Effects of impact angles and shapes on CAI strength of composite honeycomb structure

References

• Rajput SM, Magnus B, Stefan H. Evaluation of test methods and face-sheet thickness effects in damage tolerance assessment of composite sandwich plates. J Sandwich Struct Mat. 2022;24(2):1340–1366. doi: 10.1177/10996362211036973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina S, Meza J, Kawashita FL. Damage sequence of honeycomb sandwich panels under bending loading: experimental and numerical investigation. J Reinf Plast Compos. 2020;39(5-6):175–192. doi: 10.1177/0731684419880970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora H, Linz DP, Dear J. Damage and deformation in composite sandwich panels exposed to multiple and single explosive blasts. Int J Impact Eng. 2017;104:95–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.01.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel IM, Abot JL, Schubel PM, et al. Response and damage tolerance of composite sandwich structures a low velocity impact. Exp Mech. 2012;52(1):37–47. doi: 10.1007/s11340-011-9479-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F A A, A O R, A MH. Damage characterization of polypropylene honeycomb sandwich panels subjected to low-velocity impact. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2013;2013:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2013/129864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubel PM, Luo JJ, Daniel IM. Impact and post impact behavior of composite sandwich panels. Comp Part A. 2007;38(3):1051–1057. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.06.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou G, Hill MD. Impact damage and energy-absorbing characteristics and residual in-plane compressive strength of honeycomb sandwich panels. J Sandwich Struct Mat. 2009;11(4):329–356. doi: 10.1177/1099636209105704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raju KS, Smith BL, Tomblin JS, et al. Impact damage resistance and tolerance of honeycomb core sandwich panels. J Comp Mat. 2008;42(4):385–412. doi: 10.1177/0021998307088596.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang T, Yan Y, Li J, et al. Low-velocity impact of honeycomb sandwich composite plates. J Reinf Plast Compos. 2016;35(1):8–32. doi: 10.1177/0731684415612573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang T, Li F, Yu LW, et al. Damage patterns of the hexagonal aluminum honeycomb sandwich plate subjected to fragment impact. Adv Mat Res. 2012;463-464:364–368. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.463-464.364.
   Google Scholar
• McQuigg DT, Kapania KR, Scotti JS, et al. Compression after impact analysis on thin face sheet honeycomb core Sandwich Panels. J Spacecraft Rockets. 2014;51(1):200–212. doi: 10.2514/1.A32428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.l.j M, M D, T F, et al. Modelling low-velocity impact damage and compression after impact of 3D woven structures considering compaction. Comp Struct. 2023;318:117104. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117104.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew S, Paul D, M AW, et al. Low velocity impact and compressive response after impact of thin carbon fiber composite panels. Int J Solids Struct. 2022;257:111604. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.111604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rs J, Va N, Vinod KK. Low velocity impact and compression after impact behaviour of polyester pin-reinforced foam filled honeycomb sandwich panels. J Sandwich Struct Mat. 2022;24(1). doi: 10.1177/1099636221998180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang B, Wang Z, Zhou L, et al. Study on the low-velocity impact response and CAI behavior of foam-filled sandwich panels with hybrid facesheet. Composite Struct. 2015;132:1129–1140. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody RC, Harris JS, Vizzini AJ. Scaling and curvature effects on the damage tolerance of impacted composite sandwich panels. J Sandwich Struct Mat. 2002;4(1):71–82. doi: 10.1177/1099636202004001037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jean-St-Laurent M, Dano ML, Potvin MJ. Compression after impact behavior of carbon/epoxy composite sandwich panels with Nomex honeycomb core subjected to low velocity impacts at extreme cold temperatures. Compos Struct. 2021;261:113516. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuangxi G, Xueqin L, Tianwei L, et al. Parametric study on Low-Velocity Impact (LVI) damage and Compression after Impact (CAI) strength of composite laminates. Polymers. 2022;14(23):5200. doi: 10.3390/polym14235200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryotaro M, Kiyotaka O, Kazuya O. Effect of sub-micron glass fiber addition on CAI strength of UD-CFRP. Int J Comput Methods Exp Meas. 2022;10(3):271–281. doi: 10.2495/CMEM-V10-N3-271-281.
   Google Scholar
• Lacy TE, Hwang Y. Numerical modeling of impact-damaged sandwich composites subjected to compression-after-impact loading. Compos Struct. 2003;61(1-2):115–128. doi: 10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00034-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somaji VA, K S, R V, et al. Compression-After-Impact analysis of carbon fiber reinforced composite laminate with different ply orientation sequences. Int J Impact Eng. 2022;167:104277. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma J, Yan Y, Liu YJ, et al. Compression strength of stitched foam-core sandwich composites with impact induced damage. J Reinforced Plast Compos. 2012;31(18):1236–1246. doi: 10.1177/0731684412455956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan Y, Cui Z, Xie X, et al. Mechanical characteristics of composite honeycomb sandwich structures under oblique impact. Theoret Appl Mech Lett. 2022;12(05):359–370.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D7766/D7766M-11. 2011. ASTM International. Standard practice for damage resistance testing of sandwich constructions.
   Google Scholar
• Seemann R, Krause D. Numerical modelling of Nomex honeycomb sandwich cores at meso-scale level. Composite Struct. 2017;159(1):702–718. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.071.
   Google Scholar
• Yang B, Chen Y, Fu K, et al. Simulating progressive damage behaviors of carbon fiber reinforced composite tubes triggered by various initiators under axial crushing. Mech Adv Mater Struct. 2023;2023:1–9. doi: 10.1080/15376494.2023.2212269.
   Google Scholar
• Herrington PD, Sabbaghian M. Factors affecting the friction coefficients between metallic washers and composite surfaces. Composites. 1991;22(6):418–424. doi: 10.1016/0010-4361(91)90198-P.
   Google Scholar
• Ren G, Zhang Z, Zhu X, et al. Influence of functional graphene as filler on the tribological behaviors of Nomex fabric/phenolic composite. Composites Part A. 2013;49(Complete):157–164.
   Google Scholar