Innovation in multidisciplinary teams: The moderating role of transformational leadership in the relationship between professional heterogeneity and shared mental models

References

• Aiken, L. S., & West, L. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso, A., Baker, D. P., Holtzman, A., Day, R., King, H., Toomey, L., & Salas, E. (2006). Reducing medical error in the Military Health system: How can team training help? Human Resource Management Review, 16, 396–415. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2006.05.006
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 123–167). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (2000). Stimulate creativity by fueling passion. In E. Locke (Ed.), Handbook of principles of organizational behavior (pp. 331–341). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3, 321–341. doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbel, I., & Erez, M. (2008, July). Team sharing and reflexivity as a lever to innovation in product development teams. EU-US Early Career Researcher Conference on Research and Innovation Studies, proceedings. Organized by the PRIME Network of Excellence, University of Twente, Enschede.
   Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M., & Avolio, J. B. (1990). Transformational leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, P. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In S. W. J. Kozlowski & K. J. Klein (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methodsin organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–382). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In J. Castellan Jr. (Ed.), Current issues in individual and group decision making (pp. 221–246). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The group environment questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A., Ben-Tura, E., & Vashdi, D. R. (2012). The relationship between social exchange variables, OCB, and performance: What happens when you consider group characteristics? Personnel Review, 41, 705–731. doi:10.1108/00483481211263638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drach-Zahavy, A., & Somech, A. (2001). Understanding team innovation: The role of team processes and structures. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 5, 111–123. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.5.2.111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B. J., & Shamir, B. (2002). Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 735–744. doi:10.2307/3069307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. P. J. (2006). System breakdown: The role of mental models and transactive memory in the relationship between acute stress and team performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 576–589. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.21794674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. St. Paul, MN: West.
   Google Scholar
• Fleenor, J. W., Fleenor, J. B., & Grossnickle, W. F. (1996). Interrater reliability and agreement of performance ratings: A methodological comparison. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10, 367–380. doi:10.1007/BF02249609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia‐Prieto, P., Bellard, E., & Schneider, S. C. (2003). Experiencing diversity, conflict, and emotions in teams. Applied Psychology, 52, 413–440. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebert, D., Boerner, S., & Kearney, E. (2006). Cross-functionality and innovation in new product development teams: A dilemmatic structure and its consequences for the management of diversity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15, 431–458. doi:10.1080/13594320600826314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebert, D., Boerner, S., & Kearney, E. (2010). Fostering team innovation: Why is it important to combine opposing action strategies? Organization Science, 21, 593–608. doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., Gino, F., & Hofmann, D. A. (2011). Reversing the extraverted leadership advantage: The role of employee proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 528–550. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2011.61968043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, R. W. (1981). Supervisory behaviour as a source of perceived task scope. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 54, 175–182. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1981.tb00057.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurtner, A., Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., & Nägele, C. (2007). Getting groups to develop good strategies: Effects of reflexivity interventions on team process, team performance, and shared mental models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 127–142. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface and deep level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1029–1045. doi:10.2307/3069328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43–64. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, G., van Knippenberg, D., & Zhou, J. (2009). A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 280–293. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2009.37308035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. E., & Joshi, A. (2004). Diversity in social context: A multi-attribute, multilevel analysis of team diversity and sales performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 675–702. doi:10.1002/job.265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, D. I., Chow, C., & Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 525–544. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00050-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, E., & Gebert, D. (2009). Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: The promise of transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 77–89. doi:10.1037/a0013077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, R. T. (2001). Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: Diversity, communications, job stress and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 547–555. doi:10.2307/3069369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimoski, R. J., & Mohammed, S. (1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20, 403–437. doi:10.1016/0149-2063(94)90021-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions and new directions (pp. 3–90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 815–852. doi:10.1177/1094428106296642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, B.-C., & Klein, K. J. (2006). Team mental models and team performance: A field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 403–418. doi:10.1002/job.387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, B.-C., & Ployhart, R. E. (2004). Transformational leadership: Relations to the five-factor model and team performance in typical and maximum contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 610–621. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, Y., Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M., & Veiga, J. F. (2008). Transformational leadership’s role in promoting corporate entrepreneurship: Examining the CEO-TMT interface. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 557–576. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2008.32626023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. A., Sabella, M. J., Burke, C. S., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2002). The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 3–13. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. A., Zaccaro, S. J., & Mathieu, J. E. (2000). Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 971–986. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (2005). Scaling the quality of teammates’ mental models: Equifinality and normative comparisons. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 37–56. doi:10.1002/job.296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273–283. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McComb, S. A. (2007). Mental model convergence: The shift from being an individual to being a team member. In. In F. Dansereau & F. Yammarino (Eds.), Research in multi-level issues (Vol. 6, pp. 95–147). Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/S1475-9144(07)06005-5
   Google Scholar
• Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miron, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2004). Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 175–199. doi:10.1002/job.237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miron-Spektor, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2011). The effect of conformist and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: Reconciling the innovation paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 740–760. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2011.64870100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, S., & Dumville, B. C. (2001). Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: Expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 89–106. doi:10.1002/job.86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, S., Ferzandi, L., & Hamilton, K. (2010). Metaphor no more: A 15-year review of the team mental model construct. Journal of Management, 36, 876–910. doi:10.1177/0149206309356804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2006). How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 186–213. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, B. J., Parayitam, S., & Twigg, N. W. (2006). Mediating role of strategic choise between top management team diversity and firm performance: Upper echelons theory revisited. Journal of Business and Management, 12, 111–126.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, K. W., & Loyd, D. L. (2006). When surface and deep-level diversity collide: The effects on dissenting group members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 143–160. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, K. W., Northcraft, G., & Neale, M. (2006). Surface-level diversity and information sharing in groups: When does deep-level similarity help? Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 467–482. doi:10.1177/1368430206067557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227. doi:10.1080/00273170701341316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E. W. (2001). Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization Science, 12, 502–517. doi:10.1287/orsc.12.4.502.10637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rico, R., Sanchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F., & Gibson, C. (2008). Team implicit coordination processes: A team knowledge-based approach. Academy of Management Review, 33, 163–184. doi:10.5465/AMR.2008.27751276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse, W. B., & Morris, N. M. (1986). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 349–363. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B., & Schmitt, N. (1986). Staffing organizations. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
   Google Scholar
• Sheremata, W. A. (2000). Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure. Academy of Management Review, 25, 389–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, S. J., Kim, T.-Y., Lee, J.-Y., & Bian, L. (2012). Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: A cross-level interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 197–212. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2007). When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1709–1721. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Campbell, G., Milanovich, D. M., & Reynolds, A. M. (2001). Measuring teamwork mental models to support training needs assessment, development, and evaluation: Two empirical studies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 179–194. doi:10.1002/job.88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Salas, E. (2008). Guided team selfcorrection: Impactson team mental models, processes, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 39, 303–327. doi:10.1177/1046496408317794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Kraiger, K. (2005). Investigating linear and interactive effects of shared mental models on safety and efficiency in a field setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 523–535. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somech, A. (2006). The effects of leadership style and team process on performance and innovation in functionally heterogeneous teams. Journal of Management, 32, 132–157. doi:10.1177/0149206305277799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout, R. J., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1996). The role of shared mental models in developing team situational awareness: Implications for training. Training Research Journal, 2, 85–116.
   Google Scholar
• van der Vegt, G. S., & Bunderson, J. S. (2005). Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 532–547. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2005.17407918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ginkel, W., & van Knippenberg, D. (2003). The role of shared mental models for informational diversity in group decision making. Paper presented at the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology Small Group Meeting on Small Group Decision Making, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg, D., de Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008–1022. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vashdi, D. R., Bamberger, P. A., Erez, M., & Weiss-Meilik, A. (2007). Briefing-debriefing: Using a reflexive organizational learning model from the military to enhance the performance of surgical teams. Human Resource Management, 46, 115–142. doi:10.1002/hrm.20148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, S. S., Chen, G., Payne, S. C., Marsh, S. M., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2000). Enhancing team mental model measurement with performance appraisal practices. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 307–322. doi:10.1177/109442810034001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 355–387. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar