A method for analyzing accident reconstruction results under complex uncertain conditions

References

• Zhang Y, Xu J, Zou T, et al. A method for reconstructing vehicle-vehicle impact accidents based on Pc-Crash. AMM. 2014;641-642:799–804.
   Google Scholar
• Zou T, Yu Z, Cai M, et al. Analysis and application of relationship between post-braking-distance and throw distance in vehicle-pedestrian accident reconstruction. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;207(1-3):135–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson S, Josevski N, Sandvik A. Pedestrian throw distance impact speed contour plots using PC-Crash SAE Technical Paper, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Przybyla J, Jupe J, Rush T, et al. Glass debris field longevity for rollover accident reconstruction SAE Technical Paper, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Jin X, Qi W-G, et al. Vehicle crash accident reconstruction based on the analysis 3D deformation of the auto-body. Adv Eng Softw. 2008;39(6):459–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie J, Yang J. A study of bicyclist kinematics and injuries based on reconstruction of passenger car-bicycle accident in China. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;71:50–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Guo Q. Car-pedestrian accident reconstruction based on Pc-Crash. Intern Journal of Res Engng Sci. 2016;4(8):37–42.
   Google Scholar
• Lin Q, Lu G. A simulation study of accident reconstruction in car to electric bicycle side impact crashes. AMR. 2011;243-249:4441–4446.
   Google Scholar
• Xu J, Li Y, Lu G, et al. Reconstruction model of vehicle impact speed in pedestrian–vehicle accident. Int J Impact Eng. 2009;36(6):783–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng Y, Chen Y, Yang J, et al. A study of pedestrian and bicyclist exposure to head injury in passenger car collisions based on accident data and simulations. Saf Sci. 2012;50(9):1749–1759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raslavičius L, Bazaras L, Keršys R. Robertas keršys. Accident reconstruction and assessment of cyclist’s injuries sustained in car-to-bicycle collision. Procedia Eng. 2017;187:562–569.
   Google Scholar
• Guzek M, Lozia Z, Pieniazek W. Accident reconstruction based on EDR records – simulation and experimental study. SAE International, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Guzek M. Vehicle motion reconstruction based on EDR/ADR records simulation research. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2018;421(3):032011.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Ito D, Mizuno K. AEB effectiveness evaluation based on car-to-cyclist accident reconstructions using video of drive recorder . Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(1):100–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou T, Li H, Wu H, et al. Design of experiment in analyzing uncertainty of simulation results in accident reconstruction. Automob Engng. 2019;233(4):836–850.
   Google Scholar
• Peng Y, Li R, Li GB, et al. Method for investigation of child occupant impact dynamics based on real-world accident. Int J Automot Technol. 2015;16(5):791–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao Y, Huang H, Peng Y, et al. A study on motorcyclists’ head injuries in car-motorcycle accidents based on real-world. J Mech Med Biol. 2018;18(04):1850036.
   Google Scholar
• Carter EL, Neal-Sturgess CE. MADYMO reconstruction of a real-world collision between a vehicle and cyclist. Int J Crashworthiness. 2009;14(4):379–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun J, Li Z, Pan S, et al. Identification of pre-impact conditions of a cyclist involved in a vehicle-bicycle accident using an optimized MADYMO reconstruction combined with motion capture. J Forensic Leg Med. 2018;56:99–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao P, Miao Q, Zhang M, et al. A virtual reality method for digitally reconstructing traffic accidents from videos or still images. Forensic Sci Int. 2018;292:176–180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Han Y, Li Q, Wang F, et al. Analysis of pedestrian kinematics and ground impact in traffic accidents using video records. Int J Crashworthiness. 2019;24(2):211–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han I. Car speed estimation based on cross-ratio using video data of car-mounted camera (black box). Forensic Sci Int. 2016;269:89–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brach RM, Brach RM. Vehicle accident analysis and reconstruction methods. Warrendale, (PA): SAE International Publisher; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Chen H, Gao Y. Throw distance model and contact force of bicyclist in traffic accident based on PC-Crash. AMR. 2012;588-589:1368–1371.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Jin X, Qi W, et al. Virtual reconstruction of vehicle crash accident based on elastic-plastic deformation of auto-body. KEM. 2004;274-276:1017–1022.
   Google Scholar
• Kubiak P, Siczek K, Dąbrowski A, et al. New high precision method for determining vehicle crash velocity based on measurements of body deformation. Int J Crashworthiness. 2016;21(6):532–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng Y, Jin X, Zhao Z, et al. Car-to-pedestrian collision reconstruction with injury as an evaluation index. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42(4):1320–1325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano C, Li X, Kleiven S. Performances of the PIPER scalable child human body model in accident reconstruction. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0187916.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamnik R, Nekrep Perc M, Topolšek D. Using the scanners and drone for comparison of point cloud accuracy at traffic accident analysis. Accid Anal Prev. 2020;135:105391.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Osman MR, Tahar KN. 3D accident reconstruction using low-cost imaging technique. Adv Eng Softw. 2016;100:231–237.
   Google Scholar
• Du X, Jin X, Zhang X, et al. Geometry features measurement of traffic accident for reconstruction based on close-range photogrammetry. Adv Eng Softw. 2009;40(7):497–505.
   Google Scholar
• Su S, Liu W, Li K, et al. Developing an unmanned aerial vehicle-based rapid mapping system for traffic accident investigation. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2016;48(4):454–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett W, Fonda A. Evaluating uncertainty in accident reconstruction with finite differences. SAE Int. 2003;112:403–413.
   Google Scholar
• Zou T, Cai M, Shu X. Response surface methodology and improved interval analysis method-for analyzing uncertainty in accident reconstruction. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;222(1–3):306–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou T, Cai M, Du R, et al. Analyzing the uncertainty of simulation results in accident reconstruction with response surface methodology. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;216(1–3):49–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cai M, Zou T, Luo P, et al. Evaluation of simulation uncertainty in accident reconstruction via combining response surface methodology and monte carlo method. Transport Res Part C Emerging Tech. 2014;48:241–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzek M, Lozia Z. Computing methods in the analysis of road accident reconstruction uncertainty. Arch Computat Methods Eng. 2021;28(4):2459–2476.
   Google Scholar
• Davis GA. Sample-based bayesian accident reconstruction. J Transpor Safety Security. 2009;1(3):181–189.
   Google Scholar
• Zou T, Peng X, Wu W, et al. Methods for analyzing the uncertainty of a reconstructed result in a traffic accident with interval and probabilistic traces. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;270:200–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su S, Liu W, Wang F, et al. Comparison of different means to determine post-crash velocity in a real-world vehicle-pedestrian accident. AMM. 2014;496-500:3031–3033.
   Google Scholar
• The airbag did not deploy when the vehicle hit the tree. Is there any quality problem? Accident identification and recovery [EB/OL]. Transportation Research Society. http://jgzx.122.cn/c/2018-03-22/767949.shtml., 2018. 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Zou T, He F, Cai M, et al. Methods for describing different results obtained from different methods in accident reconstruction. Forensic Sci Int. 2018;291:253–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou T, He F. Methods for fusing uncertain results obtained from different models in accident reconstruction. Forensic Sci Res. 2020;1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bartlett W, Wright W, Masory O, et al. Evaluating the uncertainty in various measurement tasks common to accident reconstruction SAE Technical paper, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Randles B, Jones B, Welcher J, et al. The accuracy of photogrammetry vs. hands-on measurement techniques used in accident reconstruction SAE Technical Paper, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Zou T, Hu L, Li P, et al. A simple algorithm for analyzing uncertainty of accident reconstruction results. Forensic Sci Int. 2015;257:229–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otte D. Use of throw distances of pedestrians and bicyclists as part of a scientific accident reconstruction method SAE Technical paper, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Zou T, Li H, Cai M, et al. A case-oriented approach for analyzing the uncertainty of a reconstructed result based on the evidence theory. Int J Legal Med. 2019;133(4):1089–1106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar