Urban cemeteries’ potential as sites for cultural encounters

References

• Agrawal, S., & Barratt, C. (2014). Does proximity matter in promoting interfaith dialogue?. International Migration & Integration, 15, 567–587.10.1007/s12134-013-0295-3
   Google Scholar
• Bagwell, S., Evand, G., Willing, A., & Worpole, K. (2012). Public space management. Report to the Intercultural Cities Research Programme. London: Cities Institute, London Metropolitan University.
   Google Scholar
• Balbo, M. (2016). Contemporary urban space and the intercultural city, Chapter 1. In G. Marconi & E. Ostanel, The Intercultural City: Migration, Minorities and the Management of Diversity (pp. 25–39). London: IB. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, S. (2012). Religion in the built environment: Aesth/ethics, ritual and memory in lived urban space. In L. Gomez & W. V. Herck, The sacred in the city (pp. 73–95). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Botvar, P. K. (2010). Secularisation, sacralisation or both? Religious change in Norway 1991 – 2008. Retrieved August 29, 2017, from [DOC] uio.no. http://scholar.google.no/scholar?start=30&hl=no&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&cites=10424918587555208522&scipsc=
   Google Scholar
• Botvar, P. K., & Schmidt, U. (red.) (2010). Religion i dagens Norge. Mellom sekularisering og sakralisering. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Buddhistforbundet (2012). Når en Buddhist dør [www.buddhistforbundet 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun, Craig (2010). Rethinking secularism. The hedgehog review, 12(3), 35–48. Retrieved June 15, 2017, from Electronic version at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/42624/
   Google Scholar
• Cancellieri, A. (2016). New religious spaces of difference: Resources and risks in the new italian religious landscape, Chapter 5. In G. Marconi & E. Ostanel, ( 2016). The Intercultural City: Migration, Minorities and the Management of Diversity (pp. 79–88). London: IB. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Dawn Norge. (2010). Kartlegging av migrantmenigheter i Oslo.Retrieved November 25, 2013, from http://www.norgeskristnerad.no/doc//Flyktningenettverket/Rapport%20kartlegging%20av%20migrantmenigheter%20i%20Oslo%20(2).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Evensen, K. H., Nordh, H., & Skaar, M. (2017). Everyday use of urban cemeteries: A Norwegian case study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 159, 76–84.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.09.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fog, J. (1995). Med samtalen som utgangspunkt. København: Akademisk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, D., Kellaher, L., & Neophytou, G. (2000). Sustaining cemeteries: The user perspective. Mortality, 5(1), 34–52.10.1080/713685994
   Google Scholar
• Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, J., & Ebaugh, H. R. (2003). Calling upon the sacred: Migrants’ use of religion in the migration process. International Migration Review, 37(4), 1145–1162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, A. (2016a). Staking a claim to land, faith and family: Burial location preferences of Middle Eastern Cristian Migrants. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 37(2), 179–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, A. (2016b). Deathscapes in diaspora: Contesting space and negotiating home in context of post-migration diversity. Social & Cultural Geography, 17(2), 247–261.10.1080/14649365.2015.1059472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, A., & Ammann, E. S. (2016). End-of-life care and rituals in contexts of postmigration diversity in Europe: An introduction. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 37(2), 95–102.10.1080/07256868.2016.1142052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huuse, A. K., & Døving, C. A. (2009). Dødsritualer i det flerreligiøse Norge. Retrieved November 13, 2013, from http://www.trooglivssyn.no/livsfaseriter
   Google Scholar
• Hviid-Jacobsen, M. (Ed.). (2013). Deconstructing death: Changing cultures of death, dying, bereavement and care in the Nordic countries. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Kadrouch-Outmany, K. (2012–2013). Burial practices and desires among Muslims in the Netherlands: A matter of belonging. Canadian Journal of Netherlandic Studies, 33.2/34.1, 107–128.
   Google Scholar
• Klassekampen. (2017). The Death is Personal. Reader’s letter 10.05.2017.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, P. T. (2002). Small scale research. London: Sage.10.4135/9781849209908
   Google Scholar
• Knott, K. (2013). The Secular Sacred: In-between or both/and? In A. Day, C. Cotter, & G. Vincett (Eds.), Social identities between the sacred and the secular (pp. 145–161). London, NY: Ashgate/Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Knott, K. (2016). Living Religious Practices. In J. B. Saunders, E. Fiddian-Quasmiyeh, & S. Snyder (Eds.), Intersections of religion and migration: Issues at the global crossroads (pp. 71–90). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-58629-2
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (2009). Det kvalitative forskningsintervju. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Loga, J. (2012). Trossamfunn, innvandring, integrering. En kunnskapsoversikt ( Rapport 2012:3). Oslo: Senter for forskning på sivilsamfunn og frivillig sektor.
   Google Scholar
• Maddrell, A. (2013). Living with the deceased: Absence, presence and absence-presence. Cultural Geographies, 20(4), 501–522.10.1177/1474474013482806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddrell, A. (2016). Mapping grief. A conceptual framework for understanding the spatial dimensions of bereavement, mourning and remembrance. Social & Cultural Geography, 17(2), 166–188.10.1080/14649365.2015.1075579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madrell, A., & Sidaway, J. A. (2010). Deathscapes: Spaces for death, dying, mourning and rememberence. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McClymont, K. (2016). That eccentric use of land at the top of the hill: Cemeteries and stories of the city. Mortality, 21(4), 378–396.10.1080/13576275.2016.1151865
   Google Scholar
• Nordh, H., Evensen, K. H., & Skår, M. (2017). A peaceful place in the city – A qualitative study of restorative components of the cemetery. Landscape and Urban Planning, 167, 100–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norsk forening for gravplasskultur. (2017). https://gravplasskultur.no/kremasjon/kremasjonsstatistikk/.
   Google Scholar
• NOU 2013:1. Det livsynsåpne samfunn. En helhetlig tros- og livssynspolitikk. Oslo: Kulturdepartementet [White Paper].
   Google Scholar
• Oslo kommune, Gravferdsetaten. Årsberetning. (2016). Retrieved December 12, 2017, from https://www.oslo.kommune.no/politikk-og-administrasjon/politikk/byradet/arsberetning-2016/?del=15-9
   Google Scholar
• Pace, E. (2005). Religion and migration. In W. Bosswick & C. Husband, Comparative European research in migration, diversity and identities (pp. 113–125). Bilbao: University of Deuso. Retrieved July 18, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Plesner, I.T., & Døving, C. A. red. (2009). Livsfaseriter. Religions- og livssynspolitiske utfordringer i Norge. Oslo: STL Samarbeidsrådet for tros- og livssynssamfunn. Retrieved August 10, 2017, from http://www.trooglivssyn.no/livsfaseriter
   Google Scholar
• Reimers, E. (1999). Death and identity: Graves and funerals as cultural communication. Mortality, 4(2), 147–166.10.1080/713685976
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, I. (2009). I’m a believer – but I’ll be damned if I’m religious: Belief and religion in the greater Copenhagen area: A focus group study. ( Dr thesis). The University of Lund, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Rugg, J. (2000). Defining the place of burial: What makes a cemetery a cemetery? Mortality, 5(3), 259–275.10.1080/713686011
   Google Scholar
• Skår, M., Nordh, H., & Swensen, G. (accepted). Green urban cemeteries: More than a park. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Planning and Placemaking.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. (2016a). Retrieved August 25, 2017, from www.ssb.no/trosamf/
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. (2016b). Retrieved August 25, 2017, from www.ssb.no Table 06339
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. (2017a). Retrieved August 21, 2017, from https://www.ssb.no/befolkning/statistikker/innvbef
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. (2017b). Retrieved August 21, 2017, from https://www.ssb.no/kultur-og-fritid/statistikker/kirke_kostra/aar
   Google Scholar
• Swensen, G., Nordh, H., & Brendalsmo, J. (2016). A green space between life and death – a case study of activities in Gamlebyen cemetery in Oslo. Norwegian Journal of Geography, 70(1), 41–53.
   Google Scholar
• Synnes, R. M. (2012). Kristne migrantmenigheter i Oslo ( KIFO-rapport 2012/1). Oslo: Stiftelsen Kirkeforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Tveit, O. F. (2007). When believers meet. A study guide on interreligious dialogue. Theological Commission. Church of Norway Council on Ecumenical and International Relations. Retrieved November 13, 2013, from http://www.kirken.no/english/doc/engelsk/believers_meet_07_08.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, G., & Mayblin, L. (2016). Creating meaningful contact: Boundaries and bridges in the intercultural city, Chapter 10. In G. Marconi & E. Ostanel (Eds.), The intercultural city: Migration, minorities and the management of diversity (pp. 153–163). New York, NY: IB Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Venhorst, C. (2013). Islamic death rituals in a small town context in the Netherlands: Explorations of a common praxis for professionals. Omega, 65(1), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessel, T. (2009). Does diversity in urban space enhance intergroup contact and tolerance? Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 91(1), 5–17.10.1111/j.1468-0467.2009.00303.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, P., & Landry, C. (2008). The intercultural city: Planning for diversity advantage. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Woodthorpe, K. (2011). Sustaining the contemporary cemetery: Implementing policy alongside conflicting perspectives and purpose. Mortality, 16(3), 259–276.10.1080/13576275.2011.586125
   Google Scholar