Portuguese Public University Student Satisfaction: A stakeholder theory-based approach

References

• Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2006). Conceptual model of student satisfaction in higher education. Total Quality Management, 18, 571–588.
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, D., German, S., & Hunt, S. (2003). The identity salience model of relationship marketing success: The case of nonprofit marketing. Journal of Marketing, 67, 89–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, L. (2002). Total quality management in higher education: The implications of internal and external stakeholder perceptions (PhD thesis). Graduate School in Business Administration, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Barzelay, M. (2001). The new public management: Improving research and policy dialogue. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press and Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand, D., & Busugutsala, G. (1998). Organisation of first-cycle teaching at university: Models and issues. Higher Education Management, 10, 109–136.
   Google Scholar
• Bjorkquist, C. (2008). Continuity and change in stakeholder influence: Reflections on elaboration of stakeholder regimes. Reflecting Education, 4, 24–38.
   Google Scholar
• Burrows, J. (1999). Going beyond labels: A framework for profiling institutional stakeholders. Contemporary Education, 70, 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B. (2004). Delineating the character of the entrepreneurial university. Higher Education Policy, 17, 355–370.
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson, M. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analysing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, R. (2005). The lessons from stakeholder theory for US business leaders. Business Horizons, 48, 255–264.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, T., Mackay, S., & Yorke, D. (1994). Strategic planning in higher education: Who are the customers? International Journal of Educational Management, 8, 29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, J., & Doh, J. (2000). Identifying who matters: Mapping key players in multiple environments. California Management Review, 42, 83–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dastidar, S., & Datta, B. (2009). Demographic differences in consumer exploratory tendencies: An empirical examination. IIMB Management Review, 21, 62–78.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholders approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholders influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24, 191–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, A. (2000). The new public relations: Integrating marketing and public relations strategies for student recruitment and institutional image building: A case study of the University of Texas at San Antonio. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 7, 17–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Jr, Babin, B., Money, A., & Samouel, P. (2003). Essentials of business research methods. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Jr, Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Jham, V., & Khan, K. (2008). Customer satisfaction in the Indian banking sector. IIMB Management Review, 20, 34–67.
   Google Scholar
• Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2007, June). Higher education and its communities: Interconnections and interdependencies in higher education. Paper presented at Looking Forward: Themes on the Changing Relationship between Higher Education and Society, European Science Foundation, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2008). Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and research agenda. Higher Education, 56, 303–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, D. (2002). Unanticipated development: Perspectives on private higher education’s emerging roles. PROPHE Working Papers Series, 1, April: 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, D. (2008). Access through private higher education: Global patterns and Indian illustrations. PROPHE Working Papers Series, 11, April: 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, B., & Lomas, L. (1999). Stakeholder conceptions of quality in single company management education. Quality Assurance in Education, 7, 77–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mainardes, E., Alves, H., & Domingues, M. (2009). Which factors are important to attract students for undergraduate administration courses? The FedUni Journal of Higher Education, 4, 84–102.
   Google Scholar
• McClung, G., & Werner, M. (2008). A market/value based approach to satisfy stakeholders of higher education. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 18, 102–123.
   Google Scholar
• McVea, J., & Freeman, R. (2005). A names-and-faces approach to stakeholder management. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14, 57–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meek, L. (2006). The changing landscape of higher education research policy in Australia. In L. Meek, & C. Suwanwela (Eds.), Higher education, research, and knowledge in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 65–90). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Neave, G. (2000). The universities’ responsibilities to society. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Neville, B., Bell, S., & Mengüç, B. (2005). Corporate reputation, stakeholders and the social performance-financial performance relationship. European Journal of Marketing, 39, 1184–1198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Polonsky, M. (1995). A stakeholder theory approach to designing environmental marketing strategy. The Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 10, 29–37.
   Google Scholar
• Post, J., Preston, L., & Sachs, S. (2002). Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45, 6–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, L., & Donaldson, T. (1999). Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Academy of Management Review, 24, 619–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, M., & Amaral, A. (2007). A self-assessment of higher education institutions from the perspective of the EFQM excellence model. In D. Westerheijden, B. Stensaker, & M. Rosa (Eds.), Quality assurance in higher education: Trends in regulation, translation and transformation (pp. 181–207). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rowley, T. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22, 887–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S., & Lane, V. (2000). A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Academy of Management Review, 25, 43–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somers, M. (2009). Using the process of disruption to find new markets and to develop new marketing programs for management education. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 19, 166–178.
   Google Scholar
• Tam, F. (2007). Rethinking school and community relations in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Management, 21, 350–366.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J., Brites, R., Correia, F., Farhangmehr, M., Ferreira, B., Machado, M., … & Sá, M. (2008). Strategic enrolment management: Improving student satisfaction and success in Portugal. Higher Education Management and Policy, 20, 129–145.
   Google Scholar
• Vyas, R. (2008). A study of customers’ perception of cross selling. IIMB Management Review, 20, 121–133.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. (2002, September). The student satisfaction approach: Student feedback and its potential role in quality assessment and enhancement. Paper presented at the 24th EAIR Forum, Prague, Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S., Alessandri, S., & Kinsey, D. (2008). An integrative analysis of reputation and relational quality: A study of university–student relationships. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 18, 145–170.
   Google Scholar