Reading the Word Instead of the World: GCSE English Re-sits and the Divorce of Literacies from Their Lifeworld Use

References

• Alexander, J. 2007. “‘The Uncreating Word’: Some Ways Not to Teach English.” In V. Ellis, C. Fox & B. Street (Eds.), Rethinking English in Schools, 102–116. London; New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. 2004. “Still No Pedagogy? Principle, Pragmatism and Compliance in Primary Education.” Cambridge Journal of Education 34 (1): 7–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764042000183106.
   Google Scholar
• AoC [Association of Colleges]. 2017. “English and Maths Proposals Survey.” London: AoC. https://www.aoc.co.uk/sites/default/files/AoC%20English%20and%20maths%20proposals%20survey%20-%20summary%20report%20January%202017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• AQA. 2017. “GCSE English Language Paper 2: Writers’ Viewpoints and Perspectives.” AQA. https://filestore.aqa.org.uk/sample-papers-and-mark-schemes/2017/november/AQA-87002-INS-NOV17-CR.PDF
   Google Scholar
• ASCL [Association of School and College Leaders]. 2019. “The Forgotten Third: Final Report of the Commission of Inquiry.” Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.ascl.org.uk/ASCL/media/ASCL/Our%20view/Campaigns/The-Forgotten-Third_full-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 2017. The Education Debate. Third ed. Bristol; Chicago: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, D., and M. Hamilton. 2000. “Literacy Practices.” In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, R. Ivanič (Eds.), Situated Literacies: Reading and Writing in Context (pp. 27–35). London; New York: Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. 2017. “Education, Measurement and the Professions: Reclaiming a Space for Democratic Professionality in Education.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 49 (4): 315–330. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1048665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, G. 2014. Reflective Practice: Writing and Professional Development. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, H., O. Cara, J. Eldred, S. Grief, R. Hodge, R. Ivanić, T. Jupp, D. Lopez, and B. McNeil. 2006. “You Wouldn’t Expect a Maths Teacher to Teach Plastering … ” Embedding Literacy, Language and Numeracy in Post-16 Vocational Programmes – The Impact on Learning and Achievement.” London: ndon: National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy (NRDC) https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/22311/1/doc_3188.pdf. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/22311/1/doc_3188.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Child, S., M. Johnson, S. Mehta, and A. Charles. 2015. “Finding the Common Ground: Teachers’ and Employers’ Representations of English in an Assessment Context.” English in Education 49 (2): 150–166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/eie.12066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collyer, E. 2021. “‘You Can Change the Seats Around, but I Still Won’t Give a Shit’: The Impact of Seating Arrangements on Four Boys’ Engagement with English.” Changing English 28 (2): 186–195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684x.2020.1845610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtenay, M., and G. Mawer. 1995. Integrating English Language, Literacy and Numeracy into Vocational Education and Training: A Framework. New South Wales: Technical and Further Education Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Cuthbert, A. S. 2019. “Literature as Aesthetic Knowledge: Implications for Curriculum and Education.” The Curriculum Journal 30 (2): 181–195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2019.1576534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, A. 1999. “Standard English: Discordant Voices.” World Englishes 18 (2): 171–186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00132.
   Google Scholar
• DfE [Department for Education] and ESFA [Education and Skills Funding Agency]. 2014. “Statistics: National Achievement Rates Tables (Formerly Success Rates) for Apprenticeships and Education and Training.” GOV.UK Collections. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/sfa-national-success-rates-tables
   Google Scholar
• DfE [Department for Education]. 2013. “English Language GCSE Subject Content and Assessment Objectives.” DfE. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/254497/GCSE_English_language.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DfE [Department for Education]. 2014. “16 to 18 Accountability Headline Measures.” GOV.UK Guidance. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/16-to-19-accountability-headline-measures-technical-guide
   Google Scholar
• DfE [Department for Education]. 2018. “GCSE and Equivalent Results: 2017 to 2018 (Provisional).” GOV.UK National Statistics. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/gcse-and-equivalent-results-2017-to-2018-provisional
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C., T. Adams, and A. Bochner. 2011. “Autoethnography: An Overview.” Historical Social Research 36 (4): 273–290. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23032294.pdf?casa_token=RHKH5EztkYIAAAAA:z8uFSfEog12b2Qnz4woWdJi7LfsTrEnYIP8SazquXaw_lmHBtgXXlSfCatxMMOC35a1MGSiFeWVMk4JCaNgOrCRff9TG7IOGSJq2SmRVdaIjfsUdaEAgDQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESFA [Education and Skills Funding Agency]. 2014. “16 to 19 Funding: Maths and English Condition of Funding.” GOV.UK Guidance. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/16-to-19-funding-maths-and-english-condition-of-funding
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P., and L. Slover. 1983. “The Importance of the Act of Reading.” The Journal of Education 165 (1): 5–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/002205748316500103.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 1996. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, A., N. Mirra, E. Morrell, A. Martinez, and D. Scorza. 2015. “The Council of Youth Research: Critical Literacy and Civic Agency in the Digital Age.” Reading & Writing Quarterly 31 (2): 151–167. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2014.962203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2008. Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. Third Edition ed. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gewirtz, S., M. Maguire, E. Neumann, and E. Towers. 2019. “What’s Wrong with ‘Deliverology’? Performance Measurement, Accountability and Quality Improvement in English Secondary Education.” Journal of Education Policy 36 (4): 1–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2019.1706103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibb, N. 2018. “New Gold-Standard GCSEs Prepare Pupils for Careers Britain Needs.” GOV.UK Press Release. Department for Education. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-gold-standard-gcses-prepare-pupils-for-careers-britain-needs
   Google Scholar
• Goodwyn, A. 2011. “The Impact of the Framework of English: Teachers’ Struggle against ‘Informed Prescription.’” In the Great Literacy Debate: A Critical Response to the Literacy Strategy and the Framework for English. London & New York: ProQuest Ebook Central: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwyn, A. 2021. “Newbolt to Now: An Interpretation of the History of the School Subject of English in England.” Changing English 28 (2): 223–240. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2020.1756743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haladyna, T. M., S. B. Nolen, and N. S. Haas. 1991. “Raising Standardized Achievement Test Scores and the Origins of Test Score Pollution.” Educational Researcher 20 (5): 2–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X020005002.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, I. 2015. “A Logic of Enumeration: The Nature and Effects of National Literacy and Numeracy Testing in Australia.” Journal of Education Policy 30 (3): 335–362. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2014.945964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higton, J., R. Archer, D. Dalby, S. Robinson, G. Birkin, A. Stutz, R. Smith, and V. Duckworth. 2017. “Effective Practice in the Delivery and Teaching of English and Mathematics to 16-18 Year Olds.” London: Department for Education. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/662470/English_and_Mathematics_to_16-18_year_olds.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ireland, J. 2019. “Studying English and Mathematics at Level 2 Post-16: Issues and Challenges.” Research Matters: A Cambridge Assessment Publication 28: 26–33. https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/Images/561971-studying-english-and-mathematics-at-level-2-post-16-issues-and-challenges.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ivanič, R., R. Edwards, D. Barton, M. Martin-Jones, Z. Fowler, B. Hughes, G. Mannion, K. Miller, C. Satchwell, and J. Smith. 2009. Improving Learning in College: Rethinking Literacies across the Curriculum. London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanič, R. 2004. “Discourses of Writing and Learning to Write.” Language and Education 18 (3): 220–245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780408666877.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D. 2007. “The Unintended Outcomes of High-Stakes Testing.” Journal of Applied School Psychology 23 (2): 65–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1300/j370v23n02_05.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, M. R., and B. V. Street. 2006. “The ”Academic Literacies” Model: Theory and Applications.” Theory into Practice 45 (4): 368–377. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, T. 2008. “English in a Surveillance Regime: Tightening the Noose in New Zealand.” Changing English 15 (3): 293–310. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13586840802364210.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, M., S. Gewirtz, E. Towers, and E. Neumann. 2019. “Policy, Contextual Matters and Unintended Outcomes: The English Baccalaureate (Ebacc) and Its Impact on Physical Education in English Secondary Schools.” Sport, Education and Society 24 (6): 558–569. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2019.1611555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrens, W., and J. Kaminsky. 1989. “Methods for Improving Standardized Test Scores: Fruitful.” Fruitless, or Fraudulent? 8, 14–22. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/666871/Ofsted_Annual_Report_2016-17_Accessible.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted [Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills]. 2017. “The Annual Report of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills 2016/17.” London: Ofsted. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ofsted-annual-report-201617-education-childrens-services-and-skills
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted [Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills]. 2018. “The Annual Report of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills 2017/18.” London: Ofsted. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ofsted-annual-report-201718-education-childrens-services-and-skills
   Google Scholar
• Reese, M., S. P. Gordon, and L. R. Price. 2004. “Teachers’ Perceptions of High-Stakes Testing.” Journal of School Leadership 14 (5): 464–496. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460401400501.
   Google Scholar
• Rodeiro, C. V. 2018. “Which Students Benefit from Retaking Mathematics and English GCSEs Post-16?” Research Papers in Education 20 (3): 245–270. https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/Images/561971-studying-english-and-mathematics-at-level-2-post-16-issues-and-challenges.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., and N. Weinstein. 2009. “Undermining Quality Teaching and Learning: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective on High-Stakes Testing.” Theory and Research in Education 7 (2): 224–233. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104327.
   Google Scholar
• Sandretto, S., and J. Tilson. 2015. “Discursive Constructions of Literacies: Shifting Sands in Aotearoa New Zealand.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 38 (2): 222–234. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.1075472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, K. 2000. “A Critical Discussion of the ‘New Literacy Studies’.” British Journal of Educational Studies 48 (1): 10–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8527.t01-1-00130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stobart, G. 2008. Testing Times: The Uses and Abuses of Assessment. London & New York: ProQuest Ebook Central: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. 1997. “The Implications of the ‘New Literacy Studies’ for Literacy Education.” English in Education 31 (3): 45–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-8845.1997.tb00133.x.
   Google Scholar
• Veitch, R. 2020. “The Writing Is on the Wall for the Teaching of Literacy Skills in Post-16 Education. The GCSE English Re-Sit Policy: A Programme Which ‘Exists for the Exam’ Only.” Diss, King’s College London.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, M. E., M. Eastwood, and J. V. D’Agostino. 2014. “Conceptualizing Teaching to the Test under Standards-Based Reform.” Applied Measurement in Education 27 (2): 98–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2014.880439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winch, C. 2017. Teachers’ Know-How: A Philosophical Investigation. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, A. 2011. “Review of Vocational Education: The Wolf Report.” London: UK: Department of Education, Department for Business, Innovation & skills. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/review-of-vocational-education-the-wolf-report
   Google Scholar
• Yandell, J. 2012. “Different Ways of Reading, or Just Making the Right Noises?” Changing English 19 (3): 283–294. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2012.704579.
   Google Scholar