264
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Learning outcomes across disciplinary divides and contrasting national higher education traditions

, &
Pages 179-192 | Received 08 Jul 2013, Accepted 21 Feb 2014, Published online: 04 Apr 2014

References

  • Aamodt, P.-O., Prøitz, T., Hovdhaugen, E., & Stensaker, B. (2007). Læringsutbytte i høyere utdanning. En drøfting av definisjoner, utviklingstrekk og måleproblemer [Learning outcomes in higher education. A discussion of definitions, trends and measurement issues] (NIFU STEP rapport 40/2007). Oslo: NIFU STEP.
  • Allen, J., & van der Velden, R. (Eds.). (2010). The flexible professional in the knowledge society: New challenges for higher education. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift. Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Badcock, P., Pattison, P., & Harris, K.-L. (2010). Developing generic skills through university study: A study of arts, science and engineering in Australia. Higher Education, 60, 441–458.10.1007/s10734-010-9308-8
  • Barnett, R. (2003). Beyond all reason: Living with ideology in the university. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Barrie, S. (2006). Understanding what we mean by the generic attributes of graduates. Higher Education, 51, 215–241.10.1007/s10734-004-6384-7
  • Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual inquiry and the culture of disciplines (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Berlin Communique. (2003). Realising the European Higher Education Area. Communiqué of the Conference of Ministers responsible for Higher Education in Berlin on 19 September 2003.
  • Biesta, G. (2009). Witnessing deconstruction in education: Why quasi-transcendentalism matters. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 43, 391–404.10.1111/jope.2009.43.issue-3
  • Canning, R. (2007). Reconceptualising core skills. Journal of Education and Work, 20, 17–26.10.1080/13639080601137619
  • Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47, 1–32.10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9
  • Caspersen, J., de Lange, T., Prøitz, T., Solbrekke, D., & Stensaker, B. (2011). Learning about quality – Perspectives on learning outcomes and their operationalisations and measurement. Oslo: Department of Educational Research, University of Oslo. Retrieved April 1, 2014, from http://www.uv.uio.no/iped/forskning/prosjekter/stensaker-kvalitet/LEAQ_report.pdf
  • Clarke, L., & Winch, C. (2006). A European skills framework? – but what are skills? Anglo‐Saxon versus German concepts. Journal of Education and Work, 19, 255–269.10.1080/13639080600776870
  • Cummings, W. K. (2003). The institutions of education: A comparative study of educational development in the six core nations. Oxford: Symposium.
  • European Commission. (2011). Using learning outcomes – European Qualifications Framework series: Note 4. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
  • Harvey, L. (2000). New realities: The relationship between higher education and employment. Tertiary Education and Management, 6, 3–17.10.1080/13583883.2000.9967007
  • Hussey, T., & Smith, P. (2002). The trouble with learning outcomes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 3, 220–233.10.1177/1469787402003003003
  • Hussey, T., & Smith, P. (2003). The uses of learning outcomes. Teaching in Higher Education, 8, 357–368.10.1080/13562510309399
  • Hussey, T., & Smith, P. (2008). Learning outcomes: A conceptual analysis. Teaching in Higher Education, 13, 107–115.10.1080/13562510701794159
  • Jones, A. (2009). Redisciplining generic attributes: The disciplinary context in focus. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 85–100.10.1080/03075070802602018
  • Karlsen, H. (2011). Klare for arbeidslivet? En drøfting av metodiske utfordringer for måling av læringsutbytte i høyere utdanning [Ready for working life? A discussion of methodological challenges in measuring learning outcomes in higher education]. NIFU report 42/2011. Oslo: NIFU.
  • Kemp, N., & Lawton, W. (2013). A strategic analysis of the Scottish higher education sector’s distinctive assets: A study commissioned by British Council Scotland. Edinburgh: British Council.
  • Kim, J.-O., & Mueller, C. W. (1978). Introduction to factor analysis: What it is and how to do it. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Knight, P., & Yorke, M. (2004). Learning, curriculum and employability in higher education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Kogan, M., Bauer, M., Bleiklie, I., & Henkel, M. (Eds.). (2006). Transforming higher education. A comparative study (2nd ed.). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Kuh, G. D. (2003). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning.
  • Kyvik, S. (2009). The dynamics of change in higher education: Expansion and contraction in an organisational field. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Little, B. (2000). Undergraduates’ work based learning and skills development. Tertiary Education and Management, 6, 119–135.10.1080/13583883.2000.9967017
  • Lore, A., & Little, B. (2010). The REFLEX study: Exploring graduates’ views on the relationship between higher education and employment. Retrieved from the Open University website: http://oro.open.ac.uk/21279/
  • McLean, M., & Abbas, A. (2009). The ‘biographical turn’ in university sociology teaching: A Bernsteinian analysis. Teaching in Higher Education, 14, 529–539.10.1080/13562510903186725
  • OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2011). Education at a glance 2011: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2011-en
  • Otter, S. (1992). Learning outcomes in higher education. A development project report. London: Department of Employment/Further Education Unit.
  • Pascarella, E. T., Blaich, C., Martin, G. L., & Hanson, J. M. (2011). How robust are the findings of Academically Adrift? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 43, 20–24.10.1080/00091383.2011.568898
  • Payne, J. (2002). A tale of two curriculums: Putting the English and Norwegian curriculum models to the test of the ‘high skills’ vision. Journal of Education and Work, 15, 117–143.10.1080/13639080220137807
  • Pike, G. R. (1995). The relationship between self reports of college experiences and achievement test scores. Research in Higher Education, 36, 1–21.10.1007/BF02207764
  • Pike, G., & Killian, T. (2001). Reported gains in student learning: Do academic disciplines make a difference? Research in Higher Education, 42, 429–454.10.1023/A:1011054825704
  • Prøitz, T. (2010). Learning outcomes: What are they? Who defines them? When and where are they defined? Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 22, 119–137.10.1007/s11092-010-9097-8
  • Reay, D., David, M., & Ball, S. J. (2005). Degrees of choice: Class, race, gender and higher education. Sterling, VA: Trentham Books.
  • Schomburg, H., & Teichler, U. (Eds.). (2011). Employability and mobility of bachelor graduates in Europe: Key results of the Bologna process. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Støren, L. A., & Arnesen, C. A. (2011). Winners and losers. In J. Allen & R. van der Velden (Eds.), The flexible professional in the knowledge society (pp. 199–240). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Trow, M. (1973). Problems in the transition from elite to mass higher education. Report for Carnegie Commission on Higher Education. Berkeley, CA: Carnegie Commission on Higher Education.
  • Trow, M. (2006). Reflections on the transition from elite to mass to universal access: Forms and phases of higher education in modern societies since WWII. In J. J. F. Forest & P. G. Altbach (Eds.), International handbook of higher education, Vol. 18 (pp. 243–280). Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-4012-2

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.