Laterality across languages: Results from a global dichotic listening study using a smartphone application

REFERENCES

• Arnett, J. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63, 602–614. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellis, T. J., & Wilber, L. A. (2001). Effects of aging and gender on interhemispheric function. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 44, 246–263. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2001/021)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bless, J. J., Westerhausen, R., Arciuli, J., Kompus, K., Gudmundsen, M., & Hugdahl, K. (2013). “Right on all occasions?” – On the feasibility of laterality research using a smartphone dichotic listening application. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 42. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryden, M. P. (1988). An overview of the dichotic listening procedure and its relation to cerebral organization. In K. Hugdahl (Ed.), Handbook of dichotic listening: Theory, methods and research (pp. 1–43). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, H., Levy, J. J., & McShane, D. (1989). Hemispheric specialization for speech and non-verbal stimuli in Chinese and French-Canadian subjects. Neuropsychologia, 27, 241–245. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(89)90175-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corballis, M. C. (1989). Laterality and human evolution. Psychological Review, 96, 492–505. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gootjes, L., Van Strien, J. W., & Bouma, A. (2004). Age effects in identifying and localising dichotic stimuli: A corpus callosum deficit? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26, 826–837. doi:10.1080/13803390490509448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, S. D., Sandy, C. J., John, O. P., & Potter, J. (2010). Wired but not WEIRD: The promise of the Internet in reaching more diverse samples. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 94–95. doi:10.1017/S0140525X10000300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramstad, A., Engelsen, B. A., & Hugdahl, K. (2003). Left hemisphere dysfunction affects dichotic listening in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. International Journal of Neuroscience, 113, 1177–1196. doi:10.1080/00207450390212302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83; discussion 83–135. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., McElreath, R., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., … Ziker, J. (2006). Costly punishment across human societies. Science, 312, 1767–1770. doi:10.1126/science.1127333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirnstein, M., Westerhausen, R., Korsnes, M. S., & Hugdahl, K. (2013). Sex differences in language asymmetry are age-dependent and small: A large-scale, consonant–vowel dichotic listening study with behavioral and fMRI data. Cortex, 49, 1910–1921. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiscock, M., Inch, R., Jacek, C., Hiscock-Kalil, C., & Kalil, K. M. (1994). Is there a sex difference in human laterality? I. An exhaustive survey of auditory laterality studies from six neuropsychology journals. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 16, 423–435. doi:10.1080/01688639408402653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugdahl, K. (1995). Dichotic listening: Probing temporal lobe functional integrity. In R. J. Davidson & K. Hugdahl (Eds.), Brain asymmetry (pp. 123–156). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hugdahl, K. (2003). Dichotic listening in the study of auditory laterality. In K. Hugdahl & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The asymmetrical brain (pp. 441–476). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hugdahl, K. (2011). Fifty years of dichotic listening research – Still going and going and …. Brain and Cognition, 76, 211–213. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugdahl, K., & Andersson, L. (1986). The “forced-attention paradigm” in dichotic listening to CV-syllables: A comparison between adults and children. Cortex, 22, 417–432. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(86)80005-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugdahl, K., Bronnick, K., Kyllingsbaek, S., Law, I., Gade, A., & Paulson, O. B. (1999). Brain activation during dichotic presentations of consonant-vowel and musical instrument stimuli: A 15O-PET study. Neuropsychologia, 37, 431–440. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00101-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugdahl, K., Carlsson, G., Uvebrant, P., & Lundervold, A. J. (1997). Dichotic-listening performance and intracarotid injections of amobarbital in children and adolescents. Preoperative and postoperative comparisons. Archives of Neurology, 54, 1494–1500. doi:10.1001/archneur.1997.00550240046011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugdahl, K., Westerhausen, R., Alho, K., Medvedev, S., & Hämäläinen, H. (2008). The effect of stimulus intensity on the right ear advantage in dichotic listening. Neuroscience Letters, 431(1), 90–94. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2007.11.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, R., & Vaid, J. (2007). Bilingual language lateralization: A meta-analytic tale of two hemispheres. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1987–2008. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hund-Georgiadis, M., Lex, U., Friederici, A. D., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2002). Non-invasive regime for language lateralization in right and left-handers by means of functional MRI and dichotic listening. Experimental Brain Research, 145, 166–176. doi:10.1007/s00221-002-1090-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. (2010). Psychology. Ache WEIRD view of human nature skews psychologists' studies. Science, 328, 1627. doi:10.1126/science.328.5986.1627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura, D. (1961). Some effects of temporal-lobe damage on auditory perception. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 15, 156–165. doi:10.1037/h0083218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirmse, U., Ylinen, S., Tervaniemi, M., Vainio, M., Schroger, E., & Jacobsen, T. (2008). Modulation of the mismatch negativity (MMN) to vowel duration changes in native speakers of Finnish and German as a result of language experience. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 67, 131–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knecht, S., Drager, B., Deppe, M., Bobe, L., Lohmann, H., Floel, A., … Henningsen, H. (2000). Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans. Brain, 123, 2512–2518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Gandour, J. T., Talavage, T., Wong, D., Hoffa, A., Lowe, M., & Dzemidzic, M. (2010). Hemispheric asymmetries in phonological processing of tones versus segmental units. Neuroreport, 21, 690–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loukina, A., Kochanski, G., Rosner, B., Keane, E., & Shih, C. (2011). Rhythm measures and dimensions of durational variation in speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129, 3258–3270. doi:10.1121/1.3559709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. (2012). The smartphone psychology manifesto. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 221–237. doi:10.1177/1745691612441215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachshon, I. (1986). Cross-language differences in dichotic-listening. International Journal of Psychology, 21, 617–625. doi:10.1080/00207598608247609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocklenburg, S., Beste, C., Arning, L., Peterburs, J., & Güntürkün, O. (2014). The ontogenesis of language lateralization and its relation to handedness. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 43, 191–198. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.04.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passow, S., Westerhausen, R., Wartenburger, I., Hugdahl, K., Heekeren, H. R., Lindenberger, U., & Li, S.-C. (2012). Human aging compromises attentional control of auditory perception. Psychology and Aging, 27, 99–105. doi:10.1037/a0025667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollmann, S., Maertens, M., von Cramon, D. Y., Lepsien, J., & Hugdahl, K. (2002). Dichotic listening in patients with splenial and nonsplenial callosal lesions. Neuropsychology, 16(1), 56–64. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.16.1.56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pujol, J., Deus, J., Losilla, J. M., & Capdevila, A. (1999). Cerebral lateralization of language in normal left-handed people studied by functional MRI. Neurology, 52, 1038. doi:10.1212/WNL.52.5.1038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimol, L. M., Eichele, T., & Hugdahl, K. (2006). The effect of voice-onset-time on dichotic listening with consonant–vowel syllables. Neuropsychologia, 44, 191–196. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roup, C. M., Wiley, T. L., & Wilson, R. H. (2006). Dichotic word recognition in young and older adults. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 17, 230–240; quiz 297–238. doi:10.3766/jaaa.17.4.2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salthouse, T. A. (2009). When does age-related cognitive decline begin? Neurobiology of Aging, 30, 507–514. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.09.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segall, M. H., Campbell, D. T., & Herskovits, M. J. (1966). The influence of culture on visual perception. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, R., Goodglass, H., & Nickel, B. (1970). Ipsilateral versus contralateral extinction in dichotic listening resulting from hemisphere lesions. Cortex, 6, 249–260. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(70)80014-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strauss, E., Gaddes, W. H., & Wada, J. (1987). Performance on a free-recall verbal dichotic listening task and cerebral dominance determined by the carotid amytal test. Neuropsychologia, 25, 747–753. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(87)90112-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valaki, C. E., Maestu, F., Simos, P. G., Zhang, W., Fernandez, A., Amo, C. M., … Papanicolaou, A. C. (2004). Cortical organization for receptive language functions in Chinese, English, and Spanish: A cross-linguistic MEG study. Neuropsychologia, 42, 967–979. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.11.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Noort, M., Specht, K., Rimol, L. M., Ersland, L., & Hugdahl, K. (2008). A new verbal reports fMRI dichotic listening paradigm for studies of hemispheric asymmetry. Neuroimage, 40, 902–911. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.11.051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Haegen, L., Westerhausen, R., Hugdahl, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Speech dominance is a better predictor of functional brain asymmetry than handedness: A combined fMRI word generation and behavioral dichotic listening study. Neuropsychologia, 51(1), 91–97. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voyer, D. (2011). Sex differences in dichotic listening. Brain and Cognition, 76, 245–255. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadnerkar, M. B., Whiteside, S. P., & Cowell, P. E. (2008). Dichotic listening asymmetry: Sex differences and menstrual cycle effects. Laterality, 13, 297–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerhausen, R., Helland, T., Ofte, S., & Hugdahl, K. (2010). A longitudinal study of the effect of voicing on the dichotic listening ear advantage in boys and girls at age 5 to 8. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35, 752–761. doi:10.1080/87565641.2010.508551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerhausen, R., Kompus, K., & Hugdahl, K. (2014). Mapping hemispheric symmetries, relative asymmetries, and absolute asymmetries underlying the auditory laterality effect. Neuroimage, 84, 962–970. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerhausen, R., Woerner, W., Kreuder, F., Schweiger, E., Hugdahl, K., & Wittling, W. (2006). The role of the corpus callosum in dichotic listening: A combined morphological and diffusion tensor imaging study. Neuropsychology, 20, 272–279. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.20.3.272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar