Load-limiting in the lap belt reduces injury risks associated with new seating positions

References

• Reed M, Ebert S, Jones M, et al. Prevalence of non-nominal seat positions and postures among front-seat passengers. Traffic Inj Prev. 2020;21(sup1):S7–S12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stanglmeier MJ, Schulte F, Schauberger G, et al. Effect of legroom proportions and individual factors for sitting with crossed legs: implications on the interior design of automated driving vehicles. Ergonomics. 2021;64(11):1393–1404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohrmann B, Bengler K. 2019. Reclined posture for enabling autonomous driving. International conference on human systems engineering and design: future trends and applications. IHSED, Munich, Germany, 16th-18th September.
   Google Scholar
• Östling M and Larsson A. 2019. Occupant activities and sitting positions in automated vehicles in China and Sweden. The 26th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference (ESV), Eindhoven, Netherlands; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Östling M. Will New Seating Positions Require New Occupant Restraints? RCCADS workshop May, 2021. https://www.trcpg.com/media/in4bcg0x/ostling_will-new-seating-positions-require-new-occupant-restraints.pdf. Accesses 16th of December 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Foret-Bruno JY, Trosseille X, Page Y, et al. Comparison of thoracic injury risk in frontal car crashes for occupant restrained without belt load limiters and those restrained with 6 kN and 4 kN belt load limiters. Stapp Car Crash J. 2001;(45):205–224. PMID: 17458746.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zellmer H, Eickhoff B, Kahler C. Optimised pretensioning of the belt system: a rating criterion and the benefit in consumer tests. The 19th international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles conference (ESV). Washington D.C, US; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Eickhoff B, Zellmer H, Forster E. The mechanism of belt induced chest deflection: analysis and possibilities for reduction. The 20th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference (ESV) Lyon, France; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Faure J, Couturier S, Page Y, et al. The benefits of double pretension in decreasing knees & lower legs injuries in frontal impacts. The 20th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference (ESV), Lyon, France; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer LC, Junge M, Vörös I, et al. Odds ratios for reclined seating positions in real-world crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 2021;161:106357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle KJ, Reed MP, Zaseck LW, et al. A human modelling study on occupant kinematics in highly reclined seats during frontal crashes. In Proceedings of IRCOBI conference, Florence, Italy; 2019
   Google Scholar
• Leung YC, Hureau J, Patel A, et al. Submarining injuries of 3 Pt belted occupants in frontal Collisions -Description, mechanism and protection. Stapp Car Crash Conference Proc; 1982; Paper 821158.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson R, Donlon JP, Jayathirtha M, et al. Kinematic and injury response of reclined PMHS in frontal impacts. Stapp Car Crash J. 2020;64:83–153.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Östling M, Lundgren C, Lubbe N, et al. The influence of a seat track load limiter on lumbar spine compression forces in relaxed, reclined, and upright seating positions: a sled test study using THOR-50M Proceedings of the IRCOBI Conference (Online); 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Östling M, Sunnevång C, Svensson C, et al. Potential future seating positions and the impact on injury risks in a learning intelligent vehicle (LIV). VDI-Tagung fahrzeugsicherheit. 2017. Berlin: Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Mroz K, Östling M, Richardson R, et al. Effect of seat and seat belt characteristics on the lumbar spine and pelvis loading of the SAFER human body model in reclined postures. Proceedings of the IRCOBI Conference, Munich, Germany, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Richard O, Uriot J, Trosseille X, et al. Occupant restraint optimisation in frontal crash to mitigate the risk of submarining in out‐of‐position situation. Proceedings of IRCOBI Conference, Lyon, France; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Uriot J, Potier P, Baudrit P, et al. Comparison of HII, HIII and THOR dummy responses with respect to PMHS sled tests. Proceedings of IRCOBI Conference, Lyon, France; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Euro NCAP. 2021. European new car assessment programme assessment protocol – adult occupant protection Version 9.1.3 November 2021.1.2. https://cdn.euroncap.com/media/67264/euro-ncap-assessment-protocol-aop-v913.pdf., accesses 16th of December 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Uriot J, Potier P, Baudrit P, et al. Reference PMHS sled tests to assess submarining. Stapp Car Crash J. 2015;59:203–223.
   Google Scholar
• Euro NCAP. 2021. European new car assessment programme Mpdb frontal impact testing protocol Version 1.1.2, November 2021. https://cdn.euroncap.com/media/67282/euro-ncap-mpdbtesting-protocol-v112.pdf., accessed 16th of December 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Adomeit D, Heger A. Motion sequence criteria and design proposals for restraint devices in order to avoid unfavorable biomechanic conditions and submarining. 751146. 19th Car Crash Conference. SAE, Warrendale, USA, 1975:139–165.
   Google Scholar