Comparing Core Concepts of Child Protection: Reflecting the Social Context of Families

References

• Augsberger, A., Collins, M. E., & Levine, B. F. (2022). Family engagement in child welfare system-level change: A review of current models in the states. Families in Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/10443894211067855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Berrick, J., Dickens, J., Pösö, T., & Skivenes, M. (2016). Time, institutional support, and quality of decision making in child protection: A cross-country analysis. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 40(5), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2016.1159637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosk, E., & Feely, M. (2020). The goldilocks problem: Tensions between actuarially based and clinical judgment in child welfare decision making. Social Service Review, 94(4), 659–692. https://doi.org/10.1086/712060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böllert, K., & Wazlawik, M. (2012). Kinderschutz als Dienstleistung für Kinder und Jugendliche. In W. Thole, A. Retkowski, & B. (Hg.). Schäuble (Eds.), Sorgende Arrangements. Kinderschutz zwischen Organisation und Familie (pp. 19–38). Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Burgardt, D., Dederich, M., Dziabel, N., Höhne, T., Lohwasser, D., Stöhr, R., & Zirfas, J. (2017). Einleitung. In M. Dederich, & J. (Hg.). Zirfas (Eds.), Vulnerabilität. Pädagogische Herausforderungen (pp. 7–18). Kohlhammer.
   Google Scholar
• Bühler-Niederberger, D. (2020). Lebensphase Kindheit. Theoretische Ansätze, Akteure und Handlungsräume (p. 2). Beltz Juventa. überarbeitete Auflage, erstmals 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Child Welfare Information Gateway. (n.d.). Safety and Risk Assessment - Child Welfare Information Gateway. Downloaded 12/27/21.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, M. E., Putnam, D., & Doherty, J. (2019). Assessing student competency in diversity and social justice. Social Work Education, 40(4), 462–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2019.1701643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, M., & Katz, I. (2019). Typologies of child protection systems: An international approach. Child Abuse Review, 28(5), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuccaro-Alamin, S., Foust, R., Vaithianathan, R., & Putnam-Hornstein, E. (2017). Risk assessment and decision making in child protective services: Predictive risk modeling in context. Children and Youth Services Review, 79, 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dettlaff, A. J., & Boyd, R. (2020). Racial disproportionality and disparities in the child welfare system: Why do they exist, and what can be done to address them? The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 692(1), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716220980329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, R., Benson, K., Fitz-Symonds, S., Westlake, D., Campbell, K., & Diaz, C. (2023). Peerparental advocacy: A narrative review of the literature. Journal of Children’ s Services, 18(3/4), 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCS-08-2022-0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, J., Collins, M. E., & Kim, S. H. (2016). Linking family engagement with a rights perspective: Macro factors influencing practice. European Journal of Social Work, 21(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2016.1255925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Featherstone, B., Gupta, A., Morris, K., & Warner, J. (2016). Let’s stop feeding the risk monster: Towards a social model of child protection. Families, Relationships and Societies, 7(1), 07–22. https://doi.org/10.1332/204674316X14552878034622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelhor, D. (2018). Screening for adverse childhood experiences (ACEs): Cautions and suggestions. Child Abuse & Neglect, 85, 174–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.07.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitz-Symonds, S., Evans, L., Tobis, D., Westlake, D., & Diaz, C. (2024). Mechanisms for support: A realist evaluation of peer parental advocacy in England. British Journal of Social Work, 54(1), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcad200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong, K. (2017). Child welfare involvement and contexts of poverty: The role of parental adversities, social networks and social services. Children and Youth Services Review, 72, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N., Parton, N., & Skivenes, M. (Eds.). (2011). Child protection systems: International trends and orientations. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, V., Edwards, R., & Horsley, N. (2017). Challenging the politics of early intervention: Who's’ saving'Children and why. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henrickson, M., & Fouché, C. (2017). Vulnerability and marginality in human services. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holz, G., & Mitschke, C. (2019). Die Monheimer Präventionskette: Von der Vision zur Verwirkllichiung kindbezogener Armutsprävention auf kommunaler Ebene. Institut für Sozialarbeit und Sozialpädagogik e.V.
   Google Scholar
• Holz, G., & Richter-Kornweitz, A. (2020). Arme Kinder in der Corona-Krise nicht länger übersehen. ISS- Institut für Sozialarbeit und Sozialforschung e.V. Download unter: https://www.iss-ffm.de/aktuelles/iss-veroeffentlicht-statement-arme-kinder-in-der-corona-krise-nicht-laenger-uebersehen, (Download 10-28-2021)
   Google Scholar
• Houston, S. (2014). Meta-theoretical paradigms underpinning risk in child welfare: Towards a position of methodological pragmatism. Children and Youth Services Review, 47, 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyslop, I., & Keddell, E. (2018). Outing the elephants: Exploring a new paradigm for child protection social work. Social Sciences, 7(7), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7070105
   Google Scholar
• International Federation of Social Workers (2014). Global definition of social work. https://www.ifsw.org/what-is-social-work/global-definition-of-social-work/
   Google Scholar
• Kam, P. K. (2014). Back to the ‘social’ of social work: Reviving the social work profession’s contribution to the promotion of social justice. International Social Work, 57(6), 723–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872812447118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse, C., Humrich, W., Schluck, S., Petras, K., & Richter-Kornweitz, A. (2023). Strukturelle Armutsprävention mit Hilfe kommunaler Präventionsketten. Public Health Forum, 31(2), 74–77. https://doi.org/10.1515/pubhef-2023-0006
   Google Scholar
• Lalayants, M., Wyka, K., & Saitadze, I. (2021). Outcomes of the parent advocacy initiative in child safety conferences: Placement and repeat maltreatment. Children and Youth Services Review, 130, 106241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leotti, S. M. (2020). The discursive construction of risk: Social work knowledge production and criminalized women. Social Service Review, 94(3), 445–487. https://doi.org/10.1086/710562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, C., Rogers, W., & Dodds, S. (2014). Vulnerability. New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, K. M., Cahn, K., & Orellana, E. R. (2012). Dynamics that contribute to disproportionality and disparity: Perspectives from child welfare professionals, community partners, and families. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(11), 2201–2207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.07.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2019). Decision-making under uncertainty in child protection: Creating a just and learning culture. Child & Family Social Work, 24(1), 123–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicotera, A. (2019). Social justice and social work, a fierce urgency: Recommendations for social work social justice pedagogy. Journal of Social Work Education, 55(3), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2019.1600443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (1994). ‘Problematics of government’, (post) modernity and social work. The British Journal of Social Work, 24(1), 9–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (1998). Risk, advanced liberalism and child welfare: The need to rediscover uncertainty and ambiguity. British Journal of Social Work, 28(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a011317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomey, M. (2017). Vulnerabilität und Fremdunterbringung. Eine Studie zur Entscheidungspraxis bei Fremdunterbringung. Beltz Juventa.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsauer, N. (2000). «Verwahrlost». Kindswegnahmen und die Entstehung der Jugendfürsorge im schweizerischen Sozialstaat 1900–1945. Chronos.
   Google Scholar
• Saar-Heiman, Y., & Gupta, A. (2024). Beyond participation: Parent activism in child protection as a path to transformative change. Children and Youth Services Review, 157, 107443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schone, R. (2001). Familien unterstützen und Kinder schützen – Jugendämter zwischen Sozialleistung und Intervention. In Sozialpädagogisches Institut im SOS-Kinderdorf e. V. (Hg.): Jugendämter zwischen Hilfe und Kontrolle (pp. 50–89). Sozialpädagogisches Institut im SOS- Kinderdorf e.V.
   Google Scholar
• Schramkowski, B. (2018). Paradoxien des ,Migrationshintergrundes‘. Von vorder – und hintergründigen Bedeutungen des Begriffs. In B. Blank, S. Gögercin, K. E. Sauer, & B. Schramkowski (Eds.), Soziale Arbeit in der Migrationsgesellschaft: Grundlagen – Konzepte – Handlungsfelder (pp. 43–53). Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Schröder, C., & Burmeister, C. (2018). Zum Verhältnis von Sozialpolitik und Angst im Kinderschutz. In S. Betzelt, & I. Bode (Eds.), Angst im neuen Wohlfahrtsstaat: Kritische Blicke auf ein diffuses Phänomen (pp. 209–228). Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. S.
   Google Scholar
• Stoddart, J. K. (2017). The risk of risk: An exploration of the impact of “risk” on child welfare decision-making [Doctoral dissertation]. Wilfrid Laurier University. https://scholars.wlu.ca/etd/1906
   Google Scholar
• Sutterlüty, F., & Flick, S. (Hg.). (2017). Der Streit ums Kindeswohl. Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Swadener, B. B., & Lubeck, S. (Eds.). (1995). Children and families" at promise": Deconstructing the discourse of risk. State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swift, K. J., & Callahan, M. (2009). At risk: Social justice in child welfare and other human services. University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tobis, D. (2013). From pariahs to partners: How parents and their allies changed the New York city’s child welfare system. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vial, A., van der Put, C., Stams, G. J. J. M., Dinkgreve, M., & Assink, M. (2021). Validation and further development of a risk assessment instrument for child welfare. Child Abuse and Neglect, 117, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virokannas, E., Liuski, S., & Kuronen, M. (2020). The contested concept of vulnerability – a literature review. European Journal of Social Work, 23(2), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1508001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, M. (2007). Familienarbeit in der Heimerziehung – Überlegungen zu einer Theorie in kritischer Absicht: Da werden Sie geholfen!. In H. G. Homfeldt, & J. (Hg.). Schulze-Krüdener (Eds.), Elternarbeit in der Heimerziehung (pp. 196–233). Ernst Reinhardt.
   Google Scholar
• Wutzler, M. (2019). Kindeswohl und die Ordnung der Sorge. Dimensionen, Problematisierungen, Falldynamiken. Beltz.
   Google Scholar