871
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Promoting Contact for Children in State Care: Learning from Northern Ireland on the Development of a Framework for Assessing Contact

&

References

  • Ainsworth, F., & Hansen, P. (2017). Understanding the behaviour of children in care before and after parental contact. Children Australia, 42(1), 5–8. doi: 10.1017/cha.2016.50
  • Atwool, N. (2013). Birth family contact for children in care: How much? How often? Who with? Child Care in Practice, 19(2), 181–198. doi: 10.1080/13575279.2012.758086
  • Avby, G., Nilsen, P., & Ellström, P. E. (2017). Knowledge use and learning in everyday social work practice: A study in child investigation work. Child & Family Social Work, 22(S4), 51–61. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12227
  • Beek, M., & Schofield, G. (2004). Providing a secure base in long-term foster care. London: BAAF.
  • Berrick, J. D., Peckover, S., Pösö, T., & Skivenes, M. (2015). The formalized framework for decision-making in child protection care orders: A cross-country analysis. Journal of European Social Policy, 25(4), 366–378. doi: 10.1177/0958928715594540
  • Boyle, C. (2017). “What is the impact of birth family contact on children in adoption and long-term foster care?” A systematic review. Child & Family Social Work, 22(S1), 22–33. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12236
  • Brophy, J. (2006). Child care proceedings under the children act 1989. London: Department for Constitutional Affairs.
  • Bullen, T., Taplin, S., Kertesz, M., Humphreys, C., & McArthur, M. (2015). Literature review on supervised contact between children in out-of-home care and their parents. Canberra: Institute of Child Protection Studies, ACU.
  • Cafcass. (2016). Care demand statistics. Retrieved from https://www.cafcass.gov.uk/leaflets-resources/organisational-material/care-and-private-law-demand-statistics/care-demand-statistics.aspx
  • Child Care Act. (1991). Retrieved from http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/1991/act/17/enacted/en/html
  • Children Act. (1989). Retrieved from https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/41/contents.
  • Children and Families Act. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/6/contents/enacted
  • The Children (Northern Ireland) Order. (1995). Retrieved from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisi/1995/755/contents/made
  • The Children (Scotland) Act. (1995). Retrieved from https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1995/36/contents
  • Cleaver, H. (2000). Fostering family contact. London: The Stationery Office.
  • Cooper, J. (2010, November 29). The importance of attachment theory for children’s social workers. Community Care.
  • Department for Education. (2012). Contact arrangements for children: A call for views. London: Department for Education.
  • Department for Education. (2016). Children looked after in England (including adoption) year ending 31 March 2016. London: Department for Education.
  • Devaney, J., Hayes, D., & Spratt, T. (2017). The influences of training and experience in removal and reunification decisions involving children at risk of maltreatment: Detecting a “beginner dip”. British Journal of Social Work. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcw175
  • Fahlberg, V. I. (2012). A child’s journey through placement. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  • Featherstone, B., White, S., & Morris, K. (2014). Re-imaging child protection: Towards humane social work with families. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Fratter, J. (1996). Adoption with contact: Implications for policy and practice. London: British Agencies for Adoption and Fostering.
  • Hill, M., Welch, V., & Gadda, A. (2017). Contested views of expertise in children’s care and permanence proceedings. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 39(1), 42–66. doi: 10.1080/09649069.2016.1272781
  • Howe, D. (2011). Attachment across the lifecourse: A brief introduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Human Rights Act. (1998). Retrieved from https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/contents.
  • Humphreys, C., & Kiraly, M. (2011). High-frequency family contact: A road to nowhere for infants. Child & Family Social Work, 16(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2010.00699.x
  • Ivaldi, G. (2000). Surviving adoption. London: BAAF.
  • Kiraly, M., & Humphreys, C. (2015). A tangled web: Parental contact with children in kinship care. Child & Family Social Work, 20(1), 106–115. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12060
  • Larkins, C., Ridley, J., Farrelly, N., Austerberry, H., Bilson, A., Hussein, S., … Stanley, N. (2015). Children’s, young people’s and parents’ perspectives on contact: Findings from the evaluation of social work practices. British Journal of Social Work, 45(1), 296–312. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bct135
  • Lord, J., & Borthwick, S. (2001). Together or apart? Assessing brothers and sisters for permanent placement. London: BAAF.
  • Lowe, N., Murch, M., Borkowski, M., Weaver, A., Beckford, V., & Thomas, C. (1999). Supporting adoption: Reframing the approach. London: BAAF.
  • Loxterkamp, L. (2009). Contact and truth: The unfolding predicament in adoption and fostering. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 14(3), 423–435. doi: 10.1177/1359104509104050
  • Macaskill, C. (2002). Safe contact? Children in permanent placement and contact with their birth relatives. Dorset: Russell House Publishing.
  • Masson, J. (2014). What’s wrong with linear judgments? Family Law (Chichester), 44(9), 1277–1283.
  • Masson, J. (2016). Relationships v relatedness in family justice. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 38(4), 456–459. doi: 10.1080/09649069.2016.1239369
  • Morris, K., White, S., Doherty, P., & Warwick, L. (2017). Out of time: Theorizing family in social work practice. Child & Family Social Work, 22(S3), 51–60. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12257
  • Moyers, S., Farmer, E., & Lipscombe, J. (2006). Contact with family members and its impact on adolescents and their foster placements. British Journal of Social Work, 36(4), 541–559. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch270
  • National Audit Office. (2014). Children in care. HC 787. London: House of Commons.
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2015). Looked after children and young people. Public health guideline [PH28]. London: NICE.
  • Neil, E., & Howe, D. (2004). Contact in adoption and permanent foster care: Research, theory and practice. London: BAAF.
  • Northern Ireland Guardian ad Litem Agency. (2016). Annual statistics 2015–2016. Retrieved from http://www.nigala.hscni.net/pdf/Annual_Stats_2015-2016_Final_version.pdf
  • Northern Ireland Health and Social Care Board. (2012). The practice guidance on assessing and planning for contact with looked after children. Belfast: HSC Board.
  • Perry, A., & Rainey, B. (2007). Supervised, supported and indirect contact orders: Research findings. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 21(1), 21–47. doi: 10.1093/lawfam/ebl020
  • Rees, G., & Stein, M. (2016). Children and young people in care and leaving care. In J. Bradshaw (Ed.), The well-being of children in the UK (4th ed, pp. 231–262). Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Roberts, L. (2017). A small-scale qualitative scoping study into the experiences of looked after children and care leavers who are parents in Wales. Child & Family Social Work, 22(3), 1274–1282. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12344
  • Ruch, G., Winter, K., Cree, V., Hallett, S., Morrison, F., & Hadfield, M. (2017). Making meaningful connections: Using insights from social pedagogy in statutory child and family social work practice. Child & Family Social Work, 22(2), 1015–1023. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12321
  • Rushton, A., Dance, C., Quinton, D., & Mayes, D. (2001). Siblings in late placements. London: BAAF.
  • Schofield, G., & Beek, M. (2006). Attachment handbook for foster care and adoption. London: BAAF.
  • Schofield, G., Larsson, B., & Ward, E. (2017). Risk, resilience and identity construction in the life narratives of young people leaving residential care. Child & Family Social Work, 22(2), 782–791. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12295
  • Schofield, G., & Ward, E. (2011). Understanding and working with parents of children in long-term foster care. London: Jessica Kingsley Publications.
  • Selwyn, J. (2004). Placing older children in new families: changing patterns of contact. In E. Neil, & D. Howe (Eds.), Contact in adoption and permanent foster care: Research, theory and practice. London: BAAF.
  • Sen, R., & Broadhurst, K. (2011). Contact between children in out-of-home placements and their family and friends networks: A research review. Child & Family Social Work, 16(3), 298–309. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2010.00741.x
  • Sinclair, I., Wilson, K., & Gibbs, I. (2001). “A life more ordinary”: What children want from foster placements. Adoption & Fostering, 25(4), 17–26. doi: 10.1177/030857590102500404
  • Slade, A. (2002). A guide to best practice in supervised child contact. London: Coram.
  • Triseliotis, J. H. (2010). Contact between looked after children and their parents: A level playing field. Adoption and Fostering, 34(3), 59–66. doi: 10.1177/030857591003400311
  • Tyler, T. (2011). The observation of contact in expert assessments of parenting capacity: Is your client at a disadvantage? Family Law July, 41(7), 719–723.
  • United Nations Convention of the Rights of the Child. (1989). Retrieved from http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CRC.aspx
  • Vinnerljung, B., Sallnäs, M., & Berlin, M. (2017). Placement breakdowns in long-term foster care–a regional Swedish study. Child & Family Social Work, 22(1), 15–25. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12189
  • Waid, J., & Wojciak, A. S. (2017). Evaluation of a multi-site program designed to strengthen relational bonds for siblings separated by foster care. Evaluation and Program Planning, 64, 69–77. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.05.006
  • Wattenberg, E., Troy, K., & Beuch, A. (2011). Protective supervision: An inquiry into the relationship between child welfare and the court system. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(2), 346–350. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.09.018
  • Winnicott, D. W. (1988). Babies and their mothers. London: Free Association Books.
  • Youell, B. (2005). Observation in social work practice. In M. Bower (Ed.), Psychoanalytic theory for social work practice: Thinking under fire (pp. 47–58). London: Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.