Validity of the five-factor model and their facets: The impact of performance measure and facet residualization on the bandwidth-fidelity dilemma

REFERENCES

• Ashton, M. C. (1998). Personality and job performance: The importance of narrow traits. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 289–303. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199805)19:3<289::AID-JOB841>3.0.CO;2-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., Jackson, D. N., Helmes, E., & Paunonen, S. V. (1998). Joint factor analysis of the personality research form and the Jackson personality inventory: Comparisons with the big five. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 243–250. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1998.2214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., Paunonen, S. V., & Lee, K. (2014). On the validity of narrow and broad personality traits: A response to Salgado, Moscoso, and Berges (2013). Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 24–28. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (2005). Yes, personality matters: Moving on to more important matters. Human Performance, 18, 359–372. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1804_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9–30. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305–314. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W. (1975). Predictive validity of a linear regression equation. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 28, 79–87. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1975.tb00550.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B., Eber, H. W., & Tatsuoka, M. M. (1970). Handbook for the sixteen personality factor questionnaire (16PF). Champaign, IL: IPAT.
   Google Scholar
• Cattin, P. (1980a). Estimation of the predictive power of a regression model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 407–414. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.65.4.407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattin, P. (1980b). Note on the estimation of the squared cross-validated multiple correlation of a regression model. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 63–65. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.87.1.63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, N. D. (2008, April 11–13). Further consideration of the use of narrow traits scales. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, S., & Robertson, I. T. (2005). A meta-analytic review of the big five personality factors and accident involvement in occupational and non-occupational settings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 355–376. doi:10.1348/096317905X26183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2008). Spanish revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Madrid: TEA.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. R., & Dye, D. A. (1991). Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of tshe NEO personality inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 887–898. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(91)90177-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotter, K. L., & Raju, N. S. (1982). An evaluation of formula-based population squared cross-validity estimates and factor score estimates in prediction. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 493–519. doi:10.1177/001316448204200213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, C. G. (1957). Psychological tests and personnel decisions. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Fruyt, F., & Mervielde, I. (1996). Personality and interests as predictors of educational streaming and achievement. European Journal of Personality, 10, 405–425. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199612)10:5<405::AID-PER255>3.0.CO;2-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–896. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley, N. M., Orvis, K. A., Lebiecki, J. E., & Cortina, J. M. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: Examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 40–57. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psychological Methods, 5, 155–174. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.5.2.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual for the eysenck personality questionnaire. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327–358. doi:10.1037/h0061470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R., & Digman, J. M. (1994). Revealing structure in the data: Principles of exploratory factor analysis. In S. Strack & M. Lorr (Eds.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (pp. 216–242). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, E.K., & Watson, D. (2002). General and specific traits of personality and their relation to sleep and academic performance. Journal of Personality, 70, 177–206. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.05002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guion, R. M., & Gottier, R. F. (1965). Validity of personality measures in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 18, 135–164. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1965.tb00273.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings, S. E., & O’Neill, T. A. (2009). Predicting workplace deviance using broad versus narrow personality variables. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 289–293. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, J., & Brinkmeyer, K. (1997). Bridging the gap between overt and personality-based integrity tests. Personnel Psychology, 50, 587–599. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00704.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, J., & Holland, B. (2003). Using theory to evaluate personality and job performance relations: A socioanalytic perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 100–112. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. W. (1996). Issues and non-issues in the fidelity-bandwidth trade-off. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 627–637. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199611)17:6<627::AID-JOB2828>3.0.CO;2-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, J., & Rybicky, S. L. (1998). Performance improvement characteristics job analysis. Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, R. (2005a). In defense of personality measurement: New wine for old whiners. Human Performance, 18, 331–341. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1804_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, R. (2005b). Comments. Human Performance, 18, 405–407. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1804_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1995). Manual for the Hogan personality inventory. Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Hough, L. M. (1992). The “big five” personality variables: Confusion construct-description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5, 139–155.
   Google Scholar
• Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The big five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869–879. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. N. (1984). Personality research form manual. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. N. (1994). Jackson personality inventory—Revised manual. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Judge, T., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—Self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—With job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 80–92. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765–780. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 530–541. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., & Locke, E. A. (2000). Personality and job satisfaction: The mediating role of job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 237–249. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., Rodell, J. B., Klinger, R. L., Simon, L. S., & Crawford, E. R. (2013). Hierarchical representations of the five-factor model of personality in predicting job performance: Integrating three organizing frameworks with two theoretical perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 875–925. doi:10.1037/a0033901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisamore, J. L., Stone, T. H., & Jawahar, I. (2007). Academic integrity: The relationship between individual and situational factors on misconduct contemplations. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 381–394. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9260-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kromrey, J. D., & Hines, C. V. (1996). Estimating the coefficient of cross-validity in multiple regression: A comparison of analytical and empirical methods. The Journal of Experimental Education, 64, 240–266. doi:10.1080/00220973.1996.9943806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuncel, N. R., Crede, M., & Thomas, L. L. (2005). The validity of self-reported grade-point averages, class ranks, and test scores: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75, 63–82. doi:10.3102/00346543075001063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lautenschlager, G. J. (1990). Sources of imprecision in formula cross-validated multiple correlations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 460–462. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.4.460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lievens, F., Coetsier, P., De Fruyt, F., & De Maeseneer, J. (2002). Medical students’ personality characteristics and academic performance: A five-factor model perspective. Medical Education, 36, 1050–1056. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01328.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2012). Manual of the program factor. Tarragona: University Rovira i Virgili.
   Google Scholar
• Margrain, S. A. (1978). Student characteristics and academic performance in higher education: A review. Research in Higher Education, 8, 111–123. doi:10.1007/BF00992113
   Google Scholar
• McCabe, D. L. (2005, August 5–10). Promoting academic integrity in business schools. A professional development workshop presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Honolulu, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. D., Dalal, R. S., & Hermida, R. (2010). A review and synthesis of situational strength in the organizational sciences. Journal of Management, 36, 121–140. doi:10.1177/0149206309349309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moberg, P. J. (1998). Predicting conflict strategy with personality traits: Incremental validity and the five factor model. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9, 258–285. doi:10.1108/eb022812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R. L., Hollenbeck, J. R., Murphy, K., & Schmitt, N. (2007a). Reconsidering the use of personality tests in personnel selection contexts. Personnel Psychology, 60, 683–729. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00089.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R. L., Hollenbeck, J. R., Murphy, K., & Schmitt, N. (2007b). Are we getting fooled again? Coming to terms with limitations in the use of personality tests for personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 60, 1029–1049. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00100.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscoso, S., & Salgado, J. F. (2004). “Dark side” personality styles as predictors of task, contextual, and job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 356–362. doi:10.1111/j.0965-075X.2004.00290.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R. (1995). The big five personality dimensions: Implications for research and practice in human resources management. In K. M. Rowland & G. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resource management, (Vol. 13, pp. 153–200). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. R. (2013). What personality does and does not predict and why: Lesson learned and future directions. In N. D. Christiansen & R. P. Tett (Eds.), Handbook of personality at work (pp. 633–650). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. R., & Dzieweczysnki, J. L. (2005). Why don’t measures of broad dimensions of personality perform better as predictors of job performance? Human Performance, 18, 343–357. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1804_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, M. C., & Paunonen, S. V. (2007). Big five personality predictors of post-secondary academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 971–990. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogilvie, J. M., & Stewart, A. L. (2010). The integration of rational choice and self-efficacy theories: A situational analysis of student misconduct. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 43, 130–155. doi:10.1375/acri.43.1.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, I.-S., Schmidt, F. L., Mount, M. K., Le, H., Guay, R. P., Takahashi, K., … Law, K. S. (2011, April). The five-factor model of personality and performance in East Asia. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Olea, M. M., & Ree, M. J. (1994). Predicting pilot and navigator criteria: Not much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 845–851. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.6.845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, T. A., & Hastings, S. E. (2011). Explaining workplace deviance behavior with more than just the “big five.” Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 268–273. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, T. A., Lewis, R. J., & Carswell, J. J. (2011). Employee personality, justice perceptions, and the prediction of workplace deviance. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 595–600. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, T. A., & Paunonen, S. V. (2013). Breadth in personality assessment: Implications for the understanding and prediction of work behavior. In N. D. Christiansen & R. P. Tett (Eds.), Handbook of personality at work (pp. 299–332). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ones, D. S. (1993). The construct validity of integrity tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, IA.
   Google Scholar
• Ones, D. S., Dilchert, S., Viswesvaran, C., & Judge, T. (2007). In support of personality assessment in organizational settings. Personnel Psychology, 60, 995–1027. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00099.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1996). Bandwidth-fidelity dilemma in personality measurement for personnel selection. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 609–626. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199611)17:6<609::AID-JOB1828>3.0.CO;2-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald, F. L., Schmitt, N., Kim, B. H., Ramsay, L. J., & Gillespie, M. A. (2004). Developing a biodata measure and situational judgment inventory as predictors of college student performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 187–207. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paunonen, S. V. (1998). Hierarchical organization of personality and prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 538–556. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big five predictors of academic achievement. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 78–90. doi:10.1006/jrpe.2000.2309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paunonen, S. V., & Jackson, D. N. (1996). The Jackson personality inventory and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 42–59. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1996.0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paunonen, S. V., & Jackson, D. N. (2000). What is beyond the big five? Plenty! Journal of Personality, 68, 821–835. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paunonen, S. V., & Nicol, A. A. A. M. (2001). The personality hierarchy and the prediction of work behaviors. In B. W. Roberts & R. Hogan (Eds.), Personality psychology in the workplace (pp. 161–191). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Paunonen, S. V., Rothstein, M., & Jackson, D. N. (1999). Narrow reasoning about the use of broad personality measures for personnel selection. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 389–405. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199905)20:3<389::AID-JOB917>3.0.CO;2-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 322–338. doi:10.1037/a0014996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymark, P. H., Schmit, M. J., & Guion, R. M. (1997). Identifying potentially useful personality constructs for employee selection. Personnel Psychology, 50, 723–736. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00712.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ree, M. J., & Earles, J. A. (1991a). Predicting training success: Not much more than g. Personnel Psychology, 44, 321–332. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00961.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ree, M. J., & Earles, J. A. (1991b). The stability of g across different methods of estimation. Intelligence, 15, 271–278. doi:10.1016/0160-2896(91)90036-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ree, M. J., Earles, J. A., & Teachout, M. S. (1994). Predicting job performance: Not much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 518–524. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 353–387. doi:10.1037/a0026838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, B. W., Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S., & Goldberg, L. R. (2005). The structure of conscientiousness: An empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires. Personnel Psychology, 58, 103–139. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00301.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, P. L., & Bobko, P. (2000). College grade-point average as a personnel selection device: Ethnic group differences and potential adverse impact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 399–406. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, S., Meining, D., & Barrick, M. R. (2002, April). Predicting performance using personality measures in South Africa. Symposium on Personality at work in a cross-cultural context (D.S. Ones, Chair), Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Toronto, ON.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, M., Paunonen, S. V., Rush, J. C., & King, G. A. (1994). Personality and cognitive ability predictors of performance in graduate business school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 516–530. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.4.516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett, P. R., & Ostgaard, D.J. (1994). Job-specific applicant pools and national norms for cognitive ability tests: Implications for range restriction corrections in validation research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 680–684. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.5.680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salgado, J. F. (1996). Análisis exploratorio y confirmatorio del IP/5f [exploratory and confirmatory analysis of the IP/5f]. Psicológica, 17, 353–366.
   Google Scholar
• Salgado, J. F. (1997). The five-factor model of personality and job performance in the european community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30–43. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salgado, J. F. (1998a). Manual técnico del inventario de personalidad de cinco factores IP/5f [technical manual for the five-factor personality inventory IP/5f]. Santiago de Compostela: Tórculo.
   Google Scholar
• Salgado, J. F. (1998b). Sample size in validity studies of personnel selection. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 71, 161–164. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1998.tb00669.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salgado, J. F. (2002). The big five personality dimensions and counterproductive behaviors. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 117–125. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salgado, J. F. (2003). Predicting job performance using FFM and non-FFM personality measures. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 323–346. doi:10.1348/096317903769647201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salgado, J. F. (2004, April 2–4). Moderator effects of job complexity on the big five validity. Poster presented at the Annual Conference of Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Salgado, J. F., Moscoso, S., & Alonso, P. (2013). The sub-dimensional structure of the Hogan personality inventory. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21, 277–285. doi:10.1111/ijsa.12037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salgado, J. F., Moscoso, S., & Anderson, N. R. (2013). Personality and counterproductive behavior at work. In N. Christiansen & R. Tett (Eds.), Handbook of personality at work. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Salgado, J. F., Moscoso, S., & Berges, A. (2013). Conscientiousness, its facets, and the prediction of job performance ratings: Evidence against the narrow measures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21, 74–84. doi:10.1111/ijsa.12018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salgado, J. F., Moscoso, S., & Lado, M. (2003). Evidence of cross-cultural invariance of the big five personality dimensions in work settings. European Journal of Personality, 17, S67–S76. doi:10.1002/per.482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salgado, J. F., & Táuriz, G. (2014). The five-factor model, forced-choice personality inventories and performance: A comprehensive meta-analysis of academic and occupational validity studies. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23, 3–30. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2012.716198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, J. I., & Levine, E. L. (2012). The rise and fall of job analysis and the future of work analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 397–425. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saucier, G., & Ostendorf, F. (1999). Hierarchical subcomponents of the big five personality factors: A cross-language replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 613–627. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid, J., & Leiman, J. M. (1957). The development of hierarchical factor solutions. Psychometrika, 22, 53–61. doi:10.1007/BF02289209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, R. J., Hough, L. M., & Dunnette, M. D. (1996). Broad sided by broad traits: How to sink science in five dimensions or less. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 639–655. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199611)17:6<639::AID-JOB3828>3.0.CO;2-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, M. I. (1963). Personality measures in admissions. New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, G. L. (1999). Trait bandwidth and stages of job performance: Assessing differential effects for conscientiousness and its subtraits. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 959–968. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.6.959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tett, R. P., & Christiansen, N. D. (2007). Personality tests at the crossroads: A response to Morgeson, Campion, Dipboye, Hollenbeck, Murphy, and Schmitt (2007). Personnel Psychology, 60, 967–993. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00098.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703–742. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00696.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tett, R. P., Steel, J. R., & Beauregard, R. S. (2003). Broad and narrow measures on both sides of the personality-job performance relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 335–356. doi:10.1002/job.191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorndike, R. L. (1949). Personnel selection: Test and measurement techniques. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Trapmann, S., Hell, B., Hirn, J. O. W., & Schuler, H. (2007). Meta-analysis of the relationship between the big five and academic success at university. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 215, 132–151. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.215.2.132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Walt, H. S., Meiring, D., Rothmann, S., & Barrick, M. R. (2002, June 13–14). Meta-analysis of the relationship between personality measurements and job performance in South Africa. Paper presented at the Conference of the South-Africa Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Vinchur, A. J., Schippmann, J. S., Switzer III, F. S., & Roth, P. L. (1998). A meta-analytic review of predictors of job performance for salespeople. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 586–597. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wherry, R. J. (1931). A new formula for predicting the shrinkage of the coefficient of multiple correlation. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 2, 440–457. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177732951
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. M., Nathanson, C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2010). Identifying and profiling scholastic cheaters: Their personality, cognitive ability, and motivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 293–307. doi:10.1037/a0020773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, H. G., & Preising, K. (2005). Exploring item and higher order factor structure with the Schmid–Leiman solution: Syntax codes for SPSS and SAS. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 48–58. doi:10.3758/BF03206397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, P., & Fan X. (2001). Estimating R2 shrinkage in multiple regression: A comparison of different analytical methods. The Journal of Experimental Education, 69, 203–224. doi:10.1080/00220970109600656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, T.-Y., & Min, B.-M. (2002, April 12–14). A meta-analysis of the big five and performance in Korea. Paper presented at the 17th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Toronto, ON.
   Google Scholar