Importance of intervertebral displacement for whiplash investigations

References

• Stemper BD, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA. Gender dependent cervical spine segmental kinematics during whiplash. J Biomech. 2003;36:1281–1289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHS. Whiplash. NHS choices. [2014] Retrieved 2016 July 30. Available from: http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/whiplash/Pages/Introduction.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Stemper BD, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA. Gender- and region-dependent local facet joint kinematics in rear impact: implications in whiplash injury. Spine. 2004;29:1764–1771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson A, Linder A, Davidsson J, et al. Dynamic kinematic responses of female volunteers in rear impacts and comparison to previous male volunteer tests. Traffic Inj Prev. 2011;12:347–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson MY, Boström O, Davidsson J, et al. Neck injuries in car collisions–a review covering a possible injury mechanism and the development of a new rear-impact dummy. Accid Anal Prev. 2000;32:167–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson A. Addressing female whiplash injury protection - a step towards 50th percentile female rear impact occupant models [PhD Thesis]. Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bogduk N, Yoganandan N. Biomechanics of the cervical spine Part 3: Minor injuries. Clin Biomech. 2001;16:267–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson M. Neck injuries in car collisions - injury mechanisms. Proceedings Injury in Low Velocity Collision Conference; 2005; 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• EURO NCAP. Whiplash. The Rating Explained - Whiplash. [2009] Retrieved 2016 July 27. Available from: http://www.euroncap.com/en/vehicle-safety/the-ratings-explained/adult-occupant-protection/whiplash/.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. Traffic Safety Facts 2014 - a compilation of motor vehicle crash data from the fatality analysis reporting system and the general estimates system. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration - U.S. Department of Transportation; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe Y, Ichikawa H, Kayama O, et al. Influence of seat characteristics on occupant motion in low-speed rear impacts. Accid Anal Prev. 2000;32:243–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eis V, Sferco R, Fay P. Detailed Analysis of the Characteristics of European Rear Impacts. 19th International ESV Conference, Washington D.C.; 2005;1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Favarò FM, Nader N, Eurich SO, et al. Examining accident reports involving autonomous vehicles in California. PloS One. 2017;12:e0184952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill B. Head restraints - The neglected countermeasure. Accid Anal Prev. 2000;32:143–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luan F, Yang KH, Deng B, et al. Qualitative analysis of neck kinematics during low-speed rear-end impact. Clin Biomech. 2000;15:649–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell WE, Howard RP, Guzman HM, et al. Analysis of human test subject kinematic responses to low velocity rear end impacts. SAE Technical Paper, No. 930889 1993;
   Google Scholar
• Matsushita T, Sato TB, Hirabayashi K, et al. X-ray study of the human neck motion due to head inertia loading. Proceedings of 38th Stapp Car Crash Conference, Lauderdale – Florida, USA; 1994; 55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Ono K, Ejima S, Suzuki Y, et al. Prediction of neck injury risk based on the analysis of localized cervical vertebral motion of human volunteers during low-speed rear impacts. IRCOBI Conference Proceedings, Madrid, Spain; 2006; 103–113.
   Google Scholar
• Chirwa EC, Wang W. Mechanics of a mechanically triggered airbag head restraint system for occupant protection in rear end impact. Int J Crashworthiness. 1997;2:165–190.
   Google Scholar
• Acar M, Bewsher SR. Design concepts for an integrated whiplash mitigating head restraint and seat. Int J Crashworthiness. 2016;21:79–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt KU, Beyeler F, Muser M, et al. A visco-elastic foam as head restraint material - Experiments and numerical simulations using a biorid model. Int J Crashworthiness. 2004;9:341–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latchford J, Chirwa EC. Airbag head restraint system. Proceed Inst Mech Eng, Part D: J Automobile Eng. 2000;214:229–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latchford J, Chirwa EC, Chen T, et al. The relationship of seat backrest angle and neck injury in low-velocity rear impacts. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part D: J Automobile Eng. 2005;219:1293–1302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himmetoglu S. Car seat design and human-body modelling for rear impact whiplash mitigation [PhD Thesis]. Loughborough: Loughborough University; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kang Y-S, Moorhouse K, Herriott R, et al. Comparison of cervical vertebrae rotations for PMHS and BioRID II in rear impacts. Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14:136–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panjabi MM, Ito S, Ivancic PC, et al. Evaluation of the intervertebral neck injury criterion using simulated rear impacts. J Biomech. 2005;38:1694–1701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panjabi MM, Wang J, Delson N. Neck injury criterion based on intervertebral motions and its evaluation using an instrumented neck dummy. IRCOBI Conference Proceedings, Sitges, Spain; 1999; 179–190.
   Google Scholar
• Grauer JN, Panjabi MM, Cholewicki J, et al. Whiplash produces an S-shaped curvature of the neck with hyperextension at lower levels. Spine. 1997;22:2489–2494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord SM, Barnsley L, Wallis BJ, et al. Chronic cervical zygapophysial joint pain after whiplash. Spine. 1996;21:1737–1744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord SM, Barnsley L, Wallis BJ, et al. Percutaneous radio-frequency neurotomy for chronic cervical zygapophyseal-joint pain. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1721–1726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnsley L, Lord SM, Wallis BJ, et al. The prevalence of chronic cervical zygapophysial joint pain after whiplash. Spine. 1995;20:20–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang Y-S, Moorhouse K, Herriott R, et al. Head and cervical spine responses of post mortem human subjects in moderate speed rear impacts. IRCOBI Conference Proceedings, Berlin, Germany; 2014; 268–285.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson KM, Hildingsson Christer MD, P, et al. Disc pathology after whiplash injury: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging and clinical investigation. Spine. 1997;22:283–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhrenholt L, Grunnet-Nilsson N, Hartvigsen J. Cervical spine lesions after road traffic accidents: a systematic review. Spine. 2002;27:1934. discussion 1940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang Y-S, Moorhouse K, Icke K, et al. Rear impact head and cervical spine kinematics of BioRID II and PMHS in production seats. IRCOBI Conference Proceedings, Lyon, France; 2015; 246–260.
   Google Scholar
• Fice JB, Cronin DS, Panzer MB. Investigation of facet joint response under rear impact conditions using FE model of the cervical spine. Proceedings of the 21st International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV), Stuttgart, Germany; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Stemper BD, Yoganandan N, Rao RD, et al. Influence of thoracic ramping on whiplash kinematics. Clin Biomech. 2005;20:1019–1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panjabi MM, Miura T, Cripton PA, et al. Development of a system for in vitro neck muscle force replication in whole cervical spine experiments. Spine. 2001;26:2214–2219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panjabi MM, Nibu K, Cholewicki J. Whiplash injuries and the potential for mechanical instability. Eur Spine J. 1998;7:484–492.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panjabi MM, Cholewicki J, Nibu K, et al. Mechanism of whiplash injury. Clin Biomech. 1998;13:239–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivancic PC, Xiao M. Understanding whiplash injury and prevention mechanisms using a human model of the neck. Accid Anal Prev. 2011;43:1392–1399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivancic PC, Sha D, Lawrence BD, et al. Effect of active head restraint on residual neck instability due to rear impact. Spine. 2010;35:2071–2078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tencer AF, Mirza S, Huber P. A comparison of injury criteria used in evaluating seats for whiplash protection. Traffic Inj Prev. 2004;5:56–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ivancic PC, Pearson AM, Panjabi MM, et al. Injury of the anterior longitudinal ligament during whiplash simulation. Eur Spine J. 2004;13:61–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geigl BC. Bewegung der Halswirbeläule beim Heckaufprall [PhD Thesis]. Graz, Austria: Graz University of Technology, in German; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Geigl BC, Steffan H, Leinzinger P, et al. The movement of head and cervical spine during rearend impact. IRCOBI Conference Proceedings; 1994; 127–138.
   Google Scholar
• Bertholon N, Robin S, Le Coz, J-Y, Potier, P, Lassau, J-P, Skalli, W. Human head and cervical spine behaviour during low-speed rear-end impacts: PMHS sled tests with a rigid seat. IRCOBI Conference Proceedings, Montpellier, France; 2000; 265–277.
   Google Scholar
• Deng B, Begeman PC, Yang KH, et al. Kinematics of human cadaver cervical spine during low speed rear-end impacts. Stapp Car Crash J. 2000;44:171–188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deng B. Kinematics of human cadaver cervical spine during low speed rear-end impacts [PhD Thesis] - Detroit (MI): Wayne State University; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• N. A, Begeman W, Hardy PC, Yang WN, et al. Investigation of upper body and cervical spine kinematics of post mortem human subjects (PMHS) during low-speed, rear-end impacts. SAE Technical Paper 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Sundararajan S, Priya P, Demetropoulos CK, et al. Effect of head-neck position on cervical facet stretch of post mortem human subjects during low speed rear end impacts. Stapp Car Crash Conference; 2004;48:331–372.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sato F, Nakajima T, Ono K, et al. Characteristics of dynamic cervical vertebral kinematics for female and male volunteers in low speed rear impact, based on quasi-static neck kinematics. IRCOBI Conference Proceedings; 2015; 261–277.
   Google Scholar
• Sato F, Nakajima T, Ono K, et al. Dynamic cervical vertebral motion of female and male volunteers and analysis of its interaction with head/neck/torso behavior during low-speed rear impact. IRCOBI Conference Proceedings; 2014; 227–249.
   Google Scholar
• Ono K, Kaneoka K, Wittek A, et al. Cervical injury mechanism based on the analysis of human cervical vertebral motion and head-neck-torso kinematics during low speed rear impacts. Proceedings of 41st Stapp Car Crash Journal, Lake Buena Vista – Florida, USA; 1997; 339–356.
   Google Scholar
• Kaneoka K, Ono K, Inami S, et al. Motion analysis of cervical vertebrae during whiplash loading. Spine. 1999;24:763–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono K, Kaneoka K, Inami S. Influence of seat properties on human vertebral motion and head/neck/torso kinematics during rear-end impacts. IRCOBI Conference Proceedings, Gothenburg, Sweden; 1998; 303–318.
   Google Scholar
• Ono K, Kaneoka K. Motion analysis of human cervical vertebrae during low-speed rear impacts by the simulated sled. J Crash Prev Inj Control. 1999;1:87–99.
   Google Scholar
• Ito S, Ivancic PC, Panjabi MM, et al. Soft tissue injury threshold during simulated whiplash: a biomechanical investigation. Spine. 2004;29:979–987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivancic PC, Sha D, Panjabi MM. Whiplash injury prevention with active head restraint. Clin Biomech. 2009;24:699–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutsche AJ, Tomasch E, Darok M, et al. Comparison of the cervical spine bony kinematics for female PMHS with the virtual EvaRID dummy under whiplash loading. IRCOBI Conference Proceedings, Berlin, Germany; 2014; 528–541.
   Google Scholar
• Panjabi MM, Pearson AM, Ito S, et al. Cervical spine curvature during simulated whiplash. Clin Biomech. 2004;19:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinich KD, Ebert SM, Van Ee CA, et al. Cervical spine geometry in the automotive seated posture: variations with age, stature, and gender. Stapp Car Crash J. 2004;48:301–330.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Jager M. Mathematical head-neck models for acceleration impacts [PhD Thesis]. – Eindhoven, Netherlands: Eindhoven University of Technology.; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Yoganandan N, Pintar F. a, Klienberger M. Cervical spine vertebral and facet joint kinematics under whiplash. J Biomech Eng. 1998;120:305–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, Cusick JF. Biomechanical analyses of whiplash injuries using an experimental model. Accid Anal Prev. 2002;34:663–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tencer a. F, Huber P, Mirza SK. A comparison of biomechanical mechanisms of whiplash injury from rear impacts. Annual Proceedings/Assoc Adv Automotive Med 2003;47:383–398.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stemper BD, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA. Validation of a head-neck computer model for whiplash simulation. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2004;42:333–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivancic PC, Panjabi MM, Ito S, et al. Biofidelic whole cervical spine model with muscle force replication for whiplash simulation. Eur Spine J. 2005;14:346–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu B, Wu B, Van Hoof T, et al. Are the standard parameters of cervical spine alignment and range of motion related to age, sex, and cervical disc degeneration? J Neurosurg: Spine. 2015;23:274–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivancic PC, Sha D. Comparison of the whiplash injury criteria. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42:56–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panjabi MM, Ivancic PC, Tominaga Y, et al. Intervertebral neck injury criterion for prediction of multiplanar cervical spine injury due to side impacts. Traffic Inj Prev. 2005;6:387–397.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ivancic PC, Panjabi MM, Tominaga Y, et al. Predicting multiplanar cervical spine injury due to head-turned rear impacts using IV-NIC. Traffic In Prev. 2006;7:264–275.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ono K, Inami S, Kaneoka K, et al. Relationship between localized spine deformation and cervical vertebral motions for low speed rear impacts using human volunteers. IRCOBI Conference Proceedings, Sitges, Spain; 1999; 149–164.
   Google Scholar
• Mordaka JK. Finite element analysis of whiplash injury for women [PhD Thesis]. Nottingham, UK: The Nottingham Trent University; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Mameren van H, Sanches H, et al. Cervical spine motion in the sagittal plane II: Position of segmental averaged instantaneous centers of rotation - a cineradiographic study. Spine. 1992;17:467–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dvorak J, Panjabi MM, Novotny J, et al. In vivo flexion/extension of the normal cervical spine. J Orthopaedic Res 1991;9:824–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amevo B, Worth D, Bogduk N. Instantaneous axes of rotation of the typical cervical motion segments: A study in normal volunteers. Clin Biomech. 1991;6:111–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamazaki K, Ono K, Kaneoka K. A simulation analysis of human cervical spine motion during low speed rear-end impacts. SAE Technical Paper; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• van Lopik D. (2004). A Computational model of the human head and cervical spine for dynamic impact simulation [PhD Thesis]. Loughborough, UK: Loughborough University.
   Google Scholar
• Fréchède B, Bertholon N, Le Coz J-Y, et al. Finite element model of the human neck during omni-directional impacts. Part I. Kinematics and injury. Revue Européenne Des Éléments Finis. 2005;14:463–485.
   Google Scholar
• Fréchède B, Bertholon N, Saillant G, et al. Finite element model of the human neck during omni-directional impacts. Part II: relation between cervical curvature and risk of injury. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2006;9:379–386.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davidsson J, Deutscher C, Hell W, et al. Human volunteer kinematics in rear-end sled collisions. J Crash Prev Inj Control. 2001;2:319–333.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover J, Meguid SA. Analytical viscoelastic modelling of whiplash using lumped-parameter approach. Int J Mech Mater Des. 2015;11:125–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang QH, Teo EC, Ng HW. Development and validation of A C0 – C7 FE complex for biomechanical study. J Biomech Eng. 2005;127:729–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato F, Odani M, Miyazaki Y, et al. Effects of whole spine alignment patterns on neck responses in rear end impact. Traffic Inj Prev. 2017;18:199–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White NA, Moreno DP, Gayzik FS, et al. Cross-sectional neck response of a total human body FE model during simulated frontal and side automobile impacts. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2015;18:293–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker JB, Cronin DS, Nightingale RW. Lower cervical spine motion segment computational model validation: kinematic and kinetic response for quasi-static and dynamic loading. J Biomech Eng. 2017;139:061009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemper BD, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA. Effects of abnormal posture on capsular ligament elongations in a computational model subjected to whiplash loading. J Biomech. 2005;38:1313–1323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pramudita JA, Kikuchi S, Minato I, et al. Effect of cervical spine alignment on neck injury risk during rear-end impact – numerical study using neck finite element model. Int J Crashworthiness. 2017;22:453–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panzer MB. (2006). Numerical modelling of the human cervical spine in frontal impact [PhD Thesis]. Waterloo, Canada: Waterloo University, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Linder A, Schick S, Hell W, et al. ADSEAT - adaptive seat to reduce neck injuries for female and male occupants. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;60:334–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar