161
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

“My Identity is as a Professional Leader”; The Practice of Leadership of Child Welfare Managers in Norway

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 22 Sep 2023, Accepted 30 Apr 2024, Published online: 11 Jun 2024

References

  • Alvehus, J., & Andersson, T. (2018). A new professional landscape: Entangled institutional logics in Two Swedish welfare professions. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.v8i3.109542
  • Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2012). Critical leadership studies: The case for critical performativity. Human Relations, 65(3), 367–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711430555
  • Andersson, T., & Liff, R. (2018). Co-optation as a response to competing institutional logics: Professionals and managers in healthcare. Journal of Professions and Organization, 5(2), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joy001
  • Attride-Sterling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307
  • Berg, L. N., Puusa, A., Pulkkinen, K., & Geschwind, L. (2017). Managers’ identities: Solid or affected by changes in institutional logics and organisational amendments? Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 21(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.v21i1.14890
  • Bévort, F., & Suddaby, R. (2016). Scripting professional identities: How individuals make sense of contradictory institutional logics. Journal of Professions and Organization, 3(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jov007
  • BLD. (2017). Mer kunnskap - bedre barnevern. Kompetansestrategi for det kommunale barnevernet 2018–2024. Barne- og likestillingsdepartementet.
  • Blom, M. (2016). Leadership studies—A Scandinavian inspired way forward? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 32(2), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2016.04.001
  • Blom, M., & Alvesson, M. (2015). All-inclusive and all good: The hegemonic ambiguity of leadership. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(4), 480–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.08.001
  • Bufdir. (2017). Operativ ledelse i barnevernet. Beskrivelse av krav og forventninger. The Norwegian Directorate for Children; Youth and Family Affairs.
  • Bufdir. (2019a). Følgeevaluering av kompetansestrategien for det kommunale barnevernet 2018-2024. Retrieved from https://bufdir.no/globalassets/global/nbbf/barnevern/folgeevaluering_av_kompetansestrategien_for_det_kommunale_barnevernet_2018_2024-.pdf
  • Bufdir. (2019b). Utredning av kompetansehevingstiltak i barnevernet. The Norwegian Directorate for Children; Youth and Family Affairs.
  • Bufdir. (2020). Role and structure of the Norwegian child welfare services. The Norwegian Directorate for Children; Youth and Family Affairs. Retrieved March 04, 2020, from https://bufdir.no/en/English_start_page/The_Norwegian_Child_Welfare_Services/role_of_the_norwegian_child_welfare_services/
  • Colby Peters, S. (2018). Defining social work leadership: A theoretical and conceptual review and analysis. Journal of Social Work Practice, 32(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2017.1300877
  • Djupvik, A. R., Pithouse, A., Myklebust, V., Rees, A., Ekeland, T.-J., & Brookfield, C. (2019). New public management and practitioner autonomy in children’s services in Norway and Wales: Views from the frontline. European Journal of Social Work, 24, 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2019.1693338
  • Elofsson, S., Lundström, T., & Shanks, E. (2016). High job strain among social work managers and its relation to perceived work situation. European Journal of Social Work, 19(5), 664–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2015.1032894
  • Exworthy, M., & Halford, S. (1999). Professionals and managers in a changing public sector: Conflict, compromise and collaboration? In M. Exworthy, & S. Halford (Eds.), Professionals and the new managerialism in the public sector (pp. 1–17). Open University Press.
  • Falconer, R., & Shardlow, S. M. (2018). Comparing child protection decision-making in England and Finland: Supervised or supported judgement? Journal of Social Work Practice, 32(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2018.1438996
  • Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
  • Fossestøl, K., Breit, E., Andreassen, T. A., & Klemsdal, L. (2015). Managing institutional complexity in public reform: Hybridization in front-line service organizations. Public Administration, 93(2), 290–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12144
  • Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. Polity Press.
  • Friedland, R., & Alford, R. (1991). Bringing society back. In W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), New institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago Univeristy Press.
  • Furnari, S. (2020). Situating frames and institutional logics: The social situation as a Key institutional microfoundation. In P. Haack, P. Sieweke, & L. Wessel (Eds.), Microfoundations of institutions research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. Part B, pp. 193–209). Emerald.
  • Gadolin, C. (2018). Professional employees’ strategic employment of the managerial logic in healthcare. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 13(2), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-02-2016-1359
  • Goodrick, E., & Reay, T. (2011). Constellations of institutional logics: Changes in the professional work of pharmacists. Work and Occupations, 38(3), 372–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888411406824
  • Gotvassli, K. A., & Moe, T. (2019). Bridging the gap – the role of leadership in professional judgement in child protection services. Nordic Social Work Research, 11, 264–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2019.1694057
  • Greenwood, R., Díaz, A. M., Li, S. X., & Lorente, J. C. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21(2), 521–539. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0453
  • Hood, C. (1995). The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2-3), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W
  • Jacobsen, D. I. (2019). Ledelse og den offentlige dimensjonen. En sammenligning av ledere i offentlige og private organisasjoner. Fagbokforlaget.
  • Jermier, J. M., & Kerr, S. (1997). “Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement” — Contextual recollections and current observations. The Leadership Quarterly, 8(2), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(97)90008-4
  • Klausen, K. K. (2001). Skulle det være noget særligt?: Organisation og ledelse i det offentlige. Børsen forlag.
  • Klausen, K. K. (2019). Hybridledelse. In L. H. Petersen, P. Sørensen, & K. Klaudi Klausen (Eds.), Ledelse i den kommunale praksis (pp. 153–179). Syddansk universitetsforlag.
  • KMD. (2014). God ledelse i staten. Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet.
  • KMD. (2017). Program for bedre styring og ledelse i staten. Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet.
  • Lindberg, K. (2014). Performing multiple logics in practice. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30(4), 485–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2013.12.007
  • Llewellyn, S. (2001). `Two-way windows': Clinicians as medical managers. Organization Studies, 22(4), 593–623. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840601224003
  • Lundström, T., Sallnäs, M., & Shanks, E. (2020). Stability and change in the field of residential care for children. On ownership structure, treatment ideas and institutional logics. Nordic Social Work Research, 10(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2018.1541016
  • Mason, J. (2018). Qualitative researching (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  • McFadden, P., Campbell, A., & Taylor, B. (2014). Resilience and burnout in child protection social work: Individual and organisational themes from a systematic literature review. British Journal of Social Work, 45(5), 1546–1563. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct210
  • Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
  • Misund, B. I. (2023). Statlig styring og loklat handlingsrom i barnevernet. Norsk statsvitenskapelig tidsskrift, 39(4), 142–158. https://doi.org/10.18261/nst.39.4.2
  • Moe, T., & Gotvassli, K. A. (2016). Å lede til barns beste - Hvordan kan lederutdanning i barnevernet svare på barnevernets behov for økt lederkompetanse? Tidsskriftet Norges Barnevern, 93(3-4), 166–182. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-1838-2016-03-04-03
  • Moe, T., & Gotvassli, K. A. (2022). Den viktige barnevernlederrollen. Tidsskriftet Norges Barnevern, 99(4), 166–167. https://doi.org/10.18261/tnb.99.4.1
  • Moe, T., & Valstad, S. J. (2014). Lederutfordringer, lederansvar og en modell for barnevernledelse. In Ø Kvello, & T. Moe (Eds.), Barnevernledelse (pp. 22–40). Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.
  • Møller, A. M., & Grøn, C. H. (2021). Faglig ledelse – at lede faglighed og fællesskab for at sikre faglige skøn, begrundede prioriteringer og håndtering af følelsesmæssigt pres. Lederliv, 1, 1–26. https://lederliv.dk/artikel/faglig-ledelse
  • Noordegraaf, M. (2016). Reconfiguring professional work. Administration & Society, 48(7), 783–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713509242
  • Noordegraaf, M. (2020). Protective or connective professionalism? How connected professionals can (still) act as autonomous and authoritative experts. Journal of Professions and Organization, 7(2), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joaa011
  • Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice (8th ed.). SAGE.
  • Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 160940691773384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
  • Nyathi, N. (2018). Child protection decision-making: Social workers’ perceptions. Journal of Social Work Practice, 32(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2018.1448768
  • Olsen, T. H., & Solstad, E. (2020). Changes in the power balance of institutional logics: Middle managers’ responses. Journal of Management & Organization, 26(4), 571–584. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.72
  • Olsvik, B. (2021). Skjønn i ledelse av kommunalt barnevern. Kompleksitet, motstridende krav og paradoksale spenninger [Avhandling levert for ph.d-graden, UiT Norges arktiske universitet].
  • Olsvik, B., & Saus, M. (2022). Lederskjønnets utfordringer i kommunalt barnevern: Om spenninger mellom faglig skjønn og lederskjønn. Tidsskriftet Norges Barnevern, 99(4), 220–240. https://doi.org/10.18261/tnb.99.4.5
  • Orazi, D. C., Turrini, A., & Valotti, G. (2013). Public sector leadership: New perspectives for research and practice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(3), 486–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852313489945
  • Overgaard, D., & Bovin, J. S. (2014). Hvordan bliver forskning i sygepleje bedre med NVivo? Nordisk Sygeplejeforskning, 4(3), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1892-2686-2014-03-06
  • Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2013). Embedded in hybrid contexts: How individuals in organizations respond to competing institutional logics. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action. Part B. Research in the sociology of organizations (pp. 3–35). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
  • Petersen, L. H., Sørensen, P., & Klausen, K. K. (Eds.). (2019). Ledelse i den kommunale praksis. Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
  • Pettersen, I. J., & Solstad, E. (2014). Managerialism and profession-based logic: The use of accounting information in changing hospitals. Financial Accountability & Management, 30(4), 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12043
  • Prop. 73 L. (2016-2017). Endringer i barnevernloven (barnevernsreform). Barne- og familiedepartementet.
  • Reay, T., Goodrick, E., Waldorff, S. B., & Casebeer, A. N. N. (2017). Getting leopards to change their spots: Co-creating a new professional role identity. Academy of Management Journal, 60(3), 1043–1070. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0802
  • Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30(06), 629–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609104803
  • Riksrevisjonen. (2020). Riksrevisjonens undersøking av om statlege barnevernsmyndigheiter sikrar det beste for barn i barnevernsinstitusjonar.
  • Røsvik, K., Vike, H., & Haldar, M. (2021). Barnevernet - velferdsstatens romatiske effektiviseringsprosjekt. Barn, 39(2-3), 169–186.
  • Selznick, P. (1949). Tva and the grass roots. University of California Press.
  • Shanks, E., Lundström, T., & Wiklund, S. (2015). Middle managers in social work: Professional identity and management in a marketised welfare state. British Journal of Social Work, 45(6), 1871–1887. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcu061
  • Sirris, S. (2019). Coherent identities and roles? Hybrid professional managers’ prioritizing of coexisting institutional logics in differing contexts. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 35(4), 101063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2019.101063
  • Smets, M., Jarzabkowski, P., Burke, G. T., & Spee, P. (2015). Reinsurance trading in lloyd’s of London: Balancing conflicting-yet-complementary logics in practice. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 932–101970. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0638
  • Statens Helsetilsyn. (2012). Oppsummering av landsomfattende tilsyn med kommunalt barnevern 2011 - undersøkelse og evaluering. Rapport 2/2012.
  • Statistics Norway. (2020). Statistikk for barnevernet https://www.ssb.no/sosiale-forhold-og-kriminalitet/statistikker/barneverng
  • Sullivan, W. P. (2016). Leadership in social work: Where are we? Journal of Social Work Education, 52(sup1), S51–S61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2016.1174644
  • Svensson, K., & Svensson, L. G. (2021). Professionalism - styrning och autonomi i samspel. In L. Bringselius (Ed.), Tillit och omdöme: perspektiv på tillitsbaserad styrning (pp. 97–128). Studentlitteratur.
  • Tham, P., & Strömberg, A. (2020). The iron cage of leadership - The role of first-line managers in child welfare. The British Journal of Social Work, 50(2), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz156
  • Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford University Press, Incorporated.
  • Toresen, G. (2014). Barnevernlederen - et kommunalt kinderegg? In T. Moe & Ø. Kvello (Eds.), Barnevernledelse (pp. 286–293). Gyldendal akademisk.
  • Turba, H., Breimo, J. P., & Lo, C. (2019). Professional and organizational power intertwined: Barriers to networking? Children and Youth Services Review, 107, 104527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104527
  • Yukl, G. A., & Gardner, W. L. (2020). Leadership in organizations (9th Global ed.). Pearson.