literature Through a Non-Tragedy Lens

References

• Brown, R. I., Geider, S., Primrose, A., & Jokinen, N. S. (2011). Family life and the impact of previous and present residential and day care support for children with major cognitive and behavioral challenges; a dilemma for services and policy. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 55(9), 904–917. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01453.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M., & Miller, M. (2013). Holding a vision: An investigation of a rights-based social supports infrastructure for children/young people with an intellectual disability (Published PhD Thesis). National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, H., & Burns, K. (2015). Child welfare and protection in Ireland: Déjà vu all over again. In A. Christie & T. Walsh (Eds.), Social work in Ireland: Continuities and changes (pp. 51–70). Basingstoke: Palgrave and Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, H., Whelan, S., Carr, N., & Murphy, C. (2008). Service users’ perceptions of the child protection system. Dublin: OMCYA.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, K., & Lynch, D. (2008). Child protection and welfare social work, contemporary themes and practice perspectives. Dublin: A. & A. Farmar.
   Google Scholar
• Caples, M., & Sweeney, J. (2011). Quality of life: A survey of parents of children/adults with an intellectual disability who are availing of respite care. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(1), 64–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Central Statistics Office. (2012). Profile 8 our bill of health. Dublin: Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, D. D., Mannon, H., Garcia Iniarte, E., McConkey, R., O'Brien, P., Finlay, F., … Harrington, G. (2013). Family voices: Life for family carers of people with intellectual disabilities in Ireland. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 26(2), 119–132. doi: 10.1111/jar.12003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, L. (1996). Including all our lives. In J. Morris (Ed.), Encounters with strangers: Feminism and disability. (pp. 55–72). London: Women’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Children and Youth Affairs. (2011). Children first, national guidance for the protection and welfare of children. Dublin: Department of Children and Youth Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (2012). Value for money and policy review of disability services in Ireland. Dublin: Department of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Dominelli, L. (1998). Anti-Oppressive practice in context. In R. Adams, L. Dominelli, & M. Payne, (Eds.), Social work, themes, issues and critical debates (pp. 49–60). London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dominelli, L. (2002). Anti-oppressive social work theory and practice. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillian.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, E. (2004). Poverty and children with intellectual disabilities in the world’s richer countries. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 29(4), 319–338. doi: 10.1080/13668250400014491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Featherstone, B., White, S., & Wastell, D. (2012). Ireland’s opportunity to learn from England’s difficulties? Auditing uncertainty in child protection. Irish Journal of Applied Social Studies, 12(1), 49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Feely, M. (2015a). IQ, speciation and sexuality: How suspicions of sexual abuse are produced within a contemporary intellectual disability service. Somatechnics, 5(2), 174–196. doi: 10.3366/soma.2015.0160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feely, M. (2015b). Sexual surveillance and control in a community based intellectual disability service. Sexualities, 0(0), 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Feely, M. (2016). Disability studies after the ontological turn: A return the material world and material bodies without a return to essentialism. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, H. (2014). What social workers do in performing child protection work: Evidence from research into face-to-face practice. Child & Family Social Work, Advance Access published March 21, 2014. doi:10.1111/cfs.12142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, E. (2011). From rhetoric to action: Implementing the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, S. (2015, Spring). The current economic recession: Social work perspectives on its impact on people with an intellectual disability. The Irish Social Worker, 31–35.
   Google Scholar
• French, S., & Swain, J. (2008). On equal terms: Working with disabled people. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, N. (2011). Rethinking children and families, the relationship between the childhood, families and the state. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, P. M. (2014). Children and families. Policy Press: Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N., Parton, N., & Skivens, M. (2011). Child protection systems: International trends and orientations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. (2001). Learning difficulties, the social model of disability and impairment: Challenging epistemologies. Disability & Society, 16(2), 207–231. doi: 10.1080/09687590120035816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, N. (2002). Children’s right—whose right? A review of child policy development in Ireland. Studies in Public Policy 9. Dublin: The Policy Institute, Trinity College.
   Google Scholar
• Head, A. (1998). The child’s voice in child and family social work decision making: The perspective of a Guardian Ad Litem. Child & Family Social Work, 3(3), 189–196. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2206.1998.00092.x
   Google Scholar
• Health Service Executive. (2016, June 11). Progressing disabilty services for children and young people: The vision for children’s disability services. Retrieved from http://www.hse.ie/progressingdisabilityservices/.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, B., & Patterson, K. (1997). The social model of disability and the disappearing body: Towards a sociology of impairment. Disability & Society, 12(3), 325–340. doi: 10.1080/09687599727209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Federation of Social Workers. (2016, June 8). Principles (of social work). Retrieved from http://ifsw.org/get-involved/global-definition-of-social-work.
   Google Scholar
• Keenan, D., Redmond, S., Devaney, C., Landy, F., Canavan, J., & Gillen, A. (2015). Toward the development of a participation strategy for children and young people: National guidance & local implementation. Retrieved February 3rd, 2016, from http://www.tusla.ie/uploads/content/toward_the_development_of_a_participation_strategy_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, B. (2005). Social work with disabled children. Childrenz Issues, 9(1), 22–28.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, B., Dowling, S., & Winter, K. (2012). Disabled children and young people who are looked after: A literature review. Retrieved December 28, 2015, from http://pure.qub.ac.uk/portal/files/10445548/Literature_Review_Disabled_Children_and_Young_People_who_are_Looked_After.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, B., Dowling, S., & Winter, K. (2014). A review of the policy context in relation to looked after disabled children and young people in Northern Ireland. Retrieved December 28, 2015, from http://pure.qub.ac.uk/portal/files/10445592/POLICY_REVIEW_KELLY_ET_AL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, C., & O'Donohoe, A. (2014). HRB statistic series 24: Annual report of The National intellectual disability database committee 2013. Dublin: Health Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Kennan, D., Keenaghan, C., O'Connor, U., Kinlen, L., & McCord, J. (2011). A rights based approach to monitoring children and young peoples well-being. Ireland: Children and Youth Program. Retrieved February 14, 2016, from http://www.childrenandyouthprogramme.info/cyp_reports/cyp_reports.php.
   Google Scholar
• Kilkelly, U. (2002). Disability and children: The Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). In G. Quinn, T. Degener, A. Bruce, C. Burke, J. Castellino, P. Kenna, U. Kilkelly, S. Quinlivan (Eds.), Human rights and disability (pp. 119–140). Geneva: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• La Valle, I., Payne, L., & Jelicic, H. (2012). The voice of the child in the child protection system, research summary 7. London: National Children’s Bureau Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• McConkey, R., Kelly, F., & Craig, S. (2014). A national comparative study over one decade of children with intellectual disabilities living away from their natural parents. British Journal of Social Work, 44(3), 714–728. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, C. (2014). Why is history important at moments of transition? The case of “transformation” of Irish child welfare via the new child and family agency. European Journal of Social Work, 17(5), 771–783. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2014.927833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, C. (2016, Spring). Balancing regulation and support in child protection: Using theories of power to develop reflective tools for practice. Irish Social Worker, 11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Mlcek, S. (2013). Are we doing enough to develop cross-cultural competencies for social work? British Journal of Social Work, 44(7), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, J. (1991). Pride against prejudice. London: The Women’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. (1998). Still missing? The experiences of disabled children and young people living away from their families. London: The Who Cares? Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2011). The Munro review of child protection (Final Report): A child-centred system. Retrieved June 20, 2012, from http://www.officialdocuments.gov.uk.
   Google Scholar
• NCCIS Project. (2009). Report of the NCCIS Business Process Standardisation Project. Retrieved December 29, 2015, from http://www.hse.ie/eng/services/publications/Children/nccisbpsp_part1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connell. (2008). Hidden voices: An exploratory study of young carers in cork. Ireland: Combat Poverty Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M., Sapey, B., & Thomas, P. (2012). Social work with disabled people (4th ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, L., & Dolan, P. (2015). The voice of the child in social work assessments: Age appropriate communication with children. British Journal of Social Work, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, F., Geoghegan, M., Scanlon, M., & Swirak, K. (2013). The Irish charity myth, child abuse and human rights: Contextualising the Ryan report into care institutions. British Journal of Social Work, 43(1), 7–23. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, A. (2009). Spatial perspectives on voluntarism in learning disabilities services in Ireland. Journal of Social Policy, 38 (2), 299–315.
   Google Scholar
• Power, A., & Kenny, K. (2011). When care is left to roam: Carers’ experiences of grassroots nonprofit services in ireland. Health & Place, 17(2), 422–429. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, S., & Redmond, B. (2003). Disability and social policy in Ireland. Dublin: University of Dublin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Redmond, B., & Jennings, A. (2015). Responding to the life course goals and challenges for individuals and their families. In A. Christie, B. Featherstone, S. Quin, & T. Walsh (Eds.), Social work in Ireland: Changes and continuities (pp. 125–141). London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Revill, P., Ryan, P., McNamara, A., & Normand, C. (2013). A cost and outcomes analysis of alternative models of care for young children with severe disabilities in Ireland. ALTER—European Journal of Disability Research / Revue Européenne de Recherche sur le Handicap, 7(4), 260–274.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, S. (2013). Preventing the emotional abuse and neglect of people with intellectual disability. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ruch, G. (2005). Relationships-based practice and reflective practice: Holistic approaches to contemporary child care social work. Child and Family Social Work, 10(2), 111–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2005.00359.x
   Google Scholar
• Ruch, G., Turney, D., & Ward, A. (2010). Relationship-based social work, getting to the heart of practice. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Rush, M., & Keenan, M. (2014). The social politics of social work: Anti-oppressive social work dilemmas in twenty-first-century welfare regimes. British Journal of Social Work, 44(6), 1436–1453. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bct014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sainero, A., De Valle, J. F., Lopez, M., & Bravo, A. (2013). Exploring the specific needs of an understudied group: Children with intellectual disability in residential child care. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(9), 1393–1399. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.04.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skalecka, M. (2014). From boom to bust: How the economic crisis renders disabled people to the bottom shelf: A qualitative study of the views of adults with physical impairments on the economic crisis in Co. Kerry, Ireland (Thesis). National University of Ireland, Galway.
   Google Scholar
• Skehill, C. (2004). History of the present of child protection and welfare social work in Ireland. Lampeter: Edwin Mellen Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. (2008). Social work and power. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Spratt, T. (2001). The influence of child protection orientation on child welfare practice. British Journal of Social Work, 31(6), 933–954. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/31.6.933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spratt, T., & Callan, J. (2004). Parents’ views on social work interventions in child welfare cases. British Journal of Social Work, 34(2), 199–224. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalker, K., Green Lister, P., Lerpiniere, J., & McArthur, K. (2010). Child protection and the needs and rights of disabled children: Abridged report. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde Faculty of Education/ Sir Halley Stewart Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Stalker, K., & McArthur, K. (2012). Child abuse, child protection and disabled children: A review of recent research. Child Abuse Review, 21(2), 24–40. doi: 10.1002/car.1154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strier, R., & Binyamin, S. (2013). Introducing anti-oppressive social work practices in public services: Rhetoric to practice. British Journal of Social Work, 44(8), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P., & Knutson, J. (2000). Maltreatment and disabilities: A population-based epidemiological study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24(10), 1257–1273. doi: 10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00190-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, J., & French, S. (2000). Towards an affirmation model of disability. Disability & Society, 15(4), 569–582. doi: 10.1080/09687590050058189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Task Force on Child and Family Support, Child and Family Agency. (2013). Report on task force on the child and family agency. Dublin2: Government Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J., Stalker, K., & Stewart, A. (2015). Disabled children and the child protection system: A cause for concern. Child Abuse Review. May 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Tew, J. (2006). Understanding power and powerlessness: Towards a framework for emancipatory practice in social work. Journal of Social Work, 6(1), 33–51. doi: 10.1177/1468017306062222
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, N. (2016). Anti-discriminatory practice (6th ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• To, W. T., Neirynck, S., Vanderplasschen, W., Vanheule, S., & Vandevelde, S. (2014). Substance use and misuse in persons with intellectual disabilities (ID): Results of a survey in ID and addiction services in Flanders. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(1), 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.10.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Van Vugt, E., Asscher, J., Stams, G. J., Hendriks, J., Bijleveld, C., & Van Der Laan, P. (2011). Moral judgment of young sex offenders with and without intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(6), 2841–2846. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.05.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, V., Jones, C., Stalker, K., & Stewart, A. (2015). Permanence for disabled children and young people through foster care and adoption: A selective review of international literature. Children and Youth Services Review, 53, 137–146. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, J. (2006). Consulting with children with disabilities as service users: Practical and methodological considerations. Dublin: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfensberger, W. (1972). The principle of normalization in human services. Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation.
   Google Scholar