Crash behavior and optimization of double tubes with different cross section

References

• Kallina I. Crashworthiness, Published as Technical Briefs, Vehicle Aggressivity and Compatibility in Automotive Crashes, SAE 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Alghamdi AAA. Collapsible impact energy absorbers: an overview. Thin-Walled Struct. 2001;39(2):189–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velmurugan R., Muralikannan R. Energy absorption characteristics of annealed steel tubes of various cross sections in static and dynamic loading. Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct. 2009;6(4):385–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannan dan IV, Rajkumar R. Deformation and energy absorption analysis of simple and multi-cell thin-walled tubes under quasi-static axial crushing. Int. J. Crashworthiness. 2019:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Kim H-S. New extruded multi-cell aluminum profile for maximum crash en- ergy absorption and weight efficiency. Thin-Walled Struct. 2002;40(4):311–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang Z, Liu S, Zhang Z. Analysis of energy absorption characteristics of cylindrical multi-cell columns. Thin-Walled Struct. 2013;62:75–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghi Kashani M, Shahsavari Alavijeh H, Akbarshahi H, et al. Bitubular square tubes with different arrangements under quasi-static axial compression loading. Mater Des. 2013;51:1095–1103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nia AA, Chahardoli S. Mechanical behavior of nested multi-tubular structures under quasi-static axial load. Thin-Walled Struct. 2016;106:376–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alavi Nia A, Chahardoli S. Optimizing the layout of nested three-tube structures in quasi-static axial collapse. Thin-Walled Struct. 2016;107:169–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alavi Nia A, Khodabakhsh H. The effect of radial distance of concentric thin-walled tubes on their energy absorption capability under axial dynamic and quasi-static loading. Thin-Walled Struct. 2015;93:188–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Wierzbicki T. Relative merits of single-cell, multi-cell and foam-filled thin-walled structures in energy absorption. Thin-Walled Struct. 2001;39(4):287–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Cheng G. A comparative study of energy absorption characteristics of foam-filled and multi.
   Google Scholar
• Fang J, Gao Y, Sun G, et al. On design of multi-cell tubes under axial and oblique impact loads. Thin-Walled Struct. 2015;95:115–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu S, Zheng G, Sun G, et al. On design of multi-cell thin-wall structures for crashworthiness. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2016;88:102–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang Q, Fangliang D, Shu Y, et al. Energy-absorbing characteristics of a tapered multi-cell thin-walled tube under oblique impact. J. Vib. Shock. 2012;31(24):102–107.
   Google Scholar
• Alavi-Nia A, Parsapour M. An investigation on the energy absorption characteristics of multi-cell square tubes. Thin-Walled Struct. 2013;68:26–34.
   Google Scholar
• Krolak M, Kowal-Michalska K, Mania R, et al. Experimental tests of stability and load carrying capacity of compressed thin-walled multi-cell columns of triangular cross-section. Thin-Walled Struct. 2007;45(10–11):883–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou S, Li Q, Long S, et al. Design optimization of regular hexagonal thin-walled columns with crashworthiness criteria. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 2007;43(6–7):555–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu N, Gao Y, Fang J, et al. Crashworthiness analysis and design of multi-cell hexagonal columns under multiple loading cases. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 2015;104:89–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guler MA, Cerit ME, Bayram B, et al. The effect of geometrical pa. Rameters on the energy absorption characteristics of thin-walled structures. International Journal of Crashworthiness 2010;15(4);377-390.
   Google Scholar
• Yin H, Wen G, Liu Z, et al. Crashworthiness optimization design for foam-filled multi-cell thin-walled structures. Thin-Walled Struct. 2014;75:8–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Sun G, Xu X, et al. Multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of hollow and conical tubes for multiple load cases. Thin-Walled Struct. 2014;82:331–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou S, Han X, Sun G, et al. Multiobjective optimization for tapered circular tubes. Thin-Walled Struct. 2011;49(7):855–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirmohammad dan S, Saravani SA. Crashworthiness performance of stiffened foam-filled tapered structures under axial and oblique dynamic loads. Lat. Am. j. 2018;15(5),1-21.
   Google Scholar
• Djamaluddin F, Abdullah S, Arrifin AK, et al. Crush analysis of the foam-filled bitubal circular tube under oblique impact. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018;308(1):1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Djamaluddin F. Review: deformation and optimisation crashworthiness method for foam filled structures. Lat. Am. j. solids Struct. 2019;16(7):1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Renreng I, Djamaluddin F, Furqani F. Furqani energy absorption analysis of aluminum filled foam tube under axial load using finite element method with cross section variations. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020;875(1):012060.
   Google Scholar
• Baykasoğlu C, Baykasoğlu A, Tunay Çetin d M. A comparative study on crashworthiness of thin-walled tubes with functionally graded thickness under oblique impact loadings. Int. J. Crashworthiness. 2019;24(4):453–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanssen AC, Langseth M, Hopperstad OS. Static and dynamic crushing of circular aluminium extrusions with aluminium foam filler. Int J Impact Eng. 2000;24(5):475–‐507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djamaluddin F, Abdullah S, Arrifin AK, et al. Multi objective optimization of aluminum foam filled double tubes subjected to oblique impact loading for automobile bumper beam. AMM. 2014;663:93–97.
   Google Scholar
• Abramowicz W, Jones N. Dynamic progressive buckling of circular and square tubes. Int J Impact Eng. 1986;4(4):243–270.
   Google Scholar
• Stein M, Schwanitz P, Sankarasubramanian H. Unified parametric car model – a simplified model for frontal crash safety. In 11.LS-Dyna Forum. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Mirzaei M, Shakeri M, Sadighi M, et al. Crashworthiness design for cylindrical tube using neural network and genetic algorithm. Procedia Eng. 2011;14:3346–3353.
   Google Scholar