Close Writing Practices in the Post-Secondary Classroom

References

• Bolden, B., and C. DeLuca. 2016. “Measuring the Magical: Leveraging Assessment for Emergent Learning.” Assessment Matters 10: 52–71. doi:10.18296/am.0017.
   Google Scholar
• Branson, T. S. 2022. Policy Regimes: College Writing and Public Education Policy in the United States. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Briante, S. 2020. “Further Exercises.” The Brooklyn Rail. https://brooklynrail.org/2020/03/poetry/two-briante
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, C., and R. Penn Warren. 1960. The Scope of Fiction. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, T. F., and K. Womack. 2002. Formalist Criticism and Reader-Response Theory. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1983. “On the Genealogy of Ethics: An Overview of Work in Progress.” In Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, edited by H. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow, 229–264. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallop, J. 2000. “The Ethics of Reading: Close Encounters.” Journal of Curriculum Theorizing 15 (3): 7–17.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvie, S., and A. Beymer. 2019. “‘We Do Investigate Ourselves’: Figurative Assessment Practices as Meaning-Making in English Education.” Changing English 27 (2): 152–162. doi:10.1080/1358684X.2019.1647512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. 2003. “Re-thinking Assessment: Multimodality, Literacy and Computer-Mediated Learning.” Assessment in Education 10 (1): 83–102.
   Google Scholar
• Kleon, A. 2021. “Blog.” accessed 28th December 2021, https://austinkleon.com/
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 2003. Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lockett, M. 2010. “Close Reading: A Synergistic Approach to the (Post)modern Divide.” Changing English 17 (4): 399–409. doi:10.1080/1358684X.2010.528874.
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, D. 1992. The Art of Fiction. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Luce-Kapler, R. 2004. Writing With, Through, and beyond the Text: An Ecology of Language. 1st ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Luce-Kapler, R. 2006. “Creative Fragments: The Subjunctive Spaces of e-Literature.” English Teaching: Practice and Critique 5 (2): 6–16.
   Google Scholar
• Milton, J. 1957. Complete Poems and Major Prose, Edited by M. Y. Hughes. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, T. 2012. A Humument: A Treated Victorian Novel. London: Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. 1994. The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. 1995. Literature as Exploration. New York: Modern Language Association.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. 2005. Making Meaning with Texts: Selected Essays. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, G. 2021. “Welcome to Story Club”, Story Club with George Saunders, accessed 2 December 2021. https://georgesaunders.substack.com/p/welcome-to-story-club
   Google Scholar
• Sealey, N. 2020. “Pages 5-8: An Excerpt From The Ferguson Report: An Erasure.” The Paris Review 234. https://www.theparisreview.org/poetry/7603/pages-5-8-nicole-sealey
   Google Scholar
• Slattery, P., K. A. Krasny, and M. Patrick O’Malley. 2007. “Hermeneutics, Aesthetics, and the Quest for Answerability: A Dialogic Possibility for Reconceptualizing the Interpretative Process in Curriculum Studies.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 39 (5): 537–558. doi:10.1080/00220270600911039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T. K. 2018. “Declaration.” In Wade in the Water, 19. New York: Graywolf Press.
   Google Scholar
• Starnino, C. 2012. Lazy Bastardism: Essays & Reviews on Contemporary Poetry. Kentville, NS: Gaspereau Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sumara, D. J. 1996. Private Readings in Public: Schooling the Literary Imagination. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Tool. 2001. Lateralus. Hollywood: Volcano, compact disc.
   Google Scholar
• Wilder, L., and R. Yagelski. 2018. “Describing Cross-Disciplinary Analytic Moves in First-Year College Student Writing.” Research in the Teaching of English 52 (4): 382–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar