An Ecological Framework for Understanding and Improving Decision Making in Child Protection and Welfare Intake (Duty) Practices in the Republic of Ireland

References

• Benbenishty, R., Davidson-Arad, B., Lopez, M., Devaney, J., Spratt, T., Koopmans, C., … Hayes, D. (2015). Decision making in child protection: An international comparative study on maltreatment substantiation, risk assessment and interventions recommendations, and the role of professionals’ child welfare attitudes. Child Abuse & Neglect, 49, 63–75. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.03.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradt, L., Roets, G., Roose, R., Rosseel, Y., & Bouverne-De Bie, M. (2015). Poverty and decision making in child welfare and protection: Deepening the bias–need debate. British Journal of Social Work, 45, 2161–2175. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcu086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2014). What can “thematic analysis” offer health and wellbeing researchers? International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 9, 1–2. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v9.26152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon (Series ed) and R. M. Lerner (vol. ed), (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 993–1028). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A., & Becker, S. (2012). Methodological issues and approaches. part one: quantitative and qualitative research. In S. Becker, A. Bryman, & H. Ferguson. (Eds.). Understanding Research for Social Policy and Social Work: Themes, Methods and Approaches (2nd ed., pp. 120–135). Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, K., & McGregor C. (2019). ‘Child Protection and Welfare Systems in Ireland: Continuities and Discontinuities of the Present’ in Child Maltreatment Series (Vol 8). National Systems of Child Protection.
   Google Scholar
• Bywaters, P., Brady, G., Bunting, L., Daniel, B., Featherstone, B., Jones, C.,  …  Webb, C. (2018). Inequalities in English child protection practice under austerity: A universal challenge?. Child and Family Social Work, 23(1), 53–61. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crea, T. M. (2010). Balanced decision making in child welfare: Structured processes informed by multiple perspectives. Administration in Social Work, 34(2), 196–212. doi: 10.1080/03643101003609529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, G., Bunting, L., Bywaters, P., Featherstone, B., & McCartan, C. (2017). Child welfare as justice: Why are we not effectively addressing inequalities? British Journal of Social Work, 47, 1641–1651. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcx094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bortoli, L., & Dolan, M. (2015). Decision making in social work with families and children: Developing decision-aids compatible with cognition: Figure 1. British Journal of Social Work, 45, 2142–2160. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcu087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devaney, C., & McGregor, C. (2017). Child protection and family support practice in Ireland: A contribution to present debates from a historical perspective. Child and Family Social Work, 22, 1255–1263. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devaney, J. (2019). The trouble with thresholds: Rationing as a rational choice in child and family social work. Child & Family Social Work, 24(4), 458–466. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickens, J., Berrick, J., Poso, T., & Skivenes, M. (2017). Social workers and independent experts in child protection decision making: Messages from an intercountry comparative study. British Journal of Social Work, 47, 1024–1042. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcw064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, J., & Collins, M. E. (2010). Macro impacts on caseworker decision-making in child welfare: A cross-national comparison. European Journal of Social Work, 13(1), 35–54. doi: 10.1080/13691450903135618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, J., Taylor, B., & McCall, S. (2006). Human rights and decision-making in child protection through explicit argumentation. Child Care in Practice, 12(2), 81–95. doi: 10.1080/13575270600618331
   Google Scholar
• Hackett, S., & Taylor, A. (2014). Decision-making in social work with children and families: The use of experiential and analytical cognitive processes. British Journal of Social Work, 44, 2182–2199. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bct071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, K. R. (1996). Human judgment and social policy: Irreducible uncertainty, inevitable error, unavoidable injustice. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardiker, P., Exton, K., & Barker, M. (1991). Policies and Practices in preventative child care. Aldershot: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Heggdalsvik, I. K., Rød, P. A., & Heggen, K. (2018). Decision-making in child welfare services: Professional discretion versus standardized templates. Child and Family Social Work, 23(3), 522–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm, D. (2016). Sense-making in a social work office: An ethnographic study of safeguarding judgements. Child & Family Social Work, 21(1), 26–35. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm, D., & Roesch-Marsh, A. (2017). The ecology of judgement: A model for understanding and improving social work judgements. British Journal of Social Work, 47, 1361–1376. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcw091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, D. (2009). A brief introduction to social work theory. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• IDEA. (2019). Improving decisions through empowerment and advocacy: Building children’s rights capacity in child protection systems. Retrieved from https://ideachildrights.ucc.ie/
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K., O’Connor, D., Berry, S., Ramelmeier, D., & Pecora, P. J. (2012). Structuring the decision to accept a child protection report. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 6(2), 191–205. doi: 10.1080/15548732.2012.667736
   Google Scholar
• Joubert, L., & Hocking, A. (2015). Academic practitioner partnerships: A model for collaborative practice research in social work. Australian Social Work, 68(3), 352–363. doi: 10.1080/0312407X.2015.1045533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keddell, E. (2014a). Theorising the signs of safety approach to child protection social work: Positioning, codes and power. Children and Youth Services Review, 47, 70–77. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keddell, E. (2014b). Current debates on variability in child welfare decision-making: A selected literature review. Social Sciences, 3, 916–940. doi: 10.3390/socsci3040916
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman, E., & Melrose, K. (2014). Clinical judgment and decision-making in children's social work: An analysis of the ‘front door’ system (DfE Research Report 323). London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lauritzen, C., Vis, S. A., & Fossum, S. (2018). Factors that determine decision making in child protection investigations: A review of the literature. Child and Family Social Work, 23(4), 743–756. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone, P., & Canavan, J. (2018). Systems change: Final evaluation report on Tusla’s prevention, partnership and family support programme. Galway: UNESCO Child and Family Research Centre, National University of Ireland Galway.
   Google Scholar
• Malone, P., Devaney, C., Canavan, J., & McGregor, C. (2018). Comparing areas of commonality and distinction between the national practice models of Meitheal and signs of safety. Galway: UNESCO Child and Family Research Centre; NUI Galway.
   Google Scholar
• McCormack, C. (2018). An exploratory study of the factors that influence Team Leader decision-making processes on pathways for duty/intake child protection referrals in TUSLA western region (MA Social Work Dissertation). NUI Galway.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, C. (2014). Why is history important at moments of transition? The case of ‘transformation’ of Irish child welfare via the new child and family agency. European Journal of Social Work, 17(5), 771–783. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2014.927833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, C. (2019). A paradigm framework for social work theory for early 21st century practice. The British Journal of Social Work, bcz006. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, C., & Devaney, C. (2019). Protective support and supportive protection for families “in the middle”: Learning from the Irish context. Child and Family Social Work. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, K., Mason, W., Bywaters, P., Featherstone, B., Daniel, B., Brady, G.,  …  Webb, C. (2018). Social work, poverty, and child welfare interventions. Child and Family Social Work, 23(3), 364–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2005). Improving practice: Child protection as a systems problem. Children and Youth Services Review, 27, 375–391. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2008). Lessons from research on decision-making. In D. Lindsey, & A. Shlonsky (Eds.). Child Welfare Research: Advances for Practice and Policy (pp. 194–200). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2010). Learning to reduce risk in child protection. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 1135–1151. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2011). The Munro review of child protection: Final Report A child-centred system. London, UK: The Stationary Office Limited.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, L., & Leonard, K. (2014). Decision making in children and families social work: The practitioner’s voice. British Journal of Social Work, 44, 1805–1822. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bct051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt, D., & Turney, D. (2014). Making threshold decisions in child protection: A conceptual analysis. British Journal of Social Work, 44, 1472–1490. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bct007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, L., Cassidy, A., & Devaney, C. (2018). Meitheal and child and family support networks final report: Tusla’s programme for prevention, partnership and family support. Galway: UNESCO Child and Family Research Centre, National University of Ireland Galway.
   Google Scholar
• Ruch, G., Winter, K., Cree, V., Hallett, S., Morrison, F., & Hadfield, M. (2017). Making meaningful connections: Using insights from social pedagogy in statutory child and family social work practice. Child & Family Social Work, 22, 1015–1023. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltiel, D. (2016). Observing front line decision-making in child protection. British Journal of Social Work, 46, 2104–2119. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcv112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salveron, M., Bromfield, L., Kirika, C., Simmons, J., Murphy, T., & Turnell, A. (2015). ‘Changing the way we do child protection’: The implementation of Signs of Safety® within the Western Australia department for child protection and family support. Children and Youth Services Review, 48, 126–139. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2017). Doing qualitative research (5th ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Skehill, C. (2004). The nature of social work in Ireland. New York: Edwin Mellen.
   Google Scholar
• Spratt, T. (2000). Decision making by senior social workers at point of first referral. British Journal of Social Work, 30, 597–618. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/30.5.597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, J., & Schmidt, G. (2011). Race, poverty and child protection decision making. British Journal of Social Work, 41, 1105–1121. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J. (2012). Models for professional judgement in social work. European Journal of Social Work, 15(4), 546–562. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2012.702310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J. (2017). Heuristics in professional judgement: A psycho-social rationality model. British Journal of Social Work, 47, 1043–1060. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcw084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevithick, P. (2012). Social work skills and knowledge: A practice handbook (3rd ed.). Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Turnell, A., & Murphy, T. (2017). Signs of safety comprehensive briefing paper (4th ed.). Perth: Resolutions Consultancy Pty Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Turney, D., & Ruch, G. (2016). Thinking about thinking after Munro: The contribution of cognitive interviewing to child-care social work supervision and decision-making practices. British Journal of Social Work, 46, 669–685. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcv001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tusla Child and Family Agency. (2015). Meitheal, a national practice model, Dublin, Tusla.
   Google Scholar
• Whittaker, A. (2018). How do child-protection practitioners make decisions in real-life situations? Lessons from the psychology of decision-making. British Journal of Social Work, 48(7), 1–18. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcx145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, K. (2011). The UNCRC and social workers’ relationships with young children. Child Abuse Review, 20, 395–406. doi: 10.1002/car.1203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar