Opposite perceptual biases in analogous auditory and visual tasks are unique to consonant–vowel strings and are unlikely a consequence of repetition

References

• Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Massonnié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N., & Evershed, J. K. (2020). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods, 52(1), 388–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, E., & Karnath, H.-O. (2007). Incidence of visual extinction after left versus right hemisphere stroke. Stroke (1970), 38(12), 3172–3174. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.489096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berryman, M. L., & Kennelly, K. J. (1992). Letter memory loads change more than visual-field advantage: Interhemispheric coupling effects. Brain and Cognition, 18(2), 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2626(92)90076-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bethmann, A., Tempelmann, C., De Bleser, R., Scheich, H., & Brechmann, A. (2007). Determining language laterality by fMRI and dichotic listening. Brain Research, 1133(1), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.11.057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bless, J. J., Westerhausen, R., Arciuli, J., Kompus, K., Gudmundsen, M., & Hugdahl, K. (2013). Right on all occasions?” - On the feasibility of laterality research using a smartphone dichotic listening application. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 42–42. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bless, J. J., Westerhausen, R., Torkildsen, J. V. K., Gudmundsen, M., Kompus, K., & Hugdahl, K. (2015). Laterality across languages: Results from a global dichotic listening study using a smartphone application. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 20(4), 434–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2014.997245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boles, D. B. (1986). Hemispheric differences in the judgment of number. Neuropsychologia, 24(4), 511–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(86)90095-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boles, D. B. (1987). Reaction time asymmetry through bilateral versus unilateral stimulus presentation. Brain and Cognition, 6(3), 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2626(87)90129-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boles, D. B. (1990). What bilateral displays do. Brain and Cognition, 12(2), 205–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2626(90)90016-H
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boles, D. B. (1994). An experimental comparison of stimulus type, display type, and input variable contributions to visual field asymmetry. Brain and Cognition, 24(2), 184–197. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1994.1010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonandrini, R., Amenta, S., Sulpizio, S., Tettamanti, M., Mazzucchelli, A., & Marelli, M. (2023). Form to meaning mapping and the impact of explicit morpheme combination in novel word processing. Cognitive Psychology, 145, 101594–101594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2023.101594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonandrini, R., Paulesu, E., Traficante, D., Capelli, E., Marelli, M., & Luzzatti, C. (2023). Lateralized reading in the healthy brain: A behavioral and computational study on the nature of the visual field effect. Neuropsychologia, 180, 108468–108468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne, V. J. (2006). The divided visual field paradigm: Methodological considerations. Laterality (Hove), 11(4), 373–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500600633982
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, A., McKenna, K., & Tallis, R. C. (1999). Reasons for variability in the reported rate of occurrence of unilateral spatial neglect after stroke. Stroke (1970), 30(6), 1196–1202. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.6.1196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brederoo, S. G., Nieuwenstein, M. R., Cornelissen, F. W., & Lorist, M. M. (2019). Reproducibility of visual-field asymmetries: Nine replication studies investigating lateralization of visual information processing. Cortex, 111, 100–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.10.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brederoo, S. G., Van der Haegen, L., Brysbaert, M., Nieuwenstein, M. R., Cornelissen, F. W., & Lorist, M. M. (2020). Towards a unified understanding of lateralized vision: A large-scale study investigating principles governing patterns of lateralization using a heterogeneous sample. Cortex, 133, 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.08.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruckert, L., Thompson, P. A., Watkins, K., Bishop, D. V., & Woodhead, Z. (2021). Investigating the effects of handedness on the consistency of lateralization for speech production and semantic processing tasks using functional transcranial doppler sonography. Laterality, 26(6), 680–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2021.1898416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryden, M. P. (1964). The manipulation of strategies of report in dichotic listening. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 18(2), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0083290
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bryden, M. P. (1965). Tachistoscopic recognition, handedness, and cerebral dominance. Neuropsychologia, 3(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(65)90015-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryden, M. P. (1970). Left-right differences in tachistoscopic recognition as a function of familiarity and pattern orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84(1), 120–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028927
   Google Scholar
• Bryden, M. P., & Macrae, L. (1988). Dichotic laterality effects obtained with emotional words. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology, 1(3), 171–176.
   Google Scholar
• Bürkner, P.-C. (2017). Brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COLA Consortium (2022). Inconsistent language lateralisation – testing the dissociable language laterality hypothesis using behaviour and lateralised cerebral blood flow. Cortex, 154, 105–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2022.05.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geffen, G., Bradshaw, J. L., & Nettleton, N. C. (1972). Hemispheric asymmetry: Verbal and spatial encoding of visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 95(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033265
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Godfrey, H. K., & Grimshaw, G. M. (2016). Emotional language is all right: Emotional prosody reduces hemispheric asymmetry for linguistic processing. Laterality (Hove), 21(4–6), 568–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2015.1096940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P., MacLeod, C. J., & Nakagawa, S. (2016). SIMR: An r package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(4), 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausmann, M., Brysbaert, M., van der Haegen, L., Lewald, J., Specht, K., Hirnstein, M., Willemin, J., Barton, J., Buchilly, D., Chmetz, F., Roch, M., Brederoo, S., Dael, N., & Mohr, C. (2019). Language lateralisation measured across linguistic and national boundaries. Cortex, 111, 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.10.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman, K. M., Bowers, D., Coslett, H. B., Whelan, H., & Watson, R. T. (1985). Directional hypokinesia: Prolonged reaction times for leftward movements in patients with right hemisphere lesions and neglect. Neurology, 35(6), 855–855. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.35.6.855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman, K. M., Valenstein, E., & Watson, R. T. (2000). Neglect and related disorders. Seminars in Neurology, 20(4), 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2000-13179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellige, J. B. (1993). Hemispheric asymmetry: What’s right and what’s left / Joseph B. Hellige. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrix, P., & Sun, C. C. (2021). A word or two about nonwords: Frequency, semantic neighborhood density, and orthography-to-semantics consistency effects for nonwords in the lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(1), 157. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hines, D., & Satz, P. (1974). Cross-modal asymmetries in perception related to asymmetry in cerebral function. Neuropsychologia, 12(2), 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(74)90009-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugdahl, K. (2011). Fifty years of dichotic listening research - still going and going and … introduction. Brain and Cognition, 76(2), 211–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2011.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, Z. R., & Brysbaert, M. (2008). Visual half-field experiments are a good measure of cerebral language dominance if used properly: Evidence from fMRI. Neuropsychologia, 46(1), 316–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacoboni, M., & Zaidel, E. (1996). Hemispheric independence in word recognition: Evidence from unilateral and bilateral presentations. Brain and Language, 53(1), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1996.0040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewell, G., & McCourt, M. E. (2000). Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00045-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, E. M., Johnstone, L. T., & Carey, D. P. (2019). The depth and breadth of multiple perceptual asymmetries in right handers and non-right handers. Laterality (Hove), 24(6), 707–739. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2019.1652308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura, D. (1961). Some effects of temporal-lobe damage on auditory perception. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 15(3), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0083218
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kimura, D. (2011). From ear to brain. Brain and Cognition, 76(2), 214–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2010.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemhöfer, K. M., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattingley, J. B., Bradshaw, J. L., Nettleton, N. C., & Bradshaw, J. A. (1994). Can task specific perceptual bias be distinguished from unilateral neglect?. Neuropsychologia, 32(7), 805–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(94)90019-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazoyer, B., Zago, L., Jobard, G., Crivello, F., Joliot, M., Perchey, G., Mellet, E., Petit, L., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2014). Gaussian mixture modeling of hemispheric lateralization for language in a large sample of healthy individuals balanced for handedness. PLoS One, 9(6), e101165. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, R., Woodhead, Z. V. J., & Parker, A. J. (2022). Orthographic neighborhood effects during lateralized lexical decision are abolished with bilateral presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 48(5), 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne, A., Bianco, R., Poole, K., Zhao, S., Oxenham, A., Billig, A., & Chait, M. (2021). An online headphone screening test based on dichotic pitch. Behavior Research Methods, 53(4), 1551–1562. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01514-0
   Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oltedal, L., & Hugdahl, K. (2017). Opposite brain laterality in analogous auditory and visual tests. Laterality (Hove), 22(6), 690–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2016.1269335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, A., Egan, C., Grant, J., Harte, S., Hudson, B., & Woodhead, Z. (2021, April 28). The role of orthographic neighbourhood effects in lateralized lexical decision: A replication study and meta-analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, A. J., Woodhead, Z. V. J., Thompson, P. A., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2021). Assessing the reliability of an online behavioural laterality battery: A pre-registered study. Laterality (Hove), 26(4), 359–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2020.1859526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, S., Kruijt, A.-W., & Fox, E. (2019). Psychological science needs a standard practice of reporting the reliability of cognitive-behavioral measurements. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(4), 378–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919879695
   Google Scholar
• Perea, M., Acha, J., & Fraga, I. (2008). Lexical competition is enhanced in the left hemisphere: Evidence from different types of orthographic neighbors. Brain and Language, 105(3), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 82.
   Google Scholar
• Ringman, J. M., Saver, J. L., Woolson, R. F., Clarke, W. R., & Adams, H. P. (2004). Frequency risk factors, anatomy, and course of unilateral neglect in an acute stroke cohort. Neurology, 63(3), 468–474. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000133011.10689.CE
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spearman, C. (2010). The proof and measurement of association between two things. International Journal of Epidemiology, 39(5), 1137–1150. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyq191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, K. F., & McKeever, W. F. (1985). The roles of stimulus repetition and hemispheric activation in visual half-field asymmetries. Brain and Cognition, 4(4), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2626(85)90030-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Haegen, L., & Brysbaert, M. (2018). The relationship between behavioral language laterality, face laterality and language performance in left-handers. PLoS One, 13(12), e0208696–e0208696. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with s (4th ed.). Springer. https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS4/.
   Google Scholar
• Voeten, C. C. (2023). Buildmer: Stepwise elimination and term reordering for mixed-EffectsRegression. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=buildmer.
   Google Scholar
• Voyer, D. (1998). On the reliability and validity of noninvasive laterality measures. Brain and Cognition, 36(2), 209–236. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1997.0953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voyer, D., & Boudreau, V. G. (2003). Cross-modal correlation of auditory and visual language laterality tasks: A serendipitous finding. Brain and Cognition, 53(2), 393–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00152-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 779–804. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E. J., & Farrell, S. (2004). AIC model selection using akaike weights. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(1), 192–196. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler, B. E., & Halwes, T. (1983). Increasing the power of dichotic methods: The fused rhymed words test. Neuropsychologia, 21(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(83)90100-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler, B. E., & King, G. P. (1990). Within-modal and cross-modal consistency in the direction and magnitude of perceptual asymmetry. Neuropsychologia, 28(1), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(90)90087-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willemin, J., Hausmann, M., Brysbaert, M., Dael, N., Chmetz, F., Fioravera, A., Gieruc, K., & Mohr, C. (2016). Stability of right visual field advantage in an international lateralized lexical decision task irrespective of participants’ sex, handedness or bilingualism. Laterality (Hove), 21(4–6), 502–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2015.1130716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodhead, Z. V. J., Bradshaw, A. R., Wilson, A. C., Thompson, P. A., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2019). Testing the unitary theory of language lateralization using functional transcranial doppler sonography in adults. Royal Society Open Science, 6(3), 181801–181801. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodhead, Z. V. J., Thompson, P. A., Karlsson, E. M., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2021). An updated investigation of the multidimensional structure of language lateralization in left- and right-handed adults: A test-retest functional transcranial doppler sonography study with six language tasks. Royal Society Open Science, 8(2), 200696–200696. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, A. W., & Ellis, A. W. (1985). Different methods of lexical access for words presented in the left and right visual hemifields. Brain and Language, 24(2), 326–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(85)90139-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurif, E. B., & Bryden, M. P. (1969). Familial handedness and left-right differences in auditory and visual perception. Neuropsychologia, 7(2), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(69)90015-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar