References
- Bernardi, N., Cioffi, M., Ronchi, R., Maravita, A., Bricolo, E., Zigiotto, L., … Vallar, G. (2017). Improving left spatial neglect through music scale playing. Journal of Neuropsychology, 11, 135–158. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12078
- Bottini, R., & Casasanto, D. (2013). Space and time in the child’s mind: Metaphoric or ATOMic? Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 803. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00803
- Bruzzi, E., Talamini, F., Priftis, K., & Grassi, M. (2017). A SMARC effect for loudness. Iperception, 8(6), 1–11.
- Cho, Y. S., Bae, G. Y., & Proctor, R. (2012). Referential coding contributes to the horizontal SMARC effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 726–734.
- Cohen Kadosh, R., Brodsky, W., Levin, M., & Henik, A. (2008). Mental representation: What can pitch tell us about the distance effect? Cortex, 44, 470–477. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.002
- Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraud, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(3), 371–396. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371
- Gevers, W., Verguts, T., Reynvoet, B., Caessens, B., & Fias, W. (2006). Numbers and space: A computational model of the SNARC effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(1), 32–44.
- Guilbert, A., Clément, S., & Moroni, C. (2014). Hearing and music in unilateral spatial neglect neuro-rehabilitation. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1503. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01503
- Guilbert, A., Clément, S., & Moroni, C. (2017). A rehabilitation program based on music practice for patients with unilateral spatial neglect: A single-case study. Neurocase, 23(1), 12–21. doi: 10.1080/13554794.2016.1265652
- Hartmann, M. (2017). Non-musicians also have a piano in the head: Evidence for spatial-musical associations from line bisection tracking. Cognitive Processing, 18, 75–80. doi: 10.1007/s10339-016-0779-0
- Ishihara, M., Revol, P., Jacquin-Courtois, S., Mayet, R., Rode, G., Boisson, D., … Rossetti, Y. (2013). Tonal cues modulate line bisection performance: Preliminary evidence for a new rehabilitation prospect? Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 704. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00704
- Lega, C., Cattaneo, Z., Merabet, L., Vecchi, T., & Cucchi, S. (2014). The effect of musical expertise on the representation of space. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 250. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00250
- Lidji, P., Kolinsky, R., Lochy, A., & Morais, J. (2007). Spatial associations for musical stimuli: A piano in the head? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(5), 1189–1207.
- Parise, C., Knorre, K., & Ernst, M. (2014). Natural auditory scene statistics shapes human spatial hearing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(16), 6104–6108. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1322705111
- Pierce, J. (2007). Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1–2), 8–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017
- Pitteri, M., Marchetti, M., Priftis, K., & Grassi, M. (2017). Naturally together: Pitch-height and brightness as coupled factors for eliciting the SMARC effect in non-musicians. Psychological Research, 81, 243–254. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0713-6
- Pratt, C. (1930). The spatial character of high and low tones. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 278–285. doi: 10.1037/h0072651
- Proctor, R., & Cho, Y. S. (2006). Polarity correspondance: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 416–442. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.416
- Rusconi, E., Kwan, B., Giordano, B., Umiltà, C., & Butterworth, B. (2006). Spatial representation of pitch height: The SMARC effect. Cognition, 99, 113–129. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.004
- Spence. (2011). Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 73, 971–995. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0073-7
- Stein, B., & Meredith, M. (1993). Merging of the senses. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 483–488. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.002
- Winter, B., Marghetis, T., & Matlock, T. (2014). Of magnitudes and metaphors: Explaining cognitive interactions between space, time, and number. Cortex, 64, 209–224. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.10.015