Not just another evaluation: a comparative study of four educational quality projects at Swedish universities

References

• Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories – Intellectual inquiry and the culture of disciplines (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Case, J. M., & Light, G. (2011). Emerging research methodologies in engineering education research. Journal of Engineering Education, 100, 186–210.10.1002/jee.2011.100.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B., & Joerges, B. (1996). Travels of ideas. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 13–48). Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110879735
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fägerlind, I., & Strömqvist, G. (Eds.). (2004). Reforming higher education in the Nordic countries – Studies of change in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., & Andresani, G. (2008). The steering of higher education systems: A public management perspective. Higher Education, 56, 325–348.10.1007/s10734-008-9125-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gornitzka, Å. (1999). Governmental policies and organisational change in higher education. Higher Education, 38, 5–31.10.1023/A:1003703214848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göteborgs universitet. (2013). BLUE 11 – Översyn av utbildningsprogram vid Göteborgs universitet – bakgrund, process och diskussion [BLUE 11 – Review of study programmes at the University of Gothenburg – background, process and discussion]. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Gumport, P. (2000). Academic restructuring: Organizational change and institutional imperatives. Higher Education, 39, 67–91.10.1023/A:1003859026301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, L., & Stensaker, B. (2008). Quality culture: Understandings, boundaries and linkages. European Journal of Education, 43, 427–442.10.1111/ejed.2008.43.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedmo, T., Sahlin, K., & Wedlin, L. (2005). Fields of imitation: The global expansion of management education. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.), Global ideas: How ideas, objects and practices travel in the global economy (pp. 190–212). Liber: Malmö.
   Google Scholar
• Higher Education Academy. (2009). Reward and recognition of teaching in higher education: A collaborative investigation: Interim report. York: The Higher Education Academy and the GENIE Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning, University of Leicester. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/publications/Reward_and_Recognition_Resource
   Google Scholar
• KTH Royal Institute of Techology. (2012). Education Assessment Exercise (EAE) 2011. Evaluation for quality development at KTH – project summary. Stockholm: KTH.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lund University. (2011). Final report: EQ11 – University-wide development of education at Lund University. Lund: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Research. (2010a). En akademi i tiden – ökad frihet för universitet och högskolor [Academia for this day and age – greater freedom for universities and other higher education institutions]. Prop. 2009/10:149.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Research. (2010b). Fokus på kunskap – kvalitet i den högre utbildningen [Focus on knowledge – quality in higher education]. Prop. 2009/10:139.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Research. (2010c). Konkurrera med kvalitet – studieavgifter för utländska studenter [Competing on the basis of quality – tuition fees for foreign students]. Prop. 2009/10:65.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. P. (2007). The institutional dynamics of the European university. In P. Maassen & J. P. Olsen (Eds.), University dynamics and European integration (pp. 25–54). Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-5971-1
   Google Scholar
• Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20, 313–345.10.1080/02680930500108718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öquist, G., & Benner, M. (2012). Fostering breakthrough research: A comparative study. Stockholm: The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, R., Geschwind, L., & Aarrevaara, T. (2014). Nested tensions and interwoven dilemmas in higher education: The view from the Nordic countries. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7, 233–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis: New public management, governance, and the neo-Weberian state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, F. O. (2010). Accounting for excellence: Transforming universities into organizational actors. In L. Portnoi, V. D. Rust, & S. S. Bagley (Eds.), Higher education, policy, and the global competition phenomenon (pp. 43–58). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Røvik, K.-A. (1996). Deinstitutionalization and the logic of fashion. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 139–172). Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlin, K. (2012). The interplay of organizing models in higher education: What room is there for collegiality in universities characterized by bounded autonomy? In B. Stensaker, J. Välimaa, & C. Sarrico (Eds.), Managing reform in universities. The dynamics of culture, identity and organisational change (pp. 198–221). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlin, K. (2013). Global themes and institutional ambiguity. Rankings and management models on the move. In G. S. Drori, M. A. Höllerer, & P. Walgenbach (Eds.), Global themes and local variations in organization and management: Perspectives on glocalization (pp. 52–64). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlin, K., & Wedlin, L. (2008). Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 218–242). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stensaker, B., & Harvey, L. (Eds.). (2011). Accountability in higher education: Global perspectives on trust and power (p. 270). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Styhre, A. (2009). Byråkrati – teoretiker, kritiker och försvarare [Bureaucracy – theorists, critics and defenders]. Liber: Malmö.
   Google Scholar
• Uppsala University. (2013). Creative educational development at Uppsala University 2010–2012. Uppsala: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Van Vught, F. (2008). Mission diversity and reputation in higher education. Higher Education Policy, 21, 151–174.10.1057/hep.2008.5
   Google Scholar