Reverse reconstruction of motorcycle-car accident based on response surface model and NSGA-II algorithm

References

• Traffic Management Bureau of the Ministry of Public Security. Statistical annual report of road traffic accidents of the People’s Republic of China. Beijing: Traffic Management Bureau of the Ministry of Public Security; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Jiguang C. Research on helmet damage protection performance based on motorcycle accident reconstruction. Hunan University; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Chuang Q, Shuangzhi F, Xianlong J, et al. Application of combined dummy modeling in two-wheel electric vehicle traffic accident simulation. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. 2019;53(4):65–71.
   Google Scholar
• Lingshuang K, Chuang Q, Xianlong J, et al. Simulation for vehicle-motor collision accidents based on the Facet model and combined dummies. Vib Impact. 2018;37(14):44–50.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng L, Ding T, Xi J, et al. Simulation analysis of traffic accidents reconstruction based on reverse-reasoning method. International Conference on Electronic Commerce & Business Intelligence; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Xianghai C, Xianlong J, Xiaoyun Z, et al. The application for skull injury in vehicle–pedestrian accident. Int J Crashworthiness. 2011;16(1):11–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubiak P, Mierzejewska P, Szosland A. A precise method of vehicle velocity determination based on measurements of car body deformation – non-linear method for the ‘Luxury’ vehicle class. Int J Crashworthiness. 2018;23(1):100–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Hu Z, Du X. Probabilistic inverse simulation and its application in vehicle accident reconstruction. ASME J. Mech. Des. 2013;135(12):121006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiaoyun Z, Xianlong J, Xianghai C, et al. The simulation and optimization integration calculation method and application validation for the traffic accident. Adv Eng Softw. 2011;42(6):387–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiaoyun Z, Xianlong J, Xianghai C, et al. The first collision point position identification method in vehicle–pedestrian impact accident. Int J Crashworthiness. 2011;16(2):181–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XY, Jin XL, Qi W, et al. Virtual reconstruction of vehicle crash accident based on elastic-plastic deformation of auto-body. Key Eng Mater. 2004;274–276:1017–1022.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang XY, Jin XL, Qi WG, et al. Vehicle crash accident reconstruction based on the analysis 3D deformation of the auto-body. Adv Eng Softw. 2008;39(6):459–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiaoyun Z, Dongming Z, Xiaobo Y, et al. Traffic accident reconstruction based on occupant trajectories and trace identification. ASME J. Risk Uncertain B. 2019;5(2):020903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, et al. A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 2002;6(2):182–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deming L, Xinping Y. Multi-objective intelligent optimization algorithm and its application. Beijing: Science Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Gu H, Wang X. Application of NSGA-II algorithm in the design of car body lateral crashworthiness. DEStech Transactions on Materials Science and Engineering (icmeat); 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Wang C, Zhu J. Multi-objective optimization of a spring diaphragm clutch on an automobile based on the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II). Math Comput Appl. 2016;21(4):47.
   Google Scholar
• Wang D, Jiang R, Wu Y. A hybrid method of modified NSGA-II and TOPSIS for lightweight design of parameterized passenger car sub-frame. J Mech Sci Technol. 2016;30(11):4909–4917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagheri MR, Mosayebi M, Mahdian A, Keshavarzi, et al. Weighted sum Pareto optimization of a three dimensional passenger vehicle suspension model using NSGA-II for ride comfort and ride safety. Smart Struct Syst. 2018;22:469–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Shi T, Wang D, et al. Multi-objective optimization of the vehicle ride comfort based on Kriging approximate model and NSGA-II. J Mech Sci Technol. 2015;29(3):1007–1018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhonghua H, Chenzhou X, Jianling Q, et al. Research progress of efficient global aerodynamic optimization design method based on agent model. J Aeronaut. 1–40.(2019-10-18)
   Google Scholar
• Giunta AA, Watson LT. A comparison of approximation modeling techniques: polynomial versus interpolation models: AIAA-1998-4758. Reston, VA: AIAA; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Vavalle A, Qin N. Iterative response surface based optimization scheme for transonic airfoil design. J Aircraft. 2007;44(2):365–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthy T. Response surface approximation with augmented and compactly supported radial basis functions: AIAA-2003-1748. Reston, VA: AIAA, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Sobester A, Leary SJ, Keane AJ. On the design of optimization strategies based on global response surface approximation models. J Glob Optim. 2005;33(1):31–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han Z. Research progress of Kriging model and agent optimization algorithm. J Aeronaut. 2016;37(11):3197–3225.
   Google Scholar
• Krige DG. A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Witwatersrand. J S Afr Inst Min Metall. 1951;52(6):119–139.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks J, Welch WJ, Mitchell TJ, et al. Design and analysis of computer experiments. Stat Sci. 1989;4(4):409–423.
   Google Scholar
• Yao X, Liu Y. A new evolutionary system for evolving artificial neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 1997;8(3):694–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatandas E. Hybridizing genetic algorithm with artificial neural network in the aerodynamic optimization of the forward swept wing: AIAA-2010-2915. Reston, VA: AIAA; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bandler JW, Biernacki R CSH. Space mapping technique for electromagnetic optimization. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 1994;42(12):2536–2544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalatpour A, Amineh RK, Cheng QS, et al. Accelerating space mapping optimization with adjoint sensitivities. IEEE Microw Wireless Compon Lett. 2011;21(6):280–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smola AJ, Scholköpf B. A tutorial on support vector regression. Stat Comput. 2004;14(3):199–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun Y, Yoon M, Nakayama H. Multiobjective optimization based on meta-modeling by using support vector regression. Optim Eng. 2009;10(2):167–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Moin P, Iaccarino G. A rational interpolation scheme with super-polynomial rate of convergence. SIAM J Numer Anal. 2010;47(6):4073–4097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Moin P, Iaccarino G. A high-order multi-variate approximation scheme for arbitrary data sets. Comput Phys. 2010;229(18):6343–6361.
   Google Scholar
• Crestaux T, Le Maıtre O, Martinez J-M. Polynomial chaos expansion for sensitivity analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2009;94(7):1161–1172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novák L, Novak D. Polynomial chaos expansion for surrogate modelling: theory and software. Betonund Stahlbetonbau. 2018;113(2):27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester AIJ, Keane AJ, Bressloff NW. Design and analysis of noisy computer experiments. AIAA J. 2006;44(10):2331–2339.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Han ZH, Song WP. Comparison of infill sampling criteria in kriging-based aerodynamic optimization. 28th ICAS, 2012, paper no. 2012–0269.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Song WP, Han ZH, et al. Efficient aerodynamic shape optimization of transonic wings using aparallel infilling strategy and surrogate models. Struct Multidisc Optim. 2017;55(3):925–943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Han ZH, Zhang KS. Variable-fidelity expected improvement for efficient global optimization of expensive functions. Struct Multidisc Optim. 2018;58(4):1431–1451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai M, Zou T, Luo P, et al. Evaluation of simulation uncertainty in accident reconstruction via combining response surface methodology and Monte Carlo method. Transport Res C: Emerg Technol. 2014;48:241–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei G. Simulation research and application of vehicle and two wheeled vehicle collision. Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett JA, Park GJ. Automotive occupant dynamics optimization. Shock Vib. 1995;2(6):471–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, Sances A, et al. Biomechanics of skull fracture. J Neurotrauma. 1995;12(4):659–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar