A System of Student Feedback: Considerations of Academic Staff Taken into Account

References

• Aleamoni , L. M. 1981 . “ Student ratings of instruction ” . In Handbook of teacher evaluation , Edited by: Millman , J. 110 – 119 . Beverly Hills, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Braskamp , L. A. , Brandenburg , D. C. and Ory , J. C. 1984 . Evaluating teaching effectiveness , Newbury Park, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Boyer , E. L. 1990 . Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professorate , San Fransisco, CA : The Carnegie Foundation for Advancement of Teaching .
   Google Scholar
• Cashin , W. E. 1990 . Student ratings of teaching: Recommendations for use (IDEA Paper No. 22) , Manhattan : Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development .
   Google Scholar
• Centra , J. 1993 . Reflective faculty evaluation: enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness , San Francisco : Jossey Bass .
   Google Scholar
• Chen , Y. and Hoshower , L. B. 2003 . Student evaluation of teaching effectiveness: an assessment of student perception and motivation . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 28 : 71 – 88 .
   Google Scholar
• Csete , J. , Jones , J. and Kwan , K. Student feedback on teaching and staff appraisal . Different approaches: Theory and Practice in Higher Education. Proceedings HERDSA Conference 1996 . July 8–12 , Perth, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• D’Appolonia , S. and Abrami , P. C. 1997 . Navigating student ratings of instruction . American Psychologist , 52 : 1198 – 1208 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman , K. A. 1979 . The significance of circumstances for college students’ ratings of their teachers and courses . Research in Higher Education , 9 : 199 – 242 .
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs , G. 1995 . How can promoting excellent teachers promote excellent teaching? . Innovations in Education and Training International , 32 : 74 – 84 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling , D. and D’Andrea , V.‐M. 2001 . Quality development: A new concept for higher education . Quality in Higher Education , 7 : 7 – 17 .
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald , A. G. and Gillmore , G. M. 1997 . Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings . American Psychologist , 52 : 1209 – 1217 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry , G. D. and Dean , S. J. 2002 . Accountability, evaluation of teaching and expertise in higher education . The International Journal for Academic Development , 7 : 75 – 82 .
   Google Scholar
• Johnson , R. 2000 . The authority of the student evaluation questionnaire . Teaching in Higher Education , 5 : 419 – 434 .
   Google Scholar
• Kember , D. , Leung , D. Y. P. and Kwan , K. P. 2002 . Does the use of student feedback questionnaires improve the overall quality of teaching? . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 27 : 411 – 425 .
   Google Scholar
• Laughton , D. 2003 . Why was the QAA Approach to teaching quality assessment rejected by academics in UK HE? . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 28 : 309 – 321 .
   Google Scholar
• Magin , D. J. 1998 . Rewarding good teaching: a matter of demonstrated proficiency or documented achievement? . The International Journal for Academic Development , 3 : 124 – 135 .
   Google Scholar
• Marsh , H. W. 1984 . Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility . Journal of Educational Psychology , 76 : 707 – 754 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh , H. W. and Roche , L. A. 1997 . Making students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective . American Psychologist , 52 : 1187 – 1197 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlpine , L. and Harris , R. 2002 . Evaluating teaching effectiveness and teaching improvement: A language for institutional policies and academic development practices . The International Journal for Academic Development , 7 : 7 – 17 .
   Google Scholar
• Miles , M. and Huberman , A. M. 1994 . Qualitative data analysis. An expanded sourcebook , Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Nasser , F. and Fresko , B. 2002 . Faculty views of student evaluation of college teaching . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 27 : 188 – 198 .
   Google Scholar
• Newton , J. 2000 . Feeding the beast or improving quality? Academics’ perceptions of quality assurance and quality monitoring . Quality in Higher Education , 6 : 153 – 163 .
   Google Scholar
• Newton , J. 2002 . Views from below: Academics coping with quality . Quality in Higher Education , 8 : 39 – 61 .
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden , P. and Martin , E. 1996 . Recognition of good university teaching: Policies from an Australian study . Studies in Higher Education , 21 : 299 – 316 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmelkin‐Pedhazur , L. , Spencer , K. L. and Gellman , E. S. 1997 . Faculty perspectives on course and teacher evaluations . Research in Higher Education , 38 : 575 – 592 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seldin , P. 1989 . “ Using student feedback to improve teaching ” . In The department chairperson’s role in enhancing college teaching. New directions for teaching and learning , Edited by: Lucas , A. F. 37 89 – 91 . San Fransisco : Jossey‐Bass .
   Google Scholar
• Trowler , P. 2001 . Captured by the discourse? The socially constitutive power of new higher education discourse in the UK . Organization , 8 : 183 – 201 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Os , W. 1999 . Bruikbaarheid en effectiviteit van studentenoordelen over het onderwijs , Enschede : Printpartners Ipskam .
   Google Scholar
• Wright , A. 1998 . “ Improving teaching by design: preferred policies, programs and practices ” . In University teaching: International perspectives , Edited by: Forest , J. New York : Garland .
   Google Scholar