Analyzing the role of multiagent technology in preventing airplane crash using AHP and DEMATEL approach

References

• Genesereth MR, Ketchpel SP. Software agents. Commun Acm. 1994;37(7):48–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge MJ, Jennings NR. Intelligent agents: theory and practice. Knowl Eng Rev. 1995;10(2):115–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Airplanes BC. 2007. Statistical summary of commercial jet airplane accidents-worldwide operations 1959–2006. http://www.boeing.com/news/techissues.
   Google Scholar
• Sislak D, Volf P, Pechoucek M. Agent-based cooperative decentralized airplane–collision avoidance. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst. 2011;12(1):36–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Nuovo AG, Cannavo RB, Di Nuovo S. An agent-based infrastructure for monitoring aviation pilot's situation awareness In 2011 IEEE Symposium on Intelligent Agent (IA). IEEE; 2011. p. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma SK, Vishwakarma S, Jha N. Prognosis agent technology: influence on manufacturing organizations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2017;92(1–4):435–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storer LN, Williams PD, Gill PG. Aviation turbulence: dynamics, forecasting, and response to climate change. Pure Appl Geophys. 2019;176(5):2081–2095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arunachalam N, Giles G, Raghunath R, et al. A hybrid approach model for weather forecasting using multi-task agent. In: 2015 2nd International Conference on Electronics and Communication Systems (ICECS). IEEE; 2015. February; p. 1675–1678.
   Google Scholar
• Ioan MR, Liliana SP. Using mobile agents and intelligent data analysis techniques for climate environment modeling and weather analysis and prediction. In: 2008 10th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing. IEEE; 2008 September. p. 316–319.
   Google Scholar
• Lu J, Singh AS, Koundinya V, et al. Explaining the use of online agricultural decision support tools with weather or climate information in the midwestern United States. J Environ Manage. 2021;279:111758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goraj Z. An overview of the deicing and anti-icing technologies with prospects for the future. In: 24th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences. Vol. 29, 2004 August.
   Google Scholar
• Mao X, Ter Mors A, Roos N, et al. (2006, October). Agent-based scheduling for aircraft deicing. In: Proceedings of the 18th Belgium–Netherlands Conference on Artificial Intelligence. BNVKI; p. 229–236.
   Google Scholar
• Li W, Zhang H, Ye L, et al. Fiber-optic ice detection system for aeroplane application. In: 2009 International Workshop on Intelligent Systems and Applications. IEEE. p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Armanini SF, Polak M, Gautrey JE, et al. Decision-making for unmanned aerial vehicle operation in icing conditions. CEAS Aeronaut J. 2016;7(4):663–675.
   Google Scholar
• Dong Y. Implementing deep learning for comprehensive aircraft icing and actuator/sensor fault detection/identification. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2019;83:28–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugiyama T, Abe K. Runways using an ultraviolet image sensor. Intell Autonomous Syst. 2002;7:357.
   Google Scholar
• Cetin O, Kurnaz S, Kaynak O. Fuzzy logic based approach to design of autonomous landing system for unmanned aerial vehicles. J Intell Robot Syst. 2011;61(1–4):239–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins EM, Portillo IA, Strube MJ. Emergency flight planning applied to total loss of thrust. J Aircraft. 2006;43(4):1205–1216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunetti P, Thompson H. A soar-based planning agent for gas-turbine engine control and health management. IFAC Proc Vol. 2008;41(2):2200–2205.
   Google Scholar
• Muller A, Marquez AC, Iung B. On the concept of e-maintenance: review and current research. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2008;93(8):1165–1187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datong L, Yu P, Xiyuan P. 2011. May). Online adaptive status prediction strategy for data-driven fault prognostics of complex systems. In: 2011 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference. IEEE. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Daiping H, Weiguo X, Huiming D, et al. An agent based fault diagnosis support system and its application. In: 2006 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics. IEEE; 2006. p. 388–392.
   Google Scholar
• Haider K, Tweedale J, Jain LC, et al. Intelligent decision support feedback using multi-agent system in a defence maintenance environment. IJIIDS. 2007;1(3/4):311–324.
   Google Scholar
• Yam RCM, Tse PW, Li L, et al. Intelligent predictive decision support system for condition-based maintenance. Int J Adv Manufact Technol. 2001;17(5):383–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Källström J, Heintz F. 2019. Multi-agent multi-objective deep reinforcement learning for efficient and effective pilot training In: FT2019. Proceedings of the 10th Aerospace Technology Congress, October 8–9, 2019, Stockholm, Sweden, p. 101–111.
   Google Scholar
• Stephen C, Labib A. A hybrid model for learning from failures. Expert Syst Appl. 2018;93:212–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pechoucek M, Sislak D. Agent-based approach to free-flight planning, control, and simulation. IEEE Intell Syst. 2009;24(1):14–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chumachenko D, Meniailov I, Bazilevych K, et al. On intelligent decision making in multiagent systems in conditions of uncertainty. In: 2019 XIth International Scientific and Practical Conference on Electronics and Information Technologies (ELIT). IEEE; 2019. p. 150–153
   Google Scholar
• Wei Z, Li J. Design of air traffic control operation system using multi agent technology and simulation. TOEFJ. 2015;8(1):368–374.
   Google Scholar
• Tumer K, Agogino A. 2007. Distributed agent-based air traffic flow management. In: Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems. p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Breil R, Delahaye D, Lapasset L, et al. Multi-agent systems to help managing air traffic structure. AOP. 2018;5(1–2):119–148.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura S, Furuta K, Kanno T, et al. 2010. Multi-agent simulation of ground aircraft operations at a large airport. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International ICST Conference on Simulation Tools and Techniques. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Yingguang L, Li Y, Ruijie Y, Jianbang J, Liao W. Aircraft tooling collaborative design based on multi-agent and PDM. Concurr Eng. 2009;17(2P):139–146.
   Google Scholar
• Konotop D, Budinska I, Zinchenko V, et al. Multi-agent-based conception of modern aircraft design. In: 5th workshop on intelligent and knowledge oriented technologies. 2010, November. p. 125.
   Google Scholar
• Li X, Zhang C, Gao L, et al. An agent-based approach for integrated process planning and scheduling. Expert Syst Appl. 2010;37(2):1256–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Zhao Z, Baines RW. Constructing virtual environments for manufacturing simulation. Int J Prod Res. 2000;38(17):4171–4191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahesh M, Ong SK, Nee AY. A web-based multi-agent system for distributed digital manufacturing. Int J Comput Integr Manuf. 2007;20(1):11–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan RW, William O. Performance analysis of a multi-agent scheduling and control system under manufacturing disturbances. Prod Plan Control. 2004;15(2):225–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Pan W, Liu K. Multi-agent aviation search task allocation method. In: Vol. 646, No. 1, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing; 2019. p. 012058.
   Google Scholar
• Hawe GI, Coates G, Wilson DT, et al. Agent-based simulation of emergency response to plan the allocation of resources for a hypothetical two-site major incident. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2015;46:336–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milošovski G, Bil C, Simon P, Ćosevski, M. Demonstration of expert systems to aircraft accident investigation. Mech Eng Ma [Insko in@ Enerstvo.] 2008. p. 97. https://www.simulationaustralasia.com/files/upload/pdf/research/177_paper_E.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. The analytic hierarchy process. New York, NY: Pergamum Press; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Gabus A, Fontela E. World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL. Geneva, Switzerland: Battelle Geneva Research Center; 1972. p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Fontela E, Gabus A. The Dematel observer. Geneva, Switzerland: Battelle Geneva Research Center; 1976.
   Google Scholar