The dynamics of team coordination: A social network analysis as a window to shared awareness

References

• Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bourbousson, J., Poizat, G., Saury, J., & Seve, C. (2010). Team coordination in basketball: Description of the cognitive connections among teammates. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 22, 150–166. doi:10.1080/10413201003664657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourbousson, J., Poizat, G., Saury, J., & Sève, C. (2011). Description of dynamic shared knowledge: An exploratory study during a competitive team sports interaction. Ergonomics, 54, 120–138. doi:10.1080/00140139.2010.544763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourbousson, J., Poizat, G., Saury, J., & Sève, C. (2012). Temporal aspects of team cognition: A case study on concerns sharing within basketball. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 24, 224–241. doi:10.1080/10413200.2011.630059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Bowers, C. (2006). Applying work team results to sports teams: Opportunities and cautions. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4, 447–462. doi:10.1080/1612197X.2006.9671807
   Google Scholar
• Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In J. Castellan Jr (Ed.), Current issues in individual and group decision making (pp. 221–246). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, J., Min, E., & Bridges, D. (2009). The impact of leadership and team behavior on standard of care delivered during human patient simulation: A pilot study for undergraduate medical students. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 21, 24–32. doi:10.1080/10401330802573910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1217–1234. doi:10.2307/20159921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, N. J., Gorman, J. C., Myers, C. W., & Duran, J. L. (2013). Interactive team cognition. Cognitive Science, 37, 255–285. doi:10.1111/cogs.12009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, G. S., Barnes, G., Perz, S., Schmink, M., Sieving, K. E., Southworth, J., … Van Holt, T. (2005). An exploratory framework for the empirical measurement of resilience. Ecosystems, 8, 975–987. doi:10.1007/s10021-005-0129-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeChurch, L. A., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. (2010). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 32. doi:10.1037/a0017328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6, 485–507. doi:10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, D. W. (2010). The coordination of labour in sports teams. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 3, 154–170. doi:10.1080/1750984X.2010.519400
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, D. W., & Tenenbaum, G. (2004). Why an expert team is more than a team of experts: A social-cognitive conceptualization of team coordination and communication in sport. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 26, 542–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, D. W., & Tran Turner, K. (2014). Coordination in sports teams. In M. Beauchamp & M. A. Eys (Eds.), Group dynamics in exercise and sport psychology: Contemporary themes (pp. 240–255). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37, 32–64. doi:10.1518/001872095779049543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R., & Kiris, E. O. (1995). The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37, 381–394. doi:10.1518/001872095779064555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–251. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiore, S. M., & Salas, E. (2004). Why we need team cognition. In E. Salas & S. M. Fiore (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 235–248). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Fiore, S. M., & Salas, E. (2008). Cognition, competition, and coordination: The ‘why’ and the ‘how’ of the relevance of the sports sciences to learning and performance in the military. Military Psychology, 20, S1–S9. doi:10.1080/08995600701804764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman, J. C. (2014). Team coordination and dynamics: Two central issues. Current directions in Psychological Science, 23, 355–360. doi:10.1177/0963721414545215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman, J. C., Cooke, N. J., Amazeen, P. G., & Fouse, S. (2012). Measuring patterns in team interaction sequences using a discrete recurrence approach. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54, 503–517. doi:10.1177/0018720811426140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman, J. C., Hessler, E. E., Amazeen, P. G., Cooke, N. J., & Shope, S. M. (2012). Dynamical analysis in real time: Detecting perturbations to team communication. Ergonomics, 55, 825–839. doi:10.1080/00140139.2012.679317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (2002). Organization design. Management Science, 48, 852–865. doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.7.852.2821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, C., Svensson, M. S., Hindmarsh, J., Luff, P., & vom Lehn, D. (2002). Configuring awareness. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 11, 317–347.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, S. E., & Aime, F. (2014). Team microdynamics: Toward an organizing approach to teamwork. The Academy of Management Annals, 8, 443–503. doi:10.1080/19416520.2014.904140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W., & Chao, T. G. (2012). The dynamics of emergence: Cognition and cohesion in work teams. Managerial and Decision Economics, 33, 335–354. doi:10.1002/mde.2552
   Google Scholar
• Lance, C. E., Lautenschlager, G. J., Sloan, C. E., & Varca, P. E. (1989). A comparison between bottom-up, top-down, and bidirectional models of relationships between global and life facet satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 57, 601–624. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00565.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laroche, J., Berardi, A. M., & Brangier, E. (2014). Embodiment of intersubjective time: Relational dynamics as attractors in the temporal coordination of interpersonal behaviors and experiences. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1180. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01180
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., & Roe, R. A. (2012). Introducing an intrateam longitudinal approach to the study of team process dynamics. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21, 718–748. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2012.660749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, B. C., & Klein, K. J. (2006). Team mental models and team performance: A field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 403–418. doi:10.1002/job.387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manser, T., Howard, S. K., & Gaba, D. M. (2008). Adaptive coordination in cardiac anaesthesia: A study of situational changes in coordination patterns using a new observation system. Ergonomics, 51, 1153–1178. doi:10.1080/00140130801961919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques-Quinteiro, P., Curral, L., Passos, A. M., & Lewis, K. (2013). And now what do we do? The role of transactive memory systems and task coordination in action teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 17, 194–206. doi:10.1037/a0033304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarry, T., Anderson, D. I., Wallace, S. A., Hughes, M. D., & Franks, I. M. (2002). Sport competition as a dynamical self-organizing system. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20, 771–781. doi:10.1080/026404102320675620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos-Villagrasa, P. J., Navarro, J., & García-Izquierdo, A. L. (2012). Chaotic dynamics and team effectiveness: Evidence from professional basketball. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21, 778–802. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2012.669525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rico, R., Alcover de la Hera, C. M., & Tabernero, C. (2011). Work team effectiveness, a review of research from the last decade (1999–2009). Psychology in Spain, 15, 57–69.
   Google Scholar
• Rico, R., Sanchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F., & Gibson, C. (2008). Team implicit coordination processes: A team knowledge–based approach. Academy of Management Review, 33, 163–184. doi:10.5465/AMR.2008.27751276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riethmüller, M., Fernandez Castelao, E., Eberhardt, I., Timmermann, A., & Boos, M. (2012). Adaptive coordination development in student anaesthesia teams: A longitudinal study. Ergonomics, 55, 55–68. doi:10.1080/00140139.2011.636455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, R. A., Gockel, C., & Meyer, B. (2012). Time and change in teams: Where we are and where we are moving. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21, 629–656. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2012.729821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, M. A., Bedwell, W. L., Wildman, J. L., Fritzsche, B. A., Salas, E., & Burke, C. S. (2011). Managing adaptive performance in teams: Guiding principles and behavioral markers for measurement. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 107–122. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saavedra, R., Earley, P. C., & Van Dyne, L. (1993). Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 61–72. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, P. M., Stanton, N. A., Walker, G. H., Jenkins, D. P., Baber, C., & McMaster, R. M. (2008). Representing situation awareness in collaborative systems: A case study in the energy distribution domain. Ergonomics, 51, 367–384. doi:10.1080/00140130701636512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saner, L. D., Bolstad, C. A., Gonzalez, C., & Cuevas, H. M. (2009). Measuring and predicting shared situation awareness in teams. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 3, 280–308. doi:10.1518/155534309X474497
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, K. (2002). The problem with awareness: Introductory remarks on ‘awareness in CSCW’. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 11, 285–298. doi:10.1023/A:1021272909573
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., Stewart, R., Harris, D., Houghton, R. J., Baber, C., McMaster, R., … Green, D. (2006). Distributed situation awareness in dynamic systems: Theoretical development and application of an ergonomics methodology. Ergonomics, 49, 1288–1311. doi:10.1080/00140130600612762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theureau, J. (2003). Course-of-action analysis and course-of-action centered design. In E. Hollnagel (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive task design (pp. 55–81). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. doi:10.1201/9781410607775.ch4
   Google Scholar
• Uitdewilligen, S., Waller, M. J., & Zijlstra, F. R. H. (2010). Team cognition and adaptibility in dynamic settings: A review of pertinent work. In G. Hodgkinson & J. Ford (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 293–354). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• van der Haar, S., Li, J., Segers, M., Jehn, K. A., & Van den Bossche, P. (2014). Evolving team cognition: The impact of team situation models on team effectiveness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2014.942731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Cranach, M., & Harré, R. (Eds.). (1982). The analysis of action: Recent theoretical and empirical advances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Archive.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, P., & Eccles, D. W. (2006). A commentary on “team cognition and expert teams: Emerging insights into performance for exceptional teams”. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4, 463–483. doi:10.1080/1612197X.2006.9671808
   Google Scholar
• Wassermann, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wellens, A. R. (1993). Group situation awareness and distributed decision making from military to civilian applications. In J. Castellan Jr. (Ed.), Current issues in individual and group decision making (pp. 221–246). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wernicke, S., & Rasche, F. (2006). FANMOD: A tool for fast network motif detection. Bioinformatics, 22, 1152–1153. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildman, J. L., Thayer, A. L., Rosen, M. A., Salas, E., Mathieu, J. E., & Rayne, S. R. (2011). Task types and team-level attributes: Synthesis of team classification literature. Human Resource Development Review, 11, 97–129. doi:10.1177/1534484311417561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, Y. C., Carboni, I., & Ehrlich, K. (2014). The impact of interpersonal affective relationships and awareness on expertise seeking: A multilevel network investigation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23, 554–569. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2013.766393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar