Team-level goal orientation: an emergent state and its relationships with team inputs, process, and outcomes

References

• Alper, S., Tjosvold, D., & Law, K. S. (2000). Conflict management, efficacy, and performance in organizational teams. Personnel Psychology, 53, 625–642. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00216.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1987). Mothers’ beliefs about the role of ability and effort in school learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 409–414. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, H. (1997). Stability, bistability, and instability in small group influence patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 75–85. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranik, L. E., Barron, K. E., & Finney, S. J. (2007). Measuring goal orientation in a work domain: Construct validity evidence for the 2x2 framework. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 697–718. doi:10.1177/0013164406292090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 377–391. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, B., & Stewart, G. L. (1997). Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 62–78. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonner, B. L., Baumann, M. R., & Dalal, R. S. (2002). The effects of member expertise on group decision-making and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 719–736. doi:10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00010-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, B. H., Klotz, A. C., Postlethwaite, B. E., & Brown, K. G. (2013). Ready to rumble: How team personality composition and task conflict interact to improve performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 385–392. doi:10.1037/a0029845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brett, J. F., & VandeWalle, D. (1999). Goal orientation and goal content as predictors of performance in a training program. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 863–873. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.6.863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2003). Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 552–560. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Salas, E., Pierce, L., & Kendall, D. (2006). Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1189–1207. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnstein, E., & Vinokur, A. (1975). What a person thinks upon learning he has chosen differently from others: Nice evidence for the persuasive-arguments explanation of choice shifts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 412–426. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(75)90045-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, R. (1993). Effects of task- and ego-achievement goals on information seeking during task engagement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 18–31. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button, S. B., Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1996). Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 26–48. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). The upper echelons revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30, 749–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at difference levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G., & Gogus, C. I. (2008). Motivation in and of work teams: A multilevel perspective. In R. Kanfer, G. Chen, & R. D. Pritchard (Eds.), Work motivation: Past, present, and future (pp. 285–318). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G., Gully, S. M., Whiteman, J.-A., & Kilcullen, R. N. (2000). Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 835–847. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A., Doveh, E., & Eick, U. (2001). Statistical properties of the rwg(j) index of agreement. Psychological Methods, 6, 297–310. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.6.3.297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239–290. doi:10.1177/014920639702300303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cury, F., Elliot, A. J., Fonseca, D. D., & Moller, A. C. (2006). The social-cognitive model of achievement motivation and the 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 666–679. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. H. (1973). Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. Psychological Review, 80, 97–125. doi:10.1037/h0033951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741–749. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeShon, R. P., & Gillespie, J. Z. (2005). A motivation action theory account of goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1096–1127. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeShon, R. P., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Schmidt, A. M., Milner, K. R., & Wiechmann, D. (2004). A multiple-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1035–1056. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629–636. doi:10.1037/h0046408
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Devine, D. J., Clayton, L. D., Philips, J. L., Dunford, B. B., & Melner, S. B. (1999). Teams in organizations: Prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30, 678–711. doi:10.1177/104649649903000602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dierdorff, E. C., Bell, S. T., & Belohlav, J. A. (2011). The power of “we”: Effects of psychological collectivism on team performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 247–262. doi:10.1037/a0020929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragoni, L. (2005). Understanding the emergence of state goal orientation in organizational work groups: The role of leadership and multilevel climate perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1084–1095. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragoni, L., & Kuenzi, M. (2012). Better understanding work unit goal orientation: Its emergence and impact under different types of work unit structure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 1032–1048. doi:10.1037/a0028405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52–72). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461–475. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2x2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., & Reis, H. T. (2003). Attachment and exploration in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 317–331. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., & Sheldon, K. M. (1997). Avoidance achievement motivation: A personal goals analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 171–185. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5–12. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, S. L., & Ford, J. K. (1998). Differential effects of learner effort and goal orientation on two learning outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 51, 397–420. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00731.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried, Y., & Slowik, L. H. (2004). Enriching goal-setting theory with time: An integrated approach. Academy of Management Review, 29, 404–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedkin, N. E. (1999). Choice shift and group polarization. American Sociological Review, 64, 856–875. doi:10.2307/2657407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamero, N., González-Romá, V., & Peiró, J. M. (2008). The influence of intra-team conflict on work teams’ affective climate: A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81, 47–69. doi:10.1348/096317907X180441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (2000). The role of time in theory and theory building. Journal of Management, 26, 657–684. doi:10.1016/S0149-2063(00)00051-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersick, C. J. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9–41. doi:10.2307/256496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersick, C. J. (1989). Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 274–309. doi:10.2307/256363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersick, C. J., & Hackman, J. R. (1990). Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 65–97. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(90)90047-D
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gist, M. E., Stevens, C. K., & Bavetta, A. G. (1991). Effects of self-efficacy and post-training intervention on the acquisition and maintenance of complex interpersonal skills. Personnel Psychology, 44, 837–861. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00701.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, Y., Huang, J.-C., & Farh, J.-L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 765–778. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2009.43670890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 45–99. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60248-8
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, D. A., Mohammed, S., McGrath, J. E., Florey, A. T., & Vanderstoep, S. W. (2003). Time matters in team performance: Effects of member familiarity, entrainment, and task discontinuity on speed and quality. Personnel Psychology, 56, 633–669. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00753.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1029–1045. doi:10.2307/3069328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendricks, J. W., & Payne, S. C. (2007). Beyond the big five: Leader goal orientation as a predictor of leadership effectiveness. Human Performance, 20, 317–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., & Zhou, J. (2009). A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 280–293. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2009.37308035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwitz, S. K., & Horwitz, I. B. (2007). The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management, 33, 987–1015. doi:10.1177/0149206307308587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136, 422–449. doi:10.1037/a0018947
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, S. E., Hollenbeck, J. R., Meyer, C. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2007). Trait configurations in self-managed teams: A conceptual examination of the use of seeding for maximizing and minimizing trait variance in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 885–892. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517–543. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306–309. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, S. W., & Deighan, M. (2008). StratSim: Administrator’s guide. Charlottesville, VA: Interpretive Software.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, O., & Prins, J. (2007). Goal orientations and the seeking of different types of feedback information. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 235–249. doi:10.1348/096317906X103410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256–282. doi:10.2307/2393638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31, 386–408. doi:10.5465/AMR.2006.20208687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanfer, R., & Kerry, M. (2012). Motivation in multiteam systems. In S. J. Zaccaro, M. A. Marks, & L. A. DeChurch (Eds.), Multiteam systems: An organization form for dynamic and complex environments. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, M. F., & Miller, C. E. (1987). Group decision making and normative versus informational influence: Effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 306–313. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.2.306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 623–655. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, H. J., Noe, R. A., & Wang, C. (2006). Motivation to learn and course outcomes: The impact of delivery mode, learning goal orientation, and perceived barriers and enablers. Personnel Psychology, 59, 665–702. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00050.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., Chao, G. T., Grand, J. A., Braun, M. T., & Kuljanin, G. (2013). Advancing multilevel research design: Capturing the dynamics of emergence. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 581–615. doi:10.1177/1094428113493119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Brown, K. G., Salas, E., Smith, E. M., & Nason, E. R. (2001). Effects of training goals and goal orientation traits on multidimensional training outcomes and performance adaptability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 1–31. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Nason, E. R., & Smith, E. M. (1999). Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multi-level approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Langfred, C. W. (2007). The downside of self-management: A longitudinal study of the effects of conflict on trust, autonomy, and task interdependence in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 885–900. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 815–852. doi:10.1177/1094428106296642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LePine, J. A. (2003). Team adaptation and postchange performance: Effects of team composition in terms of members’ cognitive ability and personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 27–39. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LePine, J. A. (2005). Adaptation of teams in response to unforeseen change: Effects of goal difficulty and team composition in terms of cognitive ability and goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1153–1167. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LePine, J. A., Buckman, B. R., Crawford, E. R., & Methot, J. R. (2011). A review of research on personality in teams: Accounting for pathways spanning levels of theory and analysis. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 311–330. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Achievement goal theory and affect: An asymmetrical bidirectional model. Educational Psychologist, 37, 69–78. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3702_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal-setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, M. A. (2000). A critical analysis of computer simulations for conducting team research. Small Group Research, 31, 653–675. doi:10.1177/104649640003100602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11, 320–341. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273–283. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., Maynard, T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410–476. doi:10.1177/0149206308316061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., & Schulze, W. (2006). The influence of team knowledge and formal plans on episodic team process-performance relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 605–619. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.21794678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., & Taylor, S. R. (2006). Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 1031–1056. doi:10.1002/job.406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, J. E. (1991). Time, interaction and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small Group Research, 22, 147–174. doi:10.1177/1046496491222001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, A., Feild, H., Armenakis, A., & Mehta, N. (2009). Team goal orientation and team performance: The mediating role of team planning. Journal of Management, 35, 1026–1046. doi:10.1177/0149206308326773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. D., Dalal, R. S., & Hermida, R. (2010). A review and synthesis of situational strength in the organizational sciences. Journal of Management, 36, 121–140. doi:10.1177/0149206309349309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252–283. doi:10.1037/h0035002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, S., Ferzandi, L., & Hamilton, K. (2010). Metaphor no more: A 15-year review of the team mental model construct. Journal of Management, 36, 876–910. doi:10.1177/0149206309356804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. P., & Hofmann, D. A. (1999). The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of Management Review, 24, 249–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, G. A., & Wright, J. (1999). Team effectiveness: Beyond skills and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 376–389. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328–346. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, S. C., Youngcourt, S. S., & Beaubien, J. M. (2007). A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 128–150. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. M., & Gully, S. M. (1997). Role of goal orientation, ability, need for achievement, and locus of control in the self-efficacy and goal-setting process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 792–802. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, C. O. L. H. (2005). Goal orientation: Effects on backing up behavior, performance, efficacy, and commitment in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 811–818. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, C. O. L. H. (2008). A multilevel, multiconceptualization perspective of goal orientation in teams. In V. I. Sessa & M. London (Eds.), Work group learning: Understanding, improving, and assessing how groups learn in organizations. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, C. O. L. H., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Ellis, A. P. J., West, B. J., & Moon, H. (2003). Backing up behaviors in teams: The role of personality and legitimacy of need. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 391–403. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, C. O. L. H., Webb, J. W., & Gogus, C. I. (2010). When goal orientations collide: Effects of learning and performance orientation on team adaptability in response to workload imbalance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 935–943. doi:10.1037/a0019637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potosky, D., & Ramakrishna, H. V. (2002). The moderating role of updating climate perceptions in the relationship between goal orientation, self-efficacy, and job performance. Human Performance, 15, 275–297. doi:10.1207/S15327043HUP1503_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, R. D., Jones, S. D., Roth, P. L., Stuebing, K. K., & Ekeberg, S. E. (1988). Effects of group feedback, goal setting, and incentives on organizational productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 337–358. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.73.2.337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, A. M., & Ford, J. K. (2003). Learning within a learner control training environment: The interactive effects of goal orientation and metacognitive instruction on learning outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 56, 405–429. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00156.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. B. (2004). The development and analysis of a measure of group faultlines. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 66–100. doi:10.1177/1094428103259562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 102–111. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Kraiger, K. (2005). Investigating linear and interactive effects of shared mental models on safety and efficiency in a field setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 523–535. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, G. L. (2003). Toward and understanding of the multilevel role of personality in teams. In M. R. Barrick & A. M. Ryan (Eds.), Personality and work: reconsidering the role of personality in organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Thatcher, S. M. B., & Patel, P. C. (2011). Demographic faultlines: A meta-analysis of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1119–1139. doi:10.1037/a0024167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thatcher, S. M. B., & Patel, P. C. (2012). Group faultlines: A review, integration, and guide to future research. Journal of Management, 38, 969–1009. doi:10.1177/0149206311426187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckey, M., Brewer, N., & Williamson, P. (2002). The influence of motives and goal orientation on feedback seeking. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 195–216. doi:10.1348/09631790260098677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384–399. doi:10.1037/h0022100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuominen-Soini, H., Salmela-Aro, K., & Niemivirta, M. (2011). Stability and change in achievement goal orientations: A person-centered approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 82–100. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Iddekinge, C. H., Ferris, G. R., Perrewé, P. L., Perryman, A. A., Blass, F. R., & Heetderks, T. D. (2009). Effects of selection and training on unit-level performance over time: A latent growth modeling approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 829–843. doi:10.1037/a0014453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VandeWalle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 995–1015. doi:10.1177/0013164497057006009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VandeWalle, D., Brown, S. P., Cron, W. L., & Slocum, J. W. (1999). The influence of goal orientation and self-regulation tactics on sales performance: A longitudinal field test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 249–259. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.2.249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VandeWalle, D., Cron, W. L., & Slocum, J. W. (2001). The role of goal orientation following performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 629–640. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VandeWalle, D., & Cummings, L. L. (1997). A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 390–400. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.3.390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisband, S. P. (1992). Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 352–380. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90070-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M. A., & Anderson, N. R. (1996). Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 680–693. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker, B. G., & Levy, P. E. (2012). Linking feedback quality and goal orientation to feedback seeking and job performance. Human Performance, 25, 159–178. doi:10.1080/08959285.2012.658927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters, D., & Latham, G. P. (1996). The effect of learning versus outcome goals on a simple versus a complex task. Group and Organization Management, 21, 236–250. doi:10.1177/1059601196212007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirthwein, L., Sparfeldt, J. R., Pinquart, M., Wegerer, J., & Steinmayr, R. (2013). Achievement goals and academic achievement: A closer look at moderating factors. Educational Research Review, 10, 66–89. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar