Investigation on the low-velocity impact behaviour of non-symmetric FMLs—experimental and numerical methods

References

• Moussavi-Torshizi SE, Dariushi S, Sadighi M, et al. A study on tensile properties of a novel fiber/metal laminates. Mater Sci Eng A. 2010;527(18–19):4920–4925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun G, Yu H, Wang Z, et al. Energy absorption mechanics and design optimization of CFRP/aluminium hybrid structures for transverse loading. Int J Mech Sci. 2019;150:767–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajkumar GR, Krishna M, Murthy HN, et al. Experimental investigation of low-velocity repeated impacts on glass fiber metal composites. J Materi Eng Perform. 2012;21(7):1485–1490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalili SMR, Sharafi M, Eslami-Farsani R, et al. Effect of thermal cycling on tensile properties of degraded FML to metal hybrid joints exposed to sea water. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2017;79:95–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadighi M, Alderliesten RC, Benedictus R. Impact resistance of fiber-metal laminates_ A review. Int J Impact Eng. 2012;49:77–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai G, Manikandan P. Low velocity impact response of fibre-metal laminates – a review. Compos Struct. 2014;107:363–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morinière FD, Alderliesten RC, Benedictus R. Modelling of impact damage and dynamics in fibre-metal laminates – a review. Int J Impact Eng. 2014;67:27–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinmazçelik T, Avcu E, Bora M, et al. A review: fibre metal laminates, background, bonding types and applied test methods. Mater Des. 2011;32(7):3671–3685.
   Google Scholar
• Liu PF, Liao BB, Jia LY, et al. Finite element analysis of dynamic progressive failure of carbon fiber composite laminates under low velocity impact. Compos Struct. 2016;149:408–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao B, Liu P. Finite element analysis of dynamic progressive failure of plastic composite laminates under low velocity impact. Compos Struct. 2017;159:567–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlot A, Kroon E, La RG. Impact response of fiber metal laminates. KEM. 1997;141-143:235–276.
   Google Scholar
• Bieniaś J, Jakubczak P, Surowska B, et al. Low-energy impact behaviour and damage characterization of carbon fibre reinforced polymer and aluminium hybrid laminates. Arch Civ Mech Eng. 2015;15(4):925–932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortés P, Cantwell WJ. The impact properties of high-temperature fiber-metal laminates. J Compos Mater. 2007;41(5):613–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan J, Cantwell WJ, Guan Z. The low-velocity impact response of fiber-metal laminates. J Reinf Plast Compos. 2011;30(1):26–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakatani H, Kosaka T, Osaka K, et al. Damage characterization of titanium/GFRP hybrid laminates subjected to low-velocity impact. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2011;42(7):772–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaghoubi AS, Liu Y, Liaw B. Stacking sequence and geometrical effects on low-velocity impact behavior of GLARE 5 (3/2) fiber–metal laminates. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. 2012;25(2):223–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan SH, Ankush PS, Kitey R, et al. Effect of metal layer placement on the damage and energy absorption mechanisms in aluminium/glass fibre laminates. Int J Impact Eng. 2018;119:14–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrillo JG, Cantwell WJ. Scaling effects in the low velocity impact response of fiber-metal laminates. J Reinf Plast Compos. 2008;27(9):893–907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakubczak P, Bienias J, Surowska B. The influence of fibre orientation in aluminium–carbon laminates on low-velocity impact resistance. J Compos Mater. 2018;52(8):1005–1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bienias J, Jakubczak P, Dadej K. Low-velocity impact resistance of aluminium glass laminates – experimental and numerical investigation. Compos Struct. 2016;152:339–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bienias J, Surowska B, Jakubczak P. The comparison of low-velocity impact resistance of aluminum/carbon and glass fiber metal laminates. Polym Compos. 2016;37(4):1056–1063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu S, Chai G. Low-velocity impact response of fibre-metal laminates – experimental and finite element analysis. Compos Sci Technol. 2012;72(15):1793–1802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadighi M, Pärnänen T, Alderliesten RC, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of metal type and thickness effects on the impact resistance of fiber metal laminates. Appl Compos Mater. 2012;19(3-4):545–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarlin E, Apostol M, Lindroos M, et al. Impact properties of novel corrosion resistant hybrid structures. Compos Struct. 2014;108:886–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu B, Deshpande VS, Fleck NA. Perforation of aluminium alloy-CFRP bilayer plates under quasi-static and impact loading. Int J Impact Eng. 2018;121:106–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He W, Liu J, Wang S, et al. Low-velocity impact behavior of X-Frame core sandwich structures – experimental and numerical investigation. Thin-Walled Struct. 2018;131:718–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao L, Wang C, He W, et al. Influence of impactor shape on low-velocity impact behavior fiber metal laminates combined numerical and experimental approaches. Thin-Walled Struct. 2019;145:1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He W, Liu J, Wang S, et al. Low-velocity impact response and post-impact flexural behaviour of composite sandwich structures with corrugated cores. Compos Struct. 2018;189:37–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, He W, Xie D, et al. The effect of impactor shape on the low-velocity impact behavior of hybrid corrugated core sandwich structures. Compos Part B. 2017;111:315–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashin Z. Fatigue failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites. J Appl Mech. 1981;48(4):846–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao L, Sun G, He W, et al. Investigation on impact behavior of FMLs under multiple impacts with the same total energy: experimental characterization and numerical simulation. Compos Struct. 2019;226:1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen BF, Jacobsen TK. Determination of cohesive laws by the J integral approach. Eng Fract Mech. 2003;70(14):1841–1858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He W, Yao L, Meng X, et al. Effect of structural parameters on lowvelocity impact behavior of aluminum honeycomb sandwich structures with CFRP face sheets. Thin-Walled Struct. 2019;137:411–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puck A, Schürmann H. Failure analysis of FRP laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models. Compos Sci Technol. 2002; 62(12-13):1633–1662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abaqus analysis user’s manual, Version 6.13. Dassault Systemes; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Morozov EV, Shankar K. Progressive failure analysis of perforated aluminum/CFRP fibre metal laminates using a combined elastoplastic damage model and including delamination effects. Compos Struct. 2014;114:64–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Wang Y, Zhang J, et al. Characterizing the off-axis dependence of failure mechanism in notched fiber metal laminates. Compos Struct. 2018;185:148–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar