Phase-specific relationships between team learning processes and transactive memory development

REFERENCES

• Akgun, A. E., Byrne, J., Keskin, H., & Lynn, G. S. (2006). Transactive memory system in new product development teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53, 95–111. doi:10.1109/TEM.2005.857570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akgün, A. E., Byrne, J., Keskin, H., Lynn, G. S., & Imamoglu, S. Z. (2005). Knowledge networks in new product development projects: A transactive memory perspective. Information & Management, 42, 1105–1120. doi:10.1016/j.im.2005.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, J. R. (2003). Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 866–878. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analyses. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Brannick, M. T., Chan, D., Conway, J. M., Lance, C. E., & Spector, P. E. (2010). What is method variance and how can we cope with it? A panel discussion. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 407–420. doi:10.1177/1094428109360993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauner, E., & Robertson, R. (2009). Responsibility and transactive memory in a finance and planning department. Wirtschaftspsychologie, 11, 5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, C., Stagl, K., Salas, E., Pierce, L., & Kendall, D. (2006). Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1189–1207. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, M. J., Finkelstein, L. M., & Dusig, M. S. (1999). On average deviation indices for estimating interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 49–68. doi:10.1177/109442819921004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decuyper, S., Dochy, F., & Van den Bossche, P. (2010). Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organisations. Educational Research Review, 5, 111–133. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dormann, C., & Van de Ven, B. (2014). Timing in methods for studying psychosocial factors at work. In M. F. Dollard, A. Shimazu, R. Bin Norden, P. Brough, & M. R. Tuckey (Eds.), Psychosocial factors at work in the Asia Pacific (pp. 89–117). Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383. doi:10.2307/2666999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C., Dillon, J. R., & Roloff, K. S. (2007). Three perspectives on team learning: Outcome improvement, task mastery, and group process. The Academy of Management Annals, 1, 269–314. doi:10.1080/078559811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, A., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Wolverton, S. (2008). Learning to work together: An examination of transactive memory system development in teams. In V. I. Sessa & M. London (Eds.), Work group learning (pp. 91–115). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9–41. doi:10.2307/256496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, J., Butler, B. S., & King, W. R. (2007). Team cognition: Development and evolution in software project teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 261–292. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222240210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingshead, A. B. (1998a). Communication, learning, and retrieval in transactive memory systems. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 423–442. doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingshead, A. B. (1998b). Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 659–671. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingshead, A. B. (1998c). Distributed knowledge and transactive processes in decision-making groups. In E. A. Mannix, M. A. Neale, & D. H. Gruenfeld (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (Vol. 1, pp. 103–123). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingshead, A. B., & Fraidin, S. N. (2003). Gender stereotypes and assumptions about expertise in transactive memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 355–363. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00549-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517–543. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2007). The impact of knowledge coordination in virtual team performance over time. MIS Quarterly, 31, 783–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2008). Team learning, development and adaptation. In V. I. Sessa & M. London (Eds.), Work group learning (pp. 15–44). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Chao, G. T. (2012). Macrocognition, team learning and team knowledge: Origins, emergence, and measurement. In E. Salas, S. M. Fiore, & M. P. Letsky (Eds.), Theories of team cognition: Cross-disciplinarey perspectives (pp. 19–51). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lance, C. E., Dawson, B., Birkelbach, D., & Hoffman, B. J. (2010). Method effects, measurement error, and substantive conclusions. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 435–455. doi:10.1177/1094428109352528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 815–852. doi:10.1177/1094428106296642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 587–604. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, K. (2004). Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Science, 50, 1519–1533. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1040.0257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, K., Lange, D., & Gillis, L. (2005). Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer. Organization Science, 16, 581–598. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, D. W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 384–393. doi:10.1177/0146167295214009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloney, M. M., Johnson, S. G., & Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E. (2010). Assessing group-level constructs under missing data conditions: A Monte Carlo simulation. Small Group Research, 41, 281–307. doi:10.1177/1046496410363829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356–376. doi:10.5465/AMR.2001.4845785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, S., & Dumville, B. C. (2001). Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: Expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 89–106. doi:10.1002/job.86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, S., Ferzandi, L., & Hamilton, K. (2010). Metaphore nor more: A 15-year review of the team mental model construct. Journal of Management, 36, 876–910. doi:10.1177/0149206309356804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreland, R., & Myaskovsky, L. (2000). Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 117–133. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oertel, R., & Antoni, C. H. (2013). Wann und wie lernen teams? Zeitschrift für Arbeits-und Organisationspsychologie, 57, 132–144. doi:10.1026/0932-4089/a000116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oertel, R., & Antoni, C. H. (2014). Reflective team learning: Linking interfering events and team adaptation. Team Performance Management, 20, 328–342. doi:10.1108/TPM-03-2014-0027
   Google Scholar
• Peltokorpi, V. (2008). Transactive memory systems. Review of General Psychology, 12, 378–394. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.12.4.378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rau, D. (2005). The influence of relationship conflict and trust on the transactive memory: Performance relation in top management teams. Small Group Research, 36, 746–771. doi:10.1177/1046496405281776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, Y., & Argote, L. (2011). Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. The Academy of Management Annals, 5, 189–229. doi:10.1080/19416520.2011.590300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, R., Gockel, C., & Brauner, E. (2013). Trust your teammates or bosses? Differential effects of trust on transactive memory, job satisfaction, and performance. Employee Relations, 35, 222–242. doi:10.1108/01425451311287880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savelsbergh, C. M. J. H., van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., & Poell, R. F. (2009). The development and empirical validation of a multidimensional measurement instrument for team learning behaviors. Small Group Research, 40, 578–607. doi:10.1177/1046496409340055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23–74.
   Google Scholar
• Schippers, M. C., Den Hartog, D. N., & Koopman, P. L. (2007). Reflexivity in teams: A measure and correlates. Applied Psychology, 56, 189–211. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00250.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221–232. doi:10.1177/1094428105284955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W. H., Segers, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments: Team learning beliefs and behaviors. Small Group Research, 37, 490–521. doi:10.1177/1046496406292938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Vegt, G., & Bunderson, J. (2005). Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 532–547. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2005.17407918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegner, D., Giuliano, T., & Hertel, P. (1985). Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. In W. J. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 253–276). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185–208). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wegner, D. M. (1995). A computer network model of human transactive memory. Social Cognition, 13, 319–339. doi:10.1521/soco.1995.13.3.319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegner, D. M., Erber, R., & Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 923–929. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M. A. (1996). Reflexivity and work group effectiveness: A conceptual integration. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 555–579). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• West, M. A. (2000). Reflexivity, revolution and innovation in work teams. In M. M. Beyerlein, D. A. Johnson, & S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Product development teams (pp. 1–29). Stanford, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. M., Goodman, P. S., & Cronin, M. A. (2007). Group learning. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1041–1059. doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.26585724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaheer, S., Albert, S., & Zaheer, A. (1999). Time scales and organizational theory. The Academy of Management Review, 24, 725–741.doi:10.5465/AMR.1999.2553250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajac, S., Gregory, M. E., Bedwell, W. L., Kramer, W. S., & Salas, E. (2014). The cognitive underpinnings of adaptive team performance in ill-defined task situations: A closer look at team cognition. Organizational Psychology Review, 4, 49–73. doi:10.1177/2041386613492787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E., & Gibson, C. (2006). Multinational organization context: Implications for team learning and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 501–518. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.21794668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar