Social, Innovative and Deep: Exploring Digital Literacies in a Year 9 English Classroom

References

• Albers, P., and J. Harste. 2007. “The Arts, New Literacies, and Multimodality.” English Education 40 (1): 6–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, N. 2009. “It Makes It More Real”: Teaching New Literacies in a Secondary English Classroom.” English Education 41 (3): 207–234.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S., and M. Walsh. 2018. “‘Good Morning Fitfam’: Top Posts, Hashtags and Gender Display on Instagram.” New Media & Society 20 (12): 12. doi:10.1177/1461444818777514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour, K., K. Lee, and C. Moore. 2017. “Online Persona Research: An Instagram Case Study.” Persona Studies 3 (2): 1–12. doi:10.21153/ps2017vol3no2art710.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, A., J. Gillard, V. Firth, M. Scrymgour, M. Welford, R. Welford, J. Lomax-Smith, D. Bartlett, B. Pike, and E. Constable. 2008. Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians. Australia: Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Beavis, C., and J. O’Mara. 2010. “Computer Games: Pushing at the Boundaries of Literacy.” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 33 (1): 65–76.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatt, I. 2017. “Classroom Digital Literacies as Interactional Accomplishments.” In Researching New Literacies: Design, Theory and Data in Sociocultural Investigation, edited by M. Knobel and C. Lankshear, 127–149. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Bryer, T., L. Morlette, and L. Wilson. 2014. “A Take on A Gothic Poem: Tablet Film-making and Literary Texts.” Changing English 21 (3): 235–251. doi:10.1080/1358684X.2014.929284.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, D., and J. Sefton-Green. 1994. Cultural Studies Goes to School. London; Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Burn, A., and J. Durran. 2007. Media Literacy in Schools: Practice, Production and Progression. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, C. 2017. “The Fluid Materiality of Tablets: Examining ‘the iPad Multiple’ in a Primary Classroom.” In The Case of the iPad: Mobile Literacies in Education, edited by C. Burnett et al., 15–29. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, C., G. Merchant, K. Pahl, and J. Rowsell. 2014. “The (Im)materiality of Literacy: The Significance of Subjectivity to New Literacies Research.” Discourse 35 (1): 90–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett, C., and J. Myers. 2006. “Observing Children Writing on Screen: Exploring the Porocess of Multimodal Composition.” Language and Literacy 8 (2). doi:10.20360/G2W89Q.
   Google Scholar
• Cannon, M., J. Potter, and A. Burn. 2018. “Dynamic, Playful and Productive Literacies.” Changing English 25 (2): 180–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazden, C., B. Cope, N. Fairclough, and J. Gee. 1996. “A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures.” Harvard Educational Review 66 (1): 60–92. doi:10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles, J., and T. Bryer. 2018. “Reading as Enactment: Transforming Beowulf through Drama, Film and Computer Game.” English in Education 52 (1): 1. doi:10.1080/04250494.2018.1414419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope, B., and M. Kalantzis. 2009. ““Multiliteracies”: New Literacies, New Learning.” Pedagogies: An International Journal 4 (3): 164–195. doi:10.1080/15544800903076044.
   Google Scholar
• Derewianka, B., and P. Jones. 2016. Teaching Language in Context. South Melbourne, Victoria: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dezuanni, M. 2015. “The Buildng Blocks of Digital Media Literacy: Socio-material Participation and the Production of Media Knowledge.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 47 (3): 416–439. doi:10.1080/00220272.2014.966152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards-Groves, C. 2012. “Interactive Creative Technologies: Changing Learning Practices and Pedagogies in the Writing Classrom.” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 35 (1): 99–113.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., and R. Edwards. 2018. Revisiting Actor-network Theory in Education. London: New York Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M., and M. Langworthy. 2014. A Rich Seam: How New Pedagogies Find Deep Learning. London: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hassel, B. B. C., and E. A. Hassel. 2012. ““Teachers In The Age Of Digital Instruction “.” In Education Reform for the Digital Era, edited by C. E. Finn and D. R. Fairchild, 11–33. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, A. 2008. Multiliteracies and Diversity in Education. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchby, I., and J. Moran-Ellis. 2001. Children, Technology and Culture: The Impacts of Technologies in Children’s Everyday Lives. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Knobel, M., and Lankshear, C. (Eds.). 2007. A New Literacies Sampler (Vol. 29). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 2003. Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, J., P. Connolly, and D. Lintzenich. 2015. “Connecting Students with Shakespeare’s Poetry: Digital Creations of Close Reading.” The English Journal 104 (4): 43–49.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., and J. Law. 2018. “Social Complexity, Actor Networks and the SPACE Framework.” Creative Commons. http://www.createinnovation.org.uk
   Google Scholar
• Leaver, T., and T. Highfield. 2018. “Visualising the Ends of Identity: Pre-birth and Post Death on Instagram.” Information, Communication & Society 21 (1): 30–45. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1259343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, K. 2016. Literacy Theories for the Digital Age. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, K., A. Bellocchi, R. Patulny, and J. Dooley. 2017. ““Indigenous Children’s Multimodal Communication Of Emotions Through Visual Imagery “.” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 40 (2): 95–108;.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, K., and A. Levido. 2011. “iPed: Pedagogy for Digital Text Production.” The Reading Teacher 65: 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, K., and B. Exley. 2014. “Time, Space, and Text in the Elementary School Digital Writing Classroom.” Written Communication 31 (4): 434–469. doi:10.1177/0741088314542757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacheco, M., B. Smith, and S. Carr. 2017. “Connecting Classrooms and Communities with Language and Technology: A Multimodal Code Meshing Project.” Voices from the Middle 24 (3): 63.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J. 2017. Digital Media, Culture and Education: Theorising Third Space Literacies, 1–205. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Puentedura, R. 2014. “Building Transfromation: An Introduction to the SAMR Model “ www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2014/08/22/BuildingTransfromation_AnIntroductionToSAMR.pd
   Google Scholar
• Rowsell, J., and E. Decoste. 2012. “(Re)designing Writing in English Class: A Multimodal Approach to Teaching Writing.” Pedagogies: An International Journal 7 (3): 246–260. doi:10.1080/1554480X.2012.685226.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, A., and M. Walsh. 2017. “Multimodal Layering: Students Learning with iPads in Primary School.” In The Case of the iPad: Mobile Literacies in Education, edited by C. Burnett et al., 67–85. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stornaiuolo, A., A. Smith, and N. Phillips. 2017. “Developing a Transliteracies Framework for a Connected World.” Journal of Literacy Research 49 (1): 68–91. doi:10.1177/1086296X16683419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, E. E., and A. Stornaiuolo. 2016. “Restorying the Self: Bending toward Textual Justice.” Harvard Educational Review 86 (3): 313–338. doi:10.17763/1943-5045-86.3.313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R. 2013. Dialogic: Education for the Internet Age. Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yandell, J. 2017. “Knowledge, English and the Formation of Teachers.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 25 (4): 583–599. doi:10.1080/14681366.2017.1312494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zappavigna, M. 2016. “Social Media Photography: Construing Subjectivity in Instagram Images.” Visual Communication 15 (3): 271–292. doi:10.1177/1470357216643220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar