Efficient crash structure design for road traffic accidents of tomorrow

References

• Baroutaji A, Sajjia M, Olabi AG. On the crashworthiness performance of thin-walled energy absorbers: Recent advances and future developments. Thin-Walled Struct. 2017;118:137–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang Q, Yang S. Crashworthiness and lightweight optimisation of thin-walled conical tubes subjected to an oblique impact. Int J Crashworthiness. 2014;19(4):334–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asanjarani A, Dibajian SH, Mahdian A. Multi-objective crashworthiness optimization of tapered thin-walled square tubes with indentations. Thin-Walled Struct. 2017;116:26–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guangyao L, Fengxiang X, Sun SG, et al. A comparative study on thin-walled structures with functionally graded thickness (FGT) and tapered tubes withstanding oblique impact loading. Int J Impact Eng. 2015;77:68–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun G, Pang T, Xu C, et al. Energy absorption mechanics for variable thickness thin-walled structures. Thin-Walled Struct. 2017;118:214–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Wen Z, Zhang H. Axial crushing and optimal design of square tubes with graded thickness. Thin-Walled Struct. 2014;84:263–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Bai Z, Zhang L, et al. Crashworthiness analysis of octagonal multi-cell tube with functionally graded thickness under multiple loading angles. Thin-Walled Struct. 2017;110:133–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An X, Gao Y, Fang J, et al. Crashworthiness design for foam-filled thin-walled structures with functionally lateral graded thickness sheets. Thin-Walled Struct. 2015;91:63–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng G, Pang T, Sun G, et al. Theoretical, numerical, and experimental study on laterally variable thickness (LVT) multi-cell tubes for crashworthiness. Int J Mech Sci. 2016;118:283–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang J, Gao Y, An X, et al. Design of transversely-graded foam and wall thickness structures for crashworthiness criteria. Compos Part B. 2016;92:338–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahimi S, Vahdatazad N, Liaghat G. Crashworthiness efficiency optimisation for two-directional functionally graded foam-filled tubes under axial crushing impacts. Int J Crashworthiness. 2017;22(3):307–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Ge P, Lu M, et al. Crashworthiness study for multi-cell composite filling structures. Int J Crashworthiness. 2018;23(1):32–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Q, Wang L, Wang Y, et al. Crushing analysis and multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of foam-filled ellipse tubes under oblique impact loading. Thin-Walled Struct. 2016;100:105–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin H, Wen G, Liu Z, et al. Crashworthiness optimization design for foam-filled multi-cell thin-walled structures. Thin-Walled Struct. 2014;75:8–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Sun G, Xu X, et al. Multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of hollow and conical tubes for multiple load cases. Thin-Walled Struct. 2014;82:331–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Yu H, Fang J. A novel multi-cell tubal structure with circular corners for crashworthiness. Thin-Walled Struct. 2018;122:329–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu N, Gao Y, Fang J, et al. Theoretical prediction and optimization of multi-cell hexagonal tubes under axial crashing. Thin-Walled Struct. 2016;102:111–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Gao G, Zou X, et al. Crushing analysis and multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of bitubular polygonal tubes with internal walls. J Cent South Univ. 2016;23(11):3040–3050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun G, Pang T, Fang J, et al. Parameterization of criss-cross configurations for multiobjective crashworthiness optimization. Int J Mech Sci. 2017;124-125:145–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Bai Z, Bai F. Crashworthiness design for bio-inspired multi-cell tubes with quadrilateral, hexagonal and octagonal sections. Thin-Walled Struct. 2018;122:42–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastien C. 2014. “The prediction of kinematics and injuries of unbelted occupants under autonomous emergency braking.” Available from: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265335888_The_Prediction_Of_Kinematics_And_Injury_Criteria_Of_Unbelted_Occupants_Under_Autonomous_Emergency_Braking. > (last accessed 27/04/2021).
   Google Scholar
• SAE International. “ Instrumentation for impact test – part 1- electronic instrumentation.” Available from: <https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j211/1_201403/. > (last accessed 23/03/2021).
   Google Scholar
• Kayvantash K, Thiam A, Ryckelynck D, Chaabane SB, Touzeau J, Ravier P. 2015. “Model order reduction techniques for real-time parametric crash and safety simulations.” Available from: <https://www.dynalook.com/conferences/10th-european-ls-dyna-conference/3%20Process%20IX%20-%20Cutting-Model%20Reduction/04-Kayvantash-CADLM-P.pdf. > (last accessed 22/04/2021).
   Google Scholar
• Park J. Optimal latin-hypercube designs for computer experiments. J Stat Plan Infer. 1994;39(1):95–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revolutions In Simulation 2021. “Model order reduction techniques for real-time parametric crash and safety simulations,” Available from <https://revolutioninsimulation.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/ROM_Kambiz_Kayvantash_CAHRS_paper.pdf> (last accessed 01/05/2021).
   Google Scholar