Phonology and orthography in deaf readers: Evidence from a lateralized ambiguity resolution paradigm

References

• American National Standards Institute. (1989). Specifications for audiometers (ANSI S3.6 1989). New York: ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• Beech, J. R., & Harris, M. (1997). The prelingually deaf young reader: A case of reliance on direct lexical access? Journal of Research in Reading, 20(2), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.00024
   Google Scholar
• Bookheimer, S. (2002). Functional MRI of language: New approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25(1), 151–188. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlier, B. L., & Leybaert, J. (2000). The rhyming skills of deaf children educated with phonetically augmented speech reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 349–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colin, S., Magnan, A., Ecalle, J., & Leybaert, J. (2007). Relation between deaf children’s phonological skills in kindergarten and word recognition performance in first grade. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(2), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01700.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, R. (1979). The deaf school child: Language and Cognitive Function. London: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Corina, D. P., Lawyer, L. A., Hauser, P., & Hirshorn, E. (2013). Lexical processing in deaf readers: An fMRI investigation of reading proficiency. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e54696. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, A., MacSweeney, M., Szczerbinski, M., & Campbell, R. (2003). Predictors of reading delay in deaf adolescents: The relative contributions of rapid automatized naming speed and phonemic awareness and decoding. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 8, 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eng012
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Emmorey, K. (2020). The neurobiology of reading differs for deaf and hearing adults. In M. Marschark & H. Knoors (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of deaf studies in learning and cognition (pp. 347). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farinña, N., Dunñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2017). Phonological and orthographic coding in deaf skilled readers. Cognition, 168, 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1992). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked nonword priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724989208250619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1993). The time-course of phonological and orthographic code activation in the early phase of visual word recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 119–122. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03334157
   Google Scholar
• Frost, E. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.1.71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallaudet Research Institute. (2005). Literacy and deaf students.
   Google Scholar
• Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. East Sussex: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gurierrez-Sigut, E., Vergara-Martínez, M., & Perea, M. (2017). Early use of phonological codes in deaf readers: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 106, 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, W. C. (2017). What you don't know can hurt you: The risk of language deprivation by impairing sign language development in deaf children. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 21(5), 961–965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-017-2287-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, V. L., & Fowler, C. A. (1987). Phonological coding in word reading: Evidence from hearing and deaf readers. Memory and Cognition, 15, 199–207. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03197717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, V. L., & McGarr, N. S. (1989). Rhyme generation by deaf adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32, 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3201.02
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holt, J. A. (1993). Stanford Achievement test (8th ed.): reading comprehension subgroup results. American Annals of the Deaf, 138, 172–175. https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2012.0684
   Google Scholar
• Humphries, T., Kusgalnagar, P., Mathur, G., Napoli, D. J., Padden, C., Rathmann, C., Smith, S. R. (2016). Language choices for deaf infants: Advice for parents regarding sign language. Clinical Pediatrics, 55(6), 513–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922815616891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, N. E., & Coltheart, M. (2001). Routs to reading success and failure: Toward an integrated cognitive psychology of atypical reading. Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. Advances in Psychology, 94, 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62789-2
   Google Scholar
• Manning, A. A., Goble, W., Markman, R., & LaBerche, T. (1977). Lateral cerebral differences in the deaf in response to linguistic and nonlinguistic stimuli. Brain and Language, 4, 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934x(77)90025-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsolek, C. J., Kosslyn, S. M., & Squire, L. R. (1992). Form- specific visual priming in the right cerebral hemisphere. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 492–508. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.18.3.492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsolek, C. J., Schacter, D. L., & Nicholas, C. D. (1996). Form- specific visual priming for new associations in the right cerebral hemisphere. Memory and Cognition, 24, 539–556. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03201082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayberry, R. I., del Giudice, A. A., & Lieberman, A. M. (2010). Reading achievement in relation to phonological coding and awareness in deaf readers: A meta-analysis. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11, 164–188. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enq049
   Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, L., & Parrila, R. (2008). Phonological representation in deaf children: Rethinking the “functional Equivalence” hypothesis. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 14, 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enn025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, L., & Parrila, R. (2014). Literacy and linguistic development in bilingual deaf children: Implications of the “AND” for phonological processing. American Annals of the Deaf, 159(4), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2014.0034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehravari, A. S., Emmorey, K., Pratt, C. S., Klarman, L., & Ostehout, L. (2017). Brain- based individual difference measures of reading skill in deaf and hearing adults. Neuropsychologia, 101, 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P. (1997). The effect of communication mode on the development of phonemic awareness in prelingually deaf students. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 40, 1151–1163. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4005.1151
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P. (2006). What the processing of real words and pseudo-homophones tell about the development of orthographic knowledge in prelingually deafened individuals. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11, 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enj001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P. (2007). The role of phonology in the word decoding skills of poor readers: Evidence from individuals with prelingual deafness or diagnosed dyslexia. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 19, 385–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-007-9057-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P. (2010). Phonological, orthographic, and syntactic awareness and their relation to reading comprehension in prelingually deaf individuals: What can we learn from skilled readers? Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 22(6), 549–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-010-9195-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P. (2018). Many ways to reading success: New directions in fostering deaf readers’ reading comprehension skills. In M. Marschark & H. Knoors (Eds.), Evidence-Based practice in deaf education (pp. 191–215). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P., & Abu Achmed, R. (2010). The development of orthographic knowledge in prelingually deaf individuals: New insight from Arab readers. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 22(1), 11–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-009-9160-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P., & Clark, D. M. (2011). Phonemic awareness is not necessary to become a skilled deaf reader. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 23, 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-011-9246-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P, Kargin, T, Guldenoglu, B, Rathmann, C, Kubus, O, Hauser, P, … Spurgeon, E. (2012). Factors Distinguishing Skilled and Less Skilled Deaf Readers: Evidence From Four Orthographies. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 17(4), 439–462. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/ens022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morford, J. P., Wilkinson, E., Villwock, A., Piñar, P., & Kroll, J. F. (2011). When deaf signers read English: Do written words activate their sign translations? Cognition, 118(2), 286–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musselman, C. (2000). How do children who can’t hear learn to read an alphabetic script? A review of the literature on reading and deafness. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(1), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/5.1.9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neville, H., Bavelier, D., Corina, D., Rauschecked, J., Karni, A., Lalwani, A.…Turner, R. (1998). Cerebral organization for language in deaf and hearing subjects: Biological constraints and effects of experience. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(3), 922–929. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.3.922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, V. P. (2012). Qualitative similarity hypothesis. In P. Paul & D. Moores (Eds.), Deaf epistemologies: Multiple perspectives on the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 179–198). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, V. P., & Lee, C. (2010). The qualitative similarity hypothesis. American Annals of the Deaf, 154(5), 493–496. https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.0.0125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, P. V., Wang, Y., Trezek, B. J., & Luckner, J. L. (2009). Phonology is necessary, but not sufficient: A rejoinder. American Annals of the Deaf, 154(4), 346–356. https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.0.0110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, P. V., Wang, Y., & Williams, C. (2013). Deaf students and the qualitative similarity hypothesis: Understanding language and literacy development. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peleg, O., & Eviatar, Z. (2008). Hemispheric sensitivities to lexical and contextual constrains: Evidence from ambiguity resolution. Brain and Language, 105(2), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peleg, O., & Eviatar, Z. (2009). Semantic asymmetries are modulated by phonological asymmetries: Evidence from the disambiguation of heterophonic versus homophonic homographs. Brain and Cognition, 70, 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peleg, O., & Eviatar, Z. (2012). Understanding written words: Phonological, lexical and contextual effects in the cerebral hemispheres. In M. Faust (Ed.), The Handbook of the neuropsychology of language (Vol. 1, pp. 59–76). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Peleg, O., Markus, A., & Eviatar, Z. (2012). Hemispheric asymmetries in meaning selection: Evidence from disambiguation of homophonic vs. Heterophonic homographs. Brain and Cognition, 80(3), 328–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2012.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Sandak, R. (2000). Reading optimally builds on spoken language: Implications for deaf readers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(1), 32–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/5.1.32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phippard, D. (1977). Hemifield differences in visual perception in deaf and hearing subjects. Neuropsychologia, 15, 555–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(77)90059-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintner, R., & Patterson, D. (1916). A measure of the language ability of deaf children. Psychological Review, 23, 413–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0072260
   Google Scholar
• Poizner, H., Battison, R., & Lane, H. (1979). Cerebral asymmetry for American sign language: The effects of moving stimuli. Brain and Language, 7(3), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(79)90028-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rach, S., Diederich, A., & Colonius, H. (2011). On quantifying multisensory interaction effects in reaction time and detection rate. Psychological Research, 75(2), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-010-0289-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Report of the National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, G., Wright, H. V., & Ellis, C. (1989). Cerebral lateralization of language in deaf and hearing people. Brain and Language, 36(4), 555–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(89)90086-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarborough, H. S., & Brady, S. A. (2002). Toward a common terminology for talking about speech and reading: A glossary of the “phon” words and some related terms. Journal of Literacy Research, 34, 299–336. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3403_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolka, E, & Eviatar, Z. (2006). Phonological and orthographic visual word recognition in the two cerebral hemispheres: Evidence from Hebrew. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(6), 972–989. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290600654855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Strong, M., & Prinz, P. M. (1997). A study of the relationship between American sign language and English literacy. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2(1), 37–46. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.deafed.a014308
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sutcliffe, A., Dowker, A., & Campbell, R. (1999). Deaf children’s spelling: Does it show sensitivity to phonology? Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 4, 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/4.2.111
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G.. (1978). Methods of modeling capacity in simple processing systems. In J Castellan & F Restle (Eds.), Cognitive Theory (Vol. 3, pp. 200–239). Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Transler, C., Leybaert, J., & Gombert, J. E. (1999). Do deaf children use phonological syllables as reading units? Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 4, 124–143. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42658503
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Traxler, C. (2000). The Stanford Achievement test (9th ed.): National norming and performance standards for deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Journal of Deaf Study and Deaf Education, 5, 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/5.4.337
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Treiman, R., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (1983). Silent reading: Insights from second-generation deaf readers. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(83)90003-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troia, G. (2004). Phonological processing and its influence on literacy learning. In C. Stone, E. Silliman, B. Ehren, & K. Appel (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders (pp. 271–301). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Van Orden, G. C., & Kloos, H. (2005). The question of phonology and reading. In M. S. Snowling, & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 61–78). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2–40. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Trezek, B. J., Luckner, J. L., & Paul, P. V. (2008). The role of phonology and phonologically related skills to reading instruction for students who are deaf or hard of hearing. American Annals of the Deaf, 153(4), 396–407. https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.0.0061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wauters, L. N., Van Bon, W. H. J., & Telling, A. E. J. M. (2006). The reading comprehension of Dutch deaf children. Reading and Writing, 19(3), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-5894-0
   Google Scholar
• Willemin, J., Hausmann, M., Brysbaert, M., Dael, N., Chmetz, F., Fioravera, A., Mohr, C. (2016). Stability of right visual field advantage in an international lateralized lexical decision task irrespective of participants’ sex, handedness or bilingualism. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650x.2015.1130716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolk, S., & Allen, T. E. (1984). A 5-year follow-up of reading-comprehension achievement of hearing- impaired students in special education programs. Journal of Special Education, 18, 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246698401800209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidel, E. (1985). Language in the right hemisphere. In D. F. Benson, & E. Zaidel (Eds.), The dual brain: Hemispheric specialization in humans (pp. 201–231). New York: The Gilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zaidel, E., & Peters, A. M. (1981). Phonological encoding and ideographic reading by the disconnected right hemisphere: Tow case studies. Brain and Language, 14, 205–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934x(81)90077-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar